The Economics Implications of Fuel Management: Sagebrush Rangelands Authors: Michael Taylor, Kimberly Rollins, Mimako Kobayashi, Robin Tausch Presenter:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PINE HOLLOW WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Sherman County Soil & Water Conservation District.
Advertisements

Great Basin Restoration Initiative GBRI Field Office to On-the Ground Project.
States and Transitions in Succession. Plant Community Succession (Initial Ideas – F.E. Clements) Natural Potential Large Variation Between Years Climax.
Lion Wildland Fire Background The Lion Fire was ignited by lightning on July 8, 2011 in the Golden Trout Wilderness on the Western Divide Ranger District,
Comparing Cost, Risk, and Benefit Trade-offs Under Uncertainty: Cheatgrass Case Study Lisa Wainger and Dennis King, University of Maryland Richard Mack,
Rangelands of the U.S. Photos by K. Launchbaugh. Rangelands of the North America.
Teacher Info:  Have students take “What is Range” Quiz prior to presentation, asking them to do their best to answer the questions  Then go through slides.
BLM Plant Conservation Program: Its Role in Sage Grouse Conservation
10/12/071 Managing succession in rangelands Optional Reading: Westoby et al., 1989, Opportunistic Management for Rangelands not at Equilibrium, J Range.
Global rangelands and their role in food security Temuulen “Teki” Sankey Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ.
Longleaf Maintenance Condition Class 1 Revised Draft for Longleaf Partnership Council Discussion Clay Ware April 7, 2014.
Public Land for the Taking A Disturbing Tale. Outline What is native prairie and what remains? Of what value native prairie? Stewardship of native prairie.
Chapter 7 Financial Measures. Objectives Define and use financial measures: Revenue Growth Market Share Margin Cost of Quality (COQ) Net Present Value.
Restoration and Natural Recovery Following Wildland Fire at the INEEL Roger D. Blew.
Western Juniper- Steens Mountain Alturas Juniper.
Modeling Ecological and Economic Benefits of Post-Fire Revegetation in the Great Basin Becky Niell.
Sage Grouse and Cheatgrass in the Great Basin A Manager’s Perspective Ted Koch, USFWS, Nevada January, 2013.
2 Recognized by John C. Fremont as an area of interior drainage 145,546 square miles Precipitation, generally 7-12 inches annually Recognized by John.
Oregon’s Sage-grouse Action Plan Fire and invasives With more frequent and larger fires, and juniper continuing to expand, sage-grouse are dependent on.
Restoring Fire to the Mountains. a presentation by… your National Forests in North Carolina.
Stan Johnson Rang Narayanan College of Agriculture, Biotechnology and Natural Resources University of Nevada, Reno (UNR)
Nevada and Great Basin Workshop for Big Sagebrush State and Transition Models, Accuracy before Precision Sherman Swanson, University of Nevada, Reno Co-convenors,
Great Basin: Wildfires, Invasive Species, & Climate Change Mike Pellant Great Basin Restoration Initiative Coordinator Boise, ID Cheatgrass.
Great Basin Environmental Program Update January 15, 2013 Stan Johnson, College of Agriculture, Biotechnology and Natural Resources, UNR.
CSG West Energy and Environment Committee July 28, 2015 Dustin T. Miller Governor’s Office of Species Conservation.
A Campaign for Forest Management. FUEL FOR THOUGHT Forest Density has Increased 30% Since 1953 Forest Mortality at a 50 Year High 73.5% of NFS Lands Need.
Schmidt et al GTR RMRS-87.
Conservation Design and the Sagebrush Ecosystem Russell George Executive Director Colorado Dept. of Natural Resources.
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
March 26, 2010 Planning for Priority Species and Vegetation: Health Assessment A Systematic Framework to Plan for Biological Resources In the BLM’s Land.
Truckee Ecological Restoration the evolution of project design Tahoe National Forest, Truckee Ranger District PSW Sagehen Experimental Forest UC Berkeley.
Jeremy Maestas NRCS State Habitat Biologist -Oregon.
Healthy Forests Initiative Al Murphy BLM, NIFC. In August 2002, President Bush announced the “Healthy Forests Initiative for Wildfire Prevention and Stronger.
Homes on the Range An Introduction to California Rangelands Photo Credit: Bureau of Land Management.
 The SNC’s mission is to initiate, encourage and support efforts that improve the environmental, economic and social well- being of the Sierra Nevada.
The Greater Sage-grouse: Ecology, ESA Finding, Threats, and Solutions STATE LAND USE PLANNING ADVISORY COUNCIL April 13, 2012.
Federal Actions and Greater Sage-Grouse The Current Status: Proposed High Voltage Transmission Lines.
Greater Alpine Fire Safe Council Protecting the Alpine community from wildfire and preserving Alpine’s natural and manmade resources through education,
Utah’s Watershed Restoration Initiative Mule Deer.
What is Range?. A.A series of mountains. B.A cooking stove that has an oven and a flat top with burners. C.A place where shooting or golf driving is practiced.
Greater Sage-Grouse and BLM’s Nevada/Northeastern California Record of Decision and Approved Plan Amendment History and Overview.
Fire in Florida’s Ecosystems A program of the Florida Division of Forestry Implemented by Pandion Systems For more information: Welcome.
Agency Update U.S. Forest Service Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest.
Working for Wetlands World Wetlands Day 2016 Wetlands for our Future: sustainable livelihoods.
Regional Peer Learning Workshop: Accelerated Landscape Restoration Siuslaw Stewardship Model and Collaborative Engagement.
SAGE GROUSE INITIATIVE OREGON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY USDA – NRCS – Oregon.
What are Rangelands? Presentation (ppt.)
Sage-Grouse 101 David Dahlgren, PhD Utah State University.
Project Update SageCon, September 30, 2016
Mapping Burn Severity of the Marking Pen Prescribed Burn in the Seminoe Mountains using pre- and post-fire Landsat Thematic Mapper images Erik Collier1.
An Introduction to California Rangelands
Wildfire: Past Trends and Future Threats
Forests and Water in the Sierra Nevada
Climate change and wildfire Dr. Crystal A
Idaho ablaze Pony & Elk Complex and Trinity Ridge Fire
States and Transitions in Succession
Sagebrush Steppe.
Understanding the History of Grazing in the West
Grazing Management and Fire
Los Angeles Greater IRWM:
Grazing, Invasives & Fire
Great Basin By: Dulce and Antonio.
An adventure in rangeland transition models.
Notice the rings of very early pioneer stages on the outer rim and more advanced early seral species. Early seral plants are often annual, herbaceous,
WESTCAS Fall Conference Tuesday, October 23, 2018 Dick Fleishman
An adventure in rangeland transition models.
Rangeland Soil Carbon: State of Knowledge
Grazing & Annual Grasses
Grazing & Recovery after Fire
Grazing & Fuel for Wildfire
Presentation transcript:

