1 Term Project – Call Center Operations SOM 686, Fall 2006 Darren Mitchell Hayden Gilbert Serge Suprun.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMBA-2, BUP Major Asad EO Chapter 5: Process Analysis.
Advertisements

Make to Stock (MTS) vs. Make to Order (MTO)
Waiting Line Management
Process Flow Analysis The Little’s Law The main source for preparing these slides is Managing Business Process Flow Anupindi, Chopra, Deshmoukh, Van.
Operations Management
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 12: Service processes and flow variability Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin.
Capacity Setting and Queuing Theory
S. D. Deshmukh OM V. Capacity Planning in Services u Matching Supply and Demand u The Service Process u Performance Measures u Causes of Waiting u Economics.
© 2006, Monash University, Australia CSE4884 Network Design and Management Lecturer: Dr Carlo Kopp, MIEEE, MAIAA, PEng Lecture 5 Queueing Theory Concepts.
Jones & Robinson: Operations Management All operations need to know the likely customer demand for their goods or services on any given day, week or year.
S. Chopra/Operations/Managing Services1 Operations Management: Capacity Management in Services Module u Why do queues build up? u Process attributes and.
Call Center Basics An Introduction to Who we are and How we Work? Yousef Farraj.
Operations Management Waiting Lines. 2 Ardavan Asef-Vaziri Sep-09Operations Management: Waiting Lines1  Understanding the phenomenon of waiting  Measures.
OPSM 405 Service Management Class 19: Managing waiting time: Queuing Theory Koç University Zeynep Aksin
Chapter 4 Process design Shenval. Alamy.
OM&PM/Class 7a1 Operations Management & Performance Modeling 1Operations Strategy 2Process Analysis 3Lean Operations 4Supply Chain Management 5Capacity.
Previously Optimization Probability Review Inventory Models Markov Decision Processes.
1 CSSE 477 – A bit more on Performance Steve Chenoweth Friday, 9/9/11 Week 1, Day 2 Right – Googling for “Performance” gets you everything from Lady Gaga.
1 Ardavan Asef-Vaziri Sep-09Operations Management: Waiting Lines2  Made-to-stock (MTS) operations  Product is manufactured and stocked in advance of.
OM&PM/Class 2a1 1Operations Strategy –Class 1a: Introduction to OM –Class 1b: Strategic Operational Audits 2Process Analysis –Class 2a: Process Flow Analysis.
1 Performance Evaluation of Computer Networks Objectives  Introduction to Queuing Theory  Little’s Theorem  Standard Notation of Queuing Systems  Poisson.
Quantitative issues in contact centers Ger Koole Vrije Universiteit seminar E-commerce & OR 18 January 2001 Lunteren.
S. Chopra/Operations/Quality1 Wrap Up Levers for Improving Process Performance.
Polling: Lower Waiting Time, Longer Processing Time (Perhaps)
14-1. Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 14 Capacity Planning and Queuing Models.
Queuing Analysis Based on noted from Appendix A of Stallings Operating System text 6/28/20151.
Waiting Lines.
OM&PM/Class 6b1 1Operations Strategy 2Process Analysis 3Lean Operations 4Supply Chain Management 5Capacity Management in Services –Class 6b: Capacity Analysis.
7/3/2015© 2007 Raymond P. Jefferis III1 Queuing Systems.
Capacity Management in Services Module
1 Ardavan Asef-Vaziri Sep-09Operations Management: Waiting Lines3  Terminology: The characteristics of a queuing system is captured by five parameters:
1 3. Process Flow Measures Assignment, Problem 1 Solution 1. Bank XYZ receives 20 loan requests per hour on average. Each loan request goes through an.
1 3. Process Flow Measures Assignment, Problem 1 Solution 1. Bank XYZ receives 20 loan requests per hour on average. Each loan request goes through an.
Call Center Terminologies
Buffer or Suffer Principle
OPSM 301: Operations Management
A service of Maryland Health Benefit Exchange Consolidated Service Center Update Maryland Health Benefit Exchange Board Meeting January 27, 2014 Presented.
MBA 8452 Systems and Operations Management MBA 8452 Systems and Operations Management Product Design & Process Selection —Service.
CALL CENTRE MANAGEMENT BASICS
Queueing Theory [Bose] “The basic phenomenon of queueing arises whenever a shared facility needs to be accessed for service by a large number of jobs or.
Introduction to the Theory of Constraints (TOC) & Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Major Mark McNabb.
OMG Operations Management Spring 1997 CLASS 6: Process Design and Performance Measurement Harry Groenevelt.
Announcement-exam rules
Introduction to Operations Research
Queueing Analysis of Production Systems (Factory Physics)
1 Voice Traffic Engineering & Management. 2 PSTN and PBX networks are designed with 2 objectives: Maximize usage of their circuits Maximize usage of their.
Make to stock vs. Make to Order
Queuing Queues are a part of life and waiting to be served is never really pleasant. The longer people wait the less likely they are to want to come back.
OPSM 405 Service Operations Management
1 Chapters 8 Overview of Queuing Analysis. Chapter 8 Overview of Queuing Analysis 2 Projected vs. Actual Response Time.
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 19: Flow variability Koç University Zeynep Aksin
Managing Inventory and Service Costs Managing Inventory and Service Costs C H A P T E R 21.
OMSAN LOJİSTİK. Top Management Program in Logistics & Supply Chain Management (TMPLSM) Production and Operations Management 3: Process Analysis.
CSCI1600: Embedded and Real Time Software Lecture 19: Queuing Theory Steven Reiss, Fall 2015.
Customer-Centric Program First Year Experience. Critical Decision Dr. Franklin Shaffer CGFNS International CEO and Keith Miller Chief of Staff made a.
Operations Fall 2015 Bruce Duggan Providence University College.
Review Session Jehan-François Pâris. Agenda Statistical Analysis of Outputs Operational Analysis Case Studies Linear Regression.
3-1Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Course Code MGT 561 Supply Chain Management Book: Supply Chain Management Strategy,
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 13-14: Queue management Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin
Chapter 5 Elementary Stochastic Analysis Prof. Ali Movaghar.
1 Safety Capacity Capacity Planning in Services Industry  Matching Supply and Demand in Service Processes  Performance Measures  Causes of Waiting 
Managerial Decision Making Chapter 13 Queuing Models.
Lin/Operations/Managing Services1 Capacity Management in Services Module u Queuing processes and performance measures u Why do queues build up? u Performance.
Introduction to the Theory of Constraints (TOC) & Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Major Mark McNabb.
Managing Flow Variability: Safety Capacity
7 C H A P T E R Managing Inventory and Service Costs.
Effect of Buffer Capacity
Customer Service Performance Update
Variability 8/24/04 Paul A. Jensen
Effect of Buffer Capacity
Presentation transcript:

1 Term Project – Call Center Operations SOM 686, Fall 2006 Darren Mitchell Hayden Gilbert Serge Suprun

2 Term Project – Call Center Operations Agenda  Overview  Call Center Statistics (October), Definitions & Forecast  Process View of the Call Center  Call Center Competencies, Architecture, Three Key Measures & Little’s Law  Call Center Flow, Delays, Queues & Process Attributes  Flow Rate-related Measures of Call Center Capacity  Flow Time-related Measures of Customer Delay  Inventory-related Measures of Customer Queues  Performance Improvements & Managing Capacity

3 Term Project – Call Center Operations Overview  Time Warner Cable Los Angeles –Bought Adelphia –Exchanged properties with Comcast –Now provides cable, internet & telephone services to over 2 million customers.  Time Warner Advanced support is local –Teamed up with outsourced partner to provide basic support for all three products.  Basic support includes: billing, basic repair, changes to the accounts & general questions.  Outsourced partner provides basic support from 3 call center locations: USA, Canada & Argentina.

4 Term Project – Call Center Operations Overview  Call Center in Argentina supports English & Spanish-speaking customers.  There are 36 agents employed in the center –12 are Spanish only –24 are bilingual  On average, the call center handles 40,000 calls per month.  However, over last 2 months handled calls were 36.5% over forecast.  Service level suffered over past 2 months too –In October, only 32.4% of calls were answered within appropriate time limit.

5 Term Project – Call Center Operations Call Center Statistics (October) and Definitions  NCO – number of calls offered  ABA – number of calls abandoned; ABA% - percentage of calls abandoned  SVL – service level  ASA – average speed of answer  Hand – average handle time DATEFCASTNCO % O/U FCAST ABASVL%ABA% ASA (Seconds) Hold (seconds) Hand (seconds) 10/1/ , % %43.0% /2/20061,4731, % %29.8% /3/20061,3621, % %14.3% ************ 10/30/20061,4732, % %19.2% /31/20061,2632, % %10.6% ,16854, %11, %20.4%

6 Term Project – Call Center Operations Forecast  Past 2 months, Argentina used naïve forecast: –(Based on the last year historical data) –Forecast didn’t take into the account recent product changes & integration projects –As a result  October call volume was 32.4% over forecast.  We are suggesting to use Moving average forecast. Ex:  MA 10 3 = (A 10 + A 9 + A 8 )/3, using last months data is (54,494+56,221+50,221)/3=53,636  Therefore, F 11 =53,636. November forecast should be for 53,636 calls. This would allow Argentina to staff appropriately.

7 Term Project – Call Center Operations Process View of the Call Center  Inputs/Outputs – customers calling for service/customers completed the call  Flow Units – customers  Network of Activities and Buffers – answering customers’ calls  Resources – customer service agents (CSA), phone automated system (PAS), etc.  Information Structure – account management system, reference materials, etc. InputsOutputs Process

8 Term Project – Call Center Operations Call Center Competencies and Architecture  4 Dimensions for measuring the competence of the call center: –Process Cost –Process Flow Time –Process Flexibility –Process Quality.  Argentina call center focuses on the low cost. –Call center provides high-quality Spanish support.  Argentina call center process architecture is defined by the types of resources (CSA, PAS, etc). –Call center falls somewhere along the spectrum between two extremes (flow shop and job shop). –Flow shop fits better, as call center uses specialized resources that perform limited tasks & produce large volumes with high precision and speed.

