THE NEW PENSION ACCOUNTING AND ITS IMPACT ON FUNDING CSFMO Oakland, California February 21, 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of New Pension Accounting Requirements Under GASB Statements No. 67 and No. 68 September 2013.
Advertisements

Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to House Appropriations Committee _____________________________________.
1 GASB 68 Accounting and Reporting for Pensions an Amendment of GASB Statement No. 27 Presented by: Kevin S. Wong, CPA Gilbert Associates, Inc.
League of Minnesota Cities Fiscal Futures Policy Committee August 28, 2013 Presented by: Dave DeJonge, Assistant Executive Director, PERA.
Technical Update Presented by Chris Ray Partner - KPMG LLP KPMG LLP.
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
GASB Pension Standards: An Educational Overview PEBA Retirement Division GFOA Fall Conference October 12,
Pat Robertson Executive Director September 2014 GASB Pension Standards Update.
Communicating the Facts on GASB 68
Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to Senate Finance Committee _____________________________________.
Pension Accounting and Financial Reporting GASB Invitation to Comment The views expressed in this presentation are those of Mr. Bean. Official positions.
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting Clinic VII McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Auxiliary Organizations GASB Statement No. 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions Sheralin Klinthong, Associate Director, FS / SFSR Chancellor’s.
California Society of Municipal Finance Officers Pension Accounting and Financial Reporting: A Work in Progress The views expressed in this presentation.
GASB Technical Update Mark Thomas KPMG LLP Year-End GAAP Training April 18, 2014.
April 8, Statement No. 65, Items Previously Recorded as Assets and Liabilities Statement No. 67, Financial Reporting for Pension Plans-an amendment.
2013 SALGBA Regional Conference Change in GASB Liability Rules Alisa Bennett Cavanaugh Macdonald Consulting September 9, 2013.
GASB 68 Employer Training Presenters: Shelley Johnson Foster & Foster System Actuary for LASERS and TRSL Artie Fillastre LASERS Chief Financial Officer.
GASB’S REVISED PENSION STANDARDS: What Arizona’s Governmental Employers Need for 2015 DONNA MILLER, ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL NANCY BENNETT,
TECHNICAL UPDATE (Auxiliary Organizations) Mark Thomas KPMG LLP Year-End GAAP Training May 28, 2014.
Upcoming GASB Changes 1 Presented by Darla Iverson Glenna Musselman Chief Financial Officer Senior Accountant Presented by Darla Iverson Glenna Musselman.
Pension Accounting GASB Pension Accounting and Financial Reporting - Overview SAAABA Annual Business Seminar– April 18, 2012 Cindy Peters – Accountant.
Copyright © 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. GASB Statements 67 & 68 – Audit & Budget Committee Discount Rate and Allocation of Assets/Liabilities.
IMPLEMENTING GASB 68 Nashville Electric Service Mark Weber, Controller Brian Covington, Accounting Supervisor.
Presented by Frank Crawford, CPA President, Crawford & Associates, P.C. (twitter) 1.
The State of Our Governmental Pension Plans AGA - Fall Professional Development Seminar November 6, 2013.
Well, Now That That's Over... What We Learned and What to Communicate About Pension Auditing Year 1 is ____ V Plan V NSAA 2015 Annual Conference June 10,
1 Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 19.
GASB Standards on Pensions
Precision Experience Assurance The New Pension Standards GASB Statements 67 and 68 Milestone Professional Services, CPE Day September 13, 2013, Kissimmee.
GASB UPDATE Presented by:Brian A. Ritschel, CPA Manager 1.
