Lead Time Aviation Verification Onset and Cessation of Ceiling and Visibility Flight Category Conditions (IFR, MVFR, VFR) at FAA Core Airports NWS Aviation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Canadian Aviation Forecast Verification
Advertisements

Air Traffic Analysis, Inc Using WITI for Airport Arrival Performance Analysis A report on work-in-progress December 2010.
The Evolution of NWS Aviation Weather Services in Chicago Mike Bardou National Weather Service Chicago The views expressed in this presentation are those.
Optimizing WFO Aviation Service & Forecast Performance Dan Shoemaker Aviation Curmudgeon WFO FWD.
First Results of Thunderstorm Forecast Verification in Terminal Aerodrome Forecasts in Croatia Jadran Jurković and Igor Kos Croatia control Ltd, MET Division.
Eastern Region – Mt. Holly Regional Aviation Conference Rick Curtis Southwest Airlines 6/6/06
Interpreting TAF Verification Statistics: The Impact of TEMPO Forecasts (Corrected May 21, 2007) Chuck Kluepfel National Weather Service Headquarters Silver.
Practical Applications of Probability in Aviation Decision Making Haig Iskenderian 22 October 2014.
Categorical Amendment Criteria (CAC) FAQ Session Aviation Services Branch November, 2009.
Introduction to the Forecast Impact and Quality Assessment Section GSD Verification Summit Meeting 8 September 2011 Jennifer Mahoney 1.
NWS TAF Verification Brandi Richardson NWS Shreveport, LA.
Aviation Climatology Andrew Rorke WFO LOX Los Angeles / Oxnard.
2005 Pacific Aviation Directors Workshop April 5-7 National Weather Service Pacific Region.
Verification for Terminal and En-route Weather Forecasts and TFM Decisions Jennifer Mahoney NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory
GreenCig/Vis Categories match Pale Green Situational awareness Orange 2 categories off, Multiple impacts Yellow 1 category off, Singular impact Red 3 categories.
ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PROJECTS ON NWS PERFORMANCE Jeff Waldstreicher Scientific Services Division – Eastern Region Northeast Regional.
The 10th annual Northeast Regional Operational Workshop, Albany, NY Verification of SREF Aviation Forecasts at Binghamton, NY Justin Arnott NOAA / NWS.
Aviation Verification and Convection Chris Leonardi WFO RLX August 31, 2005.
Aviation Cloud Forecasts – A True Challenge for Forecasters v       Jeffrey S. Tongue NOAA/National Weather Service - Upton, NY Wheee !
Writing Better Aviation AFDs (or) Do you know who your customer really is ? National Weather Service, Jackson, KY Dustin Harbage And Brian Schoettmer.
PRACTICAL TAF WRITING Karen Oudeman NWS – Jackson, KY October 16, 2003.
AVIATION VERIFICATION NWS KEY WEST 2005 Bill South Aviation Program Leader.
1 How Are We Doing? A Verification Briefing for the SAWS III Workshop April 23, 2010 Chuck Kluepfel National Weather Service Headquarters Silver Spring,
NOAA FAA-NWS Aviation Weather Weather Policy and Product Transition Panel Friends and Partners in Aviation Weather October 22, 2014.
Pre-decisional 1 Traffic Flow Management Weather Requirements Working Group (TRWG) Program Review Presented to Jason Tuell, NWS Meteorological Services.
Ryan Kardell WFO Springfield.  Purpose of the Database  Data Sources  User Guide  Formulas Used for Scoring.
1 What’s New in Verification? A Verification Briefing for the SAWS IV Workshop October 26, 2011 Chuck Kluepfel National Weather Service Headquarters Silver.
Low Clouds and IFR Forecasting Southwest Aviation Weather Safety Workshop, Phoenix, AZ Ken Widelski Meteorologist NWS: Lubbock, TX.
CHRIS LEONARDI NWS CHARLESTON WV Improving Information Presentation to Aviation Users April 15, 2010 ER Subregional Aviation Conference.
Enhancing Digital Services Changing Weather – Changing Forecasts Aviation Climate Fire Weather Marine Weather and Sea Ice Public Forecasts and Warnings.
Federal Aviation Administration ATO Future Schedule Generation Performance Analysis and Strategy January 27, 2010.
Space Weather in NextGen: An Update April 27, 2010 Cecilia Miner NOAA/NWS/Aviation Services Branch April 27, 2010 Cecilia Miner NOAA/NWS/Aviation Services.
NOAA's NWS National Performance Measures FY 2010 – FY 2016 NOAA's NWS National Performance Measures FY 2010 – FY 2016 Government Performance Requirements.
