You’ve Got Questions We’ve Got Answers-- The National Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity Dr. Heather A. Kelly Assistant Director, Office of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carolyn M. Byerly, Ph.D., professor Department of Journalism and Graduate Program in Mass Comm & Media Studies TENURE: BASIC INFO AND ISSUES.
Advertisements

Accessing and Using the Delaware Secure Server to Develop Customized Peer Analysis at Your Institution Karen DeMonte and Allison Walters University of.
A Data-Centered Approach to Managing Instructional Costs and Enhancing Faculty Productivity Michael F. Middaugh Assistant Vice President for Institutional.
A Guide to Analyzing PrOF Instructional Data Packets CRC Research Office 2009.
EVALUATING FACULTY Lydia Fox, University of the Pacific Jon Harbor, Purdue University.
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
The Delaware Study Best Practices for Managing Costs and Productivity Assistant Director Office of Institutional Research University of Delaware Data Manager.
Louisiana Public Postsecondary Education Budget & Performance Funding Formula Overview August 19, 2011.
The Board’s Role in Accreditation Michael F. Middaugh Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness University of Delaware Celine R. Paquette Trustee,
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Louisiana Public Postsecondary Education Governance Commission Budget, Formula Funding, & Efficiencies September 28, 2011.
M ARCH PASSHE Budget Status SRU Comparative Budgets 1 FY Fund Sources Tuition$58,951 State Appropriation$35,946 ARRA$3,099 Other$2,279 Auxiliaries.
Specific outcomes can be compared to resources expended; and successful programs can be highlighted;
Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.
Strategies for Containing Costs in Higher Education Michael F. Middaugh Assistant Vice President – Institutional Research and Planning University of Delaware.
1 Overview of NACUBO Cost of College Model January 7, 2004 Presented by: Nancy D. Suttenfield Vice Chancellor for Finance and Administration.
Program Review and General Education Assessment at the University at Albany: Past, Present and Future Barbara Wilkinson Assistant Director for Assessment.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Writing Program Assessment Report Fall 2002 through Spring 2004 Laurence Musgrove Writing Program Director Department of English and Foreign Languages.
1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.
Peeking Inside an Institution’s Planning Toolbox Karen A. DeMonte Senior Institutional Research Analyst, Institutional Research & Planning University of.
Career Advancement and Promotion Criteria for Clinical Educators Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders 2015 Annual Conference.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
Design and Development Awards Spring 2015 TLOS Networked Learning Design and Strategies (NLDS)
AACN Financial Benchmarking Survey and Other Data Initiatives Di Fang, PhD - Director of Research and Data Services.
Developing Campus Data for Use in Delaware Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity Michael F. Middaugh Assistant Vice President for Institutional.
ASSESSMENT  Are you having an impact?  How do you know?  Are the programs and services you work on getting better?  How do you know?
UTIA Promotion & Tenure Workshop May 19, 2015 UTIA Promotion & Tenure Workshop May 19, 2015 Overall Philosophy: Maximize faculty FTE while maintaining.
Academic Affairs BOT Orientation 29 August 2011 Dr. Chula King Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Maintaining An Effective Institutional Research Office TAIR Newcomers February 20 and 22, 2002 Omni Marina Hotel Corpus Christi, Texas.
Closing the Loop in Assessment.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Staff Development Approaches at The University of Georgia: Philosophy, Models, and Financial Support University of Georgia Institute of Higher Education.
EGS Research & Consulting BASELINE SURVEYS OF MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT CHAIR PERSONS, MATHEMATICS FACULTY AND EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Measuring Value and Outcomes of Reading Dr. Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Chop, Dice, Slice, Mince, or Julienne: The Multiple Ways of Measuring Faculty Workload at the Departmental Level Samford University.
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
 Integrate the Bacc Core category learning outcomes into the course.  Clarify for students how they will achieve and demonstrate the learning outcomes.
Academic Program Review Chair’s Workshop John E. Sawyer, Ph.D. Associate Provost Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Faculty Evaluation Committee Workshop. Overview Evaluation Timeline Portfolio as a Whole Portfolio Organization –Teaching –Service (Students, College,
Florida International University G51 I & R Reporting April 28, 2006.
Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
What is the Delaware Cost Study?
CCHE690 MEDIA REVIEW Having taught for Yavapai college in Prescott for many years after having taught at Universal Technical Institute in Phoenix. I am.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
2008 FAEIS Annual Longitudinal Assessment With a Comparison to the 2007 Survey Results The purpose of the FAEIS annual evaluation is to develop longitudinal.
SURVEY SAYS: Expanded Library Support for Faculty Research 1 National Conference for African American Librarians St. Louis, MO Sandra Phoenix, Executive.
Wrestling with Workload: Valpo’s Faculty Workload Task Force Kraig Olejniczak, Dean, College of Engineering Mike Owens, Assistant Provost for Faculty Affairs.
POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
Faculty Survey Highlights University Council Presentation Lynn McCloskey Edward S. Macias April 7, 2008.
Quality Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents Qualitative State Research Team Kristin Gansle Louisiana State University and A&M College Value-Added.
Student Affairs Assessment Council Wednesday, October 28, 2015.
Florida International University G51 BUDGET AND FACULTY FUNDING MODEL April 28, 2006.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
Adding Cost and Benchmarking to Your Program Review Michelle Taylor| Senior Research Analyst National Higher Education Benchmarking Institute.
The CSU at the Beginning of the 21st Century: Meeting the Needs of the People of California.
Tom Eleuterio Manager, Higher Education Consortia
Tenure and Promotion at University of Toledo
Update: UMKC Spending, Staffing and Benefits /16
PAc-17 Sabbatical Leave of Absence
Issues Resulting from Reliance on Non-Tenure Faculty at GVSU
George A. Smathers Libraries
Provost’s Merit Pay Initiative
UTIA Promotion and Tenure Workshop 2018
North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Presentation transcript:

You’ve Got Questions We’ve Got Answers-- The National Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity Dr. Heather A. Kelly Assistant Director, Office of Institutional Research & Planning University of Delaware 2006 SUS Data Workshop Tallahassee, FL July 27, 2006

The Delaware Study Begun in 1992 with 15 research universities, 16 doctoral universities, and 65 comprehensive and baccalaureate institutions to address “Who is Teaching What to Whom, and at What Cost?” Begun in 1992 with 15 research universities, 16 doctoral universities, and 65 comprehensive and baccalaureate institutions to address “Who is Teaching What to Whom, and at What Cost?” With funding from TIAA-CREF and Fund for Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE), the Study’s instrumentation and methodology was refined and enhanced in mid-1990s. With funding from TIAA-CREF and Fund for Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE), the Study’s instrumentation and methodology was refined and enhanced in mid-1990s. Currently embraces over 400 four-year colleges and universities across the country. Currently embraces over 400 four-year colleges and universities across the country. Is the tool of choice for benchmarking detailed information of teaching loads, instructional costs, and externally funded scholarship at the academic discipline level of analysis. Is the tool of choice for benchmarking detailed information of teaching loads, instructional costs, and externally funded scholarship at the academic discipline level of analysis.

Focus on Academic Discipline is Not a Trivial Issue A study done for NCES found that over 80 percent in the variation in instructional costs across four- year colleges and universities is accounted for by the disciplines that comprise the curriculum at those institutions. A study done for NCES found that over 80 percent in the variation in instructional costs across four- year colleges and universities is accounted for by the disciplines that comprise the curriculum at those institutions.

