Good Morning! 1  Please sign-in (each team member!)  WiFi FWPS Guest  Username: guest  Password: fwpsguest  On the Sign-In Sheet…Indicate which breakout.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Implementation Grant: 5 Districts in ESD 189 Cooperating.
Advertisements

Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation RIG II PSESD October 31st, 2012 Jim Koval Michaela Miller.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1.
ESD 112 Professional Growth Cycle
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
Division of School Effectiveness1 Common Core State Standards: Transitioning from Awareness to Implementation December 1, 2011 Rutledge Conference Center.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Overview (Digging a bit deeper) April 19, 2011 Dana Anderson, ESD 113 Teaching and Learning.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Connecting the Dots BISD’S LEARNING PLATFORM AND ESTABLISHING EXPECTATIONS FOR LEARNING RUBRIC.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Legislative Update Michaela Miller TPEP Program Manager OSPI TPEP RIG Update March 15th, 2012 Jim Koval TPEP Program.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Materials  Wiki 
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot – Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Visit our blog & resource site: – Follow.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Session Materials  Wiki
WELCOME WASHINGTON STATE FELLOWS! September 22, 2015 Jessica Vavrus, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning, OSPI Cindy Duncan, Assistant Superintendent.
Brinnon School District. Understanding the new standards Understanding the major shifts between the old and new standards within their subject and grade.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Entry Task As you enter, please take a moment to place a blue dot on the continuum on the wall that represents your perception of the following: Consider.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Materials  Wiki 
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
TEACHER EVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION DAY: STUDENT GROWTH AND GOAL SETTING September 25, 2015 Shorewood High School 9/25/15 1.
Our time today… 10/7/11PSESD Assistant Superintendent CCSS Update 2  Updates on CCSS  Implementation discussion….  What do curriculum directors want.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Materials  Wiki 
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Presentation transcript:

Good Morning! 1  Please sign-in (each team member!)  WiFi FWPS Guest  Username: guest  Password: fwpsguest  On the Sign-In Sheet…Indicate which breakout session each member of your team will attend today  M or  ELA

CCSS District Implementation Network Grantee Workshops Summer 2012 August 7 and 8, Spokane August 8 and 9, Federal Way Welcome Back to Day 2! Please sign in!

Our Focus and Learning Targets 5/29/12 3 Participants will… 1. Use results of the CCSS implementation Readiness Assessment to create (or build on) their CCSS Implementation plan for and beyond. 2. Sharpen understanding and apply learnings about professional learning systems. 3. Connect CCSS Implementation with other district initiatives, especially Teacher and Principal Evaluation. 4. Consider their role to share with colleagues in their region and learn about opportunities for continued connections for supporting each other and other districts in their regions. AGENDA REVIEW

Welcome Back! Reflection on Day 1 to Inform Day 2 5/29/12 4 At your tables:  Reflect on the notes you took during the Case Study/Problem of Practice Session yesterday  Gather a pile of post-it notes and capture your thoughts from yesterday  What did I hear/learn that might inform my district’s CCSS implementation plan? (1 idea per sticky)  Share all of your post-its with your team  Sort to determine categories  Discuss the category with the most comments and discuss how this will impact your plan

Revisiting the CCSS and Digging into Resources Math and ELA Breakout Sessions (8:45 – 10) 10:00 BREAK 10:15 Reconvene with your Teams WA CCSS Implementation -WaCTE Summer Conference,

TEAM TIME: Linking the Resources to your Plans 5/29/12 6  How do the resources for both ELA and Math fit into your district plan?  What resources will best serve which audiences?  What other resources did you find that you need to support varied audiences?  What do you need to consider in light of the instructional shifts and resources available?

Large Group Reflection 5/29/12 7 How confident do you feel in your team’s ability to reach your 30 day goals given your plan?  Rank your readiness…TEXT VOTING

Large Group Reflection

Connecting CCSS to Other Initiatives Making connections: How do CCSS and Educator Evaluation Systems work together? 5/29/129

Making Connections: How do CCSS and TPEP work together? August 9, 2012

CCSS through the TPEP Lens or Vice Versa Pilots RIGs Those just starting the journey

Essential Questions How does the language of the frameworks connect with the Common Core State Standards? How do you help make sense of two “really big deals”? How do plan for the managed implementation of both?

Racing up the Mountain…

A View from the Top!

Background Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project (TPEP) Anacortes Central Valley Kennewick North Thurston North Mason Othello Snohomish Wenatchee ESD 101 Consortium Almira Davenport Liberty Medical Lake Pullman Reardan-Edwall Wellpinit Wilbur 15 TPEP Pilots 12 SIG Districts 71 RIG I 98 RIG II Open a RIG III in Fall

Criteria 2 Criteria 1 Criteria 3 Criteria 4 Criteria 5 Criteria 6 Criteria 7 Criteria 8 Frameworks + Student Growth Rubrics Observation Artifacts Other evidence relevant to the frameworks Observation Artifacts Other evidence relevant to the frameworks Student Growth Measures (From 3 specific criteria) Student Growth Measures (From 3 specific criteria) State determined process Distinguished Proficient Basic Unsatisfactory Student Growth Impact Ratings: Low, Average, High Student Growth Impact Ratings: Low, Average, High District determined process Distinguished Proficient Basic Unsatisfactory District determined process Distinguished Proficient Basic Unsatisfactory

Teachers: “fostering and managing a safe, positive learning environment.” “collaborative and collegial practices focused on improving instructional practice and student learning.” Principals: “creating a school culture that promotes the ongoing improvement of learning and teaching for students and staff.” “providing for school safety.”

