Impact of Non-Freeway Rumble Strips

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Vision, Mission and Goal presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Susan Herbel, Cambridge.
Advertisements

R U M B L E S T R I P S By Gary Dirlam, Mn/DOT District 3 Traffic Engineer.
1Operations DivisionApril 29, Pavement Markings Policy, Measures, Targets Policy: Provide appropriate pavement markings to provide presence and.
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Rumble Strip(e) June 16, 2011 Simone Ardoin Assistant Road Design Engineer Administrator.
CR 236 Resurfacing from US 441 to I-75 30% Plans Alachua County Board of County Commissioners September 28, 2010.
FUTURE CMF RESEARCH AND CHALLENGES Traffic Records Forum October 27, 2014 Daniel Carter, UNC HSRC.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
Wyoming County Paved Roads Management and Monitoring Khaled Ksaibati, Ph.D., P.E. STIC June, 2014.
A Comprehensive Study on Pavement Edge Line Implementation Presented by: Mark J. Morvant, P.E. Associate Director, Research Louisiana Transportation Research.
57 th Traffic Conference. The National Problem — ,200 Fatalities 2.68M Injuries $230.6B / year $820 per person 3.3 Million Deaths Since 1928.
The Effectiveness of Wider Edge Line Pavement Markings February 2012 Sponsored by: AGBMA.
Median Barriers & Rumble Strips in North Carolina Missouri Traffic & Safety Conference May 16, 2006 Brian Murphy, PE North Carolina DOT - Traffic Engineering.
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems CE 7640: Fall 2002 Prof. Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.
CE 4640: Transportation Design
0-1 Safe and Effective Use of Connecticut Law Enforcement Personnel in Work Zones Safe and Effective Use of Connecticut Law Enforcement Personnel in Work.
Cross Sections CE 453 Lecture 22 Iowa DOT Design Manual Chapter 3.
INDOT Rumble Striping: A Systemic Safety Measure June 4 th, 2015.
Data Analysis and Use 3-1 NLTAPA Joint Safety Work Group Webinar November 18, 2013.
Hypothesis 1: Narrow roadways and roadways with higher speed limits will increase risk of vehicle/bicycle crash Hypothesis 2: Bicycle lanes and signage.
Michigan VII: Technology Improving Lives ITS Midwest Annual Meeting February 7, 2006 Gregory D. Krueger, P.E. Statewide ITS Program Manager Michigan Department.
1-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS. 1-2 Introduction Highway Traffic Fatalities Trend.
KYTC Bicycle & Pedestrian Program February 24, 2015.
Transportation Safety Issues on our Indian Reservations Dennis Trusty Director- Northern Plains TTAP 2009 Transportation Safety Conference Pierre, SD.
Pavement Preservation Protecting the Investment and the Environment R. Gary Hicks CP2 Center, Chico, CA Prepared for CEAC 2014 Conference March 26-28,
Center Line Rumble Stripes Powerpoint presentation for HDMT February 25, (Draft 2/17/10)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
Meg Moore Traffic Engineering Section Director Traffic Operations Division Texas Department of Transportation.
FHWA10/1/ MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES REWRITE AND OUTREACH EFFORT TARGET DATE: 2001.
SESSION 8 Shoulder Considerations. Objectives Identify shoulder/edge support types Describe benefits of each type Discuss how edge support conditions.
Encouraging Transportation Investment Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce Percolator Breakfast May 2, 2013 Horizons Conference Center Rich Studley, President.
THE HISTORY OF MOBY-DICK David J Russell II. GEOMETRIC DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL FACTORS THAT IMPACT TRUCK USE OF TOLL ROADS David J Russell II.
Roadway Safety Panel How can ITS assist in bridging vehicle technology with roadway design and function?
WORK ZONE SAFETY & MOBILITY Meeting the Federal Rule Jim Allen Safety Implementation Engineer ATSSA Illinois Chapter Meeting.
PennDOT’s Study of NCHRP Research Results Implementation TRB State Representatives & AASHTO National RAC Meetings July 27, Michael Bonini Transportation.
Saving Lives: A Vital FHWA Goal Safety Priorities for 2003 Michael Halladay FHWA Office of Safety Michigan Traffic Safety Summit; April 29, 2003.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
CMV Studies: Crash Causation and Safety Belt Use Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E. Professor Wayne State University Transportation Research Group March 13, 2007.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
MICHIGAN’s INITIATIVES FOR REDUCING HIGHWAY FATALITIES.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Angela Kargel Region 2 Traffic Manager Oregon Department of Transportation January 2015.
July 12, 2005Portland State University Enhancing the Oregon Crash Reporting Process: A Feasibility Study ITE District 6 Annual Meeting July 12, 2005 Chris.
2005 ITS Georgia Annual Meeting 1 MDOT VII Vision and Test Bed Plan States and OEM’s Working Together Gregory D. Krueger, P.E. MDOT ITS Program Manager.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Intersection Safety Case Study Summary FHWA-SA Red-Light Running: All-Red Clearance Intervals and Larger Signal Lenses A Michigan Success Story.
Rural, Non-Freeway Rumbles Keeping Drivers on the Road…
Successes in Reducing Highway Fatalities Kathy Harvey, MoDOT State Design Engineer July 16, 2008 Albuquerque, N.M.
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Combination Centerline and Edgeline Rumble Strips Dr. Frank Gross, VHB.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
UsRAP Pilot Studies Douglas W. Harwood Midwest Research Institute TRB January 22, 2007.
US 421 Centerline Rumble Strips in Chatham Co. Renee B. Roach, P.E. and Al Grandy May 2, 2007.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
1 Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements (ELCSI) Pooled Fund Study Roya Amjadi, Highway Research Engineer FHWA, Turner-Fairbank Research Center 10/24/08.
SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) GRANTS Presented By: Patrick V. DeChellis Deputy Director Los Angeles County Department.
Estimation of 2001 Crash Costs Using FARS and GES John McFadden, Len Meczkowski, FHWA-Office of Safety R&D; Carol Conly, Lendis Corporation; Promod Chandhok,
California’s Experience with HFST 1.  Overview  Challenging Locations  Collision Reduction (State and Local Roads)  Typical Placement and current.
SCOHTS Meeting April 28-30, Completed NCHRP Projects Report 641 – Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips.
Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance NCHRP Project 20-68A Domestic Scan Program Scan SCOHTS 2011.
FHWA TURNER-FAIRBANK RESEARCH CENTER Welcomes you LOW-COST SPF Annual TAC Meeting, 2007.
2016 RAC Annual Meeting Sweet Sixteen
TRB Annual Meeting Performance Measure
Overcoming Barriers to Implement Research Projects
Technology Transfer Principles and Practice
Evaluation of Michigan’s Engineering Improvements for Older Drivers
Pavement Performance Measures In Georgia
State Safety Office, Florida Department of Transportation
SCOHTS Meeting April 29-May 1, 2009
KENT COUNTY Safety Edge Projects
Presentation transcript:

Impact of Non-Freeway Rumble Strips Gregory C. Johnson, PE Chief Operations Officer Michigan Department of Transportation (5 minutes) When you drive your car over a Michigan Highway center line you will feel and hear the vibrating wake up call of a rumble strip to bring your car back into your lane. We call that the sound of another life being saved. I had the privilege of serving on the research advisory panel that studied these life saving rumble strips.

Introduction Michigan Department of Transportation Project Manager: Jill Morena, PE Wayne State University: Timothy J. Gates, PhD, PE Peter T. Savolainen, PhD, PE Tapan K. Datta, PhD, PE Ryan G. Todd Brendan J. Russo tjgates@wayne.edu The project was managed by our pavement marking engineer Jill Morena. The contracted research team that conducted the research included three professors from Wayne State University and several hard working students that viewed over 700 hours of video, rode bicycles around rumble strips, and counted cracks along about 5,000 miles of road.

Problem Statement Reduce Lane-Departure Crashes Rumble Strip Installation 5,400 Miles of Non-Freeway Centerlines Shoulders Evaluate Rumble Strip Installations and Provide Future Implementation Guidance Driving out of your lane in rural Michigan is one of the leading causes of crashes and probably in many of your states accounts for a large percentage of fatal crashes. In Michigan this type of crash accounted for. 20% of all crashes 61% of fatal crashes (the largest percentage) In an effort to reduce lane-departure crashes, in 2008 the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) began a three-year statewide non-freeway rumble strip installation initiative. This initiative called for the installation of milled centerline rumble strips on all rural non-freeway highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph a paved roadway width greater than 20 ft and shoulder rumble strips on roadways with paved shoulders that were at least 6 ft wide. Approximately 5,400 miles of non-freeway roadways were ultimately included in this rumble strip installation initiative. As this initiative is believed to be the largest of its kind in the United States at its time, it was important to evaluate the impacts associated with the rumble strip installations and provide guidance for future implementation.

