Why an RE Review? Equity Quality. Focus of the RE Review –Aims –Curriculum –Exemplification of good RE practice –Assessment including qualifications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delivering as One Viet Nam Country-led Evaluation Kigali, 20 October 2009.
Advertisements

Formulation, planning, budget information provided by Department of Planning & Evaluation Analysis and Preparation of Funding Resolution Approval of the.
Councillor Egli Ward 9 Knoxdale- Merivale June 5, 2014.
Project Overview 2010 Programme FA: 14 June 2007 Start: 2 Sept 2007 Completion: 31 June 2011 Budget: €10,155,000 (EU), €155,000 (National)
@kings_lynn_bid The King’s Lynn Business Improvement District.
Triangle of Care - The Pennine Way Clair Carson Acute Services Line Manager and Trust ToC lead. Graham Mellors Business Planning Officer.
1 Introducing the Victorian Curriculum Reform 2004 Consultation Paper 2004 Consultation Paper A Framework of ‘Essential Learning’ April 2004.
Evaluation of Wellbeing 2 Quick update for grant holders Nicki Smith / Sarah Jenkins Ecorys UK #wellbeing.
UNC Modification Proposal Revised Timescales for LDZ Shrinkage Arrangements Simon Trivella – 25 th September 2008 Distribution Workstream.
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
Australian History Curriculum Brian Elliott Manager, Human Society and Its Environment
A new strategy for the College – the consultation and development process Dr Nina Biscoe Planning Division July 2009.
Joint Improvement Support Plans. Jan 09 Dec 08 Nov 08 Oct 08 Feb 09 Apr 08 Mar 09 Sept 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 Aug 08 Changes to LAA targets finalised.
Teacher Performance Appraisal What is Appraisal for? For the appraisee an opportunity to:  Reflect on and celebrate their role in supporting.
UNIT 39 Animation for Web. TIME CHALLENGE Get going.
Higher Education Review Progress May QAA timelines for NTU review October 2014–August May 2014 Informed who review team members are 22 May.
National Curriculum 2009/18847(2). What has come before? Ministerial agreement on national goals Hobart Declaration (1989) Adelaide Declaration (1999)
ConstructionSkills Amanda Sergeant - Regional Strategy Adviser, East Midlands.
Health Overview Policy and Scrutiny Panel Update on Health Reform Proposals James Foster North Somerset Council.
Workshop 4 Action Planning. Parish Plan Schedule Etc. Planning for Real Group considers option of forming sub-groups to research thematic issues First.
© 2013 OSLC Steering Committee1 Proposal to Create OSLC Affiliated Technical Committees OSLC Steering Committee Meeting: 1 PM EDT, 8 July 2013 Open Services.
Market Position Statement Voluntary Sector Forum 26 May 2015.
Main outcomes of 21 th ERG Plenary Roberto Viola, ERG Chair Brussels, 15 June 2007.
Final Deadlines for students aiming to graduate in November 2013 April 4th PGR4 submitted to Registry (to approve examiners at next GSB) July 8 th Submission.
2 Why do we need a “data revolution”? What do we want to achieve? How will we do it? Who should be involved? When will it be done?
IMPORTANCE OF QUALITY AND HIGH STANDARDS? degree of public investment in education economic competitiveness social equity personal self-esteem place on.
Complete College Georgia Policy Working Group: RHSC Deficiency February 26, 2014.
Gavin Boyd Chief Executive Designate Education & Skills Authority (ESA) Conference for School Governors 21 May 2008.
23 July 2002EUROGI1 THE EUROPEAN UMBRELLA ORGANISATION FOR GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Ian Masser.
VOICE4CHANGE-ENGLAND Modelling fair and equitable collaborations - Funded by The City Bridge Trust.
FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT The next steps. The National Technical Advisory Group On Flooding Issues An Overview and the Future.
National Curriculum Board – ISQ Curriculum Forum Robert Randall, General Manager Brisbane, 25 May 2009.
Developing NAEP Frameworks: A Look Inside the Process Mary Crovo Deputy Executive Director National Assessment Governing Board November 17, 2007.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
PROGRESS OF 5 YEAR HEALTH SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN Department of Planning and Finance, Ministry of Health.
Strategic Planning January Update. Steering Committee Eight meetings so far, with reviews of data on: O Student achievement O Finance and facilities O.
Processes for Strategy Development and Action Planning The College of Sciences & Health.
The SaTH Foundation Trust Programme Deborah Shaw March 29th 2007.
Update to NLAG board 22 nd December Sep Jan MCE Workforce and OD Oct Nov Dec IM&T Estates Finance In hospital Model Out of hospital Model Progress.
This is an example text TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING DecOctSepAugJulyJuneAprilMarchFebJanMayNov 12 Months Example text Go ahead and replace it with your own.
Project Parkway Timeline to 2011 April 1, 2010 Town Hall Meeting Steering Committee Schools February 2009 May 18, 2009 Project Parkway Community Kick-
Mădălina Dobrescu European Institute, LSE 1 May 2013.
Glendale Community College District Demographics & Districting November 18, 2014.
Strategic Advisor for Social Work and Social Care Research.
Developing Local Involvement Networks Understanding Local Involvement Networks Brenda Cook Health Scrutiny Expert Adviser Dudley Stakeholder Event – 21.
Strategic Advisor for Social Work and Social Care Research
REWG activities in LILIIA MALON REWG Chair Prague
Autumn 2013: Heads and chairs consider closer collaboration
REPORTING SDG INDICATORS USING NATIONAL REPORTING PLATFORMS
Save these dates! October 14, 15 and 16, 2010 ASU Student Union
A&M Workplan Objectives
Joint Improvement Support Plans
GFOI Plenary March 2018 Bogota, Colombia
IT Director's Group Meeting
Student Administration and Support Programme and Project Timelines
SOCIAL DIALOGUE TIMELINE
ASCEL Conference 10 – 11 November 2017 Janene Cox OBE Commissioner for
Student Administration and Support Programme and Project Timelines
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Croydon Health and Care Plans Feedback from the engagement events
Student Administration and Support Programme and Project Timelines
PARCA Timeline.
Meeting of Water Directors Progress on Reporting and WISE
Ewan Colquhoun Ridge partners 2 Aug 2016
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
Student Assignment Review Advisory Committee
Calendar Overview – Phase II – REVISED April 2019
STEM Education in Sri Lanka128/08/2019. Globally current trend is STEM Cabinet memorandum TRD 2017 August Several Institutions present strategic plan.
Presentation transcript:

Why an RE Review? Equity Quality

Focus of the RE Review –Aims –Curriculum –Exemplification of good RE practice –Assessment including qualifications

Sizing up the challenge Considerable resources within the RE Community Authority of the REC Lack of government support Very limited resources

Overview by 4 Phases 1.Identify current strengths & weaknesses of RE related to four foci (led by Expert Panel) 2.Address agenda for change identified by those findings (led by Task Groups) 3.Find best way to communicate findings of Phases One and Two in final report 4.Disseminate Report widely and celebrate!

Phase 1 Draft report goes to the …….. Steering Group (Oct 31 st ) and on to the Reference Group (REC EGM Nov 7 th) then on to Wider public consultation (Nov 12 th - Dec 3 rd ) REC Board (Dec 6 th ) Report finalised and approved Jan 2013

Phase 2 Brief for task groups agreed by Steering Group and fair/authoritative means of recruiting task group membership identified (28 th Nov) First 2 task groups undertake work (Feb – April 2013); work circulated for wider consultation Second 2 task groups undertake work (May – July 2013); work circulated for wider public consultation

Phases 3 & 4 Synthesise the reports from Phases 1 & 2 into a final document Publish the final report and organise a launch/launches at which we lobby policy makers and celebrate our collective achievement

Who’s in charge?

“We” need to do this WE being: –RE teachers –RE advisers and consultants –RE and TRS/RS university and college lecturers –“Faith” Group representatives and citizens N.B. There is no funding from the government for the RE Review:

Every argument a constructive argument!