 An Kim  Cian Branco  David Warner  Edwin Billips  Langston Lewis  Thomas Work  Mackenzie Webb  Benjamin Cawrse (CS)  Jason Harris (TCC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAE 435 Fall Space debris are a serious hazard to continued Space exploration Dead CubeSats are hard to track De-Orbit Device Project aimed at Prototype.
Advertisements

LightSail.
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
UP, UP, AND AWAY! CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Ty Bailey, Soo Park, Cameron Coupe, Trevor Arrasmith, Carolyn Mason, Sam Frakes, Brandon Harris, Peter VanderKley.
Joshua Laub Jake Tynis Lindsey Andrews.  Small, lightweight satellites  Developed by California Polytechnic State University and Stanford University.
Critical Design Review ….. Royal Ordnance,Summerfield 17 th February 2001 National Rocketry Competition 2001 Open Rocketry Association Slide 1/14.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Solar Cell Efficiency Flight Readiness Review Teddy Bounds Angela Dunn Joel Sasser.
FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM HAWAII. LEO HANO FULL SCALE LOW POWER March 13, 2011 Motor = K780R.
Team Flying Camels Nawar Chaker Pete Dokter Tim Jacobs Adam Swartley Paul Savage Capstone Project February 24, 2005.
Windward Community College University of Hawaii
AAE450 Spring 2009 Mass Savings and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Preparation for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) 100 gram Case Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold]
FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM HAWAII. LEO HANO FULL SCALE LOW POWER March 13, 2011 Motor = K780R.
Team MADD Michael Davies Andrew Mountain Dan Hoang Daniel Brink Team MADD Michael Davies Andrew Mountain Dan Hoang Daniel Brink Power Distribution Control.
Paul “Trey” Karsten Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki Brynn Larson Terek Campbell Marcus Flores 11/25/09 Final Revision.
University of Wyoming Dorin Blodgett, Kevin Brown, Heather Choi, Ben Lampe Eric Robinson, Michael Stephens, Patrick Weber October 7,
Satellite communications and the environment of space Images: NASA.
Design of a small instrumented atmospheric descent probe NASA Ames Research Center.
COMM Subgroup Tomo Sugano (Primarily served as COMM personnel) Tasks –Started out by helping Relative Orbit team with differential delta-V requirement.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
MAE 435 Fall Sahil DhaliChristopher Quarles Michael Foch Brockton Baskette Kyle Wade Cian Branco Advisor: Dr. Robert Ash, P.E.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Team Flying Camels Nawar Chaker Paul Savage Tim Jacobs Pete Dokter Adam Swartley Capstone Project January 22, 2005.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
PHAT-TACO Experiment Pressure Humidity And Temperature Tests And Camera Observations Hannah Gardiner, Bill Freeman, Randy Dupuis, Corey Myers, Andrea Spring.
LSU 06/23/04COSPAR 2004, HASP Presentation1 The High Altitude Student Platform (HASP) for Student-Built Payloads T.G. Guzik and J.P. Wefel Dept. of Physics.
Team Balloon Satellite II Multi-Disciplinary Senior Design CSEN 4201 Level II Mid-Term Report 17 October 2003 Mentor: Tony Kim.
 An Kim  Cian Branco  David Warner  Edwin Billips  Langston Lewis  Mackenzie Webb  Alexander Streit (ECE)  Benjamin Cawrse (CS)  Jason Harris.
