A. L. Hopstad, K. Ronold, C. Sixtensson, J. Sandberg 2013-02-07 Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures EWEA 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Boulder,March 11 st 2010 Proposal for a site assessment IEC standard IEC/TC88 Boulder meeting Millán Esteban - SC88 Spanish mirror committee.
Advertisements

Electric Vehicles Industrial Cluster - NPO IKEM Corp. (Business entity of EVIC) Changing the Government Agenda of EU's poorest countries using the power.
OO Star Wind Floater A robust and flexible concept for floating wind
Carl Sixtensson Senior Consultant, DNV KEMA Renewable Energy
Offshore Wind Floating Foundations the competitive technology
Tore Langeland, Yongtao Yang and Carl Öhlen Risk based approach for development of offshore HVDC transmission technologies EWEA 2012.
The first floating wind turbines Martin Jakubowski Technology Architect Blue H Technologies BV, The Netherlands Brindisi, Italia 23rd of May
An Experimental Investigation on Loading, Performance, and Wake Interactions between Floating VAWTs ____________________________________________ Morteza.
© Siemens AG 2011 Hull Offshore Wind Workshop Siemens Wind Power A/S, Thomas Mousten, Offshore Wind Americas.
MBA (Trimester) Term V Module Title : Project Finance and Management
Implications of Heavy Metals in Sewage Sludge Where Do We Stand on Regulations?
Vectus Ltd Copyright Page 1 Safety Process in Vectus ’ PRT Project Inge Alme: Safety Manager Jörgen Gustafsson: CTO.
Solutions for Flaring & Venting CNG Marine Transportation
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Cost Estimate for Different Wind Turbine Technologies Bin Cai Wind.
TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION Substructure design, manufacturing and new concepts Stockholm, 2009 September 15 th INNOVATIONS IN DESIGN AND INSTALLATION.
No Offshore Wind Farm Without Certification European Offshore Wind Conference Dipl.-Ing. Matthias Laatsch Dieser Platz ist für Ihr Bild vorgesehen.
©2015 Energy Technologies Institute LLP - Subject to notes on page 1 ©2015 Energy Technologies Institute LLP The information in this document is the property.
Opportunities to Innovate in Aquaculture with Composite Materials Presentation at 1 st Annual Maine Aquaculture R&D Forum January 14, 2015 Stephen Von.
Classification: Statoil Internal Status: Draft Summary of lectures 2007 SH-part of Design of Offshore Structures Sverre Haver, Statoil, Trondheim, April.
1.  Renewable energy is energy which comes from natural resources such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides, and geothermal heat, which are renewable.  Climate.
Lloyd’s Register Marine - Classification & Marine Technology Tim Kent Technical Director, Marine August 2013.
IEC TC88 : Wind turbines Republic of Korea.
Offshore Wind and the European Supergrid Joe Corbett, Head of Technical Services Mainstream Renewable Power Representing: Friends of the Supergrid.
NREL – Jason Jonkman MARINTEK – Ivar Fylling Risø-DTU – Torben Larsen
A Quantitative Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbines
New Technical Approach to Classification of Anchor Handling and Diving Support Vessels A. DEVADAS RINA MUMBAI.
Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringWind Energy Center University of Massachusetts Hull Offshore Wind Project: Next Steps J. F. Manwell, Prof. and Director.
Tripartite Discussions 31st Oct – 1st Nov 2005, Beijing Quality control on new buildings - Role and authority of Class Speaker – Robert Smart LR IACS Council.
EReg ANNUAL CONFERENCE 11 th MAY 2010 Vehicle Administrative Platform Walter Nissler European Commission Directorate General Mobility & Transport Road.
23 rd World Gas Conference 5 – 9 June 2006 Amsterdam Full Scale Qualification Trials and Certification of the AMPLITUDE-LNG LOADING SYSTEM Phillip COX.
1  Renewable energy is energy which comes from natural resources such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides, and geothermal heat, which.
Update on Design Standards for Offshore Wind Turbines J. F. Manwell, Prof. Wind Energy Center Dept. of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering Univ. of Mass.,
Opportunities and challenges in floating wind Eirik Byklum – 27 November 2012.
Presented to: Transport Airplane Metallic and Composite Structures Working Group and Airworthiness Authorities By: Walt Sippel and Mike Gruber Date: Sept.
 Large Blade Testing Facility LARGE WIND TURBINES Rahul Yarala Executive Director, Wind Technology Testing Center May 12, 2011.
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines EWEC2007 Milan, Italy 7-10 May 2007 B. Skaare 1, T. D. Hanson 1, F.G. Nielsen 1, R. Yttervik.
DOE Peer Review May 10, 2006 Golden, CO Walt Musial Leader-Offshore Projects National Renewable Energy Laboratory Offshore Wind.
Filename.ppt1 The Pursuit of Economic Ocean Energy A Utility Perspective John Fitzgerald Technology Manager ESBI Ocean Energy.
TAOYUAN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARK BUSINESS INVITATION SEMINAR PRESENTATION OF PREFERENTIAL MEASURE & COUNSELING ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Design of offshore structures in a field development perspective ”From nothing to nothing with solid profit” $$
THE LONG-TERM ENERGY SUPPLY AND DEMAND OUTLOOK IN TAIWAN ENERGY COMMISSION MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AUGUST 2001 MOEA -15-
Structural Monitoring System for Offshore Wind Turbine Foundation Structures ewec 2006, Athens 28 February J. Wernicke, S. Kuhnt, R. Byars, J. Shadden.
Current Status of Phase VI Floating Design Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by the Alliance.
Tripartite Meeting Seoul, Korea, September 2009 Safety & SOLAS Agenda item 4.1 Goal-Based Standards --- application and compliance --- Toshiro Arima.
Company for Urban Innovative Transport (CUIT) 19/12/2007 Request for proposal.
1 National Wind Technology Center Wind Turbine Design According to IEC (Onshore) and -3 (Offshore) Standards Overview for NWTC November 8, 2005.
Dieser Platz ist für Ihr Bild vorgesehen Goal Based Standards – A unique chance to define a new framework for the development of rules and regulations.
Industrialized Floating Foundation
Sandy Butterfield 2006 Wind Program Peer Review May 10, 2006 Overview of the Technology & Opportunities.
Offshore Wind Farms An overview… UE VISION FOR % energetic efficiency -20 % greenhouse gas emissions 20 % of energy from renewable.
An Overview of the Technology and Economics of Offshore Wind Farms
A Quantitative Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbines
1 IMO Goal-based Standards A shipbuilders ’ opinion September 20, 2007 The Shipbuilders ’ Association of Japan NISHIYAMA, goro.
The history of BALTIC WIND SOLUTIONS growth 2 Experience Quality Safety Accepting the challenge 3 What is BALTIC WIND SOLUTIONS?
Eurostat I) Context & objectives of KIP INCA project Project owner is the Environment Knowledge Community (EKC) EKC is an EU inter-services group involving.
Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration, Continued (IEA Task 30): Phase II Results of a Floating Semisubmersible Wind System EWEA Offshore Conference November.
The Universal Foundation Concept
H2020 Proposals LIFES 50 PLUS James Battensby – Technical Bid Manager 23 rd June 2015.
SME opportunities in the drive towards 2030 targets
Structural Reliability Aspects in Design of Wind Turbines
United Nations Statistics Division
OFFSHORE CONSTRUCTION
CHAPTER 5 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS.
Wind Energy Policy Perspective Isla Robb Scottish Enterprise
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
4th ISOE European Workshop on Occupational Exposure Management at NPPs Lyon, France, March 2004 Kirsi Alm-Lytz Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority.
Vanda Nunes de Lima 18th June 2009
Overview of Article 6 procedures under the Habitats Directive
Atefeh Sadeghzadeh Control engineer – Target safety and control
Presentation transcript:

A. L. Hopstad, K. Ronold, C. Sixtensson, J. Sandberg Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures EWEA 2013

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Outline of presentation  Development of a standard for design of floating wind turbine structures  Certification process for floating wind turbines 2 HywindWindFloDIWETWindSea Statoil Norway Future Emerg. Tech. EU Blue H Netherlands WindSea AS Norway

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Joint Industry Project (JIP)  Objective: Develop a (DNV) standard for design of floating wind turbine structures  10 participants from the industry - Statoil - Navantia - Gamesa - Alstom Wind - Iberdrola - Sasebo Heavy Industries - Nippon Steel - STX Offshore & Shipbuilding - Glosten Associates - Principle Power  Kick off: September 2011  External/internal hearing: tentatively March/April 2013  Expected release: Q

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Why develop a standard for floaters?  Until recently existing standards have been restricted to bottom-fixed structures only: - IEC DNV-OS-J101 - GL (IV Part 2)- ABS #176  This forms the background for the new floater standards issued by ABS, NKK, GL and for the standard to be issued by DNV later in 2013  The standard will contain normative requirements that shall be satisfied in design of tower and support structure  Development of this standard will lead to: - Expert / industry consensus on design principles - Experience from the industry reflected in the contents - Innovative designs and solutions - Economically optimized designs 4 Courtesy: Principle Power WindFloat, Principle Power

