Kristian Zarb Adami Pathfinders for the SKA: Nlog(N) vs. N 2 Imaging Instruments:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SKA New Technology Demonstrator Ray Norris CSIRO Australia Telescope National Facility.
Advertisements

Beamformer implementations (Mike Jones, Kris Zarb Adami, David Sinclair, Chris Shenton) Starting with top level considerations for now, ie Not, which FPGA.
SKAMP Square Kilometre Array Molonglo Prototype. Supporting Institutions  University of Sydney  Argus Technologies  ATNF  ICT Centre.
Paul Alexander DS3 & DS3-T3 SKADS Review 2006 DS3 The Network and its Output Data Paul Alexander.
Cosmology using 21 cm emission Jeff Peterson, CMU Talk 1…Update on early ionization telescopes (LOFAR, PAST, GMRT) Talk 2…Proposed Redshift survey.
Schediwy: Advantages and Disadvantages of Sparse Aperture Arrays Fermilab: October 2009.
System designAA Consortium - BolognaOctober 2012 AA Consortium AA System configuration options 23 October 2012.
SKAMP - the Molonglo SKA Demonstrator M.J. Kesteven CSIRO ATNF, T. J. Adams, D. Campbell-Wilson, A.J. Green E.M. Sadler University of Sydney, J.D. Bunton,
PELICAN Imaging Framework Imaging on short timescales leads to very large correlator output data rates. In order to cope with these rates and produce updated.
Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy 1 ASTRON is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) From LOFAR design to SKA1 System.
BDT Radio – 2a – CMV 2009/10/06 Basic Detection Techniques 2a (2009/10/06): Array antennas Theory: interferometry & synthesis arrays Introduction Optical.
BDT Radio – 2b – CMV 2009/10/09 Basic Detection Techniques 2b (2009/10/09): Focal Plane Arrays Case study: WSRT System overview Receiver and.
Sascha D-PAD Sparse Aperture Array.
Cylindrical Reflector SKA Update
The SKA Molonglo Prototype (SKAMP) Project SKA Meeting - April 2006 Anne Green.
The Murchison Widefield Array: an SKA Precursor Shep Doeleman - MIT Haystack For the MWA Project.
ATA Antennas Feeds and Systems NSF Review 8/05/08 Jack Welch.
Performance of station array configurations Sparse vs. Dense, Regular vs Random Jaap D. Bregman AAVP Workshop,Cambridge,
Dec 2010 AAVP Cambridge workshop AAVP AAVS1/2-low demonstrators Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate.
Keith Grainge Calibration requirementsAAVP 2010 Calibration and Imaging Requirements Keith Grainge (plus teams at ASTRON, Oxford, Cambridge)
Paul Alexander Dynamic RangeAAVP 2010 Overview of Calibration and Dynamic Range Challenges Paul Alexander.
AA-mid demonstrator Dion Kant AAVP – 10 December 2010, Cambridge, UK.
LOFAR Antenna Systems Dion Kant, Wim van Cappellen AAVP – 10 December 2010, Cambridge, UK.
CSIRO. Paul Roberts Digital Receivers SKANZ 2012 Digital Receivers for Radio Astronomy Paul Roberts CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science Engineering Development.
Name1 SKA(DS) System Design Aspects 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 SKA(DS) System Design Aspects: building a system Laurens Bakker.
Highly Scalable Packetised correlators Jason Manley CASPER workshop 2009.
AA-Low Technical Progress Meeting, October 2012, Medicina, Italy AAVS0 & AAVS0.5: System Design and Test Plan Nima Razavi-Ghods Eloy de Lera Acedo.
Backend electronics for radioastronomy G. Comoretto.
ASKAP Signal Processing Overview DIFX Users and Developers Meeting
Solar observation modes: Commissioning and operational C. Vocks and G. Mann 1. Spectrometer and imaging modes 2. Commissioning proposals 3. Operational.
FPGA-based Dedispersion for Fast Transient Search John Dickey 23 Nov 2005 Orange, NSW.
Dual Polarisation All Digital Aperture Array Danny Price, University of Oxford CASPER Workshop 2009, Cape Town SA A 2-PAD Correlator, Holography, and Direct.
S. Montebugnoli 2 nd SKADS Workshop October 2007 Stelio Montebugnoli IRA - INAF- Italy.
