Computer Aided Diagnosis: CAD overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computer Aided Diagnosis: Feature Extraction
Advertisements

3D Imaging Research Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School 3D Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) in Radiology Hiro Yoshida, PhD.
COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS: CLASSIFICATION Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah –
Assessment of Radiologists’ Performance with CADe for Digital Mammography Elodia B. Cole, MS Medical University of South Carolina Department of Radiology.
Evaluation of segmentation. Example Reference standard & segmentation.
1 FDA Radiological Devices Panel Meeting March 4-5, 2008 Mammography CAD Devices Robert C. Smith, MD, JD Medical Officer (Radiologist) Division of Reproductive,
Department of Biomedical Informatics 1 APIII Slide 1 Use of a ‘Mathematical Microscope’ to Understand Radiologists’ Errors in Breast Cancer Detection Claudia.
WHY DIGIT L MAMMOGRAPHY comes to Advocate Lutheran General Hospital 3D Mammography.
Giger, FDA 2009 Accepting CAD for Clinical Practice Maryellen L. Giger, Ph.D., FAAPM Professor & Vice-Chair for Basic Science Research Department of Radiology.
ACR and SBI Statement Margarita Zuley, MD Associate Professor, Radiology Medical Director, Breast Imaging University of Pittsburgh.
Breast Density A patient guide.
COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS: FEATURE SELECTION Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah –
BREAST CANCER UPDATE DETECTION TO DIAGNOSIS
CAD Panel Meeting General CAD Methods Nicholas Petrick, Ph.D.
· Information gathering · Data analysis · Decision making · “ Human life is too important to be left to a computer “ Patients receive the best treatment.
WRSTA, 13 August, 2006 Rough Sets in Hybrid Intelligent Systems For Breast Cancer Detection By Aboul Ella Hassanien Cairo University, Faculty of Computer.
A Computer Aided Detection System For Digital Mammograms Based on Radial Basis Functions and Feature Extraction Techniques By Mohammed Jirari Shanghai,
For internal use only / Copyright © Siemens AG All rights reserved. Multiple-instance learning improves CAD detection of masses in digital mammography.
In The Nam of God.
A Computer Aided Detection System For Mammograms Based on Asymmetry and Feature Extraction Techniques By Mohammed Jirari Benidorm, Spain Sept 9th, 2005.
February 13, 1997CWU B.Kovalerchuk1 DESIGN OF CONSISTENT SYSTEM FOR RADIOLOGISTS TO SUPPORT BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS.
Automatic Detection And Classification Of Microcalcifications In Digital Mammograms Institute for Brain and Neural Systems Brown University Providence.
BREAST IMAGING Claudia E. Galbo,M.D. USUHS Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences.
Breast Imaging Made Brief and Simple
Background on: Breast Cancer, X-Ray and MRI Mammography
Ulrich Bick, MD Maryellen L. Giger PhD Robert A. Schmidt, MD Robert M. Nishikawa, PhD Kunio Doi, PhD 1 報告者:劉治元.
Volumetric Breast Density understandbreastdensity.or g.
1 History and Lessons from FDA Regulation of Digital Radiology Kyle J. Myers, Ph.D. Division of Imaging and Applied Mathematics OSEL/CDRH/FDA October 22,
Bayesian Network for Predicting Invasive and In-situ Breast Cancer using Mammographic Findings Jagpreet Chhatwal1 O. Alagoz1, E.S. Burnside1, H. Nassif1,
Statistics in Screening/Diagnosis
ENDA MOLLOY, ELECTRONIC ENG. FINAL PRESENTATION, 31/03/09. Automated Image Analysis Techniques for Screening of Mammography Images.
Future Of Diagnostic Imaging A Look Into The Next Decade ? (Part 3)
Diagnostic Cases. Goals & Objectives Highlight Bayesian and Boolean processes used in classic diagnosis Demonstrate use/misuse of tests for screening.
Financial Disclosure Robert Nishikawa: –paid consultant for Carestream and Siemens –shareholder in and receives royalties & research funding from Hologic,
Introduction to Medical Imaging Mammography and Computer Aided Diagnostic (CAD) Example Guy Gilboa Course
DUAL ENERGY CONTRAST ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAM : AS A PROBLEM SOLVING TOOL IN EQUIVOCAL CASES Abstract ID IRIA-1121.
