1 Performance Measurement Wagner-Peyser and VETS Reporting For Employment And Training Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WIA Closure, Exit and Follow-up
Advertisements

Wagner-Peyser and VETS
COMMON MEASURES Presented by: Phil Degon Workforce Administration September 2006.
Journey 2001 Performance Reporting Under Title 1-B of the Workforce Investment Act Candice Graham-Young USDOL ETA Office of Workforce Security Performance.
Participants will: 1.understand FY 2004 DVOP/LVER State Veterans Program and Budget Plan. 2.understand DVOP specialists and LVER staff new roles & responsibilities,
1 Program and Compliance Management Workshop: UNDERSTANDING PARTICIPATION CYCLES V I R T U A L L Y.
1 Performance Measurement & Reporting For Employment And Training Programs.
Services to Migrant and Seasonal Farm Workers
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration 1 Common Measures and Reporting BINGO!
Overview and Discussion of NRS Changes. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 2 NRS Changes for FY13 AGENDA  Review changes.
Veterans’ Program Staff Training Outreach, Resources & Reports.
Performance, Reporting and Analysis One-Stop and Program Support 107 East Madison Street Caldwell Building, MSC# G-229 Tallahassee, Florida
1 Workforce Investment Act Performance and Reporting.
What’s Happening with Performance Accountability – WIA to WIOA
1 Workforce Investment Act Standardized Record Data (WIASRD) Performance and Technology Office Employment and Training Administration, USDOL
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Priority of Service for Veterans and Eligible Spouses Southern California TAT Forum May.
The Disabled Veterans Outreach Program (DVOP) and Local Veterans Employment Representative (LVER) Programs “The Law” Jobs for Veterans State Grant (JVSG)
Jobs for Veterans Act Public Law Signed by President on November 7, 2002.
The Disabled Veterans Outreach Program (DVOP) and Local Veterans Employment Representative (LVER) Programs Today we are going to discuss the Disabled.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Simple Ways to Improve Your Reporting Greg Wilson Office of Performance and Technology Employment.
Program Reporting and Performance Measurement for One-Stop Employment and Workforce Information Services Wagner-Peyser and VETS 1.
PROGRAM REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT 1 General Session #1.
107 East Madison Street Caldwell Building, MSC# G-229 Tallahassee, Florida Monthly Management Report (MMR) Measures WAGNER-PEYSER PROGRAM An.
NYS Integrated Reporting 1 New York State Integrated Reporting Plenary Session USDOL/ETA Performance and Reporting Summit 2007 Phoenix Marriott.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Services: Counting our Work and Making our Work Count ARRA Performance Accountability Forum.
Common Measures for the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) An equal opportunity employer/program. Auxiliary aids and services are available upon request to.
Welcome to the Common Measures Webinar Press *6 to mute your telephone Please do not put your phone on HOLD In the ‘chat’ box, please enter and send us.
Performance Management Policy Highlights Workforce Innovations 2005 July 12 and 13, 2005.
Everything you always wanted to know about W-P
Presented by Lois ScottAugust 21, Why We Are Here Financial and Participant Data Overview Program Year 2014 – 2015 – Program Performance – Performance.
FY07 COMMON MEASURES CHANGES FOR REPORTING AND MOSES TRACKING.
107 East Madison Street Caldwell Building, MSC# G-229 Tallahassee, Florida Monthly Management Report (MMR) Measures WIA An equal opportunity.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Assuring Equity of Service to Farmworkers: Measuring and Improving Performance Diane Walton.
June 2006 FY 2007 Federal Performance for Staff1 Overview and Discussion of Performance Measures for FY07.
OFFICE OF NATIONAL RESPONSE NATIONAL EMERGENCY GRANTS (NEG) Performance and Reporting Summit.
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Keith Rowe ETA – Dallas Region Office Presenter ETA – PROTECH WISPR Quarterly Reports and.
December 2010 Performance Reporting and Analysis, Manager One-Stop and Program Support Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation 107 East Madison Street.
Review of Data Validation Results for PY 2004 We’ve come a long way, baby!
Participants will gain knowledge of priority of service.
Performance Measurement Under Title 1-B of the Workforce Investment Act Regional Training Richard West Social Policy Research Associates.
Florida’s Experience with Long-Term, Short-Term and Common Measures Mike Switzer Workforce Florida, Inc Commonwealth Lane Tallahassee, FL
FY2007 Federal Performance for Managers1June 2006 FY2007 Federal Performance for Managers Overview and Discussion of Performance Measures for FY07.
Back to Basics, The Application of Common Measures Lane Kelly Performance Specialist USDOL – ETA, Region 3 - Atlanta May 22, 2008 Ritz-Carlton Hotel Atlanta,
Bridging the Gap and Maximizing Resources with Partner Programs for Positive Program Outcomes Presented by Mershal Noble and Danielle McNeil.
1 Veterans’ Program Services in the One-Stop Environment Veterans’ Program Staff Training Delivering Priority of Services & Case Management.
1 Implementing WIA Performance Measures for the European Social Fund Cynthia Fagnoni, Managing Director Education, Workforce, and Income Security Issues.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Services 101 “Getting Credit for the Work You Do“ ARRA Performance Accountability Forum.
Workforce Innovations Conference July 2006 Workforce Investment Streamlined Performance Reporting (WISPR) System: “HOT Wiring” State Data for Workforce.
Program Reporting Changes and Requirements for the WIA Quarterly and Annual Reports ETA 9090 / 9091.
Changing Perspectives on Workforce System Performance Workforce Innovations Conference July 2004 Employment and Training Administration Performance and.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA 1 Program Performance Accountability Requirements under the American Recovery and Reinvestment.
Performance Reporting Under WIA Title 1B Candice Graham-Young ETA Performance Accountability Team.
Services for Veterans Regional WEBEX Conference Calls May, 2012 US Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration and Veterans Employment and.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA ARRA Performance Accountability and Updates: What About the Numbers? Karen Staha Office.
Participants will have a knowledge and understanding of priority of service in DOL funded programs.
Back to Basics The Application of Common Measures to Discretionary Grants Lane Kelly April 16, 2009.
U. S. Department of Labor Organizational Chart LVER Secretary of Labor One-Stop Delivery System ADVET DVET RAVET DVOP Assistant Secretary for Veterans.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Common Measures. When did common measures become effective? Common measures became effective for W-P on 7/1/05.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Priority of Service for Veterans and Eligible Spouses – Discretionary Grantees Pacific Northwest.
Reporting & Performance Quarterly Performance Reports  Narrative  Performance  Financial.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Priority of Service for Veterans and Eligible Spouses Pacific Northwest TAT Forum April.
W-P PERFORMANCE MEASURES Red/Green. Participant Determined eligible to participate in the Wagner-Peyser Program and Determined eligible to participate.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration May 8, 2015 U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training.
Common Performance Measures for Employment and Training Programs SC Workforce Development Partnership Conference October 26-29, 2003 Brad Sickles
Presented at: INA Multi-Regional Conference Miami, FL January 2017
The Application of Common Measures
CareerSource Chipola Performance Overview
Stakeholder Consultation
April 5, 2018 WIOA Partner Program Briefing: WIOA Title III Employment Service (WP Act) Unemployment Insurance Jobs for Veterans State Grants (JVSG)
Jobs for Veterans Act Public Law
Presentation transcript:

1 Performance Measurement Wagner-Peyser and VETS Reporting For Employment And Training Programs

2 Agenda Background information Performance updates Calculating outcomes on the performance measures Revisions to existing reporting requirements

3 General References ETA TEGL (Common Measures) can be found at ommonmeasures.cfm ET Handbook No. 406 can be found at

4 A participant is someone who has been determined eligible to participate and who receives a program funded- service in a physical location. Common Measures Concepts “Participant”

5 “Participant” (cont.) States and grantees are encouraged to consider as participants those individuals who receive services via the Internet and do not access those services through a program-funded physical location.

6 “Participant” (cont.) Wagner-Peyser employment services –Universal Access –No formal determination of eligibility is required DVOP/LVER services –veterans, eligible persons, transitioning service members who meet eligibility criteria

7 “Self-directed job search” Clarification of exclusion Application to W-P and VETS: –Exclusion is limited to the act of conducting a job search, job bank browsing or modifying job search requirements. –Some self-directed job search activities should be considered reportable services (e.g. building resumes, accessing workforce information, and enrolling in online job search mini courses).

8 Common Measures reporting system calculates performance outcomes based on exit quarter. “Exiter”

9 Exit occurs when a participant does not receive a service funded by the program or a partner program for 90 consecutive calendar days and is not scheduled for future services. The date of exit is applied retroactively to the last day on which the participant received a service. This is a Soft Exit approach. “Exiter” (cont.)

