Autonomous Quadrocopter Proposal Brad Bergerhouse, Nelson Gaske, Austin Wenzel Dr. Malinowski.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michael Madavane Russell McLoughlin. Plan Build a autonomous car, a GuideBot, that follows a set of directions to navigate an obstacle course Distance.
Advertisements

LTU Armadillo 2007 IGVC Jeremy Gray, BSEE; Shawn Ellison, MSCS; Phil Munie, MSCS; Brandon Bell, MSCS.
Dan Garber, Jacob Hindle, and Bradley Lan Advisor: Dr. Joseph Driscoll
Android Enabled Camera Positioning system Design Team 3 Chris Sigler Yan Sidronio Ryan Popa Jeremy Iamurri Austin Fletcher Facilitator: Dr. Oweiss Sponsor:
Camden Mendiola Ben Houston Monty Prekeris Dan Rice Dan “Klitz” Johnson.
Autonomous Sensor and Control Platform Rover Tae Lee Josh Reitsema Scott Zhong Mike Chao Mark Winter.
Team 14 : Jonathan Pham, Pritesh Solanki, Po-Han Wu, Josh Schulte, Joseph Nguyen.
Gesture Controlled Car (GCC) By: Ashwaq Alkailany Reema Abubaker Supervised by: Dr. Luia Malhis.
Introduction  If you have ever been to shooting range before, you know that firing a gun is fun. Time flies when you’re sending hundreds of rounds down.
Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE) Kshira Nadarajan (CprE) Mazdee Masud (EE)
Autonomous Helicopter: James Lyden Harris Okazaki EE 496 A project to create a system that would allow a remote- controlled helicopter to fly without user.
SD-May1014 Team: Michael Peat, Kollin Moore, Matt Rich, Alex Reifert Advisors: Dr. Nicola Elia and Dr. Phillip Jones.
Prof. Kristofer S.J. Pister’s team Berkeley Sensor and Actuator Center University of California, Berkeley.
EUT 1040 Lecture 10: Programmable Logic Controllers.
M OBILE D EFENSE SYSTEM WITH AUGMENTED AIR ROVER Project Adviser: Dr. Muhammad Tahir Group Members: Adnan Chaudhary (2009-EE-103) Zeeshan Mahmood (2009-EE-108)
OutLine Overview about Project Wii Robot Escaper Robot Problems and Solutions Demo.
A.G.I.L.E Team Members: Brad Ramsey Derek Rodriguez Dane Wielgopolan Project Managers: Dr. Joel Schipper Dr. James Irwin Autonomously Guided Intelligent.
Bradley University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering 2011 Wind Tunnel Control (WEBWIND) By: Adam Green Advisor: Dr. Aleksander Malinowski.
Wireless Ethernet AT-Rover Group 1 Beau Cook, Barry Greenwood, Danny Martin, Matt Patella, Ian Petrie.
Reegan Worobec & David Sloan In collaboration with UAARG.
Mars Rover By: Colin Shea Dan Dunn Eric Spiller Advisors: Dr. Huggins, Dr. Malinowski.
Team GPS Rover Critical Design Review Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
Team GPS Rover Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
Camera Control Group Members - Bryan Marek - Brendan McMeel - Caitlin Motsinger - Tanya Ngo - Chris Hippleheuser.
Blimpage General-Purpose Controller Blimpage Team: Joseph Brannan Philip Grippi Daniel McCabe Nguyen Trinh David Wolpoff Preliminary Design Review.
Tracking Rover Team Rubber Ducky Alex Chi Joshua Rubin Alexander Starick Ryan Ramos.
Remote Surveillance Vehicle Design Review By: Bill Burgdorf Tom Fisher Eleni Binopolus-Rumayor.
Client: Space Systems & Controls Laboratory (SSCL) Advisor : Matthew Nelson Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE)
R3R3 Ethan Hall Michael Kelton Greg Wegman Vashisht Lakhmani.
April 26, Team Information Designation Ongo-03 Members Advisors Dr. J. Lamont, Prof. R. Patterson, Dr. Rajagopalan, Dr. J. Basart ClientSpace Systems.
Engineering 1040: Mechanisms & Electric Circuits Fall 2011 Introduction to Embedded Systems.
Client: Space Systems & Controls Laboratory (SSCL) Advisor : Matthew Nelson Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE)
Embedded Microcomputer Systems Andrew Karpenko 1 Prepared for Technical Presentation February 25 th, 2011.
