Infrastructure Finance Districts (IFDs) – The California Case Study Tuesday - August 7, 2012 12:30 pm to 1:45 pm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Senate Bill 70: 2011 Changes to TIF Financing Law J. Craig Smith Kyle C. Fielding.
Advertisements

Bae Fort Monroe Economic Advisory Services Bay Area Economics.
Alternatives to Financing Lake Development Infrastructure in Mississippi Public Improvement Districts and Tax Increment Financing February 4, 2009 Lucien.
California State Association of County Auditors Property Tax Managers’ Sub-committee Thursday, February 5, 2015 Ontario, CA PRESENTED BY Elizabeth W.
Legislative Committee on Education Capital Funding Needs July 15, 2014.
2014 Election Ballot Mill Levy Override #3A For the Elizabeth School District Explained.
BRAC: GETTING THE NEXT ROUND RIGHT BASE REDEVELOPMENT FORUM NOVEMBER 2014.
School Facilities Financing Work Group Summary of Report and Recommendations Tom Melcher School Finance Director, MDE House Education Finance Committee.
1 Assembly Bill x Dissolution Act Thomas P. Clark, Jr., Special Counsel to the City of Santa Ana Acting and Serving as Successor Agency to the Community.
DEBT SERVICE EXTENSION BASE REFERENDUM Hartsburg-Emden District #21.
The Challenges of Providing Services in Unincorporated Areas Best Understood in the context of which services are provided John Benoit, LAFCO Executive.
1 Understanding Revenue Allocation Districts (“RADs”) Prepared for the Jersey City Redevelopment Agency Presented by: Glenn F. Scotland, Esq. & Jennifer.
Massachusetts Community & Banking Council Economic Development Committee June 10, 2010.
1 LAFCO FEES The Statutory and Legal Framework 2010 Annual CALAFCO Meeting Hilton Hotel, Palm Springs Scott Browne.
Child Welfare and Housing Access Summit Harrisonburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority Michael G. Wong, Executive Director.
1 County Budget & Finance Issues. 2 What Counties Do.
California Redevelopment Law E159U: Local Economic Development.
Tools for Redevelopment Courtney Knight Managing Director, Redevelopment Revitalizing Atlanta 1.
Public Campaign Financing in New Mexico. What is Public Campaign Finance?  Public money used to pay all or part of a candidate’s campaign expenses in.
James Pappas, Housing Policy and Preservation Associate California Housing Partnership SCANPH Webinar 03/17/2014.
Tax Increment Financing TIF: A method for funding public investments in an area slated for redevelopment by capturing for a time all or a portion of the.
WHAT THE HAPPENED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN CALIFORNIA!? Steve Andrews Senior Policy Advisor Mayor’s Office of Economic Development City of Los.
Doug Brown October 23, Budget Overview A Budget Planning Process (Overland Park’s) Financial Management.
Financing Tools for Capital Projects Marshall Public Schools School Board Work Session 1 February 2, 2015.
Capital Appreciation Bonds (CABs): Do They Have a Legitimate Role in Municipal & School Finance September 25, 2012 Capitol Public Finance Group · 1900.
Enhanced Infrastructure Finance Districts and Your Community CALED’s 35 th Annual Training Conference April 21, 2015 Presented by Constantine Baranoff.
2009 Payable 2010 Levy Certification Independent School District 196 Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools December 14, 2009 Educating our students.
Introduction to Public Hospital Districts April 25, 2002 Association of Washington Public Hospital Districts.
California Society of Municipal Finance Officers OVERVIEW of ABx1 26 and ABx1 27 Changes to Redevelopment Law August 4, 2011 Presented by Stephanie Downs.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
Old Corvallis Road Urban Renewal Program An Overview May 4 th, 2009.
Latest Developments With Respect To Redevelopment Successor Agencies As of July 2013 Department of Finance Local Government Unit.
Debt Management Overview Presentation to Board of Estimates August 29, 2011.
goldfarb lipman attorneys
Institutional Controls at BRAC Sites July 19, 2011.
3TB Project Review Tax Increment Financing (“TIF”) Overview January 25, 2013.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Presented by: MMASC “Redevelopment 101” A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates October 4, 2001.
Farmington Municipal Schools Two Mill Levy Election.
City of Tallahassee Community Redevelopment Agency Success Stories January 11, 2012 Michael Parker, Executive Director, Tallahassee Community Redevelopment.
2006 ANNUAL CONFERENCE CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING FOR SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Sam Sperry,
Robert E. Josten Dorsey & Whitney LLP 801 Grand Avenue, Suite 4100 Des Moines, Iowa WHAT IS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING? Questions and Answers.
Board of Supervisors Meeting September 13, 2011 Finance Committee Recommendations on Options for County Redevelopment Program.
1 Community Facilities District & Redevelopment Overview January 19, 2008.
Overview of the Transportation Trust On November 5, 2002, Miami-Dade County voters approved a half-penny surtax to implement the People’s Transportation.
What’s In Your Wallet? How Redevelopment Agencies Divert Millions From Public Safety Fire Chief Steve Foster, Cosumnes FD Business Officer John Ebner,
Latest Developments With Respect To Redevelopment Successor Agencies Department of Finance Local Government Unit.
LAO The State Education Budget Legislative Analyst’s Office Presented at: CASBO 2011 Annual Conference April 7, 2011.
Simplifying the Dissolution Process California Department of Finance February 2015.
2010 Legislative Highlights For Redevelopment (Community Development and Urban Renewal) J. Craig Smith Kyle C. Fielding S mith | H artvigsen, PLLC 215.
Created by Way Development Ventures as a public service The following presentation provides background information to assist voters in gaining an understanding.
Goodhue School District 2015 Payable 2016 Truth In Taxation Public Meeting Time: 6:30pm Date: December 21, 2015 at the Goodhue School District Board Room.
Capital Expenditure Recap Refinance Discussion September 8, 2015 Anna Pimentel Director, Fiscal Services Jamie Metcalf Asst. in Training – Director, Fiscal.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 2295 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 250, Sacramento, CA fax presented to California.
An Introduction to Community Facilities District Financing City of Dixon City Council Workshop May 29, 2013 Item 6.2 Distributed at Council Meeting 5/29/2013.
T E F R A H E A R I N G T E F R A H E A R I N G CITY OF STOCKTON TAX-EXEMPT CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION SERIES 2003 (UNITED CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS) Presented.
Joint Public Hearing - Closed Redevelopment Agency & City Council Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan for the North Stockton Redevelopment Project.
Transportation and Transit Funding Options. Opportunities (Sales Tax)  Additional Mass Transit Sales Tax (UCA ) (.25%)  Requires countywide.
Babc.com ALABAMA I DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA I MISSISSIPPI I NORTH CAROLINA I TENNESSEE Overview of Industrial Development Board TIFs The City of Spring Hill.
Recovery Zone Bonds Resolution No Excerpt from webinar presentation by: MO Department of Economic Development and Gilmore Bell.
What is Tax Increment Financing?
WHAT IS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING? Questions and Answers About TIF
Community Improvement Districts County Counselors Association of Kansas Annual Meeting November 15, 2010 Janet S. Garms
Discussion Topics Election Results Capital Facilities Financing
Overview of property tax levies for Idaho Schools
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AUGUST 24, 2017 REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH.
Presented by: Deborah Early Icenogle Seaver Pogue, P.C.
League of California Cities
Getting the Most Out of Alternative Financing Sources
GATEWAY CITIES Gateway Cities agenda CONFERENCE Draft recommendations
Presentation transcript:

Infrastructure Finance Districts (IFDs) – The California Case Study Tuesday - August 7, :30 pm to 1:45 pm

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 3 3 Panelists  Mr. Michael Wright, Director, Community Reuse Planning, City of Concord, CA  Robert M. Haight, Jr., Partner, Goodwin Procter, Los Angeles, CA  Suheil Totah, Executive Vice President, Lennar Urban Development, San Francisco, CA Moderator  Ms. Kristie Reimer – Associate Vice President, ARCADIS–US, Marina, CA

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 4 4 Background  Redevelopment project financing is complex, and adequate funding for infrastructure improvements are critical to overall project success.  In February 2012, 400 redevelopment agencies throughout the State of California were abolished.  Redevelopment agencies used a portion of property tax money (tax increment) in partnership with developers to encourage development in blighted areas.  This equated to billions of dollars per year in tax revenues – a portion of which were allocated to support redevelopment on former military installations.  Reuse and redevelopment of former military bases is a complicated process, and in now in California it is even more challenging without these fiscal tools.  LRAs are promoting State law amendment to provide an easier process to create Infrastructure Financing Districts (IFDs); allowing a percentage of tax increment used to fund public infrastructure improvements.

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 5 5 Focus of the Panel  This session will provide details on IFDs, their applicability and potential benefits to BRAC sites.  Various perspectives will be presented:  Local Reuse Authority viewpoint and realities  Legal interpretations and aspects  Developer experience and outlook  Session Outline  Background / Impact from loss of Redevelopment  IFD Options and Application  Legislation  Implications to Redevelopment  Panelist will engage in an active discussion and encourage an open Q&A discussion

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 6 6 Impact from Loss of Redevelopment  Loss of tax increment for infrastructure + affordable housing contribution by municipalities  Impact is to recently closed bases and early round closures that have progressed to issuing bonds  Reduced attractiveness of reuse of closed bases  Adds years to development build-out

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 7 7 IFDs  What are they?  What can they do?  Are they a substitute for RDAs?

