Status of Iran’s Nuclear Program and Negotiations David Albright ISIS November 3, 2013 Nuclear Weapon Issues in the 21st Century Sponsored by the American.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Iran’s Nuclear Program: Status and Implications Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 19 November, 2013.
Advertisements

On the creation of a nuclear crisis in the ME. Luc Reychler On the creation of a nuclear crisis in the ME KU Leuven
Oh, I almost forgot, it packs a 150 to 170 kiloton nuclear punch It’s about the size of an office trash can Let’s start with a modern nuclear.
Excellences, allow me first to remind you of some relevant information on the present status of peaceful use of nuclear energy within global energy strategy.
Renewable Energy in Islamic Republic Of Iran
1 MASSACHUSETTS UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) PROGRAM Baseline Compliance Assessment 1 MassDEP 8/2/2011.
Determining the Irreducible Elements of an Interim Agreement with Iran: A Freeze Plus David Albright ISIS November 5, 2013.
Iran Expert in a Semester By: Jon Doe III. Iran ●Has been known to be Anti-American/Israel ●8 year war, against Iraq ●2005 Iran says that it.
Nuclear Fuel, Uranium Enrichment, Fuel Fabrication, MOX Seminar on Nuclear Science and Technology for Diplomats P. Adelfang (+)Division of Nuclear Fuel.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
"Why are Iran's nuclear technology efforts of critical concern to Israel's security?” Mike Natelson.
Foreign Policy Proposal: Iranian Diplomacy Jenny Wang Tom McCauley.
IRAN: NUCLEAR PROGRAM SAKI AMAGAI AND KYORY PARK.
Iran’s Nuclear Program: Competing Narratives, Hard Choices August 29, 2012.
Instilling rigor and imagination in analysis Countering the Iranian Nuclear Threat Stuxnet and its Broader Implications Randolph H. Pherson Mary C. Boardman.
Foreign Obligations and Annual Inventories Jessica Norles Savannah River National Laboratory.
Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy
South Africa – Verification Lessons Learned from the Dismantled Nuclear Weapons Programme Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Addressing Worldwide Threats through Export Controls David Flynn Chairman Operating Committee for Export Policy.
Stephen Dembek, Section Chief Export Controls and International Organizations Section Office of International Programs Contact Info: ,
Piggybacking: Providing Donor Assistance Through U.S. Programs.
Work Health and Safety (National Uniform Legislation) Act and Regulations NT WorkSafe Anna McGill.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
Report on the recent IAEA Workshop on Antineutrino Detection for Safeguards Applications Andrew Monteith Division of Technical Support Department of Safeguards.
Timelines And Nuclear Deals With Iran Jon Wolfsthal Deputy Director CNS US Institute for Peace – June 10, 2014.
Security threats in the Middle East and Northern Africa: the problem of weapons of mass destruction proliferation Dr. Vladimir A. Orlov President, PIR.
GROUP 2: Hotspots 2 Central Asia. Figure 1: Central Asia Map.
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Experience and Future Activities for Introduction of Nuclear Power Masaomi KOYAMA Deputy Director Nuclear Energy.
The Impact of Sanctions on Iran By Vinayak Ganeshan and Matt Nguyen Research Staff.
Assessment of Iran’s Nuclear Program Press Event Tuesday, September 14, 2004 Dr. Charles D. Ferguson Science and Technology Fellow.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
JRC Information Day – May 11, 2006, Bucharest 1 Valică GOREA President of Nuclear Agency GOVERNMENT of ROMANIA Romanian Nuclear Programme Medium and Long.
MTE Forecasting and Tracking Workgroup #108 Goal: To have enough of the right type of MTE equipment in the right place at the right time to meet every.
U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School The U.S. Army’s Special Operations Center of Excellence The overall classification of this.
Future of Iranian nuclear program Vladimir Orlov President PIR Center.
IAEA Support of Research Reactor HEU to LEU Fuel Conversion Projects Institute of Nuclear Materials Management 48 th Annual Meeting July , 2007 Tucson,
Enrichment. U-238 More than 99% of the Uranium in the ground is U-238. U-238 doesn’t fission.
Samin Mohebbi IRANIAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM. NUCLEAR WEAPONS About 12,000 nuclear weapons are deployed in 14 states. Five states: New Mexico, Georgia,
Technical summary of DPRK nuclear program Siegfried S. Hecker Stanford University Center for International Security and Cooperation 2005 Carnegie International.
Iranian Nuclear Weapons 1. Iran Nuclear Weapons Problem Threaten Israel Threaten other Middle Eastern countries Threaten western countries including the.
Calder Hall Sellafield Decommissioning Martin Adam Heriot-Watt Edinburgh 2008.
The safeguards activities for LWRs with MOX in Japan - Remote data-driven safeguards - YATSU Shoichi Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and.
JORDAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (JAEC) Building of National Safeguards Capabilities in Jordan IAEA’s Technical Meeting/Workshop on National Infrastructure.
The State Evaluation Process Therese Renis Section Head Division of Operations B Department of Safeguards 08 February 2007.
Iranians view life after nuclear pact with blend of skepticism and hope.
The Procurement Channel and the Procurement Working Group of the Joint Commission February 2016RELEX, Brussels1.
© 2011 wheresjenny.com Iran’s nuclear program. © 2011 wheresjenny.com Ahmadinejad defends Iran's nuclear programme  Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
July 2015 Apr 2015 May 2015 Iran Nuclear Negotiations Timeline of Key Recent Federal Actions on Iran Nuclear Negotiations Potential Actions in 114 th Congress.
LCG Persistency Framework Project Boundary Conditions and Overall Schedule Torre Wenaus, BNL/CERN.
Investing in Cameco. About Cameco  One of the largest uranium producers in the world  Headquarters are located in Saskatoon SK.  Leading provider of.
1 Increasing Access to Primary Care Through Operational Redesign The Ambulatory Care Restructuring Initiative Annual Meeting of the American Public Health.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
Investing in Cameco. About Cameco  One of the largest uranium producers in the world  Headquarters are located in Saskatoon SK.  Leading provider of.
FY 2012 Budget Press Briefing February 14, NRC FY 2012 Budget NRC Mission: License and regulate the Nation’s civilian use of byproduct, source,
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
Russia and Iran’s Nuclear Program M.A. in Nonproliferation Studies
János Krutzler Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority
Iran Nuclear Deal In 200 Words © Copyright Showeet.com.
A Fissile Materials Cut-off Treaty: french views
What does it take for the DPRK to be a nuclear threat?
The Nuclear Weapons Convention
Institute for Science and International Security
Submarines & Safeguards
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
GNI Advanced Reactors Security Analysis & Findings
Current Status of Iran’s Nuclear Program
GNI Advanced Reactors Safeguards Analysis & Findings
Integration Modeling to Decipher a Fuel Cycle
Deterrence Below The Weapons Threshold Cristina Varriale
Presentation transcript:

