HRG4 and Payment By Results Roadshows 2009 Information Breakout Session Part 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practice Based Commissioning East Devon PCT – How to Develop an Indicative Budget Beverly Stretton-Brown Devolved Budgets Project Manager 9 December 2004.
Advertisements

Best Practice Tariffs Falls and Fractures: Towards Best Practice Sam Alderson Economic Adviser – PbR Development Team.
Terminology Service NHS Connecting for Health Roger Tackley Working Group Meeting May 2005.
The complete solution to managing real budgets and SUS validation.
Complete financial control and crucial information for GP Commissioning Consortia iQ Budget Manager.
Adult HIV Outpatient PBR Tariff Development National Reference Group Meeting 21/05/10.
An Overview of SUS Release 11 - Use
Reference Costs Afternoon Workshop Richard Russell, DH Ali Connell, DH PbR – Finance and Costing Team.
Currently there are significant variations between PCTs and Practices in their understanding and implementation of:  PBC  Data Validation  Information.
Options for the Future of Payment by Results (PbR) – Consultation exercise Sebastian Habibi – May 2007.
What do we do in Casemix?. The Casemix Service develops… clinical grouping methodologies - HRGs software products - Groupers …that enable the NHS to accurately.
Epidemiology and benefit to patients from accurate coding Heather Walker CHKS Consultancy and Marketing Director 4 th May 2012.
Features of HRG4 Paula Monteith Principal Casemix Consultant – Finance & Commissioning.
Using Payment by Results to commission better quality clinical care Eileen Robertson Payment by Results (PbR) Development Team.
Future of Payment by Results (PbR) PCT network – 19 Feb 2007.
Patient-Focused Funding & Payment by Results The UK Experience CEO Forum, Kananaskis, Alberta February 16, 2009 Robert J. Bell – Chief Executive Royal.
Overview Clinical Documentation & Revenue Management: Capturing the Services Prepared and Presented by Linda Hagen and Mae Regalado.
ISB Notice and preparing for the implementation of the new IAPT Data Standard Shaun Crowe Mental Health, Employment and IAPT Mental Health Collaborative.
Improve accuracy of clinical coding
E | W | E | W | NHS e-Referral Service Referring Roles Issued: 3 June.
Mental Health Collaborative PAYMENT BY RESULTS BRIEF UPDATE.
INTRODUCTION TO ICD-9-CM PART TWO ICD-9-CM Official Guidelines (Sections II and III): Selection of Principal Diagnosis/Additional Diagnoses for Inpatient.
The Project AH Computing. Functional Requirements  What the product must do!  Examples attractive welcome screen all options available as clickable.
Introduction to HRG4 Reference Cost Grouper Presented by Chris Knee Senior Information Analyst and Peter Broughton Senior Casemix Consultant.
Opportunities and Challenges of SUS Roger Dewhurst Director of Operations, Information Centre for health and social care.
Payment by Results for CHIM
NICE quality standard for COPD Craig Grime Technical Analyst Quality Standards NICE
Payment by Results for Specialist Alcohol Services Don Lavoie Alcohol Policy Team.
© RSR Consultants Ltd HRG4 Background RSR Consultants Ltd retain copyright to these slides (produced March 2009) and are free to be used for non-income.
Serbia Health Project – Additional Financing Training for Trainers on AR-DRG, Република Србија МИНИСТАРСТВО ЗДРАВЉА Linda Best
Clinical Coding Service Manager
INFORMATION AND PERFORMANCE JO WORSWICK. Content Why we need to record activity data What is it used for and by whom Nationally Locally (commissioners)
Welcome to the HRG4 Grouper Zone. HRG4 Grouper - Group your data.
The National Renal Dataset Charlie Tomson UKRR Annual Meeting 24 th June 2009.
PCTs working with foundation Trusts SUS Update Stockport 19th February 2007.
Excellence in specialist and community healthcare Clinical Coding Mr Buddhi Pant Deputy General Manager Children’s Services SGUHT.
Healthcare Resource Groups. What are HRGs? Casemix methodology underpinning system of payment to providers and contract pricing Aggregation of OPCS or.
London Specialised Commissioning Group 10 th September 2009 Major Trauma Services for London Commissioning and Finance Arrangements Sean Overett Divisional.
Mental Health Information: NHS Trust Forum 26 th April 2010, Birmingham Botanical Gardens.
Welcome to the Casemix Design & Analysis Zone. The Code to Group Table is available to download from our website Code to.
Developments & Issues in the Production of the Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC)
Page 1 Non-Payroll Cost Transfer Enhancements Last update January 24, 2008 What are the some of the new enhancements of the Non-Payroll Cost Transfer?
CAMHS Data Event Barbara Fittall 5 th March 2013.
Sarah Butler/Martin Campbell Deputy Directors of NHS Finance HRG4 Roadshows PbR in and beyond.
0 eCPIC Admin Training: OMB Submission Packages and Annual Submissions These training materials are owned by the Federal Government. They can be used or.
HRG4 HealthCheck. The Science of Casemix The Operating Environment Now and Next HRG4 HealthCheck Things you Need to Know Help! Key Messages Session Overview.
National Programme for Information Technology The Secondary Uses Service Jeremy Thorp Director of Business Requirements Technology Office.
Supplier Forum Update on the Secondary Uses Service Jeremy Thorp April 2008.
2011/12 Operating Framework Vanessa Harris 21 st December 2010.
Why Develop HRG4? John Madsen, Programme Manager Stephen Cole, Principal Casemix Consultant.
1 Reference Costs & Wheelchair Services. 2 Contents Background –Costing vs. collection –What are reference costs? –Governance –Why do we collect reference.
HRG4: Impact on Arrhythmia Care Donna Elliott-Rotgans Cardiology Service Manager UCLH / The Heart Hospital.
E | W | E | W | NHS e-Referral Service Referring Roles Issued: 27 th.
What data are collected? How, and who by? Karen Graham and Barry Plewa.
EC TWINNING PROJECT Development of National Coding Standards within the Czech DRG System CZ2005/IB/SO/03.
Hospital inpatient data James Hebblethwaite. Acknowledgements This presentation has been adapted from the original presentation provided by the following.
Diseases of Childhood Expert Working Group 1 st March 2012.
Creating incentives for better quality: Lessons from the English NHS Jennifer Field, Associate Director National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
Support for Intelligent Commissioning Roger Dewhurst Director of Operations, Information Centre for health and social care.
Stage 2 DATA SUBMISSIONS AND TRANSFERS 1www.ihpa.gov.au.
South East Public Health Observatory Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) Steve Morgan - Senior Public Health Intelligence Analyst - SEPHO Day 2 – Session.
A ssociation of Public Health Observatories Hospital Activity data Roy Maxwell SWPHO & Bristol University Dr Richard Wilson Sandwell PCT.
EC TWINNING PROJECT Development of National Coding Standards within the Czech DRG System CZ2005/IB/SO/03.
Introduction to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Robel Feleke Knowledge and Intelligence Team (London) 20 th February 2014.
September 2016 Survey Data Entry User Guide (v1 – 6th September 2016)
Required Data Files Review
Evaluating Sepsis Guidelines and Patient Outcomes
Comments on ASFA Input Helen Wibley, FAO 2016 ASFA Advisory Board Meeting – Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Frequently asked questions
Training Module Introduction to the TB9100/P25 CG/P25 TAG Customer Service Software (CSS) Describes Release 3.95 for Trunked TB9100 and P25 TAG Release.
Presentation transcript:

HRG4 and Payment By Results Roadshows 2009 Information Breakout Session Part 1

Scope of presentation HRG4 Grouping (not the grouper) Grouping scope/coverage HRG4 in SUS HRG derivation process New in HRG4 grouping Comparative statistics

What can the Local Payment Grouper group? Admitted Patient Care Non-Admitted Consultations Adult Critical Care Emergency and Urgent Care (HRG4) Accident & Emergency HRG v3.2 algorithm from HRG v3.5

What are the HRGs that the Local Payment Grouper can produce? Covers all the areas of HRG v3.5 More Settings –Extends beyond admitted patient care –Ability to generate the same HRG with data from different settings Generates HRGs for additional services: The grouper accommodates the mandated underlying OPCS-4 classification (OPCS-4.5 from 1 April 2009) Chemotherapy Diagnostic Imaging Emergency & Urgent Care Rehabilitation Radiotherapy Specialist Palliative Care

Roles of the SUS Grouper and the Local Payment Grouper The NHS Operating Framework for 2008/09 stated that “…by April 2009, when the NHS should use SUS as the standard repository for activity for performance monitoring, reconciliation and payments" SUS has its own grouper and will allocate HRG4 to all relevant data submissions. SUS also implements PbR business rules. The role of the Local Payment Grouper application is: -Planning -Monitoring -Data validation -Supporting payment for locally commissioned services SUS and the Local Payment Grouper share the same grouping algorithms.

HRG4 in CDS6? DSCN 17/2008 (HRG4)’ states that: “There is no national requirement to flow HRG4 through the CDS”. DSCN 24/2008 (CDS 6.1), Finished General Episode CDS section includes: M = Mandatory - data must be included where available 3 characters!