1 Your Tilted Balance Sheet – GASB 68 Overview Presented by: Kevin S. Wong, CPA Gilbert Associates, Inc. September 12, 2013.
Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota An Overview of GASB 68 for Cost-Sharing Plans Dave DeJonge Assistant Executive Director, PERA.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
GASB 45 at SMCCCD District Committee on Budget and Finance October 3, 2006.
GASB Pension Reporting Update Minnesota Society of CPAs: School District Audit Conference June 2, 2014 Presented by: Dave DeJonge, Assistant Executive.
OPEBs: Implementation Issues for Public Power Joni Davis, Manager Financial Accounting and Reporting Omaha Public Power District September 27, 2005.
Inside the New GASB Pensions Standards Municipal Analysts Group of New York February 15, 2013 Thad Calabrese, Assistant Professor, NYU Dean Michael Mead,
GASB 68 From the Employer’s Perspective © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC Laura Self, Manager Columbia, South Carolina.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning Unit #6.
GASB 68 & 71, PERS and the Impact on Mississippi Entities
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Unit 6 Seminar Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.
County of Riverside ■ Office of the Auditor-Controller GASB Statement No. 45 Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Other Postemployment Benefits.
Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve MAPERS 2012 Conference GASB Update July 12, 2012 Presented by:
Joint Presentation of the Auditor of Public Accounts and the Virginia Retirement System GASB 68 Implementation Virginia Association of School Business.
Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota GASB 68 Webinar: Employers’ Road Map to Successful Implementation July 23, 2015 Presented by the Public.
James Marta CPA, CGMA, ARPM Ken Hearnsberger, Finance Manager NBSIA Matt Nethaway, CPA 1.
GASB 67 & 68 Disclosures Implementing and Auditing GASB’s New Pension Standards.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Presentation to the Joint Board of Supervisors.
Governmental Accounting Pensions and Other Postemployment Benefits Local Government Corporation.
Governmental Accounting and Standards Board Pension Accounting Changes September 10, 2013.
Prepared by Aon Hewitt Retirement and Investment Consulting Presentation to Iowa School Districts Changes in Postemployment Benefit Accounting July 2015.
Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Results of the January 1, 2015 GASB 45 Valuation September 22, 2015 Linda L. Bournival, FSA Consulting Actuary KMS Actuaries,
Presented by: Chris Pembrook, CPA, MBA, CGAP, Cr.FA Frank Crawford, CPA @fcrawfordcpa.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. MGFOA Annual Meeting 2016 OPEB and GASB 74/75 May 11, 2016 Daniel J. Rhodes, FSA, MAAA Vice.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning.
THE BASICS OF THE GASB OPEB CALCULATION PRESENTED BY: MARK VAN BUSKIRK, PHD, ASA, MAAA HOLMES MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 23,
GASB’s OPEB Changes - Will they impact public sector health care benefits? November 7, 2014 Eric Gary, FSA, FCA, MAAA Chief Health Actuary.
Senior Vice President, Assurance Services
GASB 67 and 68 and PERA’s Schedule of Employer Allocations
The New GASB 74/75 StandardS
GASB 68-Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions
Other Post Employment Benefits
GASB 75 Employer Reporting Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB)
Beth Wright Managing Director
GASB 67 and 68: Pension Fund Reporting
Pension Regulations Presented by David Maccoux, CPA, Shareholder
GASB Update Colorado pera
Presentation transcript:

