MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 Identification and collection of the Best Practices METHODOLOGICAL APPROCH 1) OBJECTIVES 2) STRUCTURE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regions for Economic Change | LMP Workshop 3C When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform How can INTERACT.
Advertisements

Technical meeting with the Regional representative offices in Brussels Brussels, 17 March 2009 The INTERACT II Programme – Knowledge Management and Capitalisation.
EuropeAid PARTICIPATORY SESSION 2: Managing contract/Managing project… Question 1 : What do you think are the expectations and concerns of the EC task.
WP4 – 4.1 and 4.2 Preparatory activities for the creation of the WATERMODE permanent network 1 Technical Committee Meeting Venice, June 24-25, 2010 VENETO.
Summer Internship Program Outline
Supporting National e-Health Roadmaps WHO-ITU-WB joint effort WSIS C7 e-Health Facilitation Meeting 13 th May 2010 Hani Eskandar ICT Applications, ITU.
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
URBACT III LAUNCH EVENT Brussels, 16 March The URBACT III programme  Objectives & Activities  Thematic coverage  3 Types of network  Beneficiaries.
CONTACT SEMINAR November 2008 Project management tools.
CH4LLENGE has just started its series of online learning courses! We offer a SUMP Basics online course and four in-depth courses.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
Leonardo da Vinci Project BLENDED LEARNING TRANSFER Rationalising, Learning and Transferring the use of technological platforms to enterprise-based learning.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
V.I.D.E.O. Video-CVto Increase and Develop Employment Opportunities THE RESEARCH ACTIVITIES OF THE V.I.D.E.O. PROJECT Marco Merlini First Transnational.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 Identification and collection of the Best Practices Annex 1 BEST PRACTICE Collection Template 1) OBJECTIVES.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Common framework Guidelines for Pilot Actions Debrecen 2013 Municipality of Debrecen Department of Sociology University of Debrecen External expert.
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
UNDP-GEF Adaptation 0 0 Impact of National Communications on Process of Integrating Climate Change into National Development Policies UNFCCC Workshop on.
Slide 1 Final Conference Stratos Papadimitriou Cracow, September 2009 Work Package C A Quality Management Approach for Managing Mobility in Medium and.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
5 th World Water Forum Building the Programme for the Next Forum Partnership WWC-Turkey-International Stakeholder Kick-off Meeting Istanbul– March 19,
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic MEETING OF DIRECTORS GENERAL “Territorial Cohesion” The Implementation of Action 1.1a (Urban –
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
Essential SNA Project being developed from 2011 to 2013.
2010/12/10 First Skills Council Meeting Brussels, April 14 th 2014 Federico Brugnoli.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
EEA Grants Norway Grants Annual Programme Report Template Brussels, 20 November
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
“ BIRD Project“ 1 Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Project Description Ulrich.
1 Key elements of a good project ECVET contact seminar October 2010 Brussels LEONARDO DA VINCI.
Participation in 7FP Anna Pikalova National Research University “Higher School of Economics” National Contact Points “Mobility” & “INCO”
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
ESPON Seminar Luxembourg, 8-9 December Cohesion-and-Urban-Policy-_26-27-November-2015_-Luxembourg-City_/index.php.
The Male’ Declaration Proposal for Phase 4 Implementation.
CAI-Asia is building an air quality management community in Asia Investment Implications of the Action Plan Sustainable Urban.
Work Package 6 2nd Consortium meeting, Provincia di Reggio Emilia, 3rd May.2011 Blaz Jemensek, PIL Klemen Gostic, PIL.
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
Lifelong Learning Programme Call for Proposals Learning partnerships Agence Education Formation - Europe FROM THE FIRST IDEA… TO THE REAL.
Air Quality Governance in the ENPI East Countries EMISSION INVENTORY September 2012 Chisinau, MOLDOVA.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
MMOVE Mobility Management OVer Europe: changing mobility patterns.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture Life Long Learning: Education and Training policies School Education and Higher education.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Improved socio-economic services for a more social microfinance.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Ellinogermaniki Agogi Research and Development Department DigiSkills Network DigiSkills: Network for the enhancement of Digital competence skills.
Building an ENI CBC project
Smart Industrial Villages Support SMEs innovation and initiatives within Smart industrial villages, an approach for renovating traditional urban industrial,
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Project Cycle Management
PLANNED ACTIONS – UPCOMING DUTIES
Prof. Maria Loizidou Nicosia, Hilton Park Hotel, 15th June, 2006
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
BEST PRACTICES IDENTIFICATION
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Employment and Social Affairs Platform
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
URBACT III LAUNCH EVENT Brussels, 16 March 2015
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Gio.net First Proposal to discuss during Barcelona Meeting
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 Identification and collection of the Best Practices METHODOLOGICAL APPROCH 1) OBJECTIVES 2) STRUCTURE 3) ANNEX

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) OBJECTIVES 1.Presentation of the MMOVE Methodology and approach; 2.Sharing and validation of the Best Practices template; 3.First reflections on Study Visits template and feasibility study contents; 4.Timeline of the next steps; 5.Open discussion.