The Typical Delaware Study Participant Pool In Any Given Year 45 to 55 Research Universities 45 to 55 Research Universities 25 to 35 Doctoral Universities 25 to 35 Doctoral Universities 60 to75 Comprehensive Institutions 60 to75 Comprehensive Institutions 20 to 30 Baccalaureate Institutions 20 to 30 Baccalaureate Institutions Note: The Delaware Study utilizes the 1995 Carnegie Institutional Taxonomy. For analytical purposes, it is far more meaningful than the current version. Note: The Delaware Study utilizes the 1995 Carnegie Institutional Taxonomy. For analytical purposes, it is far more meaningful than the current version.

The Delaware Study has emerged as an important reporting tool for a diverse group of constituents AAU Data Exchange AAU Data Exchange HEDS HEDS Southern Universities Group Data Exchange Southern Universities Group Data Exchange Big 12 Universities Big 12 Universities University of North Carolina System University of North Carolina System Tennessee Board of Regents Tennessee Board of Regents Louisiana Board of Regents Louisiana Board of Regents Mississippi Board of Regents Mississippi Board of Regents South Dakota Board of Regents South Dakota Board of Regents

The Delaware Study Data Collection Template

Delaware Study Benchmarks are Produced for All Participating Institutions By Carnegie Institutional Type By Carnegie Institutional Type By Highest Degree Offered By Highest Degree Offered By Relative Emphasis on Undergraduate versus Graduate Instruction By Relative Emphasis on Undergraduate versus Graduate Instruction

The Delaware Study benchmarks detailed teaching load data… By faculty category (tenured/tenure track, other regular faculty; supplemental faculty; graduate teaching assistants) By faculty category (tenured/tenure track, other regular faculty; supplemental faculty; graduate teaching assistants) By level of instruction (lower division undergraduate; upper division undergraduate; graduate) By level of instruction (lower division undergraduate; upper division undergraduate; graduate) By student credit hours and organized class sections taught By student credit hours and organized class sections taught

Benchmark Data for Measuring Teaching Loads Undergraduate Student Credit Hours Taught per FTE Faculty Undergraduate Student Credit Hours Taught per FTE Faculty Graduate Student Credit Hours Taught per FTE Faculty Graduate Student Credit Hours Taught per FTE Faculty Total Student Credit Hours Taught per FTE Faculty Total Student Credit Hours Taught per FTE Faculty Total Organized Class Sections Taught per FTE Faculty Total Organized Class Sections Taught per FTE Faculty FTE Students Taught per FTE Faculty FTE Students Taught per FTE Faculty

Benchmark Data for Measuring Fiscal Variables Direct Instructional Expense per Student Credit Hour Taught Direct Instructional Expense per Student Credit Hour Taught Direct Instructional Expense per FTE Student Taught Direct Instructional Expense per FTE Student Taught Separately Budgeted Research and Service Expenditures per FTE Tenured and Tenure Track Faculty Separately Budgeted Research and Service Expenditures per FTE Tenured and Tenure Track Faculty

In Addition to the Standard Delaware Study Benchmarks… You may request up to 5 peer analyses, each comprised of at least 10 participating institutions. Each peer analysis contains the same benchmarks as in the full Delaware Study analysis. You may request up to 5 peer analyses, each comprised of at least 10 participating institutions. Each peer analysis contains the same benchmarks as in the full Delaware Study analysis. You receive access to the Delaware Study’s secure website, and to the basic data set from which the national benchmarks were generated. You may massage these data to generate further analyses. You receive access to the Delaware Study’s secure website, and to the basic data set from which the national benchmarks were generated. You may massage these data to generate further analyses.

Let’s look at a practical example of using the Delaware Study data…

The Provost chooses to focus on tenured/tenure track faculty when examining data from the Delaware Study Direct instructional costs are 85% to 90% on average driven by faculty salaries. Direct instructional costs are 85% to 90% on average driven by faculty salaries. Tenured and tenure track faculty are “fixed costs.” They are essentially with us until retirement. Tenured and tenure track faculty are “fixed costs.” They are essentially with us until retirement. Tenured and tenure track faculty are the most visible of faculty categories. Tenured and tenure track faculty are the most visible of faculty categories. What is the return on investment? What is the return on investment?

