Electricity Standby Rates for Today and Tomorrow Public Utilities Commission of Ohio CHP & Standby Rates Workshop September 13, 2012 – Columbus, OH Tom.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

Topics for Todays RPS Workshop Methods to Encourage Specific Renewables Methods to Encourage Compliance Compliance Verification and Tracking Presentation.
Texas Energy Independence Week Renewables & Natural Gas: Confluence, Conflict, or Something In Between? February 23, 2011 Todd Foley Senior Vice President,
The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT Phone: “Designing Distributed Generation.
A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies Energy.
COGEN Europe The European Association for the Promotion of Cogeneration (Combined Heat and Power - CHP)
Cost of Services Pricing Enables a Net Zero Energy World © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. 1.
Regulatory Environment and Small-hydro Development Professor Priyantha D C Wijayatunga Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka and University of Moratuwa.
CREE Site Visit Oslo, September 19, 2013 Who Should Pay for Transmission? Nils-Henrik M. von der Fehr.
John B. Wharton, PE Technical Executive Baltimore, Maryland October 16, 2013 Perspectives on Grid-Integrated Microgrids Maryland Clean Energy Summit.
Hydropower Development: Experience of Nepal
IEEE JOINT TASK FORCE ON QUADRENNIAL ENERGY REVIEW Utility and Other Energy Company Business Case Issues Related to Microgrids and Distributed Generation.
Unlocking value from existing utility assets NARUC Meeting – February 2012
PRME Seminar “Responsible Management of GHG Emissions” Fri 14 October 2011 Gujji Muthuswamy Department of Management Faculty of Business and Economics.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Regulatory Barriers to the Adoption and Diffusion of Stationary Fuel Cells in Ohio William M. Bowen Professor, Public Administration and Urban Studies.
The Impact of Liberalisation on the Environmental Performance of the Electricity Sector in Germany.
Responses and Suggestions for Distributed Resource Plans Sky C. Stanfield September 17, 2014 CPUC Workshop – R
FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FOR CLEAN DG Tom Bourgeois Director of Research Pace Univ. Energy Project.
Neeharika Naik-Dhungel, EPA CHP Partnership Program Central Pennsylvania AEE Meeting January 26, 2012 Combined Heat and Power: CHP Partnership and the.
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
SMART GRID DEVELOPMENTS IN THE UK CLEAN ENERGY, GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ELECTRICITY REGULATION CAPE TOWN MAY 2010 DR GILL OWEN, PROJECT DIRECTOR,SERN,
Value of Solar Tariff Will it work in Washington State? Ahlmahz Negash
The European Energy Market Emanuela CESAREO Xavier NOEBES Léna THONON.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Transformation of the Electric Power Industry: Value of Regulatory Impact Assessments Greg R. White Commissioner.
1 THE RATE CASE PROCESS A Blend of Science and Superstition Presentation to the Mongolian Energy Regulatory Board By Burl Haar Executive Secretary Minnesota.
Expanding Access to Natural Gas: Principles and Experiences 2015 NASUCA Mid-Year Conference Joseph A. Rosenthal Conn. Office of Consumer Counsel
E.ON on the Romanian Energy Market ZF Power Summit Bucharest, February 27, 2013 Frank Hajdinjak CEO E.ON România.
Institutions and Processes for Scaling Up Renewables: Run-of-River Hydropower in British Columbia Mark Jaccard, Noel Melton and John Nyboer Energy & Materials.
MINISTRY OF ENERGY Energy Storage Presentation to APPrO Storage Symposium November 19, 2014.
Discussion of Feed-in Tariff Pilot Programs September 18, 2013 Presentation to the Regulatory Flexibility Committee of the Indiana General Assembly 1.
Utility Finance: A View from the Trenches Brad Jackson Foley & Lardner, LLP.
Grid-based Technology and Business Model Innovation: DG, DR, and EE How will Disruptive Challenges in Electric Markets Impact Michigan’s Energy Decisions?
Reactive Power Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Open Meeting December 15, 2004.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
Economic Instruments Expert Group Meeting on Enabling Measures for Inclusive Green Economy in Africa 23 and 24 September 2014, UNCC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Overview of Distributed Generation Applications June 16, 2003 Harrisburg, PA Joel Bluestein Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
INTRODUCTION TO THE UNIDO/REEEP TRAINING MANUAL ‘SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA’ User Manual.
How to Help Your Customers Read Their Electric Bills and Apply for Incentives Charley Budd, KEMA.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 177 Water St. Gardiner, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont.
Low carbon scenarios for the UK Energy White Paper Peter G Taylor Presented at “Energy, greenhouse gas emissions and climate change scenarios” June.
Nikos HATZIARGYRIOU – Greece – BETA SESSION 4b: Integration of RES+DG Barcelona May 2003 BETA SESSION 4b: Integration of Renewable Energy Sources.
Designing Utility Regulation to Promote Investment in Cost-Effective Energy Efficiency Dale S. Bryk Natural Resources Defense Council Pennsylvania.
Energy Networks Association The Road to a Smarter Grid Alan Claxton Director of Energy Futures Towards The Smarter Utility Wednesday 18 th May 2011.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Feed In Tariffs A Policy for Rapidly Expanding Renewable Energy Deployment.
European Commission DG TREN / C: Conventional Energy Greenhouse gas mitigation and energy policy, a European perspective Presentation by Cristóbal.
Combined Heat and Power Workshop Report and Next Steps Power Committee Briefing 7/15/03.
Reasons for Pursuing DG in Ontario Presented by: Mark Wolnik Markham Energy Corp -Director March 5, 2003.
CPUC Role in AB 32 Implementation LIOB – 2 nd June, 2010 San Diego, CA.
Examples of benefits assessment of low emissions development Iris Jiménez National Institute of Ecology and Climate Change Mexico October 14th.2015.
+ Transactive Energy – Business Models and Value Realization Session Transactive Energy Conference and Workshop 2013 Portland, Oregon May 23, 2013 Dian.
NARUC/FERC COLLABORATIVE: DEMAND RESPONSE Paul Suskie, Chairman, Arkansas Public Service Commission July 15, 2007.
Energy Transformation for Green Growth Pathways for Sustainable Energy Security to Power India’s Economic Growth 29 August 2015, Kolkata.
Promoting Distributed Generation Resources Through State Initiatives Ed Ethridge Public Utility Commission of Texas Distributed Resources in Restructured.
Visions for the grid: A brief survey. The Grid we have now ●Old centralized model ●Not intended for everyone to participate ●Utilities missing incentive.
Demand Response
Energy Market Issues for Biomethane Projects Workshop - 31 October 2011 RIIO-GD1 Environmental Incentives.
1 Policies Promoting Renewables to Reduce GHG Emission & Improve Air Quality Presented by Commissioner Edward Garvey Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.
1 Proposed Final Opinion on GHG Strategies in the Energy Sectors Key Findings and Recommendations October 16, 2008.
AES NewEnergy To The Institute For Regulatory Policy Studies May 18, 2000 By David L. Townley.
Institutional Support Vladimir Koritarov Argonne National Laboratory April 2016.
11 Regional Renewable Energy Study Review of Findings and Forecasts Presented to: Climate, Energy and Environment and Policy Committee Metropolitan Washington.
REGULATORY INNOVATION IN THE HEARTLAND Electricity for the 21 st Century Mike Bull, Director Policy and Communications.
The regulators’ role in integrating non-market related environmental goals in energy markets Finn Dehlbaek, Deputy Director, Danish Energy Regulatory Authority.
Microgrids & Emerging Control Techniques
Commission Chairperson Phil Montgomery Presentation to Alaska Delegation September 5, 2014 Integrating Wisconsin’s Grid: an Energy Policy Perspective Public.
Module 40 Planning Our Energy Future
Utility Owned Generation? (UOG)
Presentation transcript:

Electricity Standby Rates for Today and Tomorrow Public Utilities Commission of Ohio CHP & Standby Rates Workshop September 13, 2012 – Columbus, OH Tom Stanton, Principal Researcher for Renewable Resources and Energy Efficiency National Regulatory Research Institute –

Outline of presentation Brief summary of recent NRRI research paper – Reasons to care about standby rates now – Major goals for standby rate design Major goal for the total DG policy toolkit: Achieving the “right” growth rate Forward-looking challenges for standby rates September 2012© NRRI and T. Stanton2 See NRRI research paper, Electric Utility Standby Rates: Updates for Today and Tomorrow, at

It all depends… Standby costs and benefits to the utility and customers depend on: – expected operations of distributed generation, – specifics of the grid location, – time of use, and – overall rate design Modeling and analysis should include effects on individual standby customers, and on multiple standby customers, as a rate class September 2012© NRRI and T. Stanton3

Why care now about standby rates? Increased energy efficiency with DG (roughly doubled or tripled with CHP) Low-cost natural gas Tightening environmental standards Improving DG efficiency, reliability, and economics Supporting other DG-promoting policies Achieving smarter-grid benefits September 2012© NRRI and T. Stanton4

Major goals for standby rate design Economic efficiency – based on cost causation – neither a barrier nor a subsidy be Fairness – just and reasonable to both customer and utility – symmetry in benefits and costs – fairness in the total rates paid for all services, including standby Simplicity and transparency – easy to administer and understand – prospective users can accurately estimate costs and benefits Promoting efficiency and reliability – reward customers for good operating practices – use other policies to “tilt” DG economics (e.g., tax & incentive policies, not standby rates) Standardizing markets – similar to full-service rates – in RTO; in state September 2012© NRRI and T. Stanton5

Finding the “right” growth rate September 2012© NRRI and T. Stanton6 Source: C. Wilson, Dec 2010, Growth dynamics of energy technologies, UK Centre for Climate Change, Working Paper No. 42,

Finding the “right” growth rate September 2012© NRRI and T. Stanton7 Source: C. Wilson, Dec 2010, Growth dynamics of energy technologies, UK Centre for Climate Change, Working Paper No. 42,

Forward-looking Issues Modeling & analyzing costs for individual standby customers and standby customer class(es) – Separating costs for generation vs distribution standby – Using localized IRP to determine distribution system costs and benefits – Designing rates that encourage users to produce system benefits CHP for campuses of multiple customers and facilities, using multiple technologies Electric microgrid operations in safe-island mode September 2012© NRRI and T. Stanton8

Most important take-aways There are many pressing reasons for supporting accurate standby rates – Economy – Efficiency – Environment Achieving accuracy requires modeling & analyzing costs – for individual standby customers – for standby customer class(es) Separate costs for generation vs distribution standby – Generation standby quickly approaches zero cost – Distribution standby raises universal ratemaking issues about how to pay for capacity vs energy, variable vs fixed costs (fixed for the time being, that is) September 2012© NRRI and T. Stanton9