Mammography and DICOM Adapting an Analog Modality to the Digital World Julian Marshall R2 Technology, Inc.
Improvement in Screening Radiologists’ Performance in an Organized Screening Program Nancy A. T. Wadden, MD, FRCPC Gregory Doyle, BSc, MBA Breast Screening.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Learning Cue Phrase Patterns from Radiology Reports Using a Genetic Algorithm Robert M. Patton, Ph.D.
3D Mammography Ernesto Coto Sören Grimm Stefan Bruckner M. Eduard Gröller Institute of Computer Graphics and Algorithms Vienna University of Technology.
FAVOR F actors A ssociated with V ariability O f R adiologists (2000 to present) Supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA ;
2/3/04Sacks1 Clinical Description William Sacks, PhD, MD—ODE/CDRH Clinical Description William Sacks, PhD, MD—ODE/CDRH R2 Technology, Inc. ImageChecker.
Preliminary validation of content- based compression of mammographic images Brad Grinstead Hamed Sari-Sarraf, Shaun Gleason, and Sunanda Mitra Funded in.
3D Digital Cleansing Using Segmentation Rays Authors: Sarang Lakare, Ming Wan, Mie Sato and Arie Kaufman Source: In Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization.
Renate Höcker, Antje Schroeder, Siemens Healthcare IHE Radiology – DBT Supplement Supplement Development Kick-Off.
Predictive values prevalence CK and acute myocardial infarction –sensitivity 70% –specificity 80% –prevalence - 40% –prevalence - 20% –PPV and NPV.
Screening Mammography Benchmarks – Modified Angoff: Screening Performance and Guidelines for Practice  Robert D Rosenberg and Patricia Carney for Breast.
Biometrics % Biostatistics
Mammography Linda Haun Bryan Medical Center Mammography Coordinator.
Some Difficult Decisions are Easier without Computer Support / TA Mammography, RT Diversity / Andrey A. Povyakalo (work together with E Alberdi, L Strigini.
Mammogram Analysis – Tumor classification - Geethapriya Raghavan.
Information Extraction for Clinical Data Mining: A Mammography Case Study H. Nassif, R. Woods, E. Burnside, M. Ayvaci, J. Shavlik and D. Page University.
Radiological Devices Advisory Panel Meeting Radiological Devices Advisory Panel Meeting Computer-Assisted Detection Devices Panel Questions Radiological.
The CALMA project A CAD tool in breast radiography A.Ceccopieri, Padova
ACRIN Breast Committee Fall Meeting CADe study Etta Pisano, MD Martin Yaffe PhD Elodia Cole, MS Zheng Zhang, PhD ACRIN Breast Committee.
THIRD CLASSIFICATION OF MICROCALCIFICATION STAGES IN MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGES THIRD REVIEW Supervisor: Mrs.P.Valarmathi HOD/CSE Project Members: M.HamsaPriya( )
國立雲林科技大學 National Yunlin University of Science and Technology Intelligent Database Systems Lab 1 Self-organizing map for cluster analysis of a breast cancer.
TUMOR BURDEN ANALYSIS ON CT BY AUTOMATED LIVER AND TUMOR SEGMENTATION RAMSHEEJA.RR Roll : No 19 Guide SREERAJ.R ( Head Of Department, CSE)
Dr. Julia Flukinger Breast Radiologist, Director Breast MRI, Advanced Radiology May 21, 2106.
Thursday Case of the Day History: The hypothetical results from a clinical trial of computer-aided detection (CADe) used in mammographic screening of 5,000,000.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins CHAPTER 22 Breast Cancer Diagnostic Technologies: Today and Tomorrow.
Contrast-enhanced Dedicated Breast CT: Initial Clinical Experience
In Search of the Optimal Set of Indicators when Classifying Histopathological Images Catalin Stoean University of Craiova, Romania
Is ultrasound valuable in breast cancer screening
CS 698 | Current Topics in Data Science
Thursday Case of the Day
Digital 2D versus Tomosynthesis Screening Mammography among Women Aged 65 and Older in the United States Screening mammography performance metrics are.
imaging modalities for Breast screening
Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer A.
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Presentation transcript:

Computer Aided Diagnosis: CAD overview Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah – www.k-space.org

Recommended Reference Digital Mammography, by U. Bick and F. Diekmann (Eds.), Springer, 2010.

Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is defined as a diagnosis made by a radiologist who uses the output of a computer analysis of the images when making his/her interpretation Computer-aided detection (CADe) Used with “Screening Radiology” Identify and mark suspicious areas in an image Goal of CADe is to help radiologists avoid missing a cancer Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) Used with “Clinical Radiology” CADx help radiologists decide if a woman should have a biopsy or not Report the likelihood that a lesion is malignant

Goals of CAD Improving radiologists’ performance Reduce intra- and inter-variability of radiologists It is also hoped that CAD can improve radiologists’ productivity Estimating the risk of a woman to develop breast cancer (?)

Methodology

Example CADx User Interface

Clinical Studies for CADe

Clinical Studies for CADx

Required Pixel Size Quality of digital image will affect the performance of CAD Two image sources for CAD Digitized film mammograms Full field digital mammograms (FFDM) Most important factor is the pixel size Consistent with pixel size in full digital mammograms, film mammograms are digitized for CAD with pixels ranging from 50-100 m It is generally believed that pixel size is only important for microcalcifications and not for masses

Evaluation of CAD Systems Graph shows two ROC curves with equal AUC, but the curves cross One system is superior if high sensitivity is desirable, while the other system would be preferred for high specificity “Partial area under ROC” (pAUC), where it is assumed that high sensitivity is desirable is shown in color for 0.9AUC

CADe as Pre-Screening As the performance of CADe schemes has improved, the number of false detections has decreased while the sensitivity has improved or remained the same The performance of clinical CADe systems is now at the point where it may be possible to use CADe as a pre-screener of screening mammograms That is, before the cases are reviewed by a radiologist, a CADe scheme is run and cases without any detections are considered normal and not read by the radiologist Goal here is to reduce the radiologists’ workload CADe scheme will pre-screen out “easy” cases Problem: radiologists may become more exhausted, as every case will be “difficult”

Concurrent Reading with CADe Currently, CADe is used as a second reader, where the radiologist first reads the images without CADe and then re-reads with the knowledge of the CADe findings An alternative paradigm is to have CADe as the first reader and have the radiologist verify (i.e., accept or reject) each CADe prompt For this to be effective, the sensitivity of the CADe system must be very high For clustered microcalcification detection, sensitivity is approximately 98% At this level of performance, it is conceivable that CADe could be the first reader, which is sometimes referred to as concurrent reading CADe finds clustered microcalcifications at very high rate

Interactive CADe Instead of presenting all CADe detections to the radiologist, radiologist can mark suspicious area on softcopy display and if area was identified by the computer, the computer’s likelihood that the area contains a cancer is given This information can be used by the radiologist in two ways: If CADe scheme has high NPV, then if area selected by radiologist has low likelihood of malignancy or if computer did not select region as suspicious, then radiologist may have selected a region that does not contain actual cancer If CADe scheme has high PPV and if area selected by radiologist has high likelihood of malignancy, then there is a high probability that selected region contains a cancer Researchers achieved high PPV by operating the CADe scheme at a low false detection rate of 0.1 per image It was shown previously that at this false detection rate, performance of CADe scheme was comparable with that of the radiologists, if analysis was restricted to detections that were considered suspicious by radiologists

CAD for Tomosynthesis and Breast CT Like other modalities, X-ray imaging of breast is becoming 3D Breast tomosynthesis and breast CT are emerging technologies that have a large potential to improve screening and diagnosis One of the potential drawbacks of these technologies is that a large volume of images is produced per breast Screening mammogram produces two images of each breast, while a tomosynthesis exam could produce more than 100 images of each breast with large amount of data that the radiologist needs to review CAD may play an important role in assisting radiologists, so that they do not overlook a cancer.

Assignments Read Chapter 6 entitled “Computer-aided Detection and Diagnosis” by Robert M. Nishikawa Read the following paper and think about how to implement the first- and second-order grey level parameters using built-in Matlab/Octave functions and also the kNN classifier: Kadah et al., "Classification algorithms for quantitative tissue characterization of diffuse liver disease from ultrasound images," IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 466-478, August 1996.