WSSDA Annual Conference Saturday, November 23, 2013 Presented by: Kerri Lunstroth, East Valley School District Director-Spokane Ray Vefik, Auburn School District Director Scott Black, OSPI School Facilities Tom Carver, OSPISchool Facilities

Recognize the importance or promoting student health and safety by being proactive in maintaining your schools and extending building life. Become knowledgeable of the changes to this program in order to alleviate any misconceptions about how school will be assessed for future state funding assistance Recognize your district must provide an annual Building Condition Assessment and a report detailing the results which must be presented annually by April 1.

Many districts throughout the nation have studied the impact of proactive maintenance and improved indoor environmental quality resulting in: Heightened concentration Higher performance levels Reduced absenteeism Increased test scores Lower drop out rates

Proactive Maintenance in Schools Schools without a major maintenance backlog have a higher average daily attendance by an average of 4 to 5 students per 1,000 and a lower annual dropout rate by 10 to 13 students per 1,000.

Background and History Development of the Asset Preservation Program (APP) To Whom Does APP Apply? What Are the Requirements? Managing the APP Online Definitions Resources and Contacts WAC

What is the Asset Preservation Program? A systematic approach to: Ensure performance accountability, and Promote student health and safety by: Maintaining and operating building systems to their design capacity, Maintaining an encouraging learning environment, and Extending building life, thus minimizing future capital needs.

Why is the Asset Preservation Program needed? To protect the public’s investment. Ensuring the state-assisted construction of school facilities is protected through a system of building maintenance. To ensure modernization eligibility for state assistance on major capital projects. (30-year cycle of eligibility)

The previous requirement known as “The 2% Rule” The 2% Rule said that a district needed, in the last 15 years before coming in for state assistance, to show that it expended at least 2% of the estimated replacement value per year on Infrastructural Maintenance. Stakeholders foresaw big problems with The 2% Rule.

Perception of The 2% Rule An unfunded mandate. Promoted spending at inappropriate times of a building’s life cycle. Was well-intended, but not achievable. Was unable to document spending at the building level.

Transition from The 2% Rule to the Asset Preservation Program Around 2008, OSPI worked with these groups to change WAC from an accounting rule to a performance rule. Washington State School Directors’ Association Washington Association of School Administrators Washington Association of School Business Officials Washington Association of Maintenance and Operations Administrators Technical Advisory Committee Citizens’ Advisory Panel

There were two ideals to keep in mind: 1.Maintain the State Board of Education’s original intent. 2.Keep the new program non-burdensome to districts as possible. The result was the Asset Preservation Program.

Three key components Board Resolution, District Policy & Procedures Asset Preservation System APP Accountability Educational Adequacy Asset Preservation District Accountability Targeted Standards Reporting System Funding Assistance School Board Review Policy Procedures OSPI Review Bldg. Condition Standard Community Review Building Assessments (Reporting)

Has your district ever received state assistance for a major capital project? Did any state-assisted project receive school board acceptance of completion January 1, 1994 or afterwards? Was at least one project new or replacement new construction where the building involved structurally stands alone? NO - stopYES NO - stopYES NO - stopYES

APP? YES New Administration, commons, library, and classrooms New Classrooms New Gym

Existing Main Building Attached New Addition Stand-Alone New Addition Covered or Enclosed Walkway APP? YES APP? NO

New Addition or New-in-Lieu Replacement Existing Building, Modernized or not APP? YES APP? NO New Addition or New-in-Lieu Replacement Existing Building, Modernized or not More than 75% Less than 75%

Three key components Board Resolution, District Policy & Procedures Asset Preservation System APP Accountability Educational Adequacy Asset Preservation District Accountability Targeted Standards Reporting System Funding Assistance School Board Review Policy Procedures OSPI Review Bldg. Condition Standard Community Review Building Assessments (Reporting)

1.A commitment from the School Board of Directors, in the form of an APP Resolution, to implement best practices of school building maintenance through the adoption of APP. This only needs to be ONCE in perpetuity. See sample resolution on next slide.

APPLE VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Resolution Whereas, the school district is committed to preserve the district’s facilities in a safe, healthful and educationally effective manner that is compliant with applicable codes and requirements; and Whereas, the superintendent or his/her designee shall oversee the development of an Asset Preservation Program (APP) with supporting policies and procedures to comply with all requirements of the Asset Preservation Rule (APR) (WAC ); and Whereas, the APP shall provide for the preservation of district facilities by employing a system of processes, to include but not limited to predictive and preventative, repairs, maintenance, and re- conditioning; and Whereas, the APP shall also include a yearly and six year evaluation and reporting process to comply with the requirements that facilities sustain their expected life cycle, and include a commitment to implement an Asset Preservation System (APS) in all facilities constructed with state assistance and accepted after January 1, 1994; Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Board of Directors of the Apple Valley School District does hereby certify the aforementioned findings to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction.

2.For each project that has been determined to contain at least one APP building, district personnel must submit a certification letter verifying your district has adopted an Asset Preservation System. This needs to be done for EACH project, but may be done ONCE. See sample letter on next slide.

