The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Update on Indicator to Measure Transparency IATI Steering Committee, 3 October, Copenhagen www.effectivecooperation.org.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Summary of Report to IATI Steering Committee, Paris 9 February 2011 Richard Manning.

Advertisements

Donor Performance Assessment Framework – results and lessons learnt on transparency and mutual accountability - Rwanda - John Bosco Ndaruhutse External.

LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.

Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.

SAI Performance Measurement Framework

Linn OHLSSON, IATI Secretariat Rudolphe PETRAS, Development Co-operation Directorate, OECD IATI Steering Committee, 3 October 2013 The Common Standard.

BUILDING BLOCK FOR HLF-4 PUSHING THE BOUNDARIES ON TRANSPARENCY FOR BETTER PREDICTABILITY, ENGAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY Alma Kanani, World Bank, IATI.

1 Mutual Accountability in Cambodia: What has been done so far? Heng Chou Cambodian Rehabilitation and Development Board Breakout Session on Mutual Accountability:

CAPE CONFERENCE November 2014

Presentation by Ms. Siona Koti DAD Community of Practice, Yerevan, Armenia June 2011 DAD Solomon Islands: Channelling Donor Resources to the Country’s.

Welcome to the IATI TAG meeting Moor Hall, Cookham 14—15 May 2012 Overview of IATI Brian Hammond Chair of the TAG.

Capacity Development for Cooperation Effectiveness in Latin America and the Caribbean OAS Subregional Workshop for Cooperation Effectiveness: Caribbean.

Delivering on Commitments to Gender Equality and Women’s Rights Key issues for HLF4 on aid effectiveness, Busan November 2011 Delivering on Commitments.

CSO’s on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals.

CSOs on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals March 2011.

The Outcomes of the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (HLF-4) Aid Quality & Architecture Division Development Co-operation Directorate OECD.

The Current Debate on the Post-2015 Development Agenda Assistant Secretary-General Thomas Gass December 2014.

Transparency Beyond Mexico IATI Steering Committee Lessons Learnt and proposals on a way forward for the Busan « Transparency » indicator and the common.

Eduardo González Aid Quality Division DCD-OECD 9 May, 2011 Update in THE ROAD TO BUSAN.

PARIS21 CONSORTIUM MEETING Paris, October 2002 Progress Report of the Task Team on Food, Agriculture and Rural Statistics  Objectives  Past activities.

Inter-agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators

July 2011: OECD-DAC Working Party on Aid Effectiveness, Paris June 2011: Joint Global Assembly of Open Forum and Better Aid Platform to prepare for HLF4.

Gender and Development Effectiveness. Entry points for Tanzania? DPG Main, 8 May 2012 Anna Collins-Falk, Representative, UN Women on behalf of DPG Gender.

Presentation to Asia Health Policy Program Palo Alto, CA 20 October 2011 ASIA PACIFIC OBSERVATORY ON HEALTH POLICIES AND SYSTEMS.

Ownership, Results & Accountability

Independent Monitoring & Evaluation for Accountability Presented to Health Sector Steering Committee, 21 st July 2009.

PRESENTATION IV Cycle of the Structured Dialogue.

Transparency Indicator IATI Steering Committee Copenhagen 13 March 2014.

Development and Cooperation - EuropeAid Future directions in EU development policy Françoise Moreau DG Development and Cooperation – Europe Aid European.

Participatory Democracy through African Peer Review Mechanism in South Africa Citizens’ Engagement in Public Sector Management Ledule Bosch AfCoP Annual.

BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.

The International Aid Transparency Initiative Why is it relevant to private aid organisations? Partos Plaza, Netherlands, 14 th October 2010.

AID EFFECTIVENESS A GLANCE FROM GLOBAL TO COUNTRY LEVELS Cao Manh Cuong Foreign Economic Relations Dept. Ministry of Planning and Investment.

The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.

DANIDA’s Experience of Results Managing for Development Results Peter Ellehøj – Quality Assurance Department November 2011.

HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS Building Blocks Core Busan Commitments Common principles.

Aid Transparency: Better Data, Better Aid Simon Parrish, Development Initiatives & IATI Yerevan, 4 October 2009.

Monitoring the Paris Declaration in 2011 Preliminary Findings Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Paris, 5-8 July 2011.

WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.

Report from Partner Countries Work Stream – Day 1 Room 2.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

Report of the 2nd ad hoc Committee on the TB epidemic Jaap F. Broekmans STOP TB Partner’s Forum NEW DELHI June 2004.

IATI Indicator Report to IATI Steering Committee – 3 December 2015.

Global Partnership for Enhanced Social Accountability (GPESA) December 19, 2011 World Bank.