10 “Exiter” – W-P and VETS Significant change from the former labor exchange performance measures: –calculated performance outcomes on a fixed point, based on registration quarter –the first or second quarter following the registration quarter. –Hard Exit.

11 Exiter Calculation Sample Calculation: Please see handout! It is mathematically possible for an individual job seeker to be a participant and an exiter four (4) times in one year. 4 X 91= 364 Although unlikely, it is possible. Here is a more likely scenario.

12 Global Outcome Exclusions that apply to WIA Adults, Dislocated Workers, Wagner-Peyser, and VETS –Institutionalization –Health/Medical or Family Care; –Reservist called to active duty; and –Deceased. Global Outcome Exclusions

13 Global Outcome Exclusions New to W-P and VETS In implementation of global outcome exclusions, states should consider: –High costs of developing system to accept and track supplemental data –Negligible effects on outcome

14 Reporting Transition from PY 2004 to PY 2005 States will continue to report receipt of services and outcomes using the rolling four quarters methodology. For the report due November 14, 2005, States will need to “reach back” to re- calculate number of participants, exiters, and outcome data.

15  At a minimum, data needed from self-service participants:  social security number (SSN)  employment status at the point of participation.  Upon request of a customer’s SSN, the customer must also be offered the opportunity to provide Equal Employment/demographic information. Minimum Data Needed from S-S Participants

16 Entered Employment Rate (EER) Measure: Of those not employed at participation, the percentage of individuals employed in the 1 st quarter after program exit. Includes only those not employed at entry. Entry to employment is based on wage record data and other administrative data sources. Employment status at the start of participation is self-reported by jobseekers.

17 EER – former Labor Exchange measures Common Measures change: Registrant -to- Participant Hard -to- Soft Exit UI Wage Record and other state data system records -to- all of the preceding plus…. supplemental data –States have to weigh benefit of developing follow-up case management system

18 Measure: For those employed in the 1 st quarter after exit, the percentage employed in the 2 nd and 3 rd quarter after exit Of those employed in the 1 st quarter after exit, measure applies to individuals that were not employed at the start of participation, as well as those who were employed at the start of participation. Employment Retention Rate (ERR)

19 ERR – former Labor Exchange measures Change from old labor exchange measure: Employment in the 3 rd quarter after exit is new measurement point. The common measure ERR requires employment in two quarters to count toward employment retention.

20 Measure: Of those employed in 1 st quarter after exit, total post-program earnings (in Q2 & Q3 after exit) minus pre-program earnings (in Q2 & Q3 prior to participation) divided by the number of adults who exit during the quarter. Comparison of pre-program earnings to post- program earnings using dollar amount, not rate. Includes only those employed in first quarter after exit. Verified through wage record data only. Earnings Increase (EI)

21 EI – Wagner-Peyser and VETS A new outcome measure for W-P and VETS Unsure of the expected outcome level States will report the outcomes results Outcome goals will not be negotiated for PY 2005 for W-P PY 2005 will a baseline year for W-P Negotiation of goals in PY 2006

22 Workforce Information To integrate employment and workforce information services, WIA Adults, Dislocated Workers, and Wagner-Peyser will collect and report data on the provision of workforce information to job seekers. Workforce information may be accessed in person through self-help in the resource rooms, individual counseling or career guidance in a One-Stop Career Centers, or remotely via the Internet, and/or in ancillary agency sites.

23 Workforce Information (cont.) The W-P employment service program will report on receipt of workforce information as a self-directed and/or staff-assisted service and sub-aggregate outcome data for those who received workforce information. DVOP and LVER staff members will report receipt of workforce information only as a staff-assisted service.

24 W-P/VETS and TSMs Recently Separated Veteran –WIA – time period within last 48 months –W-P/VETS – time period within last 36 months Transitioning Service Member (TSM) Expects to retire within 24 months or separate within 12 months and seeks employment services. Homeless Veteran – A veteran who meets the statutory criterion for homelessness. Intensive Services - Replaces Case Management as a reporting category.