9 Term Project – Call Center Operations Three Key Call Center Measures  Flow Time = Time Customer spends: –In automated phone system –Waiting in the queue for an agent –Talking to an agent. Ex: October Average PAS time is 46, Queue average waiting time is 32 & handle time is 462 seconds. T=540 seconds  Flow Rate = Number of customers that flow through a specific point in the call center process per unit of time.  Inventory = Total number of customers present within call center boundaries. Ex: Argentina call center is 24/7 & call patterns are very different. Therefore, to simplify calculations we will use I=27 customers

10 Term Project – Call Center Operations Little’s Law  Throughput = Average number of customers that flow through the call center per unit of time.  Little’s Law - Average inventory (=) Throughput (x) Average flow time. –I = R x T Ex: We identified: T = 540 seconds (9 min) I = 27 customers. Therefore, R = I/T R = 27/9 R = 3 customers/minute

11 Term Project – Call Center Operations Call Center Flow, Delays and Queues Customer Arrival RateThroughput RiRi Capacity R p = c/T p R = Min (R i, R p ) I i + I p = I T i + T p = T Queue + Service =Process Number: Time: In:

12 Term Project – Call Center Operations Call Center Process Attributes  Inflow Rate R i = Average rate of customer arrivals per unit time. –In the Argentinean call center, R i = 5 customers/minute Processing Time T p = Average time required by agent to process the customer. –T p = 462 (agent) + 46 (PAS) = 508 seconds  c = Number of agents in the resource pool –c = 36 agents in Argentina  Process capacity (R p ) = Total processing rate at which customers are processed by agents in the resource pool. –R p = c/T p or R p = 36/8.47 = 4.25 customers/minute  Buffer capacity (K) = Maximum number of customers that can wait in queue. –K = 120 (there are 10 lines that can hold 12 each at any given time)

13 Term Project – Call Center Operations Flow Rate-related Measures of Call Center Capacity  Throughput rate (R) = Average rate at which customers flow through the call center process –R = min (R i, R p ) –In our case, R p is smaller, so R = R p = 4.25  Capacity utilization (ρ) = Average fraction of the resource pool capacity that is occupied in processing customers –ρ = R/R p –In our case, R = R p and ρ = 1 »Our resource pool is constantly busy processing customers.  Safety capacity (R s ) = Excess processing capacity available to handle the customers inflows. –R s = R p – R i –In our case, R s = 4.25 – 5 = »All the available capacity is busy processing arrivals.

14 Term Project – Call Center Operations Flow Time-related Measures of Customer Delay  Average waiting time (T i ) = Time that a customer spends in queue. –T i = 32 seconds.  Average theoretical time = Average processing time of a customer. –T p = 462 seconds + 46 seconds (automated system) = 508 seconds  Average flow time in the process (T) = Average time that a customer spends waiting in queue & being served –T = T i + T p or T – = 540 seconds or 9 minutes  Flow time efficiency = Proportion of time that a customer spends being served rather than waiting in queue –T p / T =.94

15 Term Project – Call Center Operations Inventory-related Measures of Customer Queues  Average queue length = Average number of customers waiting for service –I i = R x T i –I i = 4.25 x 0.53 = 2.25 customers waiting for service  Average number of customers in service = Average in-process inventory –I p = R x T p –I p = 4.25 x 8.47 = customers in service  Average total number of customers in the process –I = I i + I p –I = = customers in the process

16 Term Project – Call Center Operations Call Center Flow, Delays and Queues Customer Arrival RateThroughput 5 customers/min Capacity R p = c/T p 4.25 customers/min = = 540 seconds Queue + Service = Process Number: Time: In:

17 Term Project – Call Center Operations Performance Improvements The following levers improved process performance:  Decrease variability in customer interarrival & processing times.  Decrease capacity utilization (or increase safety capacity) either by –Decreasing the arrival rate or increasing the unit processing rate –Increasing the number of servers  Synchronize the available capacity with demand.

18 Term Project – Call Center Operations Managing Capacity  Capacity utilization (ρ = R i /R p ) can be reduced by increasing average processing rate (R p )  In order to increase processing rate (R p = c/T p ) we recommended decreasing average processing time (T p )  To achieve a decrease in processing time: –Identified that billing & escalated calls took longer to handle in this call center vs. similar centers. –Thus recommended & implemented 2 separate hour training segments »Billing prorates explanation »How to handle escalated calls

19 Term Project – Call Center Operations Call Center Statistics (November)  Processing time decreased to 410 seconds –T p = = 456 seconds or 7.6 minutes  Process capacity R p = c/T p or R p = 36/456 = 4.74 customers/minute  Result: Capacity Utilization ρ = R i /R p or 5/4.74 = 1.06 DATEFCASTNCO % O/U FCAST ABASVL%ABA%ASAHoldHand 11/1/20061,9732, % %12.8% /2/20061,9862, % %13.2% ************ 11/25/20061,3681, % %18.4% ,38147, %7, %14.8%

20 Term Project – Call Center Operations