5 April, 2013 Indicator 4 on Transparency Consultation IATI Steering Committee, 3 Dec 2015 Alejandro Guerrero UNDP-OECD Joint Support Team (Global Partnership.

IT Directors’ Group Meeting October 2010 Item 2.2 of the agenda Co-ordination with the DIME Rainer MUTHMANN, Head of Unit B2.

Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.

Update on Monitoring IATI Steering Committee Meeting Copenhagen, 15 October.

The Busan Action Plan for Statistics: Discussion of the Implementation Roadmap The World Bank and PARIS21 Secretariat PARIS21 Board Meeting: Special Session.

Background The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which the UN Members States jointly committed to in September 2015, provide an ambitious and long-term.

1 January 2005 Introduction to Phase 2 and General Update Lesotho CCM.

WGCapD, CEOS and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Deputy CEOS Executive Officer / CSA Marie-Josée.

Supporting measurement & improvement of primary health care (PHC) at the facility and community levels Dr. Jennifer Adams, Deputy Assistant Administrator,

The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Indicator on Use of Results Framework Seoul GP Annual Workshop Indicator Clinic 6 November 2014effectivecooperation.org.

Monitoring the Paris Declaration Emerging Findings Brenda Killen, OECD Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Helsinki, Finland 30 August.

The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,

The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Process: What, when, by whom? Global Partnership monitoring workshop Copenhagen, June 2013.

Session 2 The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation Setting the scene: the Global Partnership, what it is and how it can make a difference.

The Global Partnership

UNEP/Global Mechanism support for UNCCD reporting

Session 3 The monitoring framework

Session 6 – Communications & Outreach

Session 3 Stock take of the first monitoring round

Follow us: June 15-16, 2017 Steering Committee Meeting Summary of Conclusions and Action Items Follow.

HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS

Building Statistical Capacity UNSD perspective

IATI – Planned evaluation of IATI

Presentation title Adaptation Committee and Least Developed Countries Expert Group Agenda item 5 (c-e) Draft recommendations developed by the Adaptation.

Session 2 – From asks to action

Presentation transcript:

The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Update on Indicator to Measure Transparency IATI Steering Committee, 3 October, Copenhagen

Where are we coming from? Busan HLF4 (2011) “…implement a common, open standard for electronic publication of timely, comprehensive and forward looking information on resources provided through development cooperation...” “Agree, by June 2012, on a selective and relevant set of indicators and targets through which we will monitor progress” Post-Busan Interim Group → WP-EFF June 2012 Global Partnership monitoring Framework Indicator 4: “Measure of state of implementation of the common standard by co-operation providers” Indicator development (joint UNDP-OECD support team) Consultations with Ad Hoc Group on the Common Standard Technical work among Core Group of experts

What is the political approach? Accelerate and deepen efforts to implement the common standard – enhanced accountability Improve the availability and public accessibility of information on development co-operation – transparency vis-à-vis all stakeholders Deliver a feasible and practical pilot indicator to measure implementation and progress Facilitate political debate on transparency at ministerial-level meeting Global transparency agenda is broad – need a strong narrative

What is the ‘practical’ approach? Measure providers’ actual delivery of information Build on existing data and systems Simple, graduated measure of implementation  Assess providers’ information provision to the systems of the common standard (IATI and OECD/DAC CRS and FSS)  Focus on Official Development Finance (bilaterals & multilaterals)  Composite, quantitative indicator delivering one score/grade (out of 5) for each provider

Coverage Timeliness - Frequency of updates - Freshness of information / time lags [monthly / quarterly / semi-annual / annual] Comprehensiveness - Level of detail [information in common standard data fields] Forward looking - How many years ahead - How disaggregated [1, 2 or 3 years; activity / sector / country level] What are we measuring?

Why coverage? One element of comprehensiveness Putting the information in ‘size context’ Latest verified figure for annual disbursements ODF Common Standard Reporting

Core group to finalise technical work, joint support team to issue proposal for feedback by mid-October (online consultation) Joint support team to finalise indicator and lead assessment for progress report (continued collaboration with common standard secretariats) Nov-Dec Complementary evidence to enrich the narrative: members contributions in the run-up to the ministerial In the spirit of a pilot approach… Test methodology, assess strengths/weaknesses, refine if appropriate. Future aspirations (long-term) Quality of information Broader coverage of actors – how to assess compliance with common standard beyond existing reporting systems? What happens next?

Use online consultation to familiarise yourself with the indicator, provide feedback and mobilise political support for this assessment (2 nd half of October) Provide complementary evidence to enrich the narrative: Contribute your ideas through the e-discussion! Feedback Initial reactions to the approach? How can we work together so that this resonates politically? Beyond the common, open standard, what are the key transparency issues where progress is taking place or persistent challenges remain? What can you do?