Guidance: HRGs in CDS 6.1 HRG4 cannot be accommodated by CDS 6.1; HRG and HRG Version Number should not be populated in data submissions. SUS will not reject records where these two fields are not populated. The SUS CDS Validation Table categorises HRG as: F – the format is validated R – required as part of NHS business rules to meet NHS business requirements But not M – mandatory in XML schema (messages will not flow if absent) SUS will derive the HRG.

New in HRG4 Grouping: General Single application groups episodes and spells (no separate spell converter) Improved user interface Record Definition File Wizard Enhanced data validation Support for newer versions of Windows Larger range of output files to support various user requirements (more in the next presentation…) Note that the Local Payment Grouper does not produce reports.

New in HRG4 Grouping: Derivation Process Spell LA03B Spell HRG grouped from all the procedures and diagnoses in the Spell Spell HRG grouped from all the procedures and diagnoses in the Spell Kidney Transplant from Live donor 18 years and under Unbundled HRGs Unbundled HRGs LC02B XD23Z VC42Z  Renal Dialysis  High Cost Drug  Rehab FCE You can get one core and zero or more unbundled HRGs per FCE/Spell You can get one core and zero or more unbundled HRGs per FCE/Spell FCE HRGs grouped from all the procedures and diagnoses in the FCE FCE HRGs grouped from all the procedures and diagnoses in the FCE LA07A Acute Renal Failure with Major CC Kidney Transplant From Live donor 18 years and under LA03B Data Validation Patient Admission Patient Discharge Source: Local Payment Grouper

New in HRG4 Grouping: Multiple Trauma Trauma means non-superficial injury (e.g. broken limb bone) Requirements –In the first episode of the spell: Primary diagnosis of trauma Another diagnosis of trauma from a different trauma site (body is divided into nine areas) Diag1 (trauma), Diag2 (non-trauma), Diag3 (trauma)

New in HRG4 Grouping: Non-Admitted Consultations HRG allocation is based on OPCS code If no OPCS code, then HRG is WF01* Non-Admitted Attendance Multi-professional clinics identified by OPCS code X62.2 and X62.3 (HRG is WF02*) Diagnosis is ignored Where APC HRG is based on procedure, then the Non- Admitted HRG will be the same (for the same procedures) i.e. setting-independent

Non-Admitted Consultations Outpatient attendance Data Validation Unbundling For example:  RA03Z MRI HRG4 OPCS Logic For example:  JC16B Skin therapies level 4 THEN STOP yes HRG4 Default Logic no For example:  WF01A Non-admitted Face to Face Attendance – Follow-up

Where Has Our Activity Gone? A comprehensive set of comparative analyses are available from the Casemix website. For example:

PCT Comparative Statistics: HRG v3.5 to HRG4 This needs to be mentioned… –Sent to all English PCTs ‘Director of Commissioning’ in January 2009 via courier –Check with your Director of Commissioning if you want access to these data –Password available from

HRG4 and Payment By Results Roadshows 2009 Information Breakout Session Part 2

Scope of presentation: HRG4 Grouping Ingredients Process Products

Downloading the Grouper Grouper applications Documentation FAQ All available from:

Types and Roles of Groupers Reference Costs –Used as part of the PbR reference costs process carried out annually by DH RoadTest –Used to support the annual DH road-test exercise. Precursor to… Local Payment –Derives the HRGs that underpin tariff

Grouper Recognition The application title bar indicates the version The icon helps to remind the user of the grouper type Icon Title bar

Input Data Comma-separated text files only Each data type has its own mandatory fields Fields must be in the correct format The input files are described in the Guide to File Preparation document available from the Casemix website

Output of HRG4 - Unbundling Each episode and spell can now generate more than one HRG Depends on: –Treatment patient receives –Whether that treatment is unbundled Ability to generate unbundled HRGs will also depend on HRG unit of activity, e.g. –Rehabilitation – one HRG per inpatient day –Radiotherapy one planning HRG one delivery HRG

Output Files Comma-separated text files Different output files for each data type No reports

The Output Files – Admitted Patient Care There are eleven output files but all grouped data can be obtained by using just two of them: –The FCE output file contains everything apart from Specialised Service Codes (SSCs) –SSCs are available from the spell output file The other nine files consist of: –Five containing alternate views of data –Two containing data quality messages –Two containing data about the grouping run

Unbundling Sample Output – Admitted Patient Care Note: the input rows contain the spell number; this enables spell members to be identified.

The Output Files – Non-Admitted Consultations There are seven output files but all grouped data is available from just one of them The other six files consist of: –Two containing alternate views of the data –Two containing data quality messages –Two containing data about the grouping run

Relational Output This is targeted at technical users

Summary Ensure that the correct grouper is being used (Local Payment, Reference Costs etc.) Ensure that the appropriate data are being used All the output files are described in detail in the grouper User Manual