Autonomous Quadrocopter Design Review Brad Bergerhouse, Nelson Gaske, Austin Wenzel Dr. Malinowski.
Team Spot A Cooperative Robotics Problem A Robotics Academy Project: Laurel Hesch Emily Mower Addie Sutphen.
Team 01 : QuadSquad Patent Liability Analysis Camille Chang 10/30/2013 the ECE quadcopter senior design Purdue University1.
Client: Space Systems & Controls Laboratory (SSCL) Advisor : Matthew Nelson Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE)
RC CAR CONTROLLER BASED ON INTEL GALILEO SOC PLATFORM Nadav Shiloach Sagi Sabag Supervisor: Idan Shmuel Spring 2014 One Semester Project PROJECT’S ENDING.
Ruslan Masinjila Aida Militaru.  Nature of the Problem  Our Solution: The Roaming Security Robot  Functionalities  General System View  System Design.
David Gitz, EE, ICARUS Lead Engineer Senior Design.
Ted Hench Imaging. Objectives  Determine target locations to within 50 feet Targets are all unique, but similar Large area to search Limited time  How.
Virtual Imaging Peripheral for Enhanced Reality Aaron Garrett, Ryan Hannah, Justin Huffaker, Brendon McCool.
Computational Mechanics and Robotics The University of New South Wales
EDGE™ Wireless Open-Source/Open-Architecture Command and Control System (WOCCS) Group Members: –Eric Hettler –Manuel Paris –Ryan Miller –Christian Moreno.
Presents: THE XR-82 PROJECT. Team Members James Flora Power Point Christopher Ho Report Editor Jonathan Hammer Parts Manager Kyle Tam Web Design Edel.
Phong Le (EE) Josh Haley (CPE) Brandon Reeves (EE) Jerard Jose (EE)
Client: Space Systems & Controls Laboratory (SSCL) Advisor : Matthew Nelson Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE)
MACHINE VISION Machine Vision System Components ENT 273 Ms. HEMA C.R. Lecture 1.
By: Eric Backman Advisor: Dr. Malinowski.  Introduction  Goals  Project Overview and Changes  Work Completed  Updated Schedule.
David Gitz, EE, ICARUS Lead Engineer.  Michael Welling  PhD Candidate  ICARUS Vehicle Engineer  Ben Wasson  Masters Student  ICARUS Business Manager.
RoboNova 1.
O.S.C.A.R. Office Surveillance via Covert Audio/Visual Rover Critical Design Review.
FUFO project Final report.
ECE 4007 L01 DK6 1 FAST: Fully Autonomous Sentry Turret Patrick Croom, Kevin Neas, Anthony Ogidi, Joleon Pettway ECE 4007 Dr. David Keezer.
Laboratory 2 Group 19 The Group of Destiny. User Interface - Debugging Objectives:  Display: Sensor data (telemetry) – including IR sensors, status of.
Abstract Each July, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International holds an annual International Aerial Robotics Competition (IARC), with major.
Maze Twinbots Group 28 Uyen Nguyen – EE Ly Nguyen – EE Luke Ireland - EE.
CONTENTS: 1.Abstract. 2.Objective. 3.Block diagram. 4.Methodology. 5.Advantages and Disadvantages. 6.Applications. 7.Conclusion.
We thank the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for supporting this research, and Learning & Technology Services for printing this poster. Fully-Autonomous.
Autonomous Quadcopter Andrew Martin, Baobao Lu, Cindy Xin Ting Group 37 TA: Katherine O'Kane.
The Surveyor By: Randy Direen, David Cox, Ali Abali, Leonardo Carrasco, Lisa Prince Preliminary Design Review January 25, 2005.
The entire system was tested in a small swimming pool. The fully constructed submarine is shown in Fig. 14. The only hardware that was not on the submarine.
Inertial Measurement Unit. Project Advisor: Dr. Basart Client: Matt Nelson Team Members (491): Matt Ulrich Luis Garcia Amardeep Jawandha Julian Currie.
Self-Navigation Robot Using 360˚ Sensor Array
ECE Computer Engineering Design Project
Monitoring Robot Prepared by: Hanin Mizyed ,Abdalla Melhem
Smart Car Robot Prepared by Supervised by Mai Asem Abushamma
Multi-Rotor Autonomous Vehicle MRAV
Manual Robotics ..
Presentation transcript:

Autonomous Quadrocopter Proposal Brad Bergerhouse, Nelson Gaske, Austin Wenzel Dr. Malinowski

Outline  Introduction  Goals  Project Description  Tests  Schedule 2

Outline  Introduction  Goals  Project Description  Tests  Schedule 3

What is a Quadrocopter?  A quadrocopter is an aircraft that is lifted and propelled by four rotors. 4

Why is this technology important?  Quadrocopters are inherently stable platforms which share advantages with helicopters and airplanes, without the disadvantages  Microprocessor and DSP chip integration provides an powerful core while maintaining the low power usage of single chip processors 5

Why this project?  To develop an autonomous vehicle with 6-DOF  Tackle challenges presented during 3 dimensional navigation with minimal sensors  Provides a unique opportunity to implement an aerial platform for use in future department projects and courses 6

Outline  Introduction  Goals  Project Description  Tests  Schedule 7

Goals  Implement backup fly-by-wire controls for safety and testing  Avoid obstacles using video and sensor feedback  Autonomously navigate through narrow passages using onboard sensors  Develop a quadrocopter platform for future senior projects 8

Fly-by-wire  Remotely control quadrocopter with computer joystick or R/C transmitter for safety  Implemented to prevent loss of control during development and testing 9

Obstacle Avoidance  Use range sensors and single camera to avoid obstacles  Range sensors will be (initially) positioned in all 6 Euclidian directions  Camera will be aimed forward and DSP will be used for object detection 10

Autonomous Navigation  Navigate narrow passages in a fully autonomous nature  Create ‘obstacles’ using symbols to indicate directional constraints 11

Future Platform  Fully document design process and component interfacing  Expandable processing and I/O components 12

Outline  Introduction  Goals  Project Description  Tests  Schedule 13

Project Description  Interface BeagleBoard with XAircraft X650 Quadrocopter platform  Use BeagleBoard I/O to interface with sensors and remote controls  Develop passage following algorithm using minimal sensor input  Utilize image processing techniques to detect obstacles or goal criteria 14

System Diagram 15

System Diagram 16

XAircraft X650  Platform includes controllers, motors, and infrastructure required for operation  Accepts industry standard R/C PWM inputs for flight controller  Handles stability and individual motor control for arbitrary PWM inputs 17

System Diagram 18

BeagleBoard  Includes TI OMAP processor, USB interfaces and camera header  Performs processing required for navigation  Outputs industry standard PWM directly into flight controller 19

System Diagram 20

IR Distance Sensors  Output analog voltage based upon distance to an obstacle  Linear response between 10cm and 150cm  ADC necessary to interface with Beagleboard 21

TI ADC  12-bit Octal ADC with I 2 C interface  Bridges logic between sensors and Beagleboard  50K samples per second 22

System Diagram 23

Accelerometer  Possibly used for orientation input to BeagleBoard 24

System Diagram 25

I 2 C Interface  Inter-Integrated Circuit  Master-slave 2-wire bus interface  Used to communicate between ADC, Accelerometer, and BeagleBoard  Additional logic level converter required to interface between BeagleBoard (1.8V) and ADC (5V) 26

System Diagram 27

Camera  Captures images, send to BeagleBoard over serial communication  5-Megapixel image output with downsizing for processing speed 28

System Diagram 29

Laptop  Communicates via wireless protocol to BeagleBoard  Transmits manual override controls to Beagleboard  Provides goal conditions for navigation  Can act as a data store for retrieved information 30

System Diagram 31

DSP  Images processed using Canny edge detection algorithm  Symbol detection using predefined symbols for navigation control  Communicates with processor using shared memory regions 32

System Diagram 33

OMAP ARM core  Interprets sensor information  Provides control outputs to platform  Monitors sensor inputs for proper goal conditions 34

Outline  Introduction  Goals  Project Description  Tests  Schedule 35

Tests to be performed  Tethered Testing  Takeoff and Landing  Move at constant altitude to a landmark  Change altitude during flight, continue to landmark  Move in straight line through narrow passageway  Un-Tethered Testing  Fly straight and return to starting position  Fly through narrow passageway and turn corner 36

Outline  Introduction  Goals  Project Description  Tests  Schedule 37

Division of labor  Austin  DSP and object recognition  Brad  Communication and networking  Nelson  Hardware interfacing and power management 38

Schedule  11/17-Camera and Joystick Interfacing  12/1-Wireless and I 2 C interfacing  1/19-PWM output design  1/26-PWM output testing  2/2-IR sensor interfacing  2/9-Platform Assembly  2/16-Platform Power Testing  2/23-Initial Navigation Design 39

Schedule contd  3/1-Navigation Design  3/8-Navigation Design  3/22-Navigation Design  3/29-Test Design  4/5-Testing and debugging  4/12-Testing and debugging  4/19-Testing and debugging  4/26-Presentation preparation 40

Questions? 41