Chapter 6 Formal Approaches to SLA Joanna – N98C0026 楊鎧綺 Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLL lecture: Theoretical issues in SLA research 12 October 2004 Florencia Franceschina.
Advertisements

CLL Session 1: Introduction LAEL, Lancaster University Florencia Franceschina.
Second Language Acquisition Sarah Cole Robin Stafford.
I NNATIST HYPOTHESIS, (UG) Second language acquisition.
Chapter 4 Key Concepts.
Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis, Interlanguage
Main points of Interlanguage, Krashen, and Universal Grammar
Introduction: The Chomskian Perspective on Language Study.
Linguistics and Second Language Teaching Phil Hubbard Linguistics/English for Foreign Students Linguistics 1 November 30, 2011.
The Linguistics of SLA.
The theoretical significance of UG in second language acquisition Present by Esther, Karen, Mei.
Second Language Acquisition (SLA)
Cristina Hudgins Middle Tennessee State University
Explaining Second Language Learning I
Second Language Acquisition SS Topics How do adult speakers acquire a second language? What characterizes the process of second language acquisition?
Chapter 12: 2 nd Lang. Acq. As coffee is an ACQUIRED taste…
Topic: Theoretical Bases for Cognitive Method Objectives Trainees will be able to give reasons for the design and procedures of the Cognitive Method.
1 Introduction to Computational Natural Language Learning Linguistics (Under: Topics in Natural Language Processing ) Computer Science (Under:
Instance Theory and Universal Grammar in Second Language research Team members : Steve, Jones, Ines, Trixie Teacher : Aya Okamato.
Lecture 1 Introduction: Linguistic Theory and Theories
Generative Grammar(Part ii)
Second language acquisition
Emergence of Syntax. Introduction  One of the most important concerns of theoretical linguistics today represents the study of the acquisition of language.
Interlanguage Variation of Chinese Learners of English D. Victoria Rau Providence University.
1. The innateness Hypothesis 2. How languages process in the brain. 3
On the Complexity of Transfer in Multilingualism Patricia Bayona PhD Candidate The University of Western Ontario.
1 Second Language Acquisition Introduction Roger Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.).
Contrastive analysis: an Overview Raung-fu Chung Based on Thu Nguyen.
Ch.8 Looking at Interlanguage Processing By Kelly 黃宣綺 Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.).
An Introduction to Interlanguage Phonetics and Phonology 四技應英四乙 洪淑玲.
The Communicative Language Teaching Lecture # 18.
Chapter 10 - Language 4 Components of Language 1.Phonology Understanding & producing speech sounds Phoneme - smallest sound unit Number of phonemes varies.
X Linguistics and Foreign Languages Teaching. Relation between linguistics and Language Teaching Theoretical views of lg explicitly or implicitly inform.
LANGUAGE TRANSFER SRI SURYANTI WORD ORDER STUDIES OF TRANSFER ODLIN (1989;1990) UNIVERSAL POSITION WHAT EXTENT WORD ORDER IN INTERLANGUAGE IS.
Universal Grammar Noam Chomsky.
GROUP 5 ANNIS LUTHFIANA AULYA PURNAWIDHA D FITA ARIYANA
Language: Why is it important?: A system of words and rules for.
Formal Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Michelle Samoray ELS Language Centers
Linguistic Anthropology Bringing Back the Brain. What Bloomfield Got “Right” Emphasized spoken language rather than written language The role of the linguist.
Universal Grammar Functional Approaches
The Linguistics of SLA Saville-Troike, M. (2005). Introducing second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge UP
SLA Effects of Recasts as Implicit Knowledge Young-ah Do Fall, College English Education.
Piaget, Vygotsky, Bruner, Krashen, Chomsky
Chapter 7 Linguistics aspect of interlanguage
Chapter 6 Key Concepts. cognates Words in related languages that developed from the same ancestral root and therefore have a same or similar form across.
Introduction : describing and explaining L2 acquisition Ellis, R Second Language Acquisition (3 – 14)
Universal Grammar Chomsky and his followers no longer use the term LAD, but refer to the child’s innate endowment as Universal Grammar (UG). UG is a theory.
Variability in Interlanguage Session 6. Variability Variability refers to cases where a second language learner uses two or more linguistic variants to.
Angela Briggs FLT 860 Michigan State University. 1. SLA is largely or exclusively implicit Krashen and the Monitor Model Universal Grammar 2. SLA is largely.
Chapter 3 Language Acquisition: A Linguistic Treatment Jang, HaYoung Biointelligence Laborotary Seoul National University.
Module 3 Developing Reading Skills Part 1 Transition Module 3 developed byElisabeth Wielander.
PSYCHOLINGUISTICS Grupo: Alejandro Ferrer Moya, Blanca Gallego Lopez,María Jose Garcia Ramón, Victoria Herrera Mercader, Soraya Lozano Carrión Grupo: Alejandro.
OUTLINE Language Universals -Definition
 Introduction  Former Theories  Universal Grammar (UG) Theory  Nativism and UG  Chomskyan View of Language  Generative Linguistic Theory  How does.
Glottodidactics Lesson 7.
Instruction and L2 acquisition
Second Language Acquisition
Theoretical Discussion on the
What is Language Acquisition?
2nd Language Learning Chapter 2 Lecture 4.
Explaining Second Language Learning
Theories of Language Development
Overview of Approaches to Second Language Acquisition
Psycholinguistic aspects of interlanguage
SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
Quaid –e- azam university
Traditional Grammar VS. Generative Grammar
First Language Acquisition
Linguistic aspects of interlanguage
Chapter 3 Interlanguage.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 6 Formal Approaches to SLA Joanna – N98C0026 楊鎧綺 Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. 6.1 Introduction – p The relationship on the area of research that has dominated the theoretical study of second language acquisition over the year, Universal Grammar.