APPLE VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Re: Asset Preservation System (APS) This letter is being sent to comply with the requirement of the Asset Preservation Program (WAC ) to adopt and/or implement an Asset Preservation System (maintenance plan). The Apple Valley School District #1 hereby certifies that an APS has been adopted and implemented to maintain and care for all the state assisted building that have been designed to be a part of the APP. ___________________ Signature ___________________ Name (please print) ___________________ Title

3. A Building Condition Assessment (BCA) and a report detailing the results of that assessment to the School Board of Directors and OSPI. Due April 1 st annually. 30 *62 * CERTIFIED assessments are required every 6 years. The score in year 30 is crucial for future state assistance.

The Information and Condition of Schools system = ICOS District’s general information List of all facilities (schools and otherwise) Square footage of all buildings at a facility Broken down by one or more areas per building

Asset Preservation Program (APP) The program to ensure state-assisted newly constructed buildings are well-maintained. A school board resolution is required to ensure district commitment. Asset Preservation System (APS) Synonymous with a maintenance plan. A district must certify an APS is in place for the buildings that are constructed in each APP capital project. Completed by your business or facilities staff. Building Condition Assessment (BCA) Material and systems assessments, not inspections, required by April 1 st annually in APP for 30 years. ANNUAL assessments may be completed by your facilities or maintenance staff. CERTIFIED assessments are required every 6 years completed by a trained external consultant. The score at year 30 is critical for future state assistance. Information (Inventory) & Condition of Schools System (ICOS) A web-based system where inventory and condition details, about facilities and sites operated by the Districts, are documented and stored. Provides functionality for inventory tracking, condition rating, record keeping and comparative and report analysis.

OSPI School Facilities: WAC State funding assistance in post 1993 facilities: EPA Healthy Schools: Scott Black, OSPI School Facilities Tom Carver, OSPI School Facilities Kerri Lunstroth, East Valley School Board- Spokane Ray Vefik, Auburn School Board

WAC State funding assistance in post 1993 facilities. As a condition precedent to receiving state funding assistance for modernization under WAC or new-in-lieu of modernization under WAC , school districts that received state funding assistance for new and new-in-lieu school buildings and whose buildings were accepted as complete by school board of directors as of January 1, 1994, and later, shall adopt by board resolution and implement an asset preservation program (APP). (1) Definitions: For purposes of this chapter: (a) An asset preservation program is a systematic approach to ensure performance accountability; promote student health and safety by maintaining and operating building systems to their design capacity; maintain an encouraging learning environment; and extend building life, thus minimizing future capital needs. (b) An asset preservation system is a system of tasks or projects that are active, reactive, or proactive in maintaining the day to day health, safety, and instructional quality of the school facility and tasks or projects that are proactive, predictive or preventative in maintaining the school facility over its thirty-year expected life cycle. (c) A building condition evaluation is an evaluation of the condition of building components and systems using a standardized scoring matrix. (d) A building condition standard is a numeric scoring table with a scale identifying the expected condition score for each year of the building's expected life cycle. (2) The office of the superintendent of public instruction shall establish and adopt a uniform program of specifications, standards, and requirements for implementing and maintaining the asset preservation program. (3) School districts with affected buildings under this chapter are required to: (a) Adopt or implement an asset preservation system; (b) Annually perform a building condition evaluation and report the condition of such building to the school district's board of directors no later than April 1st of each year; (c) Thereafter in six year intervals during the thirty-year expected life span of the building, have a certified evaluator, as approved by the office of the superintendent of public instruction, perform a building condition evaluation and report the condition to the school district's board of directors and to the office of the superintendent of public instruction no later than April 1st.

WAC continued ( 4) A school district building affected under this chapter and that does not meet the minimum building condition standard score of forty points at the end of the thirty years from the accepted date shall: (a) Have its allowable cost per square foot used to determine the amount of state funding assistance in any modernization project reduced at a rate of two percent for each point below forty points, not to exceed a total twenty percent reduction; or (b) Be ineligible for state funding assistance when the building condition score is less than thirty points. (5) The following schedule shall apply to school districts with buildings affected under this chapter, and the requirements set forth shall replace the former requirements of this section: (a) Buildings accepted by the school board in 1994 must begin an asset preservation program in 2009, and shall fully implement the program within no more than one and one-half years; (b) Buildings accepted by the school board in 1995 must begin an asset preservation program in 2010, and shall fully implement the program within no more than one year; (c) Buildings accepted by the school board in 1996 through 2010 must begin an asset preservation program in 2011, and shall fully implement the program within no more than six months; (d) Buildings accepted by the school board after December 31, 2010, must implement an asset preservation program within six months of facility acceptance. [Statutory Authority: RCW 28A WSR , § , filed 4/8/10, effective 5/9/10; WSR , § , filed 4/28/09, effective 5/29/09; WSR , § , filed 4/8/08, effective 5/9/08; WSR , amended and recodified as § , filed 7/25/06, effective 8/25/06; WSR , § , filed 4/6/01, effective 5/7/01; WSR , § , filed 6/5/91, effective 7/6/91.]