Research Performed Video of Driver Behavior Encroachment Centerline Shoulder Passing Maneuvers Bicyclists Vehicles Surveyed Bicyclists about Rumble Strips We used pole-mounted high definition cameras to collect video data of driver behavior both before and after the installation of centerline rumble strips. After the 700 hours of manual video review, data shows: how well vehicles were centered within their lanes; the reduction in corner cutting effects on passing maneuvers. Including the lateral displacement of drivers when passing bicyclists. Additionally, we surveyed Michigan bicyclists about the effect of rumble strips on their safety and comfort.

Research Performed Crash Data Analysis Video Logs of Pavement Centerlines Evaluate Pavement Cracking Before and after Rumble Strip Installations Roadside Noise We also: • Developed a comprehensive database of crash data before centerline rumble strip installation to establish a baseline for later comparison to crash data after installation. Total target crash and injury frequency decreased considerably during the “After” period. Injury crashes are substantively lower in the “After” period • Used MDOT’s pavement management system video logs to evaluate 5,000 miles of pavement counting cracks before and after centerline rumble strip installations. • Set up ambient noise detectors and evaluated roadside noise due to installations. 2008 installation Before Crashes After Crashes 1,494 miles 584 392

Results Safety Pavement Performance Noise Improved Driver Performance Do not Contribute to Short-Term Transverse Cracking in Asphalt Pavements Noise Deeper Rumbles Produce Higher Noise Levels Noise Typically did not Exceed the Roadside Noise Level Produced by Tractor-Trailer Safety Researchers found that the presence of centerline rumble strips on rural high-speed non-freeway highways improves driver performance in most conditions. Drivers position themselves more centrally in lanes, leading to fewer encroachments over centerlines and shoulders, thus increasing safety. More bicyclists felt safer with rumble strips placed on 6 foot shoulders and than with rumble strips placed on narrower shoulders.   Pavement performance: Centerline rumble strips did not contribute to short-term transverse cracking in asphalt pavements. Noise: The noise from rumble strips was incrementally higher for rumbles strips with a depths greater than ½ inch. leading us to limit their depth. Vehicles produced higher levels of roadside noise when traveling over rumble strips than they did traveling over regular pavement, but this noise typically did not exceed the roadside noise level produced by tractor-trailer trucks traveling on normal highways.

Recommendations Depth of 0.5 Inch at the Center and 0.375 Inch at the Outer Edges Reduces Noise Installation on 6 Foot or Wider Shoulders Increases Bicyclist Perceived Safety Overall the recommended installation of rumble strips was upheld by this research, but I’d like to highlight 2 specific recommendations and commend the summary spotlight document or full report to your reading: First how deep should they be to minimize ambient noise and still be effective? ½ inch at the center line Second how wide should the paved roadway shoulders be before they are installed? 6 feet These are specifications that lead to improved quality of life with lower noise levels and safer roads for bicycles. You can access the report or summary spotlight at our MDOT research website. Copies of the spotlight are available here for your use. Report Available @ www.michigan.gov/mdotresearch

Implementation Status and Strategy Installing Rumble Strips Follow Specification Communicate Results Research Spotlight Three TRB Papers Phase II Project Quantify the Benefit Develop Guidelines Cities Counties “We expect Phase 2 of this project to give transportation agencies in Michigan and other states the data they need to implement their own initiatives.” Jill Morena, PE Project Manager What are we doing about all this good information? We are installing them and following the specification We are communicating the information Every project with exciting findings like this one we develop a spotlight summary to get research results to a broad audience We have had three papers presented at TRB on this one topic to share the findings of this research We have embarked on a second phase of this research to quantify the life saving crash reducing benefit of rumble strip installations And Develop a how to install rumble strips document to help cities and counties through out Michigan install rumble strips on their roadways. MDOT only has jurisdiction over 8% of its roads leaving over 600 local agencies to implement similar systems on their roads.

Value Save Lives and Reduce Crashes Annually 60 Incapacitating Injuries 15 Lives Improving the Quality of Life Investment Research $262,829 Construction 3 years @ $2.7M /year Total $8.3 Million We know people get distracted — we know people get tired — we never know where people are going to do this - we did not want to wait until someone has a crashed. We made a $8.3 million investment. It works out to about 28 cents a foot, that’s an incredible investment for the return you get with lives saved Based on the literature, we project a reduction of more than 300 crashes annually a reduction of approximately 60 incapacitating injuries annually and 15 lives saved annually

Better.Faster.Cheaper.Safer.Smarter Questions? Better.Faster.Cheaper.Safer.Smarter Customer Service is Important Please take our customer survey: www.michigan.gov/mdot