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 8 8 IFDs: The Drew Barrymore of Public Finance Drew BarrymoreIFDs Drew is Offspring of Famous Parentage (i.e., the Barrymore family). IFDs are Offspring of Famous Parentage (i.e., Mello-Roos CFDs and RDAs). At a young age, Drew made a movie (E.T.) that has thrilled children for decades. At a young age, IFDs financed a theme park (Legoland) that has thrilled children for decades. After early success, Drew fell into obscurity.After early success, IFDs fell into obscurity. Drew went through rehab to fix her problems. IFDs now going through rehab (legislatively) to fix its problems. Drew rediscovered in her early 20’s.IFDs rediscovered in its early 20’s. Drew marked her comeback taking over role made famous by another (Farrah Fawcett) in reboot of well-known franchise (Charlie’s Angels). IFDs mark its comeback by taking over role made famous by another (RDAs) in reboot of well-known financing vehicle (tax increment).

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 9 9 IFDs  IFD legislation enacted in  Only two IFDs in existence:  City of Carlsbad (Legoland Improvements) (early 90’s)  City of San Francisco (Rincon Hill) (2011)  Hybrid of Mello-Roos CFD Law and RDA Law.

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE Formation of IFDs (Like a CFD) IFDsCFDs Resolution of Intention (ROI) (to form IFD and to authorize issuance of bonds) Yes ReportInfrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) (very detailed) Community Facilities District Report (very simple) Public Hearing60 days notice after IFP30 days notice after ROI Resolution of FormationYes Resolution Calling ElectionYes

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE Formation of IFDs (Like a CFD) IFDsCFDs Waiver of Election Time and Formalities? 100% of Qualified Electors Qualified Electors Registered Voters if 12 or more in territory 90 days prior to public hearing; otherwise Landowners. Same Election (on IFD formation and to authorize issuance of bonds) 2/3 Vote of Qualified Electors Voting Same OrdinanceYes (to create IFD)Yes (to levy special taxes)

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE Financing Method (Like an RDA) IFDsRDAs Revenue SourceTax Increment (of Issuer and Consenting Taxing Entities Only) Tax Increment (of All Taxing Entities and ERAF) Term of Tax Increment30 yearsUp to 45 Years LocationMay not be formed over property that is, or ever was, in a RDA Project Area N/A Pass-Through AgreementsNoYes Housing Set-AsideNoYes (20%)

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE IFDs (Unlike an RDA)  Participation in an IFD is 100% voluntary:  Tax increment that is usually paid to an “affected taxing entity” may NOT be allocated to an IFD without the affected taxing entity’s explicit approval.  Education districts may not participate in IFDs.  ERAF not allocated to IFDs.  IFDs formed only by City or County.

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE Other IFD Restrictions  Facilities  Public Capital Facilities only (no private facilities).  Useful Life of 15 Years or greater.  Finding of Community-Wide Significance.  Finding that Facilities benefit an area larger than the IFD.  Only “completed” Facilities may be acquired.

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE Other IFD Restrictions  Housing  Like RDAs:  Housing that is destroyed by development must be replaced.  Unlike RDAs:  No tax increment set aside.  If the IFD finances public housing, then 20% of units must be set aside for affordable housing.  No Eminent Domain powers.

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE So Why Aren’t IFDs More Popular?  IFDs can’t be formed in a former RDA project area.  Voluntary nature of IFDs drastically reduces tax increment amounts.  30-year life limits bond financing capacity.  Less flexible than RDAs.  More complicated than CFDs.

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE Infrastructure Financing Districts Alternative to Redevelopment  Existing sections of California Government Code and Health Safety Code allow for formation of IFD  Existing law is restrictive and cumbersome in terms of formation and operation of a District  Six basic goals for change  Waive existing District formation restrictions  Streamline formation requirements  Extend term of the District  Match affordable housing requirements to Redevelopment  Expand definitions for use of funds  Affected tax entities control

ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 18 Redevelopment/IFD Comparison Redevelopment 780,000,000 IFD Scenario 1 City share only 84,420,000 IFD Scenario 2 City + County 335,000,000 IFD Scenario 3 City/County/ERAF 387,920,000

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE Legislative “Fixes” in the Works  AB 2144 (Perez)  Renames IFDs “Infrastructure and Revitalization Financing Districts”.  Removes RDA Project Area restriction.  Extends tax increment life to 40 years from date of Ordinance, or such later date as set forth in Ordinance.  Allows certain private facilities, including housing.  Lowers vote to 55% (from 2/3).  No vote required for former military bases under certain circumstances.

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE Legislative “Fixes” in the Works  SB 214 (Wolk)  Creates new “Public Financing Authority” to be appointed by Issuer.  Removes RDA Project Area restriction.  Extends tax increment life to 40 years.  Eliminates voting requirement for formation and bond authorization.  Allows for tax increment to be used for maintenance of constructed facilities.  Imposes public accountability measures.

2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE Legislative “Fixes” in the Works  SB 1156 (Steinberg)  Creates new “Sustainable Communities Investment Authority” (SCIA) as a substitute for RDAs (not IFDs).  For transit oriented and sustainable communities only through Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs).  SCIA formed by County, or as joint powers agency with City and County.  SCIA has all powers of an RDA.  If joint powers agency, tax increment generated from both City and County (but not ERAF).