We provide the Provost with data from multiple years of the Delaware Study, looking at the University indicators as a percentage of the national benchmark for research universities. We provide the Provost with data from multiple years of the Delaware Study, looking at the University indicators as a percentage of the national benchmark for research universities. The Provost receives a single sheet for each academic department, with graphs reflecting numerous indicators. The Provost receives a single sheet for each academic department, with graphs reflecting numerous indicators.

Sample Benchmarking Science Department

Using Delaware Study Data at the Institutional Level From its inception, the Delaware Study has had as its primary function that of being a management tool for provosts, deans, and department chairs to assess the relative position of their academic departments and programs vis- à-vis those at appropriate comparator institutions. From its inception, the Delaware Study has had as its primary function that of being a management tool for provosts, deans, and department chairs to assess the relative position of their academic departments and programs vis- à-vis those at appropriate comparator institutions. The Delaware Study is not intended to be used as a tool to reward or penalize programs, but rather to focus on strategies for program improvement. The Delaware Study is not intended to be used as a tool to reward or penalize programs, but rather to focus on strategies for program improvement.

The NCES Study Examined data from three Delaware Study data collection cycles – 1998, 2000, and 2001 – for 25 disciplines typically found at four year colleges and universities. Examined data from three Delaware Study data collection cycles – 1998, 2000, and 2001 – for 25 disciplines typically found at four year colleges and universities. The initial hypothesis was that Carnegie institutional classification would be a significant cost driver, i.e., research universities would teach fewer credit hours at higher cost than doctoral universities, which in turn would teach less and at higher cost than either comprehensive or baccalaureate institutions. The initial hypothesis was that Carnegie institutional classification would be a significant cost driver, i.e., research universities would teach fewer credit hours at higher cost than doctoral universities, which in turn would teach less and at higher cost than either comprehensive or baccalaureate institutions. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to analyze the variance in instructional cost across the institutions that participated in each of the three data collection cycles. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to analyze the variance in instructional cost across the institutions that participated in each of the three data collection cycles.

Delaware Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity

Cost per Student Credit Hour Taught in Selected Disciplines

Delaware Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity  The volume of teaching activity, as measured by student credit hours taught, is a major expense factor. As one might expect, given a relatively constant faculty size, expense decreases as the volume of teaching increases.  Department size, as measured in terms of total number of faculty, is consistently associated with expense. The larger the department, the higher the cost.  The proportion of a departmental faculty holding tenure is associated with expense. Since tenured faculty are “fixed costs,” not surprisingly the higher the proportion of tenured faculty, the higher the cost.

Delaware Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity  A surprising finding was that, while the presence of graduate level instruction is associated with higher expense, the measured effect of this variable on the magnitude of cost is smaller than teaching volume, department size, and tenure rate.  It is frequently assumed that disciplines such as engineering and the physical sciences are expensive, in part, owing to the equipment- intensive nature of those disciplines. While measurable, the extent to which expense is associated with personnel cost, as opposed to equipment cost, has less impact on the magnitude of expense than teaching volume, department size, and tenure rate.

Major Findings from the NCES Study Across almost all disciplines, the volume of teaching activity, measured in student credit hours taught, is always associated with direct instructional expense. Cost decreases as the volume of teaching increases. Across almost all disciplines, the volume of teaching activity, measured in student credit hours taught, is always associated with direct instructional expense. Cost decreases as the volume of teaching increases. Department size, measured in terms of total number of faculty, and total number of tenured and tenure track faculty, is consistently associated with cost across the disciplines. The larger the faculty size, the higher the cost. Department size, measured in terms of total number of faculty, and total number of tenured and tenure track faculty, is consistently associated with cost across the disciplines. The larger the faculty size, the higher the cost.