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE MAIN DOCUMENTS TO DEBATE POWER POINT PRESENTATIONS  General Approach  BPs template  Gantt chart

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE General focus of the project best practices exchange. Specific focus of the project deepen and better understand the reasons which leaded the undertaken mobility interventions, their impacts and the citizens mobility choices. EMPIRICAL Approach THEORETICAL Logical framework DPSIR model (Driving forces, Pressure, State, Impact and Response), conceived from the EU Institution as a relevant tool for the assessment and identification of policies development purposes:  provide information on the different elements of DPSIR chain related to MMOVE project;  to demonstrate the connections among each element;  to estimate the effectiveness of the responses given.

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE DRIVER UMAN SYSTEM Work Goods and services PRESSURES Flows (use of natural resource, space, emissions, exhaust) STATE ENVIROMENT AL SYSTEM Pollution, Noise, Congestion, Car accident IMPACTS LOCAL Health, Goods, Landscape, Time GLOBAL Clime Population MITIGATION AND COMPENSATI ON ACTIONS Noise barrier ACTIONS ON MOBILITY OFFER Innovative, ICT Traditional and infrastructural ACTIONS ON MOBILITY DEMAND MANAGEMENT Legislation, Planning, Taxes, Benefit, Information, Marketing Urban system Economy – Social system RESPONSE / POLICY DPSIR model Bearing in mind the project aims, a model based on the concept of causality chains for data synthesis, could provide an useful approach for understanding the impact of existing sustainable mobility actions and for identifying appropriate solutions

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE 1.Identification and collection of the Best Practices (1 st Phase) This first step is aimed to identify 30 best practices in total, 20 from the partnership and 10 from other EU countries in order to:  benchmark the process;  learn from the previous experiences;  develop practical data indicators to improve the learning process for the involved organizations;  enhance the discussion;  assess the quality of findings;  provide more comparable results;  provide practical outcomes of the project;  provide input to develop a guide / tool for similar contest (MMOVE Policy tool box); According to this approach, the BP collection will be realized submitting a standardized and shared format/ template (subsequently in detail ppt)

MMOVE Project 2. Study Visits (2 nd Phase) The best practices collected will be shared among the project partners during the Best Practices Network Meeting. The six best practices selected, two for each strand, will be analyzed in a larger detail through Study Visits. 3. Feasibility studies to assess the transferability of good practices (3rd phase) After the selection phase each project partners assesses that the identified policy is applicable on its area. Afterwards, the good practices transferability will be assessed preparing feasibility studies and verifying the necessary adaptations. TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE Study Visits

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE Feasibility /transferability studies (share and exchange the undertaken intervention)

MMOVE Project This three-phase process will contribute to set up the “MMOVE Policy Tool Box” aims to:   allow user to evaluate the impacts of existing actions on sustainable mobility;   identify appropriate technologies, policies and/or institutional management options to point the citizens mobility choices taken under a given set of conditions;   became an useful support for policy makers might to review the policies are carrying out and to drive next strategy and practices;   identify both potential benefits and problems for each of the defined practices and options for enhancing or alleviating the potential effects. TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE MMOVE Tool Box, model proposed Step 1 Step 2 The first step has the aim to favor a previous screening among the features (the Driver) and the main urban and social-economics topics in relation to the macro- policies implemented in the field of mobility and transport. For each problems the MMOVE Policy toolbox will indicate the set of actions more suitable to facing them Step 2 propose a systematic approach. It will suggest the better intervention for each segments of demand (the Response). Proposed leverage has an own set of implementing tools (1, 2, 3, …)

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE ……. to next slide ….. Step 1

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 ……. from previous slide Step 2

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE Details Annex 1 - Best Practices Collection Template Annex 2 - Study Visits Template (Part1, 2, 3) Annex 3 - Feasibility Study Template Discussion on Best Practise Template Annex 4 - Component 3_Gant Chart

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE Annex 2 - Study Visits Template (Part1, 2, 3) – (November 2009 – April 2010) Selection criteria TWG role an support What TWG and SAG expect from you