THE NEW PENSION ACCOUNTING AND ITS IMPACT ON FUNDING CSFMO Oakland, California February 21,

GASB STATEMENT NO. 68 Summary of changes 2

Our focus Employers in single employer and agent multiple- employer defined benefit plans Employers in cost-sharing plans 3

SINGLE-EMPLOYER AND AGENT PLANS Changes for employers 4

Preliminary Only relevant for economic resources measurement focus and accrual basis of accounting No effect on governmental funds Report expenditures rather than expense No effect on fund balance 5

Key changes 1. Employer liability 2. Employer expense 3. Discount rate 4. Actuarial method 5. Amortization 6. Timing 6

1. Employer liability Now: Annual required contribution (ARC) Less: Actual contributions Net pension obligation (NPO) Future: Total pension liability (TPL) Less: Fiduciary net position (FNP) Net pension liability (NPL) 7

Employer liability - Illustration 8

2. Employer expense Now: Calculation tied to funding ARC adjusted for the cumulative effect of prior differences between required contributions and actual contributions Future: Calculation tied to cost Changes in the net pension liability (NPL) 9

Components of expense Annual service cost Interest on the net pension liability Projected earnings on plan investments The full effect of any changes in benefit terms Amortization of deferred outflows/inflows of resources 10

3. Discount rate Now: Estimated long-term investment yield for the plan, with consideration given to the nature and mix of current and expected plan investments Future: Modification necessary if it is expected that FNP will not be sufficient to pay benefits to active employees and retirees Single blended rate 11

Discount rate – single blended rate Single rate equivalent to the combined effect of using the following rates: For projected cash flows up to the point the FNP will be sufficient Long-term expected rate of return on plan investments For projected cash flows beyond that point A yield or index rate on tax-exempt 20-year, Aa-or-higher rated municipal bonds. 12

4. Actuarial method Now: Whatever actuarial method is used for funding Six acceptable methods Must be applied within parameters defined by GASB Future: No tie to actuarial method used for funding All employers will use the entry age method for accounting and financial reporting purposes (with service cost determined as a percentage of pay) 13

5. Amortization Background Circumstances that could affect the net pension liability (NPL) A. Changes in benefit terms B. Changes in economic and demographic assumptions C. Differences between economic and demographic assumptions and actual experience (other than investment returns) D. Differences between expected and actual investment returns Now: Effect amortized over a period not to exceed 30 years Future: Effect to be amortized over a much shorter period Different periods, depending on the circumstances 14

Future amortization periods A. Changes in benefit terms Immediate recognition B. Changes in economic and demographic assumptions Closed period equal to average remaining service period of plan members (average remaining service period of retirees = 0 years) C. Differences between economic and demographic assumptions and actual experience (other than investment returns) Closed period equal to average remaining service period of plan members (average remaining service period of retirees = 0 years) D. Differences between expected and actual investment returns Closed 5-year period (including current period) 15

6. Timing Now: Timing of actuarial valuation Within 24 months of start of valuation period Future: Measurement date for assets and TPL No earlier than 1 year + 1 day prior to reporting date Actuarial valuation date Up to 30 months before employer reporting date Update to “roll forward” to measurement date 16

COST-SHARING PLANS Changes for employers 17

Key changes 1. Employer liability 2. Employer expense 18

1. Employer liability (cost-sharing) Now: Liability only if employer contribution is less than the contractually required amount Future: Liability equal to the employer’s proportionate share of the total NPL of all participating employers 19

2. Employer expense (cost-sharing) Now: Expense = contractually required contribution Future: Expense = employer’s proportionate share of total pension expense of all participating employers 20

EFFECTIVE DATE Employers 21

Effective date of GASB Statement No. 68 Implementation first required Fiscal year ending 6/30/15 Earlier application encouraged Requires cooperation of the pension plan 22

FUNDING CHALLENGE Accounting v. funding 23

Background: Historic contribution of GASB Statement No. 27 Set parameters to ensure reasonable application of actuarial methods Displayed whether employers were meeting the goal of systematic and rational funding each period Highlighted the cumulative financial impact of underfunded contributions Information on funding progress also provided Notes Required supplementary information (RSI). 24

Changes resulting from GASB Statement No. 68 Elimination of GASB parameters Compromises the usefulness of the actuarially determined contribution (ADC) for other purposes by eliminating standardization No automatic requirement to provide information on funding progress Required only if an ADC is calculated or contribution is statutorily mandated 25

DEVELOPMENT OF PENSION FUNDING GUIDELINES Response to GASB Statement No

Objective Provide guidance on funding in the wake of GASB Statement No. 68 Take advantage of the fact that GASB Statement No. 68 requires the presentation of funding data if an ADC is used for funding purposes 27

Task force Convening organization – Center for State and Local Government Excellence Membership “Big seven” Other organizations invited to participate 28

“Big seven” National Governors Association (NGA) National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) Council of State Governments (CSG) National Association of Counties (NACo) National League of Cities (NLC) U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM) International City/County Management Association (ICMA) 29

Other participating organizations National Association of State Auditors, Comptrollers and Treasurers (NASACT) Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) National Association of State Retirement Administrators (NASRA) National Council on Teacher Retirement (NCTR) 30

Approach Closely modeled on the work of the California Actuarial Advisory Panel 31