Major Findings from the NCES Study The proportion of total faculty who are tenured or who are on tenure track is associated with cost. The higher that proportion, the higher the cost. The proportion of total faculty who are tenured or who are on tenure track is associated with cost. The higher that proportion, the higher the cost. Among variables that measure faculty teaching workload, the mean number of student credit hours taught per FTE faculty is the most common cost factor across the disciplines. The larger the average number of student credit hours taught, the lower the cost. Among variables that measure faculty teaching workload, the mean number of student credit hours taught per FTE faculty is the most common cost factor across the disciplines. The larger the average number of student credit hours taught, the lower the cost.

We invite you to visit the Delaware Study website:

As useful and comprehensive as quantitative instructional ratios and benchmarks are….. They do not address the non-classroom dimensions of faculty activity in an institution and its academic programs. They do not address the non-classroom dimensions of faculty activity in an institution and its academic programs. It is possible that quantitative productivity and cost indicators for a given program/discipline may differ significantly from other institutional, peer, and national benchmarks for wholly justifiable reasons of quality that can be reflected in what faculty do outside of the classroom. It is possible that quantitative productivity and cost indicators for a given program/discipline may differ significantly from other institutional, peer, and national benchmarks for wholly justifiable reasons of quality that can be reflected in what faculty do outside of the classroom. This cannot be determined unless measurable indicators of quality are collected. This cannot be determined unless measurable indicators of quality are collected.

Expanding the Delaware Study Those working with the Delaware Study over the years are highly sensitive to the possibility of misinterpretation of benchmark data. Those working with the Delaware Study over the years are highly sensitive to the possibility of misinterpretation of benchmark data. It is quite conceivable that a department may have teaching loads well below national benchmarks, and instructional costs well above, and pride itself on those measures for purely qualitative reasons. It is quite conceivable that a department may have teaching loads well below national benchmarks, and instructional costs well above, and pride itself on those measures for purely qualitative reasons. To be sure, what faculty do outside of the classroom – instructional support, scholarship, and service - substantively contributes to the quality of an academic program, but may also significantly impact how much faculty teach, and at what expense. To be sure, what faculty do outside of the classroom – instructional support, scholarship, and service - substantively contributes to the quality of an academic program, but may also significantly impact how much faculty teach, and at what expense.

Expanding the Delaware Study The University of Delaware, which received a major FIPSE grant in to underwrite the teaching load/cost portion of the Delaware Study, received a second FIPSE grant to expand data collection to include measures of out-of-classroom faulty activity. The University of Delaware, which received a major FIPSE grant in to underwrite the teaching load/cost portion of the Delaware Study, received a second FIPSE grant to expand data collection to include measures of out-of-classroom faulty activity. The core activity in the current FIPSE grant, as was the case with the earlier grant, is the use of an Advisory Committee to develop data definitions, data collection instruments, and calculation conventions. The Committee is comprised of faculty, institutional researchers, and other experts in measuring what faculty do. The core activity in the current FIPSE grant, as was the case with the earlier grant, is the use of an Advisory Committee to develop data definitions, data collection instruments, and calculation conventions. The Committee is comprised of faculty, institutional researchers, and other experts in measuring what faculty do.

National Center for Education Statistics indicate that full-time faculty at four-year institutions report they spend approximately one-half of their time on teaching activities, which includes approximately 10 hours per week in the classroom (Zimbler, 2001). The term “work load” is often thought to refer to the time faculty spend in the classroom. However, work load relates to faculty work and the numerous associated activities and responsibilities in and out of the classroom (Braskamp & Ory, 1994). Is Faculty Work Understood?