Road to MeerKAT KAT-7 DBE Alan Langman. meerKAT Overview Objectives of meerKAT Location Location Location MeerKAT Engineering Specification Prototypes.
NTD/xNTD Signal Processing Presented by: John Bunton Signal Processing team: Joseph Pathikulangara, Jayasri Joseph, Ludi de Souza and John Bunton Plus.
XNTD/SKAMP/LFD Correlator 4th RadioNet Engineering Forum Workshop Next Generation Correlators for Radio Astronomy and Geodesy June 2006, Groningen,
Casper Signal Processing Workshop 2009 SKA Signal Processing (Preliminary) Wallace Turner Domain Specialist for Signal Processing.
Rosie Bolton SKADS Workshop April 10th 2008 SKADS Costing work: beyond the benchmark scenario Rosie Bolton Paul Alexander, Andy Faulkner and SKADS Costing.
Next Generation Digital Back-ends at the GMRT Yashwant Gupta Yashwant Gupta National Centre for Radio Astrophysics Pune India CASPER meeting Cambridge.
Mileura Widefield Array – Low Frequency Demonstrator MHz * Currently in “Early Deployment” phase Goal: HI at redshift 6 to 17.
© ASTRON On the Fly LOFAR Station Correlator André W. Gunst.
CASPER Packetised correlators Jason Manley CASPER workshop 2009.
Integrated receivers for mid-band SKA Suzy Jackson Engineer, Australia Telescope National Facility SKADS FP6 Meeting – Chateau de Limelette – 4-6 November,
1 Advanced ATNF Correlators Dick Ferris AT Electronics Development Group May 2003.
Andrew Faulkner 2 nd SKADS Workshop October 2007 SKADS Benchmark Scenario Andrew Faulkner.
Australian Astronomy MNRF Development of Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuits (MMIC) ATCA Broadband Backend (CABB)
MeerKAT DBE Past Present Future Alan Langman 28 September 2009.
ASKAP Capabilities John Reynolds on behalf of the SEIC and ASKAP team.
S.Montebugnoli BEST 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 Stelio Montebugnoli IRA -INAF- Bologna –Italy- SKADS 4th -Lisbon- Oct 2-3, 2008.
Kristian Zarb Adami Danny Price M E Jones & the AADC Single vs Dual Band Considerations Instruments:
Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) : Design and Status Divya Oberoi, Lenoid Benkevitch MIT Haystack Observatory doberoi, On behalf.
Ariadne’s Thread Kristian Zarb Adami. Simulator Aims ۞ Provide the system architect a tool to visualise trade-offs in designs ۞ Provide the scientist.
ASKAP: Setting the scene Max Voronkov ASKAP Computing 23 rd August 2010.
The Allen Telescope Array Douglas Bock Radio Astronomy Laboratory University of California, Berkeley Socorro, August 23, 2001.
A real-time software backend for the GMRT : towards hybrid backends CASPER meeting Capetown 30th September 2009 Collaborators : Jayanta Roy (NCRA) Yashwant.
ATCA GPU Correlator Strawman Design ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE Chris Phillips | LBA Lead Scientist 17 November 2015.
Rosie Bolton 2 nd SKADS Workshop October 2007 SKADS System Design and Costing: Update and next steps Rosie Bolton University of Cambridge.
1 Advanced ATNF Correlators Dick Ferris AT Electronics Group.
Keith Grainge Calibration issuesAA-low Technical Progress meeting Calibration Issues Keith Grainge.
Andrew Faulkner April 2016 STFC Industry Day: Low Frequency Aperture Array Andrew Faulkner Project Engineer.
Multi-beaming & Wide Field Surveys
Digital Receivers for Radio Astronomy
Medichats 14 October 2008 ADC bit number and input power needed, in new radio-astronomical applications View of the Medicina Radiotelescopes - Italy Eng.
AAVS1 Calibration Aperture Array Design & Construction Consortium
Signal Processing for Aperture Arrays
Phased Array Feeds Wim van Cappellen
Aperture Array Station Processing
Some Design and Calibration Considerations for Dense Aperture Arrays
Technical Foundations & Enabling Technologies – DS4
Aperture Array Simulations
Presentation transcript:

Kristian Zarb Adami Pathfinders for the SKA: Nlog(N) vs. N 2 Imaging Instruments:

N log N Astronomy

In fact...  Japan designed the SKA in 1994  8x8 Images in 1994 with Waseda telescope  Extrapolating with Moore’s Law  (doubling every 18 months)  2016 is 1x10 6 antennas  Which is equivalent to SKA-phase-1

Remit of the talk  Science Justification for SKA 1 -Low  Science and Technical simulations towards implementation of the SKA  Physical Implementation on Medicina as a flexible DSP test-bed and a comparison between spatial-FFT and N 2 imaging  Industrial Engagement

SKA Phase-1 Specifications Memo 125

Sensitive (-ity) Issues.. [SKA Memo 100]

Roadmap to the SKA-lo N BW (16,32) (16,60) (1,768) (25,192) (400,50x2xNbeams) Super Terp LOFAR UK GMRT Medicina SKA-1 (32, 64) MWA-32 LOFAR (8,50x2xNbeams) LWA (78,100) (32, 1024) MWA-512 PAPER (100,128) MITEOR (25,16)

H1-Power Spectrum (z≈8) Theoretical 21-cm Power 150 MHz Power Spectrum from a (100,256) instrument Foregrounds suppressed by frequency/angle differencing

NlogN vs. N 2 LOFAR 2010 Super-Terp 2011 SKA-Phase 1 SKA-Phase 2

HI Power Spectra (SKA-Phase-II) Blue: HI > 10 8 Green: HI > 20’ Linear Bias = 1.0 Linear bias = 0.8 Co-moving Volume = (500MPc/h) 3

SKA 1 Low Layout 100km 200m

 Bandwidth 70 – 450 MHz (Instantaneous B/W 380 MHz)  ADC Sampling at 1 8-bit  Antenna Spacing ~ 2.6m  Array Configuration:  50 stations  11,200 antennas per station (~10,000)  Output beams of 2-bit real; 2-bit imag The numbers game (SKA 1 -low)

Numbers cont...  SKA-1 ~ 50 stations of 10,000 antennas each  Station diameter ≈ 200m  Station 70 MHz ≈ MHz ≈ 0.2 ○  N baselines = 5,000 (50^2/2 *4)  Input data rate to station 160 Tb/s (total data rate 8 Pb/s for the SKA-1 lo)  Output rate?  Assume 10 Tb/s off station = 100 x 100Gb/s fibres  Output beams 2+2 bits, ~100kHz channels (1.6Mbps per beam-channel)  6.25 million beam-channels – by DFT need 0.1 Pop/s ( channels)  Equalise sky coverage so N(f) ~f 2 – 100 beams in lowest (70 – 70.1 MHz) channel  100 sq deg instantaneous coverage.  Correlator has to do 1,000 baselines for each 1 kHz beam-channel  (for a total ~ 10 Pop/s)

Station Architecture

Station Layout Richard Armstrong – Tile Processor Tile Processor Tile Processor Tile Processor Station Processor Optical Fibre Copper

Hierarchical Architecture Antennas Multiply and add by weights Cross correlation of sub-arrays (for station calibration and ionospheric calibration) Hierarchical Beam Forming (tiles then station) Tile Level Weights Station Level Weights Direct Station Beam Forming Station Weights Sub-Station Cross-correlation (calibration)? Sub-Station Weights Tile level Electronic Calibration Field or Strong Source Calibration ~CAS-A Source & Polarisation Calibration Polarisation Calibration

Tile processor box RF in (coax) 16 x dual pol Multi-chip module Fibre: Data out Clock and control in Reg DC in

Tile Processor ADCADC ADCADC ADCADC ADCADC Coarse freq splitting 1 st Level Beamforming RFI Mitigation & 4-bit Quantisation Tile Processor Inputs: 16 dual-pol antennas 8-bit Coarse frequency splitting Into 4 channels Outputs: dual-pol 4-bit re/4-bit imag Output is optical Control and Calibration Interface