Teachers: “using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning.” Principals: “development, implementation, and evaluation of a data-driven plan for increasing student achievement, including the use of multiple student data elements.”

Teachers: “providing clear and intentional focus on subject matter content and curriculum.” Principals: “assisting instructional staff with alignment of curriculum, instruction, and assessment with state and local district learning goals.”

Teachers: Implementing the instructional framework Principals: “monitoring, assisting, and evaluating effective instruction and assessment practices.”

Teachers: “communicating and collaborating with parents and school community.” Principals: “partnering with the school community to promote learning.”

Table Talk Where do you already see and want to make the connection between the criteria and CCSS?

Essential Questions How does the language of the frameworks connect with the Common Core State Standards? How do you help make sense of two “really big deals”? How do you plan for the managed implementation of both?

Framework Danielson Framework for Teaching CEL 5D+ TM Teacher Evaluation Rubric 2.0 Marzano Art and Science of Teaching Framework Domain or Dimension Domains Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Domain 2: The Classroom Environment Domain 3: Instruction Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Dimensions  Purpose  Student Engagement  Curriculum and Pedagogy  Assessment for Student Learning  Classroom Environment and Culture  Professional Collaboration and Communication Domains Domain 1: Classroom Strategies and Behaviors Domain 2: Planning and Preparing Domain 3: Reflecting on Teaching Domain 4: Collegiality and Professionalism Components Evaluation Level Rubric (4 level) Components – 22 (Example: Component 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students) Sub-dimensions – 13 (Example: Student Engagement 5: Use of Background to plan lessons and units) Components– 31 (Example: 3.1 The teacher knows individual student learning needs to design instruction) Support for observation Indicators Possible Teacher Evidence Possible Student Evidence Critical Attributes/Possible Examples – teacher and student Possible Teacher Observables Possible Student Observables Possible Artifacts Possible Impacts Note: The component numbers for both Danielson and CEL are reflective of the component numbers in their original frameworks, thus they may not be in numerical order

Criterion 1: Centering instruction on high expectations for student achievement Key Word: EXPECTATIONS Definition: The teacher develops and communicates high expectations for student learning. DanielsonCEL 5D+Marzano Domain 2: The Classroom Environment 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning Domain 3: Instruction 3a: Communicating with Students 3c: Engaging Students in Learning Purpose P1: Connection to standards, broader purpose and transferable skill P4: Communication of learning target(s) P5: Success criteria and performance task(s) Student Engagement SE3: Work of high cognitive demand Classroom Environment & Culture CEC3: Discussion, collaboration and accountability Component 1.1: Providing Clear Learning Goals and Scales (Rubrics) Component 1.2: Celebrating Success Component 1.3: Understanding Students’ Interests and Backgrounds Component 1.4: Demonstrating Value and Respect for Low Expectancy Students

Exploration Time Using documents regarding Criterion 1 (teacher) or Criterion 4 (principal), – review the indicators, rubric language and observables/evidence – discuss (highlight if you wish)what connections you see with CCSS – discuss how you will plan for keeping these connections clear to others

Implications for CCSS/TPEP Implementation Classroom Teachers Building Administrator District Office

More information will be posted on OSPI website. TPEP Webinars 29 Webinar #1 Evaluation System Orientation - Instructional and Leadership Frameworks Student Growth - Summative Methodology Thursday, August 23 from 1:30-3:30pm Webinar #2 Evaluation System Orientation - Instructional and Leadership Frameworks Student Growth - Summative Methodology Thursday, August 30 from 1:30-3:30pm

TEAM TIME: Bringing it Home: Making Connections in your CCSS Plans 5/29/12 30  Where does TPEP implementation fit within your CCSS plan and next steps?  What are key actions you need to take to integrate it into your plan?  What opportunities are present to support this?  Who are key champions to support this effort?

Next Steps – How to stay connected 5/29/1231

Staying connected as a professional learning SYSTEM around the CCSS … 5/29/12 32  What opportunities exist at your local level?  Within your district?  With districts nearby?  What opportunities exist at your regional, ESD, levels?  District teaching and learning leader collaboratives (assistant superintendents)  Content-specific “cadres”

Staying connected as a professional learning SYSTEM around the CCSS… 5/29/12 33  OSPI Webinar Series, ; Statewide presentations  Learning Forward Washington connections  Follow on Twitter and #CCSSLFWA)  LF WA Blog  Become a member CCSS System Thinking for District/Building Leaders CCSS Mathematics CCSS English Language Arts September 12, :30–11:30 a.m. September 18, :30–4:30 p.m. September 20, :30–4:30 p.m. December 12, :30–11:30 a.m. December 18, :30–4:30 p.m. December 20, :30–4:30 p.m. March 7, :30–11:30 a.m. March 12, :30–4:30 p.m. March 14, :30–4:30 p.m. May 23, :30–11:30 a.m. May 28, :30–4:30 p.m. May 30, :30–4:30 p.m.

Staying connected as a professional learning SYSTEM around the CCSS … 5/29/12 34  What are ways that you can commit to keeping the momentum within your team and with districts around you?

And now…Onto ! WA CCSS Implementation -WaCTE Summer Conference,  Ways to stay connected:  CCSS OSPI Web Site:  OSPI Teaching and Learning Monthly Newsletter  TEACH:

36 Thanks and see you tomorrow! 5/29/12