Consider…. NSOPF survey results indicate: (1999) full-time instructional faculty report they spend approximately 53% of their time on teaching activities including 10 hours per week in the classroom (NCES; Zimbler, 2001). (1999) full-time instructional faculty report they spend approximately 53% of their time on teaching activities including 10 hours per week in the classroom (NCES; Zimbler, 2001). (2004) full-time instructional faculty report they spend 58% of their time on teaching activities, including approximately 9 hours per week in the classroom (NCES; Cataldi, Bradburn, Fahimi, Zimbler, 2005). (2004) full-time instructional faculty report they spend 58% of their time on teaching activities, including approximately 9 hours per week in the classroom (NCES; Cataldi, Bradburn, Fahimi, Zimbler, 2005). These data suggest while faculty may be spending more time on teaching activities, they spend slightly less time in the classroom.

But, the public sees…. “It’s 10 a.m. Do you know where your professors are?” (Wilson, Chronicle of Higher Education, 2001) A Boston University professor of Spanish was quoted saying, “I don’t get paid for hanging around my office. I get pay increases for preparing for classes and because I publish books and articles and reviews” (p. 10). A Boston University professor of Spanish was quoted saying, “I don’t get paid for hanging around my office. I get pay increases for preparing for classes and because I publish books and articles and reviews” (p. 10). “It’s not unusual for professors in English, history, modern languages, political science, and philosophy, for example, to come to campus only two or three days a week. The rest of the time professors spend writing at home or conducting research in libraries, archives, and museums – both local and afar. That’s true not only for B.U. professors, but for those at research universities across the country” (p.11). “It’s not unusual for professors in English, history, modern languages, political science, and philosophy, for example, to come to campus only two or three days a week. The rest of the time professors spend writing at home or conducting research in libraries, archives, and museums – both local and afar. That’s true not only for B.U. professors, but for those at research universities across the country” (p.11).

Who Else Is Interested in Faculty Workload? Those who fund higher education: –State legislatures –Federal government –Students and parents Higher education trustees and administrators Higher education trustees and administrators Faculty themselves Faculty themselves

Faculty Activity Study - Purpose Help alleviate misunderstandings of faculty activity by providing information to discuss what faculty actually do, how much they do, and the associated products. Help alleviate misunderstandings of faculty activity by providing information to discuss what faculty actually do, how much they do, and the associated products.

Faculty Activity Study - Goal Demonstrate faculty outputs that are a result of faculty spending time outside the classroom on non-instructional activities. Demonstrate faculty outputs that are a result of faculty spending time outside the classroom on non-instructional activities. –Teaching (i.e., redesigning course curriculum, advising students, or conducting research with students) –Scholarship (i.e., refereed and non-refereed publications, editorial positions, juried shows and commissioned performances, or grant activity) –Service (i.e., institutional service, faculty extension and outreach activities, or professional service). The overall goal is to provide evidence regarding program productivity, as well as the means to encourage more effective management in higher education. The overall goal is to provide evidence regarding program productivity, as well as the means to encourage more effective management in higher education.

The Delaware Faculty Activity Study Helps to articulate the different expectations for what faculty are expected to do outside of the classroom, based on institutional mission. Helps to articulate the different expectations for what faculty are expected to do outside of the classroom, based on institutional mission. Helps to quantify what faculty actually do outside of the classroom as a management tool for assessing the extent to which an institution is fulfilling its mission. Helps to quantify what faculty actually do outside of the classroom as a management tool for assessing the extent to which an institution is fulfilling its mission.

Faculty Activity Study Data Collection Template

Faculty Activity Study Participants 2002 Faculty Activity Study Total of 57 institutions 2002 Faculty Activity Study Total of 57 institutions –23 comprehensive institutions (40%) –20 baccalaureate institutions (35%) –7 doctoral universities (12%) –7 research universities (12%) –29 private institutions (51%) –28 public institutions (49%) 2003 Faculty Activity Study Total of 47 institutions 2003 Faculty Activity Study Total of 47 institutions –27 comprehensive institutions (57%) –7 baccalaureate institutions (15%) –7 doctoral universities (15%) –6 research universities (13%) –33 public institutions (70%) –14 private institutions (30%)

Faculty Activity Study - Results  Refined means were not calculated for the variables owing to the relatively small number of participating institutions within each Carnegie institution type, and the large variance in data responses.  The large variance for the majority of the variables within each Carnegie classification makes the median a better statistic to describe the central tendency for the sample.