The Chicago Aviation Initiative: More Than Meets The Eye A basis for improving customer service Mike Bardou Senior Forecaster/Aviation Program Leader National.
Summer WAS*IS 2006 National Weather Service Verification Program Overview Brenton MacAloney II National Weather Service Headquarters Silver Spring, MD.
Quality Assessment - National Ceiling and Visibility (NCV) Analysis (now, not forecast) Product Tressa L. Fowler, Matthew J. Pocernich, Jamie T. Braid,
FPAW – Weather Forecast Performance Requirements Validation 25 August 2015 Chris Ermatinger, Ops. Research Analyst Aviation Weather Division, Policy and.
Tailwinds Flying Club Spring (Summer) Safety Session – 2009 WEATHER VFR – MVFR - IFR.
Event-based Verification and Evaluation of NWS Gridded Products: The EVENT Tool Missy Petty Forecast Impact and Quality Assessment Section NOAA/ESRL/GSD.
Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation Workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, FAA NextGen and Ops Planning Date: January 28, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
1 Introduction to Categorical Amendment Criteria (CAC)
An Experiment to Evaluate the Use of Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts from Numerical Guidance by Operational Forecasters Joshua M. Boustead and Daniel.
The Benefit of Improved GOES Products in the NWS Forecast Offices Greg Mandt National Weather Service Director of the Office of Climate, Water, and Weather.
HEMS Weather Summit – 21 March The Outlook for National-Scale Ceiling and Visibility Products Paul Herzegh Lead, FAA/AWRP National C&V Team.
“Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather” Forum 1 November 2012 Michael D. McPartland Wind Data Quality Factors & Metrics* *This work was sponsored by the.
Collaborative Convective Forecast Product (CCFP).
The Evolution of NWS Aviation Weather Services in Chicago Mike Bardou National Weather Service Chicago.
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES Office of the Federal Coordinator July 2000 Bethesda, MD.
Digital Aviation Services Paving the way for aviation forecasts of the future Cammye Sims Cammye Sims.
© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F065-B Risk Management for TFM through Incremental Decision Making NBAA 61 ST Annual Meeting &
INTERPRETING WEATHER INFORMATION
FAA-NWS Aviation Weather Requirements Working Group (ARWG)
Science and Technology Infusion Plan for Aviation Weather Services Science and Technology Infusion Plan for Aviation Weather Services Kevin Johnston NWS.
Eastern Region Aviation Overview Fred McMullen Regional Aviation Meteorologist Fred McMullen Regional.
LOW CLOUDS AND IFR FORECASTING NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE KEN WIDELSKI October 11, 2005.
Forecasting C&V The Limits of Science Tom MacPhail Dec 18, 2013.
Enhanced Flight Following. Major Concepts  “Second Opinion”  Positive Flight Following  Resource for Captain.
National Weather Service Eastern Region Activities Fred McMullen Regional Aviation Meteorologist Eastern Region Headquarters.
2004 Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC Stan Benjamin Steve Weygandt NOAA / Forecast Systems Lab NY Courtesy:
1 CWSU Near-term Improvement Program. 2 Objective Low-cost improvements at CWSUs which will noticeably improve quality of support provided to FAA ARTCCs.
NWS Activities and Perspective Friends/Partners of Aviation Weather Forum Washington, DC July 24, 2013 Cyndie Abelman NOAA/NWS Aviation Weather Services.
NAS WITI vs. Combined WITI-FA and Delta (“forecast goodness”) Negative delta = Under-forecast of weather/traffic impact Positive delta = Over-forecast.
The GOES-R/JPSS Approach for Identifying Hazardous Low Clouds: Overview and Operational Impacts Corey Calvert (UW-CIMSS) Mike Pavolonis (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR)
The Network-Enabled Verification Service (NEVS)
Briefing to the FPAW Forum National Weather Service
Friends / Partners in Aviation Weather
Improving the TAF Training National Workshop Forecast Tools
Drivers Influencing Weather-related NAS Metrics
Joint Planning and Development Office “Where new ideas are welcome”
Thunderstorm Ceiling/Visibility Climatology
Presentation transcript:

Lead Time Aviation Verification Onset and Cessation of Ceiling and Visibility Flight Category Conditions (IFR, MVFR, VFR) at FAA Core Airports NWS Aviation Services Branch Aviation Services Virtual Workshop April 16, 2013

Lead Time Accuracy Requirements Identified by Joint FAA/NWS Traffic Flow Management (TFM) Weather Requirements Working Group (TRWG) Performance-Based Weather Information Requirements –Linked to Decisions for Traffic Management Initiatives –Accuracy needed at decision points prior to onset and cessation New Verification Method, Different than Traditional Method –Probability of Detection (POD) and False Alarm Ratio (FAR) only at time of onset and cessation, not throughout event duration Verification Metrics to Baseline Current Support against New Performance-Based Requirements –NWSH Performance Branch developed modified version of Stats on Demand 2

Lead Time Accuracy Requirements 3 Accuracy Criteria Needed for Time of Onset and Cessation of IFR, MVFR, VFR Conditions

Lead Time to Cig/Vis Event Example 4 MVFR Onset 0536Z VFR Cessation 0536Z MVFR Forecast Onset 0500Z VFR Forecast Cessation 0500Z

TAF Lead Time - IFR Onset POD Hour Lead Time to Onset of IFR Conditions at Core Airports Probability of Detection Number of Events/Forecasts 75%

TAF Lead Time – IFR Onset FAR Hour Projection to Onset of IFR Conditions at the Core 30 Airports 25% Number of Events/Forecasts False Alarm Ratio

TAF Lead Time - IFR Onset Timing Error 7 Mean Absolute Timing Error: 2-4 Hour Lead Time to Onset of IFR Conditions 30 min Number of Events/Forecasts Timing Error (minutes)

TAF Lead Time - IFR Cessation POD Hour Lead Time to Cessation of IFR Conditions at Core Airports 75% Number of Events/Forecasts Probability of Detection

TAF Lead Time - IFR Cessation FAR Hour Projection to Cessation of IFR Conditions at the Core 30 Airports 25% Number of Events/Forecasts False Alarm Ratio

TAF Lead Time - IFR Cessation Timing Error 10 Mean Absolute Timing Error: 2-4 Hour Lead Time to Cessation of IFR Conditions 30 min Number of Events/Forecasts Timing Error (minutes)

TAF Lead Time - MVFR Onset POD Hour Lead Time to Onset of MVFR Conditions at Core Airports 75% Number of Events/Forecasts Probability of Detection

TAF Lead Time - MVFR Onset FAR Hour Projection to Onset of MVFR Conditions at the Core 30 Airports 25% Number of Events/Forecasts False Alarm Ratio

TAF Lead Time - MVFR Onset Timing Error Hour Lead Time to Onset of MVFR Conditions at Core Airports 30 min Number of Events/Forecasts Timing Error (minutes)

TAF Lead Time - MVFR Cessation POD Hour Lead Time to Cessation of MVFR Conditions at Core Airports 75% Number of Events/Forecasts Probability of Detection

TAF Lead Time - MVFR Cessation FAR Hour Projection to Cessation of MVFR Conditions at the Core 30 Airports 25% Number of Events/Forecasts False Alarm Ratio

TAF Lead Time - MVFR Cessation Timing Error 16 Mean Absolute Timing Error: 2-4 Hour Lead Time to Cessation of MVFR Conditions 30 min Number of Events/Forecasts Timing Error (minutes)

TAF Lead Time - VFR Onset POD Hour Lead Time to Onset of VFR Conditions at Core Airports 75% Number of Events/Forecasts Probability of Detection

TAF Lead Time - VFR Onset FAR Hour Projection to Onset of VFR Conditions at the Core 30 Airports 25% Number of Events/Forecasts False Alarm Ratio

TAF Lead Time - VFR Onset Timing Error Hour Lead Time to Onset of VFR Conditions at Core Airports 30 min Number of Events/Forecasts Timing Error (minutes)

TAF Lead Time - VFR Cessation POD Hour Lead Time to Cessation of VFR Conditions at Core Airports 75% Number of Events/Forecasts Probability of Detection

TAF Lead Time - VFR Cessation FAR Hour Projection to Cessation of VFR Conditions at the Core 30 Airports 25% Number of Events/Forecasts False Alarm Ratio

TAF Lead Time - VFR Cessation Timing Error 22 Mean Absolute Timing Error: 2-4 Hour Lead Time to Cessation of VFR Conditions 30 min Number of Events/Forecasts Timing Error (minutes)

Summary Lead Time Accuracy Requirements –Decision process needs timing of Onset/Cessation of events impacting TFM on scale of tens of minutes New Verification Method, Different than Traditional Method –Preliminary Flight Category verification results show significant gap between accuracy baseline and decision process needs –TAF hourly time scale too coarse to meet need of TFM decisions –Model guidance time scale likely to lead to similar results Next Steps for Lead Time Assessment Tool –Wind Direction Changes, Thunderstorms, Model Guidance –Accessible on Performance Management Website –Training for Lead Time Verification Method and Results Interpretation 23