Janet Davis Dept. of Computer Science Grinnell College Generating Design Directions for Persuasive Technology with the Inspiration Card Workshop.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Management of Engineers and Technology Strategic Planning Group Processes.

Advertisements

1. Creativity and Innovation 2. Communication and Collaboration

Normative-narrative scenarios as a tool to support strategic R&D processes: benefits and limits Hannah Kosow, Dr. Robert Gaßner IZT – Institute for Futures.

DeSILA Designing and Sharing Inquiry-based Learning Activities JISC Design for Learning Programme Dr Philippa Levy & Dr Sabine Little (CILASS) John Stratford,

Focus on Instructional Support

Laura Pejsa Goff Pejsa & Associates MESI 2014

Building Team Facilitation Skills Presented by: Mary Jo Meyers M.S.

Reflective Practice Leadership Development Tool. Context recognised that a key differentiator between places where people wanted to work and places where.

Curriculum design: Social and behavioral Sciences Team members Dr Thilakavathi Dr Krishnendu Dr Prabhdeep Kaur Dr Prabhu Dr Biju Soman Facilitator: Evangeline.

4th June 2010IASSIST 2010 conference 1 APPLICATIONS OF SOCIAL NETWORKING IN INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION, MULTISITE-RESEARCH, KNOWLEDGE RE-USE AND DATA.

Who Should Be Evaluated? All HEO EMPLOYEES  13.3b  One year appointment  Two year appointment  Substitute.

Methods of Instruction. Learning Objectives Upon completion of this lesson, participants will be able to: – Compare and contrast a range of instructional.

How’s it Working? Evaluating Your Program MAAPS Conference, 7 May 2010 Debra Smith & Judah Leblang Program Evaluation & Research Group School of Education,

B LENDED L EARNING CID Lunch Presented by Robin Popow.

Developing an Internship Program & Using interns effectively.

Jack C Richards Professional Development for Language Teachers: Strategies for Teacher Learning Jack C Richards & Thomas.

Problem Solving Design Process.

Communication Degree Program Outcomes

Connected Learning with Web 2.0 For Educators Presenter: Faith Bishop Principal Consultant Illinois State Board of Education

Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address

Semester 2: Lecture 9 Analyzing Qualitative Data: Evaluation Research Prepared by: Dr. Lloyd Waller ©

European Broadband Portal Phase II Application of the Blueprint for “bottom-up” broadband initiatives.

A Pilot Project with Urban Aboriginal Youth. Margo Purcell’s Career I’m good at everything, I’m not the best at anything. I know what I don’t want to.

® Designing an M&E System for Market Engagement at CARE Christian Pennotti Technical Advisor, Learning & Impact Economic Development Unit

Nef (the new economics foundation) Co-producing Lambeth what’s possible? Lucie Stephens and Julia Slay nef, October 2011.

Inquiry and Investigation. What was the TOPIC? PROBLEM? CIVIC INQUIRY?

American Community Survey (ACS) Program Review Webinar March 6, 2012.

Small Group Teaching Key Educational Skills Faculty Development Workshop December 9, 2014 Katherine M. Hyland, PhD Marieke Kruidering-Hall, PhD.

ADAPT: Audience Design of Ambient Persuasive Technology Timothy M. Miller, Janet Davis Grinnell College Computer Science Grinnell, IA CHI 2009 ~

Making the Connection between Assessment and Learning More Intentional Carol Rovello, Director of Employee & Organization Development Sherian Howard, CAD.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Types of Media.

EDUCAUSE 2005 Annual Conference October 19, 2005.

Online course: Multiculturalism in vocational guidance – Innovative tool for career counsellors’ professional development. Zuzanna Rejmer.

Group #1 GroupWork of Making National Standards Competency for ICT Teacher.

Jim Dorward Sarah Giersch Kaye Howe Rena Janke Mimi Recker Andy Walker NSF Awards: NSDL ;TPC Using Online Science & Math Resources in Classrooms.

MakingConnections Unit planning.

Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP). What Is the Program Mission Why Is It Important Who Is It Designed to Assist How Will It Encourage TT.

Leadership Cohort Meeting September 21, :30-3:30.

Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher

111 MakingConnections Focus on Assessment. 222 Facilitator/s: Date:

Passport to Science MSP Science Program Indianapolis Public Schools.