Activities Related to Teaching

Activities Related to Scholarship

Activities Related to Service

Utilizing the Faculty Activity Study Provides contextual information and supplies a backdrop for examining DE Study’s teaching loads and associated costs. Provides contextual information and supplies a backdrop for examining DE Study’s teaching loads and associated costs. Institutions experiencing state mandates have combined state-mandated elements with the Faculty Activity Study variables to develop one instrument. Institutions experiencing state mandates have combined state-mandated elements with the Faculty Activity Study variables to develop one instrument. Institutions have integrated Faculty Activity Study variables into their annual review process. Institutions have integrated Faculty Activity Study variables into their annual review process. Data facilitates informed decision-making processes. Data facilitates informed decision-making processes. Data helpful in answering requests from state agencies, as well as other external constituents. Data helpful in answering requests from state agencies, as well as other external constituents.

We invite you to visit the Faculty Activity Study website:

Summarizing the Findings  Certain factors are associated with the magnitude of direct instructional cost. These include volume of student credit hours taught, department size in terms of full time equivalent faculty, and tenure rate. However, before manipulating these factors in any draconian fashion to contain costs, it must be underscored that faculty engage in activities other than teaching that have significant value to students, the institution, and the larger society.  Faculty are typically involved in out-of-classroom activities such as curriculum re-design, academic advising, thesis/dissertation supervision, academic scholarship, and service to the profession/institution/community.  Emphasis on various types of out-of-classroom faculty activity generally reflect institutional choices related to mission and to the balance between and among teaching, research, and service.

Closing Thoughts It is also incumbent upon institutions to manage their resources, including faculty teaching loads. It is also incumbent upon institutions to manage their resources, including faculty teaching loads. Benchmarking tools such as the Delaware Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity assist provosts and department chairs in assessing their resources in comparison with peer departments and other departments to which they aspire. Benchmarking tools such as the Delaware Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity assist provosts and department chairs in assessing their resources in comparison with peer departments and other departments to which they aspire. Colleges and universities must be proactive in describing how and why they deploy human and fiscal resources in the manner in which they do. Colleges and universities must be proactive in describing how and why they deploy human and fiscal resources in the manner in which they do.

Questions and Discussion

Useful Resources Middaugh, M.F. (2001). Understanding faculty productivity: Standards and benchmarks for colleges and universities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Middaugh, M.F. (2001). Understanding faculty productivity: Standards and benchmarks for colleges and universities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Middaugh, M.F., Graham, R., & Shahid, A. (2003). A study of higher education instructional expenditures: The Delaware Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity. (NCES Publication No ). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Middaugh, M.F., Graham, R., & Shahid, A. (2003). A study of higher education instructional expenditures: The Delaware Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity. (NCES Publication No ). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Middaugh, M.F., & Isaacs, H.K. (2005). Benchmarking departmental activity via a consortial approach: The Delaware Study. In J.E. Groccia & J.E. Miller (Eds.), On Becoming a Productive University: Strategies for Reducing Costs and Increasing Quality in Higher Education (pp ). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company, Inc. Middaugh, M.F., & Isaacs, H.K. (2005). Benchmarking departmental activity via a consortial approach: The Delaware Study. In J.E. Groccia & J.E. Miller (Eds.), On Becoming a Productive University: Strategies for Reducing Costs and Increasing Quality in Higher Education (pp ). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company, Inc. Middaugh, M.F. (2005). Understanding higher education costs. Planning for Higher Education, 33(3), Middaugh, M.F. (2005). Understanding higher education costs. Planning for Higher Education, 33(3), 5-18.

Thank you! Please feel free to contact me: Heather A. Kelly,