Structure Five policy objectives Starting point = funding based upon an actuarially determined ARC Application of policy objectives to three core elements Actuarial costs Asset smoothing Amortization policy Recognition that employers may need to adopt a transition plan to phase in the new practices over a period of years. 32

General policy objectives Actuarially Determined Contributions Funding Discipline Intergenerational equity Contributions as a stable percentage of payroll Accountability and transparency 33

Actuarially determined contributions A pension funding plan should be based upon an actuarially determined annual required contribution (ARC) that incorporates both the cost of benefits in the current year and the amortization of the plan’s unfunded actuarial accrued liability. 34

Funding discipline A commitment to make timely, actuarially determined contributions to the retirement system is needed to ensure that sufficient assets are available for all current and future retirees. 35

Intergenerational equity Annual contributions should be reasonably related to the expected and actual cost of each year of service. 36

Contributions as a stable percentage of payroll Contributions should be managed so that employer costs remain consistent as a percentage of payroll over time. 37

Accountability and transparency Clear reporting of pension funding should include an assessment of whether, how, and when the plan sponsor will meet the funding requirements of the plan. 38

NEXT STEPS FOR GFOA Best Practices 39

Overall best practice “Guidelines for Funding Defined Benefit Pensions” Every state and local government that offers defined benefit pensions should formally adopt a funding policy that provides reasonable assurance that the cost of those benefits will be funded in an equitable and sustainable manner. Such a funding policy should incorporate each of the four principles and objectives 1. Obtain ADC 2. Balance stable contributions and equitable allocation 3. Commit to funding full amount (with transition period, if needed) 4. Provide information needed to assess funding progress 40

1. Obtain ADC Every government employer that offers defined benefit pensions should continue to obtain no less than biennially an actuarially determined contribution (ADC) to serve as the basis for its contributions 41

2. Balance contributions/allocation The ADC should be calculated in a manner that fully funds the long-term costs of promised benefits, while balancing the goals of 1) keeping contributions relatively stable and 2) equitably allocating the costs over the employees’ period of active service 42

3. Commit to funding full amount Every government employer that offers defined benefit pensions should make a commitment to fund the full amount of the ADC each period. For some government employers, a reasonable transition period will be necessary before this objective can be accomplished 43

4. Transparency Every government employer that offers defined benefit pensions should demonstrate accountability and transparency by communicating all of the information necessary for assessing the government’s progress toward meeting its pension funding objectives 44

Future best practices The GFOA intends to develop additional best practices that will provide specific guidance on the practical application of these principles and objectives to each of the three core elements of a comprehensive pension funding policy 1. Actuarial cost method 2. Asset smoothing 3. Amortization. 45

AUDITING CHALLENGE Participants in multiple-employer plans 46

Cost-sharing plans Issues: Who should calculate the allocation percentages? Who should calculate the allocated pension amounts? 47

Potential solution 1 Opinion from plan auditor on 1. Supplemental schedule of employer allocations in plan financial statements 2. Either: a. Supplemental schedule of plan pension amounts Net pension liability Deferred outflows Deferred inflows Pension expense b. Supplemental schedule of employer pension amounts 48

Example 49

Example 50

Agent multiple-employer plans Issue: Employer assurance regarding the following amounts as of measurement date Total pension liability - fiduciary net position = net pension liability Deferred outflows/inflows Investment experience Changes in assumptions Actuarial gains and losses Pension expense 51

Potential solution – fiduciary net position Opinion from plan auditor on Supplemental condensed schedule of changes in fiduciary position (by employer) SOC 1 (type 2) report from plan auditor on Allocation of plan inflows to individual employer accounts Contributions Investment income Allocation of plan outflows to individual employer accounts Benefit payments Administrative expenses 52

Example 53

Potential solution – other amounts Plan auditor Engaged to issue SOC 1 (type 2) report on census data controlled by plan (retired employees) Plan actuary Issues separate actuarial report for each participating employer which includes net pension liability, deferred outflows/inflows by type and year, pension expense, and discount rate calculation Employer auditor tests census data of active employees and confirms actuarial information used by actuary Employer and employer auditor Responsible for validating deferred outflows/inflows and pension expense related to individual employer 54