25 The Jobs for Veterans Act authorized DVOP and LVER staff members to deliver employment participants is included in the total count and/or services to TSMs. Information on TSM separately identified on the ETA 9002 A, B, C and D reports and the VETS 200 A, B and, similar to “Recently Separated C reports. TSM is a reporting characteristic Veteran” and “Campaign Badge Veteran.” Transitioning Service Members

26 A homeless veteran is an individual who has: –At least one day of active duty service with an “other than dishonorable” discharge; AND –“No fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence.” Services and outcomes for homeless veterans are reported only on the VETS 200 C report. Homeless Veterans

27 The Jobs for Veterans Act replaced the Term “Case Management” with the term “Intensive Services” and referenced Section 134(9)(3) of WIA, which identifies six specific services: –Conduct of assessments; –Development of individual employment plans; –Group counseling; –Individual counseling and career planning; –Case management; and –Short-term prevocational services. Intensive Services

28 Intensive Services (cont.) “Intensive Services” has Replaced “Case Management” as a reporting item on the ETA 9002 B and the VETS 200 A-C. DVOP/LVER staff still must meet the two prerequisites for case management in order to deliver intensive services: –Conduct of an assessment; and –Development of an individual employment plan

29 After the prerequisites, DVOP/LVER staff can provide: –Group counseling; –Individual counseling and career planning; and –Case management. Short-term prevocational services are NOT included among the intensive services to be provided by DVOP/LVER staff. Veterans are not required to receive “core services” prior to receiving intensive services but veterans still are expected to receive standard labor exchange services from Wagner-Peyser staff prior to being referred to DVOP/LVER staff for the delivery of intensive services. Intensive Services (cont.)

30 Customer Satisfaction for W-P funded programs Because it is not a common measure, for the Wagner-Peyser-funded employment services, ETA will discontinue capturing: a)job seeker customer satisfaction data using the American Customer Satisfaction Index; and b)employer customer satisfaction data.

31 Reporting Job Openings States should exclude from the ETA 9002E Report those job openings that were initially listed with America’s Job Bank and then imported into the state job bank.

32 Technical Changes to the ETA 9002 and VETS 200 Reporting For further information, please review the ET Handbook No. 406 or contact your ETA or VETS regional office.

33 ETA 9002 A Eliminations Reporting on job seekers who were “Referred to Support Services” (row 17 on previous report). Column reporting on “Other Race” (column 13 on previous report)

34 ETA 9002 A Minor Adjustments Renamed column A from “Total Jobseekers” to “Total.” Renamed column B from “Employment Status at Registration” and “Unemployed” to “Employment Status at Participation” and “Not Employed,” respectively. Renamed “Total Active Jobseekers” row to “Total Participants.” Renamed “Veterans and TSM Job Seekers” row to “Veterans, Eligible Persons, and TSMs.” Changed age breakout from “Adult (19 and over)” to “Adult (18 and over).” Changed age breakout from “19-44” to “18-44.”

35 ETA 9002 A Additions Reporting row: Total number of participants who “Received Workforce Information Services.” Reporting row: “Total Exiters” during the reporting period.

36 ETA 9002 B Eliminations All column level reporting by age breakouts for each category of veteran. On the previous report, this included column B, rows 5-7, column C, rows 9- 11, column D, rows 13-15, and column E, rows Reporting requirements for veterans who were “Referred to Support Services” (row 9 on previous report).

37 ETA 9002 B Minor Changes Renamed column A from “Total Veterans and TSM Jobseekers” to “Total Veterans, Eligible Persons, and TSMs.” Changed age breakout in column A from “19-44” to “18-44.” Switched columns B and C. On new report format, column B is labeled “TSMs” and column C is labeled “Campaign Badge Veterans.” Renamed column F from “Newly Separated Veterans” to “Recently Separated Veterans (3 yrs).” Renamed row 1 from “Total Active Veterans and TSM Jobseekers” to “Total Veterans, Eligible Persons, and TSMs.” Renamed, where appropriate, “case management services” to “intensive services.” Renamed, where appropriate, the term “placed in” with “entered into.”

38 ETA 9002 B Additions 3 reporting rows that include the total number of veterans served who were ages “18-44,” “45-54,” and “55 and over” for each category of veteran. Reporting row that includes the total number of veterans who “Received Workforce Information Services.” Reporting row that includes “Total Exiters” during the reporting period.

39 ETA 9002 C Eliminations All column level reporting based on “Employment Status at Registration” (column B on previous report). Column reporting on “Other Race” (column 13 on previous report) Reporting requirements for job seekers who “Entered Employment Following Staff-Assisted Services” (row 11 on previous report). Row reporting requirements for the job seeker and employer customer satisfaction measure (rows 12 – 17 on previous report).

