1 Constraint-based Round Robin Tournament Planning Martin Henz National University of Singapore.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Constraint Satisfaction Problems A Quick Overview (based on AIMA book slides)
Advertisements

Introduction. IC-Parc2 ECLiPSe Components Constraint Logic Programming system, consisting of  A runtime core Data-driven computation, backtracking, garbage.
1 Finite Constraint Domains. 2 u Constraint satisfaction problems (CSP) u A backtracking solver u Node and arc consistency u Bounds consistency u Generalized.
Hamiltonian Circuits and Paths
Michael Trick Tepper School, Carnegie Mellon Combinatorial Benders’ Cuts for Sports Scheduling Optimization.
Constraint Processing and Programming Introductory Exemple Javier Larrosa.
Lake Highlands Soccer Association Game Scheduling Sherif Khalifa Senior Design Project May 9, 2008.
Sports Scheduling An Assessment of Various Approaches to Solving the n-Round Robin Tournament Noren De La Rosa Mallory Ratajewski.
Augoust /47 Heuristics for the Mirrored Traveling Tournament Problem Celso C. RIBEIRO Sebastián URRUTIA.
PERL 105 Practicum: Scheduling Session. Factors to Consider Availability of space Availability of space Facility (size and suitability) Facility (size.
May 2004 Minimizing travels by maximizing breaks1/32 Minimizing Travels by Maximizing Breaks in Round Robin Tournament Schedules Celso RIBEIRO UFF and.
Modular Answer Set Programming. Introduction One common answer set programming (ASP) methodology is to: Encode the problem Enumerate possible solutions.
Programming with Constraints Jia-Huai You. Subject of Study Constraint Programming (CP) studies the computational models, languages, and systems for solving.
Sports Scheduling and the “Real World” Michael Trick Carnegie Mellon University May, 2000.
CPSC 322, Lecture 18Slide 1 Planning: Heuristics and CSP Planning Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 18 (Textbook Chpt 8) February, 12, 2010.
Alan M. Frisch Artificial Intelligence Group Department of Computer Science University of York Extending the Reach of Constraint Technology through Reformulation.
CPSC 322, Lecture 12Slide 1 CSPs: Search and Arc Consistency Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 12 (Textbook Chpt ) January, 29, 2010.
Chapter 2: Algorithm Discovery and Design
© J. Christopher Beck Lecture 20: Sports Scheduling.
Heuristics for the MTTPROADEF, February /49 Heuristics for the Mirrored Traveling Tournament Problem Celso C. RIBEIRO Sebastián URRUTIA.
Linear Programming Applications
© J. Christopher Beck Lecture 22: Local Search for Sports Scheduling.
1 Combinatorial Problems in Cooperative Control: Complexity and Scalability Carla Gomes and Bart Selman Cornell University Muri Meeting March 2002.
Chapter 2: Algorithm Discovery and Design
Chapter 2: Algorithm Discovery and Design
Using Use Case Scenarios and Operational Variables for Generating Test Objectives Javier J. Gutiérrez María José Escalona Manuel Mejías Arturo H. Torres.
International sporting events world championships Football Rugby – 1987 wwec Cricket Athletics Formula one
CISC 235: Topic 6 Game Trees.
CP Summer School Modelling for Constraint Programming Barbara Smith 1.Definitions, Viewpoints, Constraints 2.Implied Constraints, Optimization,
An Overview of Constraint Programming MSORM 2000 Tutorial November 20/21, 2000 Martin Henz, National University of Singapore.
Chapter 2: Algorithm Discovery and Design Invitation to Computer Science, C++ Version, Third Edition.
Pelvic floor Specialised Constraints for Stable Matching Problems Contact details: 17 Lilybank Gardens Glasgow G12 8QQ The Problem.
1 CSC 221: Introduction to Programming Fall 2012 Functions & Modules  standard modules: math, random  Python documentation, help  user-defined functions,
Event Scheduling Using Constraint Programming November 22, 2002 Martin Henz, School of Computing, NUS
ILOG Solver Directions Laurent Perron ILOG SA. Outline Constraint Programming, a powerful technology The CP suite in ILOG CP faces new challenges Recent.
Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) CPSC 322 – CSP 1 Poole & Mackworth textbook: Sections § Lecturer: Alan Mackworth September 28, 2012.
© J. Christopher Beck Lecture 13: Modeling in Constraint Programming.
© J. Christopher Beck Lecture 21: Sports Scheduling 1.
Operational Research & ManagementOperations Scheduling Workforce Scheduling 1.Days-Off Scheduling 2.Shift Scheduling 3. Cyclic Staffing Problem (& extensions)
CP Summer School Modelling for Constraint Programming Barbara Smith 2. Implied Constraints, Optimization, Dominance Rules.
A Second Look at Constraint Programming February 17/18, 2000.
Reference points for comparison and measurement. Brute Force.
Sports Scheduling Written by Kelly Easton, George Nemhauser, Michael Trick Presented by Matthew Lai.
Propositional Calculus CS 270: Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science Jeremy Johnson.
December 2003 Traveling tournament problem1/57 Heuristics for the Traveling Tournament Problem: Scheduling the Brazilian Soccer Championship Celso C. RIBEIRO.
FORS 8450 Advanced Forest Planning Lecture 5 Relatively Straightforward Stochastic Approach.
2. Program Development Intro Programming in C++ Computer Science Dept Va Tech August 2001 ©2001 Barnette ND & McQuain WD 1 Top-Down Design:A solution method.
Solving Problems by searching Well defined problems A probem is well defined if it is easy to automatically asses the validity (utility) of any proposed.
Constraints and Search Toby Walsh Cork Constraint Computation Centre (4C) Logic & AR Summer School, 2002.
© J. Christopher Beck Lecture 21: IP and CP Models for Sports Scheduling.
1 Constraint-based Round Robin Tournament Planning Martin Henz National University of Singapore.
Seeding and Ties. How to seed Based on league or divisional competition Above not available: –Competed with each other or other team(s) in other competitions.
G51IAI Introduction to Artificial Intelligence
PROBLEM-SOLVING TECHNIQUES Rocky K. C. Chang November 10, 2015.
Robust Planning using Constraint Satisfaction Techniques Daniel Buettner and Berthe Y. Choueiry Constraint Systems Laboratory Department of Computer Science.
Assigning Judges to Competitions Using Tabu Search Approach Amina Lamghari Jacques A. Ferland Computer science and OR dept. University of Montreal.
Kubota-Zarivnij, 2010 BEFORE 5 to 10 minutes only Activating students’ mathematical knowledge and experience that directly relates to the mathematics in.
10.3 Reformulation The Lex-Leader Method Shant Karakashian 1.
Chapter 2: Algorithm Discovery and Design Invitation to Computer Science.
Shortcomings of Traditional Backtrack Search on Large, Tight CSPs: A Real-world Example Venkata Praveen Guddeti and Berthe Y. Choueiry The combination.
The Double Elimination Tournament. Purpose: All contestants remain in championship contention until they lose two games Advantages: A player or team must.
MgtOp 470—Business Modeling with Spreadsheets Professor Munson Topic 10 Analytics in Sports.
1 Compiler Construction (CS-636) Muhammad Bilal Bashir UIIT, Rawalpindi.
Tools and Techniques Sports and Athletics Focus on the Competitive Format.
Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 13
MgtOp 470—Business Modeling with Spreadsheets Professor Munson
Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 13
Mathematical thinking and task design
Constraint satisfaction problems
Constraint satisfaction problems
Presentation transcript:

1 Constraint-based Round Robin Tournament Planning Martin Henz National University of Singapore

2 Chonology November 1996, Boston, CP 96: George Nemhauser mentions ACC problem Summer 1997, Trick and Nemhauser solve ACC problem (published Jan 1998) Dec Jan 1998, using constraint programming for ACC problem March - June 1998, development of sport scheduling tool Friar Tuck January 1999, Friar Tuck 1.1

3 The ACC 1997/98 Problem 9 teams participate in tournament dense double round robin: –there are 2 * 9 dates –at each date, each team plays either home, away or has a “bye” there should be at least 7 dates distance between first leg and return match. To achieve this, we fix a mirroring between dates: (1,8), (2,9), (3,12), (4,13), (5,14), (6,15) (7,16), (10,17), (11,18)

4 The ACC 1997/98 Problem (cont’d) No team can play away on both last dates No team may have more than two away matches in a row. No team may have more than two home matches in a row. No team may have more than three away matches or byes in a row. No team may have more than four home matches or byes in a row.

5 The ACC 1997/98 Problem (cont’d) Of the weekends, each team plays four at home, four away, and one bye. Each team must have home matches or byes at least on two of the first five weekends. Every team except FSU has a traditional rival. The rival pairs are Clem-GT, Duke-UNC, UMD- UVA and NCSt-Wake. In the last date, every team except FSU plays against its rival, unless it plays against FSU or has a bye.