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Three main technologies: Spar buoys, Semi-submersibles, Tension leg platforms (TLP) Weight-buoyancy stabilized structure with large draught + Simple, inherently high stability substructure + “Proven” technology - Substructure weight - Draught implication on site flexibility 5 Tension restrained structure with relatively shallow draught + Low steel weight + Small seabed footprint - Sensitive to soil conditions - Stability in intermediate phases Free-surface stabilized structure with relatively shallow draught + Simple transport & installation + Flexible design with respect to site - Substructure weight and complexity - Motions in extreme wave conditions Spar Semi- submersible TLP

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Technical issues covered by the standard SSafety philosophy and design principles SSite conditions, loads and response MMaterials and corrosion protection SStructural design DDesign of anchor foundations SStability SStation keeping CControl system MMechanical system TTransport and installation IIn-service inspection, maintenance and monitoring CCable design (structural) GGuidance for coupled analysis 6 Photo: Knut Ronold

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Safety philosophy  The safety class methodology is based on the failure consequences  The safety class is characterized by a target annual failure probability  Safety class LOW => target annual probability of failure of  Safety class NORMAL => target annual probability of failure of  Safety class HIGH => target annual probability of failure of  In DNV-OS-J101 and IEC rules: safety class Normal  Requirements for load factors to be used in design depend on the target safety level of the specified safety class 7 Hywind Photo: C.F. Salicath

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures What shall the safety level be in large floating wind farms?  The current safety class NORMAL was originally developed for small, individual turbines on land and has been extrapolated to be used also for: 1.Larger MW size turbines on land 2.Offshore turbines 3.Support structures for offshore turbines 4.Many large turbines in large offshore wind farms  Is it possible to reduce the target safety level based on having large wind farms with many turbines offshore?  The consequence of failure is primarily a loss of economic value => cost-benefit analysis 8 Kabashima demonstration turbine Photo: Knut Ronold, DNV

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Cost – benefit analysis  Establish which safety level is necessary / acceptable in design of floating support structures  Find optimum between choice of safety class in design and net present value (NPV) for a wind farm development  The analysis is to be used as part of the basis for selecting target safety level  Input: - Insurance companies estimated maximum loss philosophy - Cost data for CAPEX and OPEX - Cost data for replacing turbines and support structures - Cost differences when applying different safety classes - Electricity prices 9

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Cost – benefit analysis – example of results 10 Optimum Low CAPEX, low safety level High CAPEX, high safety level

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Structural design  Special provisions for the different floater types and for floater specific issues  Design rules and partial safety factors for structural components - Ultimate Limit State (ULS) - Fatigue Limit State (FLS) - Accidental Limit State (ALS)  Existing design standards from oil & gas industry has been capitalized on: - DNV-OS-C101 for offshore structures - DNV-OS-C105 for tendons - DNV-OS-E301 for mooring lines  Design Fatigue Factors (DFFs) specific for floating support structures and station keeping system have been established 11 Kabashima demonstration turbine Photo: Knut Ronold, DNV Kabashima demonstration turbine Photo: Knut Ronold, DNV

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Station keeping  Develop design rules and requirements for station keeping of floating wind turbines  The JIP has received data on load/response from three developers: - Hywind (full-scale data, mooring lines) - Pelastar (analysis data, tendons) - WindFloat (analysis / full scale data, mooring lines)  Load factors for tendons and mooring lines for different safety classes are established - Capitalize on “PosMoor” rules (DNV-OS-E301) - Reliability-based calibration for validation has been performed based on received data 12 Demonstration turbine in Japan Photo: Knut Ronold, DNV

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Project Certification for Offshore wind farms  Provide evidence to stakeholders that a set of requirements laid down in standards are met during design and construction and maintained during operation  DNV-OSS-901 Project Certification of Offshore Wind Farms (2012) - developed for DNV service for bottom-fixed wind farms  Phases: - Phase I – Verification of Design Basis - Phase II – Verification of design - Phase III – Manufacturing Survey - Phase IV – Installation Survey - Phase V – Commissioning Survey - Phase VI – In-Service 13

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Project Certification for Floating Wind Farms  DNV is currently in the process of extending the project certification service to also cover floating wind farms  Extended scope for Phase II – Design verification: - Floater stability - Station keeping - Validation of software - Verification by model testing  Current floating wind turbine concepts capitalize on novel technology to various degrees  Technology items not covered by any standards may need to be taken through a technology qualification process to obtain documentation required for certification 14

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Type Certification  Type certification of floating units for a specific environmental class is foreseen as a possible new service in the case of mass-produced floater units  The station keeping system including anchor design would need to be qualified for each site 15 WindFloat Photo: Principle Power

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures Thank you Thank you for your attention

Standard Development for Floating Wind Turbine Structures