Dhruv Patel 12th- Project manager Max Beasley 11th- Systems Engineer Trey Hargett 11th Jonathan Ford 11th Brent Higdon 11th Austin Lambert 11th Jay Chenault.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
DemoSat IV Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 21, 2006.
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
THE AVENGERS Measuring Atmospheric Ozone gases. General  The primary goal of the ITO sensor project is to measure the concentration of Ozone (O 3 ) as.
Team Parro Project HUSP. Team Members Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Shawn Mullins.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Slide Concepts March 26, 2009 [Cory Alban] [Mission Ops] [Locomotion] 1.
CubeSat DeOrbit System TREVOR JACKSON JOSHUA BARHAM TROY TARNACKI JOSEPH MCNAMARA TIMOTHY LYNCH JOE POWELL AMANDA SOKOLSKY MACKENZIE WEBB.
Preliminary Critical Design Review Jason Mueller Jeff Weinell Brittany Dupre TEAM TOTAL RESISTANCE 1.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
THE AVENGERS Measuring Atmospheric Ozone 1 of 25.
CubeSat DeOrbit System
© 2014 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. SPRSA Excess Capacity Panel Carol P. Welsch Orbital Sciences Corporation June 10, Welsch.
BlackBox Sat Critical Design Review Colorado State University-Pueblo April 2, 2004 Greg Barela Jose Segovia Enrique Cornejo.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium University of Colorado at Boulder Undergraduate Research Opportunity Fund.
CubeSat for Ions, Neutrals, Electrons and Magnetic Fields PI Robert Lin, SSL Project Manager Thomas Immel, SSL Systems Engineer Chris Pasma, SSL Mechanical.
TERSat Massachusetts Institute of Technology Eric Peters, Danilo Roascio, Leonard Tampkins, Kezi Cheng June 29,
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
 An Kim  Cian Branco  David Warner  Edwin Billips  Langston Lewis  Thomas Work  Mackenzie Webb  Benjamin Cawrse (CS)  Jason Harris (TCC)
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
Pima Community College ASCEND Team Spring PCC ASCEND TEAM ASCEND Spring 2010 Team – James Gardner – Andy Gee – Chris Martinez – Chris Pecora Team.
CubeSat De-Orbit Team First Status Report Team Members: Todd Estep Juan Parducci Kimberly Scheider Nathan Schwinn Dylan Blackshear Trevor McCarthy Gregory.
CubeSat Team Final Presentation Team Members: Dylan Blackshear Todd Estep Gregory Lemmer Trevor McCarthy Juan Parducci Kimberly Scheider Nathan Schwinn.
CUBESAT TEAM STATUS REPORT Team Members: Todd Estep Juan Parducci Kimberly Scheider Nathan Schwinn Dylan Blackshear Trevor McCarthy Gregory Lemmer.
ODU CubeSat MAE 435 Midterm Presentation – June 21, 2016 Cornelius Aaron Malcom-Scott Edwards Heather Culley Josh Frechem Jonathan DeGroff Owen Parkinson.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Shape Memory Alloy Reusable Deployment Mechanism
Mission Statement... The Space Wolverines will;
The Koehler Sounding Rocket Launched Carrying Interesting Student-Developed Payloads The sixth flight of a RockSat-X education payload launched on a suborbital.
SOCEM: Sub-Orbital CubeSat Experimental Mission
CanSat Competition Competition Objectives Pre-Launch Launch
Basics of Rocket Propulsion
Mozella Bell, Herman Neal, Matthew Ware
PROJECT METEOR: RITSAT1 P08102
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Pima Community College ASCEND Flight: Spring 2010 A post-mortem!!!
Team Up, Up, and Away Launch Readiness Review
Sub-Orbital CubeSat Experimental Mission
Presentation transcript:

 An Kim  Cian Branco  David Warner  Edwin Billips  Langston Lewis  Thomas Work  Mackenzie Webb  Benjamin Cawrse (CS)  Jason Harris (TCC)

 Thousands of man made objects in earth orbit (mostly junk).  Debris can be a serious hazard to satellites.  A paint flake threatened the Space Shuttle; a Russian Satellite disabled an Iridium satellite

 CubeSats are picosatellites used by universities and institutions for research in space.  Pending international treaty will require future launch stages and LEO satellites to deorbit within 25 years of mission completion.  Objective: design and test a de-orbit system to de- orbit CubeSats within 25 years of mission completion.

 Demonstrate commercial viability  Prove it is a robust and viable system  Achieve these objectives with a minimum cost ◦ Orbital demonstrator ◦ Suborbital flight ◦ High altitude balloon flight

 Demonstrate commercial viability  Prove it is a robust and viable system  Achieve these objectives with a minimum cost ◦ Orbital demonstrator ◦ Suborbital flight ◦ High altitude balloon flight

 Demonstrate commercial viability  Prove it is a robust and viable system  Achieve these objectives with a minimum cost ◦ Orbital demonstrator ◦ Suborbital flight ◦ High altitude balloon flight

 Demonstrate commercial viability  Prove it is a robust and viable system  Achieve these objectives with a minimum cost ◦ Orbital demonstrator ◦ Suborbital flight ◦ High altitude balloon flight

 The RockSat-X program out of Wallops Flight Facility is currently considered the best option for our test flight  RockSat-X utilizes the Terrier-Improved Malemute suborbital sounding rocket  The sounding rocket will reach apogee at approximately 160 km altitude from the Earth.

 300 seconds of microgravity flight  Power and telemetry on deck provided for timing devices, communication between ground and payload, and data storage  Direct access to orbital space after second stage burn-out when the skin of the sounding rocket is ejected.  Adequate space and weight capacity available to mount the deployment device and necessary telemetry for the mission of our CubeSat

Langston Lewis

 Lithium-Ion batteries will be used to supply power to the board and release mechanism.  Can sustain high amounts of continuous current discharge in order to run the camera and communications devices.  Mass of batteries is a concern

Stable operation between 6-20 volts 14 digital and 6 analog pins Board has built in accelerometers

Mounted on aero brake support structure. Voltage differences can be converted to strain and then used to calculate drag coefficient produced by balloon

160x120 resolution Support capture JPEG from serial port Default baud rate of serial port is but we will be transmitting at Works reliably with 5v power supply Size 32X32mm Consumes between mA of current

Low-power and weight in an equally small size Provides adequate resolution and range

 Objective: ◦ Mylar Balloon  Test benzoic acid inflations under different temperature than the sublimating temperature  Calculate the correct benzoic acid mass to inflate the Mylar balloon within the vacuum chamber  Record time for the benzoic acid to fully inflate ◦ Nitinol (SMA)

 Mass of benzoic acid ◦ The required amount of benzoic acid will be less than 0.1 gram. ◦ The mass may vary to increase the rate of inflation s/2011/09/photo-4.jpg

 Time Limit ◦ Must inflate in under 300 seconds ◦ Goal of the experiment is to have the Mylar Balloon to inflate in less than 200 seconds.

David Warner Cian Branco O-POD Design

ODU Picosatellite Orbital Deployer Bolted to Rocksat-X deck, “piggybacks” rocket Directly connected to RS-X Power Interface (1 A- h) Stores, imparts ejection velocity to CubeSat 1.6 m/s from spring, lateral to deck Al-7075-T651 frame kg total mass

Materials 7mm thick Al-7075 plates  Holes can be cut for RS-X power interface & instruments bolts (M4 x mm) ASTM-A228 “Music Wire” Spring  19.62cm length (entire)  7 turns coil  Held by crossbar on back plate  Supports pusher-plate  ~1.5 kg total Overall Dimensions 12.7cm x 12.7 cm x cm

5 design iterations, still not space-rated Weak pusher-plate to spring connection Torsion in spring, friction issues on rails  CubeSat mockup “f” varies w/ humidity (cardboard)  Aluminum mockup in the works  Lubrication? Quick Release Mechanism Options  Vectran Line Cutter (ODU built)  2 Linear Solenoids Center-of-Mass  Must be inside 2” square at center

Further PATRAN & FEA analysis (vibrations accountable) Resume velocity measurements with new mockup Choose quick release mechanism within budget Design a mounting plate to connect O-POD to RockSat-X

 Most of our time so far has been allocated to gathering information, resources and planning  We will apply that information to create prototypes and perform the necessary experimental tests for the successful mission of our CubeSat  All tests and prototypes will be performed and created to interface with RockSat-X, but we will consider other options for test flights as well.

?