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE Annex 2 - Study Visits Template (Part1, 2, 3) Some suggestion for the elaboration of the SV template SV TEMPLATE PART 1 – SUBMISSION for HOSTING THE VISIT (Filled out by the partner interested in host the visit in his municipality) 1.Subject: identify the BP and the thematic related 2.Reason: why this case is important for the project 3.Schedule: favourite dates for the visit 4.Activities: what we would like to show during the visit (objectives, programme...) 5.Involved actors: who the participant partners will meet and will be able to interview during the visit (politicians, technical experts, decision makers, transport users) 6.Staff exchange (if applicable): short description of the staff exchange programme and organization we would like to organise also a staff exchange 7.Dissemination: how we will be able to disseminate the visit results at local level

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE SV TEMPLATE PART 2 – APPLICATION FORM (filled out by the partner interested in take part to the visit) Selection of the visit: which visit we would like to join and which BP we would like to deepen Expectations from the visit: what we hope to learn from the visit Portability: your opinion about the portability of the BP in your town Dissemination: how we will disseminate the visit results to our municipalities

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE SV TEMPLATE PART 3 – FINAL REPORT (Section A: filled out by the partner that hosted the visit, Section B: filled out by all the participant partners) SECTION A – general description of the visit (when, how, where,...) further relevant technical elements not already described in the BP collection template SECTION B – feedback from the partners took part in the visit what we learned from the visit how we will disseminate the results of our visit to our municipalities your opinion about the portability of the BP in your town.

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE Annex 3 - Feasibility Study Template (April 2010 – September 2011) Problem: Transfer one of the best practice saw during the SV to a local context Which kind: MMOVE will analyze only light interventions practices, not involving infrastructural hard measures, within the following themes: Communication & awareness raising; Parking and traffic management and control; Public & collective transport. Tool: Transferability/feasibility study (level of intensity: it should represent a good basis for each partner to negotiate the future development of regional and local sustainable mobility policies and it will provide recommendations for transferring and implementing the intervention in its own area, using own cost). Who: All the Project Partners in two different phases.

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE Annex 3 - Feasibility Study Template (April 2010 – September 2011) Phases: 1.Three city leaders will start the process of studying the transferability of the practice to their local situation; 2.Each of the city leaders will host a meeting with other partners interested in that theme explaining the process of transferring one practice to their local situation; 3.Each partner (not leader) will start the Transferability/feasibility study following the example of the three city leaders with the support of TWG.

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE Annex 3 - Feasibility Study Template (April 2010 – September 2011) a) Summarize local plans and policies: collecting of existing plans and policies b) Status analysis: provide a comprehensive quantified baseline of the current status of mobility c) Scenario development: develop prospective scenarios inform and stimulate the discussion among stakeholders d) Vision, objectives and targets: develop a common vision between all local stakeholders, defining a clear, measurable and shared objectives e) Action and budget plan: choose set of policies and measures from the BPs collection and study visit results, suitable for your local situation, planning the allocation of resources (human, knowledge, funds) and the time framework. Proposed feasibility study tasks No Are all data available? Study adoption Yes

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE Annex 3 - Feasibility Study Template (April 2010 – September 2011) Main activities Self evaluation For each activity ask yourself which critical success factors (Ref. Section C of MMOVE Best Practice Template, pag. 17) are more relevant for the action, if they are present and how to reinforce them. a) Summarize local plans and policies: Research and analysis of policy and procedure documents on the local and regional transport and mobility. Research and analysis of planning documents and studies on the local transport and mobility. b) Status analysis: Retrieval of available data and their synthesis (care about town planning too). Select suitable indicators (preferably pick over the BPs indicators). Complementary data collection. Interpretation of results (correlations and comparisons).

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE c) Scenario development: Elaborate development trends and programmed measures. Formulate hypotheses for scenario building together with stakeholders (fi. do nothing, top and bottom scenario). Modelling of different scenarios. d) Vision, objectives and targets: Provide basic information to stakeholders. Realisation of stakeholder meetings, focus group, interviews.... Finalize specific and concrete mobility objectives referred to the vision. Adoption of indicators that are representative for the objectives set. e) Action and budget plan: Select and design measures strategies, instruments, tools, starting from the BPs and the Study Visits results and with the TWG and MMOVE PP support Plan the timing, the technical and the budget issues of measures (keep in mind the self evaluation output to allocate budget an resource, and the skills point out from the BPs collection in an analogous context). Presentation and discussion of the action plan with the stakeholders and citizen.

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February ) STRUCTURE

MMOVE Project Erika Fulgenzi Marche Region SVIM – Sviluppo Marche S.p.A Tel Fax Giovanni Romanini Marche Region SVIM – Sviluppo Marche S.p.A. Tel Fax TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 CONTACTS

MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 Thank you for your attention!!