1 Educational Technology Electronic Teaching Portfolio Based on the ISTE/NCATE Foundation Standards for all educators. All candidates in teacher preparation.

Global Conflicts: An example Ass. Professor Simon Egenfeldt-Nielsen Københavns Kommune Seriousgames.dk 20th June 2005, Copenhagen “…develop games which.

Google Earth INTEGRATING GLOBAL THINKING. Why Use Virtual Tours? Flexible Tool: History, Science, Math, English, etc. An Interactive Way to Explore Supports.

Chapter 11: Topic Selection and Development COMM3 Verderber, Sellnow, and Verderber © 2014 Cengage Learning.

ISTE Standards for Teachers Anja Whitehead IDT 3600 Fall 2015.

1. October 25, 2011 Louis Everett & John Yu Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation October 26, 2011 Don Millard & John Yu Division.

What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL

1 Erica. 2 Introducing… 3 Your Design Challenge…

Participatory Evaluation The Fieldworx Way Eleesa Johnstone.

Instructional Design Course Evaluation Phase. Agenda The Evaluation Process Expert Review Small Group Review The Pilot Feedback and Revision Evaluation.

Teaching with CHRONOS Data and Tools A Framework for Design Cathy Manduca Science Education Resource Center Carleton College June 13, 2006.

A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.

T-527 Fall 2005 Developing Curriculum for Deep Learning How is learning assessed? Ongoing assessment and educative evaluation 10 November 2005.

1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.

Understanding M/Information Literacy Requirements Needed for Successful Implementation of Open Government: proposal of a contextual-participatory approach.

CBME in MESAU Institutions, Uganda Sarah Kiguli MakCHS 7 th August 2013.

Primary Prevention Institute

Data Collection with Forms For Special Education

LOGIC MODEL A visual depiction of what a project does and what changes it is expected to bring about. Learn more: Readings, template, examples:

Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs

ePortfolios and the First-Year

TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011

Improving Coaching through Participant & Observation Feedback

Katherine M. Hyland, PhD Marieke Kruidering-Hall, PhD

MaryCatherine Jones, MPH, Public Health Consultant, CVH Team

Be The Transformative Change

Nanotechnology & Society

Empowering Councils to Lead:

Running a workshop: the role of the facilitator

Presentation transcript:

Janet Davis Dept. of Computer Science Grinnell College Generating Design Directions for Persuasive Technology with the Inspiration Card Workshop

Why participatory design? Research agenda (Davis, PERSUASIVE 2009) Ethics Pragmatics

Research questions 1.How can participatory design methods lead to effective persuasive technologies? 2.What are the ethical outcomes?

Goal: Co-design persuasive technology with Grinnell College EcoHouse

Participatory Methods Exploratory activities Inspiration Card Workshop (Halskov & Dalsgård, PDC 2006)

Exploratory Activities Interviews Document review Participant- observation Generative tools

Domain Cards

Technology Cards

Inspiration Cards

Workshop Agenda

Combination & Co-Creation

Results: Use of Inspiration Cards

Results: Persuasive Strategies

Results: Technology Channels

Non-computational Tech Card

Non-Computational Design

The Design in Action

Ongoing work: Connecting EcoHouses

Ongoing work: GreenRes.Net

Results: Summary Inspiration Cards used in a variety of ways Persuasive strategies and technology channels mostly reflective of input Technology Cards Audiences include selves, others Concepts are feasible At least one concept worth pursuing Some discussion of ethical issues, though this was not an explicit goal of the method

Ethics: Means (1)

Ethics: Means (2)

Ethics: Ends

Questions for Future Work

When is PD (not) appropriate?

Other participatory approaches to exploring behavior, desires, and barriers to change?

Participatory approaches tailored to a specific technology channel?

How to engage both potential users and experts?

How to intentionally engage potential users in ethical discussions?

Thanks! Contact me:

Findings: Technology  

Findings: Feedback

Findings: Barriers

Evaluation Workshop planningWorkshop outcomes + Workshop is short straightforward to plan & facilitate flexible Design concepts are plentiful (26) feasible exciting to participants within the intended design space - Little guidance for designing/selecting Inspiration Cards No specific ethics prompts Design concepts are limited in detail in technical innovation