6 The ACC 1997/98 Problem (cont’d) The following pairings must occur at least once in dates 11 to 18: Duke-GT, Duke-Wake, GT- UNC, UNC-Wake. No team plays in two consecutive dates away against Duke and UNC. No team plays in three consecutive dates against Duke UNC and Wake. UNC plays Duke in last date and date 11. UNC plays Clem in the second date. Duke has bye in the first date 16.

7 The ACC 1997/98 Problem (cont’d) Wake does not play home in date 17. Wake has a bye in the first date. Clem, Duke, UMD and Wake do not play away in the last date. Clem, FSU, GT and Wake do not play away in the fist date. Neither FSU nor NCSt have a bye in the last date. UNC does not have a bye in the first date.

8 Preferences Nemhauser and Trick give a number of additional preferences. However, it turns out that there are only 179 solutions to the problem above. If you find all 179 solutions, you can easily single out the most preferred ones. More details on ACC 97/98 in:Nemhauser, Trick; Scheduling a Major College Basketball Conference; Operations Research, 46(1), 1998.

9 Nemhauser/Trick Solution enumerate home/away/bye patterns –explicit enumeration (very fast) compute pattern sets –integer programming (below 1 minute) compute abstract schedules –integer programming (several minutes) compute concrete schedules –explicit enumeration (approx. 24 hours) Schreuder, Combinatorial Aspects of Construction of Competition Dutch Football Leagues, Discr. Appl. Math, 35: , 1992.

10 Modeling ACC 97/97 as Constraint Satisfaction Problem Variables: 9 * 9 * 2 variables taking values from {0,1} that express which team plays home when. Example: H UNC, 5 =1 means UNC plays home on date 5. away, bye similar, e.g. A UNC, 5 or B UNC, 5 9 * 9 * 2 variables taking values from {1,...,9} that express against which team which other team plays. Example: O UNC, 5 =1 means UNC plays team 1 (Clem) on date 5

11 Modeling ACC 97/97 as Constraint Satisfaction Problem (cont’d) Constraints: Example: No team plays away on both last dates. A Clem,17 + A Clem,18 < 2, A Duke,17 + A Duke,18 < 2,... All constraints can be easily formalized in this manner.

12 Constraint Programming Approach for Solving CSP “Propagate and Distribute” store possible values of variables in “constraint store” encode constraints as computational agents that strengthen the constraint store whenever possible compute fixpoint over propagators distribute: divide and conquer, explore search tree

13 First Step: Back to Nemhauser/Trick! constraint programming for generating all patterns. –CSP representation straightforward. –computing time below 1 second (Pentium II, 233MHz) constraint programming for generating all pattern sets. –CSP representation straightforward. –computing time 3.1 seconds

14 Back to Schreuder constraint programming for abstract schedules –Introduce variable matrix OA similar to O in naïve model –there are many abstract schedules –runtime several minutes constraint programming for concrete schedules –model somewhat complicated, using two levels of the “element” constraint –runtime several minutes

15 Cain’s Model Alternative to last two phases of Nemhauser/Trick assign teams to patterns in a given pattern set. assign opponent teams for each team and date. W.O. Cain, Jr, The computer-assisted heuristic approach used to schedule the major league baseball clubs, Optimal Strategies in Sports, North-Holland, 1977

16 Dates Pattern 1H A B A H B Pattern 2B H A B A H Pattern 3A B H H B A Cain 1977 Schreuder 1992 Dates DynamoH A B A H B SpartaB H A B A H Vitesse A B H H B A Dates Team 1 3H 2A B 3A 2H B Team 2 B 1H 3A B 1A 3H Team 3 1A B 2H 1H B 2A Dates DynamoVH SA B VA SH B SpartaB DH VA B DA VH Vitesse DA B VH DH B VA

17 Using Cain’s Model in CP CP model simpler than CP model for Schreuder runtimes: –patterns to teams: 33 seconds –opponent team assignment: 20.7 seconds –overall runtime for all 179 solutions: 57.1 seconds Details in: Martin Henz, Scheduling a Major College Basketball Conference - Revisited, Operations Research, 2000, to appear

18 Idea for Friar Tuck constraint programming tool for sport scheduling convenient entry of constraints through GUI open source, GPL implementation language: Oz using Mozart see

19 Implementation of Friar Tuck special purpose editors for constraint entry access to all phases of the solution process choice between Schreuder and Cain’s methods computes schedules for over 30 teams some new results on number of schedules Martin Henz, Constraint-based Round Robin Tournament Planning, International Conference on Logic Programming, 1999

20 Future Work application specific “constraint language” for sport scheduling re-implementation using Figaro library (under development) using local search for sport scheduling