The Economics Implications of Fuel Management: Sagebrush Rangelands Authors: Michael Taylor, Kimberly Rollins, Mimako Kobayashi, Robin Tausch Presenter: Laine Christman (UNR) For the Eastern Nevada Landscape Coalition and Nevada Pinyon-Juniper Joint Summer Conference July 16 th, 2014

Introduction and Study Area  Why the Great Basin?  Suffering from invasive grass and PJ encroachment  Wildfire contributes to these threats  Ecosystem changes effects costs of fighting fire, habitat, ranching, recreation values, etc.  Treatments to reduce threats  Reduce fuel loading/characteristics – lessen wildfire severity  Restore health and resiliency of the ecosystem  What is the value of these treatments?  One approach – put benefits in terms of reduced future wildfire suppression costs Wyoming Mountain Big

The Model  Inputs  Treatment cost (per acre) and probability of success  FRI and cost of wildfire (per acre)  Transition time between ecologic health states  Assume a finite number of year without wildfire or treatment  Assume fire in “healthy state” is, fire in “unhealthy state” is   Simulation Based – dynamic  Changes happen over time  Uncertainty regarding state, success, fire  Defined States of Health  Mountain Big Sagebrush  Healthy = Shrubs/ native grass or mix PJ/shrubs/ native grass  Unhealthy = Closed Canopy PJ or invasive grass dominated  Wyoming Sagebrush Steppe  Healthy = Shrubs/grass  Unhealthy = Decadent sagebrush/grass or invasive grass dominated

STM Big Mountain Sagebrush (>6500 ft)

STM Wyoming Sagebrush Steppe ( ft)

Results - WSS Wyoming Sagebrush Steppe - Initial Ecological State WSS-1 Healthy sagebrush WSS-2 Mature woody brush with annual grass WSS-3 Annual Grass Dominated Avg. Total Suppression Costs (NPV) – No Treatment $350$364$390 Avg. Total Suppression Costs (NPV)– With Treatment $56$231$251 Avg. Cost of Treatment(s) $19.50$205$164 Average Wildfire NET Suppression Costs Savings (NPV) $272-$72-$2,782 Average Benefit Cost Ratio (NPV) WSS-1 Benefit = $272/acre (CBR = 13.3) Tx Cost - $19.50/acres and highly successful are preventing transition Expected wildfire cost savings = $293/acre WSS-2 Treatment is expensive ($205/acre) only successful half the time Failure moves to WSS-3 WSS-3 reduces wildfire suppression costs Treatment is extremely expensive Rarely successful

Result Table - MBS Mountain Big Sagebrush - Initial Ecological State MBS-1 Healthy sagebrush MBS-2 PJ, mature sagebrush &cheatgrass MBS-2 Closed-canopy PJ & cheatgrass MBS-3 Cheatgrass dominated Avg. Total Suppression Costs (NPV) – No Treatment $273$561$576$1,448 Avg. Total Suppression Costs (NPV) – With Treatment $16$158$793$894 Avg. Cost of Treatment(s) $19.50$45.50$205$164 Ave Wildfire NET Suppression Costs Savings (NPV) $90$358-$419-$2,332 Ave. Benefit Cost Ratio (NPV) MBS-1 & MBS-2 Only BCR greater than 1 Cheap, successful, prevent transition MBS-3& MBS-4 Expensive, unsuccessful Not a good return on investment

Results and Conclusion  Take Home Message  Fuel treatment are cost effective for healthiest states only  Treatment costs are relatively cheap and success is relatively high  Results hold for a range of different success rates  Fuel treatment costs greater than expected wildfire costs for unhealthiest states  Once degraded, benefits reduce dramatically  Rehabilitation costs are expensive and success is relative low  Fuel Treatment Priority for a uniform landscape  Focus on lands that have not yet transitioned 1.WSS-1 = MBS-1b CBR = MBS-1a CBR = 5.7

Thank You