6.2 Universal Grammar  UG – Universal Grammar -p  Chomsky’s Noam Theory  How does UG relate to language acquisition?  I want to go.  I wanna go.

 p 163 Initial State – The unconscious linguistic knowledge that learners have before receiving L2 input  p164 Fundamental Difference Hypothesis – The claim that child first language and adult second language acquisition are different.

 p 165 Access to UG Hypothesis – The claim that the innate language facility is operative in second language learners.

L1 as the base  1.Full Transfer/Full Access  2.Minimal Trees Hypothesis  3.Valueless Features L2 UG-Based  4.The Initial Hypothesis of Syntax  5.Full Access/No Transfer

6.2.2 UG Principles  6-13 The boy who is standing over there is happy.  6-14 Is the boy who is standing over there ____ happy?  6-15 Is the boy who ______ standing over there is happy?  ECP – Empty Category Principle (Chomsky,1981)

6.2.3 UG parameters  a) the omission of subject pronouns  b) the inversion of subjects and verbs in declarative sentences  c) that-trace effects-that is, the extraction of a subject out of a clause that contains a complementizer.

6.2.4 Falsification - Kaleidoscope factor -  Assume a no-access to UG position, as we have seen with regard to the Fundamental Difference Hypothesis  Attribute the results to methodological problems  Attribute the result to an undefined performance component  Attribute the results to mapping factors or; Assume he theory is false

6.3 Transfer : the UG perspective - White (1992) – Provided detail on this issue. – P Levels of representation – p Visiting relatives can be boring When I visit relatives, I am bored Relatives who visit me can be boring.

 Clustering -P177  - How multiple properties of language do or do not behave in a like fashion.  Learnability  (6-28) The man is drinking slowly his coffee.  6.4 Phonology  Markedness Differential Hypothesis -179

 Similarity/Dissimilarity : Speech Learning Model  - Similarity Differential Rate Hypothesis  Optimality Theory – Eckman, Elreyes,and Iverson (2003) 1) the target language has two contrasting sounds, neither of which is present in the native language (2)the target language has two contrasting sounds, one of which is present in the native language and (3)the target language has two contrasting sounds, both of which are present in the native language, but which do not contrast.

 Ontogeny Phylogeny Model – p Chronological corollary : interlanguage develops chronologically in the following manner : (a) L2 increases, (b) L1 decreases, and (c) U increases and then decreases (p85). this is demonstrated in Figures 6-1to Stylistic corollary : IL varies stylistically in the following manner : (a) L2 increases (b) l1 decreases (c) U increases and then decreases (p.93)

-Similarity corollary: In similar phenomena, IL develops chronologically in the following manner: (a) L2 increases slowly (b) L1 decreases slowly (c) U increases slowly and then decreases slowly

 - Markedness corollary : In marked phenomena, IL develops chronologically in the following manner: (a) second language increases slowly (b) first language decreases [at a normal rate] and then decrease slowly (c) U increases rapidly and decreases slowly. Thus, except for the earliest stages, the role of U is much greater than L1, compared to less-marked phenomena.

6.5 Conclusion & Discussion What is the concept of language UG and relationship to SLA? Would these relate to the concept of language universals? 2. What way can U affect the develop of IL grammars in terms of the nature of how grammatical knowledge relates to input?

How does this concept relate to Kellerman’s notion of transfer discussed in chapter 5 ? 3. What might the function of the use or nonuse of pronouns be ? Why are pronouns obligatory in English and not so in other languages? How can our knowledge of parameter clusterings help language teachers?

 Thank you for your patient. Have a nice day! Joanna