40 ETA 9002 C Minor Adjustments Renamed column A from “Total Jobseekers” to “Total Exiters.” Included, where appropriate, the term “numerator” and a denominator” for the entered employment and employment retention measures. Changed age breakout from “19-44” to “18-44.”

41 ETA 9002 C Additions Reporting row to capture “Six Months Earnings Increase.” 3 reporting rows to capture common measures outcomes for participants who receive workforce information services. –“Entered Employment Rate Follow Work-Info Services,” –“Employment Retention Rate Follow Work-Info Services,” and –“Six Months Earnings Increase Follow Work-Info Services.”

42 ETA 9002 D Eliminations All column level reporting by age breakouts for each category of veteran. On the previous report, this includes column B, rows 5-7, column C, rows 9-11, column D, rows 13-15, and column E, rows

43 ETA 9002 D Minor Changes Changed age breakout in column A from “19- 44” to “18-44.” Switched columns B and C. On new report format, column B is labeled “TSMs” and column C is labeled “Campaign Badge Veterans.” Renamed column F from “Newly Separated Veterans” to “Recently Separated Veterans (3 yrs).” Included, where appropriate, the term “numerator” and “denominator” in the rows for the entered employment and employment retention measures.

44 ETA 9002 D Additions 3 reporting rows that includes the total number of veterans who entered employment for each category of veteran according to the following age breakouts: “18-44,” “45-54,” and “55 and over.” Reporting row to capture “Six Months Earnings Increase.” 3 reporting rows to capture common measures outcomes for jobseekers who receive workforce information services. –Entered Employment Rate Follow WI Services, –Employment Retention Rate Follow WI Services, –Six Months Earnings Increase Follow WI Services

45 ETA 9002 E No changes - Everything stays the same!

46 VETS 200 A, B and C Reports Eliminations Services Provided Reporting on veterans who were “Referred to WIA Services” (row 11 on previous reports). Reporting on veterans who were “Referred to Support Services” (row 12 on previous reports). Results and Outcomes The 3 rows of reporting for the entered employment data: “Entered Employment,” “Entered Employment Rate Base,” and “Entered Employment Rate” (rows on previous reports). Placeholder for state reporting on Job Seeker Satisfaction Score (row 32 on previous reports).

47 VETS 200 A, B and C Reports Additions Reporting row that includes the “Total Exiters” during the reporting period. Services Provided Reporting row that includes the total number of participants who “Received Workforce Information Services.” Results and Outcomes Reporting row that includes an aggregate count of the “Six Months Earnings Increase” during the reporting period.

48 VETS 200 C - Only Additions Reporting column on the VETS 200 C only that includes aggregate reporting on services to “Homeless Veterans” (column I).

49 SAMPLE CALCULATION of EXITER An unemployed job seeker came to the One-Stop Center on July 1, 2005 and browsed the job bank. She returned on July 3 rd and created and posted a resume. On July 5 th she modified job bank search requirements and accessed workforce information. She did not receive any more services for 90 days. Employed but interested in looking at other options, she returned to the One-Stop on January 5, 2006 to update her resume and look at workforce information. She did not receive any more services for 90 days. She remained employed through January Questions: What is her participation date(s)? What is her exit date(s)? What quarters do you follow for entry to employment? What quarters do you follow for retention? Earnings gain?

50 July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan Feb. March April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan July 1: Browsed Job Bank July 3: Created Resume – Participation Date 1 July 5: Modified search requirements. Looked at workforce information. Oct. 3: 90 days have elapsed, no service. Exit program. Exit date 1: July 5, (Exit qtr July – Sept. 2005) Oct. – Dec qtr is the first qtr after Exit date 1. Look at this qtr for entry to employment for participation 1. In this case the participant was found to be employed Jan 5: Updated resume and accessed workforce information – Participation Date 2. (still employed) April 5, 2006: 90 days have elapsed, no service. Exit program. Exit date 2: Jan 5, 2006 (Exit qtr 2 Jan – March 2006) April-June 2006 qtr is the first qtr after Exit Date 2. Because jobseeker was employed at this participation, not included in the EER for participation 2. Jan- March 2006 and April-June 2006 are qtrs 2 and 3, respectively, after exit of participation 1. Because participant was employed in first qtr after exit 1, look at these qtrs for Retention and Earnings Increase. July-Sept and Oct.-Dec are qtrs 2 and 3, respectively, after exit of participation 2. Because participant was employed in first qtr after exit 2, look at these qtrs for Retention and Earnings Increase.

51 Time and Date Calculator

52 QUESTIONS?