Status of Iran’s Nuclear Program and Negotiations David Albright ISIS November 3, 2013 Nuclear Weapon Issues in the 21st Century Sponsored by the American Physical Society Forum on Physics/Society & GWU Elliott School

Photo of Natanz, DigitalGlobe

Natanz Plant, September 2002

Fordow Centrifuge Facility

Arak Heavy Water (IR-40) Reactor

6 Kalaye Electric

Natanz Pilot Plant IR-1 Centrifuge Cascades

3.5% LEU Production at Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant

Cumulative 3.5% LEU Production

Taking Stock, August 2013 LOCATION 3.5% LEU product 3.5% LEU feed 19.75% LEU product FEP 9,704 kg N/A N/A PFEP N/A 1,455 kg 178 kg FFEP N/A 1,422 kg 195 kg GROSS TOTAL 9,704 kg 2,877 kg 373 kg NET TOTAL 6,774 kg* 2,877 kg 186 kg (in hex form)**

Advanced Centrifuge Deployment: Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant (FEP)

Breakout to Enough Weapon-Grade Uranium for a Nulear Weapon

Estimating Breakout Timelines Illustrative IR-1 centrifuge plant to make weapon-grade uranium (WGU), based on a four Step, Khan-Type Centrifuge Plant 24 cascades (164 P1s/cascade) make 3.5% LEU--3,936 P1s 8 cascades (164/cascade) make 20% from 3.5%--1,312 P1s 4 cascades (114/cascade) 20 to 60%--456 P1s 2 cascades (64/cascade) 60 to 90%--128 P1s Total: 38 cascades with 5,832 P1s  Iranian cascades are not ideal and their performance and output is modeled by Houston Wood and Patrick Migliorini from University of Virginia’s Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Department in collaboration with ISIS.