Space-Frequency Beamforming Time-delay beamforming is now an option… Dense mid-freq array: Antenna sep ~ 20cm Time step ~ 1ns ~ 30 cm Angle step > 45 deg Sparse low-freq array: Antenna sep ~2 m Time step ~ 1ns ~ 30 cm Angle step ~10 deg – less if interpolate Front end unit can combine space-freq beamforming in a single FIR-like structure Golden Rule: throw away redundant data before spending energy processing/transporting it

Station processor Optical- electro Heirarchical processor Electro- optical Multi-chip module M&C Optical- electro Heirarchical processor Electro- optical Multi-chip module M&C Optical- electro Heirarchical processor Electro- optical Multi-chip module M&C Optical- electro Heirarchical processor Electro- optical Multi-chip module M&C Optical- electro Heirarchical processor Electro- optical Multi-chip module M&C Clock & control

Station Processor 2 nd Level Beamforming 2 nd Level Channelisation Corner Turner Station Calibration and Correlator Inputs: 64-dual pol 1 st stage beams Outputs: selectable dual-pol 2-bit re/2-bit imag Channelisation to 4096 channels With a 1024 channeliser Station Calibration and station correlator Output is optical and correlator ready

Simulations

Multi-Level Beamforming  Split the problem to be hierarchical and parallel.  Station divided into tiles (can be logical).  Dump as much unwanted data as we can early on. Tile beam Station beams

Simple Beam Patterns 80 x 80 degrees: Station beam at (45, 87) degrees.Tile beam at zenith.

Visualisation of beams Elevation degrees 1000 MHz antennas, 256 tiles Station beams 0.05 degrees apart Tile beams 2 degrees apart 27 tile beams, station beams Run time: 5.67 seconds Station beams 0.20 degrees apart Tile beams 2 degrees apart 27 tile beams, 8005 station beams Run time: 2.18 seconds

Dynamic Range Simulation Courtesy: S. Schediwy & Danny Price This is the reason a correlator is required for a beamformer

Auto-power beam Peak power 0 dB Array station sparsed x3 Cross-power beam 3deg rotation Peak power -20dB Cross-power beam 30 deg rotation Peak power -50dB

Examples of Implementation

Introduction 564m 24 segments 640m 64 cylinders 32m dish Medicina Radio Telescopes BEST-2 BEST-3Lo

BEST-2 specs N cylinders8 N receivers32 Total collecting area m 2 Total effective area m 2 Central Freq.408 MHz Frequency BW16 MHz IF30MHz Longest baseline N/S E/W 70m 17.04m Primary FOV37.65 deg 2 Sensitivity / Antenna Gain K/Jy Aeff / Tsys m 2 /K Transit time at delta = 45 deg sec. Marco Bartolini, IRA - INAF

64- Channel ADC F - ROACH X - ROACH S - ROACH B - ROACH HOST - PC GPU Imaging & Calibration GPU Transient 1Gb-E 10 Gb-e Richard Griffin Jack PCI-X Jack Alessio Dickie OeRC Medicina Radio Telescopes

Medicina Backend: Spatial FFT Danny Price – Jack Hickish

Medicina Fringes…

Medicina Fringes (Cas. A.)

Cas. A. Image

Industrial Engagement It is NOT the intention of the SKA community to deliver 'finished' chip designs yet. Aiming for detailed device specifications ready to start prototype manufacture when NRE money available There are basic engineering processes that have to be done to enable meaningful sizing, cost & power estimation IP identification and development – potential industrial involvement Development of strategic technology partnerships ADC design IP macros for eg FFT, switch fabric Embedded controllers Non-packaged device mounting Identification of key architectural features Identify appropriate optimisation opportunities and trade-offs. Development of accurate models for cost and power analysis at the wider system level. Identify key interface 'Hot Spots' and apply effort accordingly

Industrial Engagement  Multi-Chip Module (One Chip to Rule them all!)  4 x 4 antenna array (currently) – easily extended to 8x8  Can also be used for Phased Array feeds for dishes  Current Chip RFI protection shows -57dB/m (in air) ADC FIR-FFT Processor Beam Combiner & Calibrator Optical I/O RF IN Optical OUT 16-8 bit 1GS/s 1024 channel splitter 16 element Beam combiner Optical Chip UWB RX 10mW/FFT 10mW/ channel 4mW/Beam ??

Requirement Specifications