Production of WGU in a Breakout at Declared Enrichment Sites 2009 Nuclear weapons capability achieved in that Iran has enough IR-1 centrifuges and 3.5 percent LEU (about 1,500 kg 3.5 LEU hexafluoride to produce 25 kg weapon-grade uranium in a breakout in about 4,593 enriching IR-1 centrifuges. It would take longer than six months August 2012-breakout time using Natanz only (IR-1 centrifuges being installed in Fordow) was months with three-step process, 9,330 IR- 1 centrifuges, a stock of 91 kg near 20 percent LEU hexafluoride, and use of 3.5 percent LEU hexafluoride (in three-step process) August 2013-Breakout time with enriching IR-1 centrifuges only is months, with three step process with 10,092 IR-1 centrifuges, 186 kg near 20 percent LEU hexafluoride, and use of 3.5 percent LEU hexafluoride. [ months with 3.5 percent LEU only, no near 20 percent LEU] August 2013-Breakout time for scenario using all installed IR-1 centrifuges is 1.0 to 1.6 months with three step process as above but with 18,454 IR-1 installed centrifuges and 186 kg near 20 percent LEU hexafluoride. [ months with 3.5% LEU only and no near 20% LEU] Note: calculational methods changed somewhat from Fall 2012 estimates to fall 2013 estimates

Key Questions for Negotiations How to extend breakout times? How to cap the Iranian centrifuge program and ensure that it will not expand during the next 5-10 years? How to increase the chance of finding a secret centrifuge or plutonium separation plant? How to establish adequate transparency in general, including Iran addressing the IAEA’s concerns about Iran’s past and possibly on-going nuclear weapons efforts? How to trade Iranian concessions for sanctions relief?  The United States anticipates obtaining an interim agreement followed several months later by a long-term agreement that will verifiably ensure that Iran will not build nuclear weapons.  What will an interim deal look like?

Minimal Goals of an Interim Agreement Stopping production of near 20 percent LEU; mothballing or disabling 6 cascades involved in making near 20 percent LEU at Natanz and Fordow Reducing stocks of near 20 percent LEU, particularly those in hexafluoride form Achieving the principle that Iran’s centrifuge program would be capped to below a certain size for the long term. Initially, there should be freezes in the numbers of installed and enriching centrifuges. Cancelling the Arak heavy water reactor project Developing a baseline of information about Iran’s gas centrifuge program, including its centrifuge manufacturing complex, a detailed declaration of any centrifuge plants under construction or planned, and Iran’s total inventory of centrifuges Expanding IAEA monitoring, including remote camera monitoring of centrifuge plants and implementation of early notification of construction of new facilities (code 3.1) Ensuring that Iran understands that significant sanctions relief requires that Iran address fully and cooperatively the IAEA’s concerns about Iran’s alleged past and possibly on-going work on nuclear weapons.

Alleged Military Dimensions IAEA has considerable evidence of Iranian work on nuclear weapons prior to 2004 and some evidence suggesting that some of that work continued afterward and may continue today. Western intelligence agencies are united in assessing with high confidence that Iran had a nuclear weapon program prior to They are less united about any such work after There is general agreement that the Iranian regime has not decided to build a nuclear weapon. There is less agreement whether Iran will refrain from building a nulear weapon in the future Little hope of significant sanctions relief if Iran does not come clean about its past activities and address cooperatively and fully the IAEA’s concerns.

Visits Associated with Resolving Concerns about Military Dimensions Iran will need to allow the IAEA to visit several sites and interview a range of experts and officials in order to address their concerns. The IAEA has identified several sites to Iran, but so far Iran has refused the IAEA’s requests to visit these particular sites. One set involves workshops that were involved in making mock-ups of missile re-entry vehicles suitable to hold a nuclear warhead. Another of those is a site at the Parchin military complex that is alleged to have been involved in undertaking high explosive tests related to the development of nuclear weapons. After the IAEA asked to visit this site early 2012, Iran undertook extensive excavation and reconstruction at this site, compromising the IAEA’s ability to settle this issue. Iran will need to address the Parchin issue to the satisfaction of the IAEA, which will inevitably involve more than simply allowing a visit.

Parchin: Before and After