2012-13 Policy Debate Topic Discussion Transportation Infrastructure.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Manitoba International Gateway Strategy Manitoba Infrastructure & Transportation.

Advertisements

The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.

POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.

Answering Counterplans  Acronym is PLOTS  Permutation  Links to their disads  Other disads to the Counterplan  Theory Objections  Doesn’t Solve the.

Russia’s Arctic Development Plan Strategy to 2020 Caitlyn Antrim Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans The Road to Nuuk CSIS-WWF April.

The 1ar: Debate’s Paramedic Get the patient to the hospital…alive.

Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.

PROYECTO NEREIDAS VISIÓN EUROPEA DE LOS PROYECTOS TEN-T ALEXIO PICCO – CIRCLE Malaga 03/04/2014.

What is Debate? A debater’s guide to the argumentative universe…

The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.

Introduction to Debate -Negative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L. Husick,

Earth’s Oceans Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its non-military exploration and/or development of the Earth’s.

POLICY DEBATE Will look like CX on the sign up sheet.

Dharma Initiative Team. Dharma Initiative Team Project METROVALENCIA.

Counterplans CODI 2014 Lecture 2. What is a counterplan? A plan offered by the negative to solve some or all of the affirmative’s advantages The negative.

FOCUS: GLOBALIZATION.  1801 Allen Parkway  Houston, TX  

Seaports in the transport chain The Danish Perspective Jakob Svane, Danish Ports UNECE Transport Committee 2 June 2010 Geneva.

The Business of Empowering Women November 18, 2009 Presentation at the World Bank’s GAP Event Working Women: Better Outcomes for Growth CONFIDENTIAL AND.

 Read through the recent Guardian article and brainstorm answers to the following: 1.Does India show any signs of development in its education system?

Use with Export Practice & Management Fifth Edition by Alan Branch ISBN 1–84480–081–4 © 2006 Alan Branch Chapter 3 Characteristics of international transport.

1 Break out group 2-Technological developments and policies and measures Issues discussed: Hydrogen Energy efficiency Biomass and biofuels Infrastructure.

TOPIC INTRO TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE Courtesy of Katie Gjerpen, Niles North Head Debate Coach.

Odessa National economic university Trends in the development of free economic zones in Ukraine Speaker Mamontova I.V. Supervisor PhD, Prof. Baranova V.G.

Counterplans Debate Central Workshop August 30, 2008.

Action Plan Resources. Intersections of geoscience and sustainability.

Debate Topic: Affirmative G: Negative G: Affirmative Group Speaker A-1.

Distribution Customer Services and Logistics

The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.

THE NEW TRANS-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT NETWORK A CORE NETWORK: BLUEPRINT FOR 2030.

Debate should be a means of significantly improving one's education through analytical development and extension of advocacy positions. The negative strategy.

1 1 Unit 7 - Chapter 22 Physical Distribution. 2 »The process of transporting, storing, and handling goods to make them available to customers »Third.

Negating Space June 29 th, Exploration Beyond Exploration What can we ACTUALLY explore? FX Topicality Not Earth Topicality.

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA Intermodal transport between Europe and Asia: opportunities and challenges of Latvia.

Introduction. Getting the Most Out of Camp  Someone made some sacrifices to make it possible for you to be here  The next two or three weeks are likely.

Topic Lecture Social Services for Poverty. Significance Connection to your daily lives Connection to your daily lives Your community Your community Your.

Going Negative The Surveillance Topic. Outline for the topic I. Categories of neg ground -Go over the specific arguments we have II. Dealing.

CoPS has built SinoTERM: a Chinese multi-regional model based on TERM To investigate issues such as: regional development planning food security trade.

Affirmative Strategy Austin Layton. Overview At least, take two things from this lecture Main Advantage of Being Aff: Familiarity – Preparation Matters.

POLICY DEBATE Training Tomorrow’s Leaders How to Think Today!

Investing in our future: A European budget for climate security Russell Marsh Head of Policy – Green Alliance.

Rob Verheem The Netherlands EIA Commission

Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards Baylor University July 2013.

1 Restoring Ecosystem, Benefits and Value: The EU Nature & Biodiversity policy Stefan Leiner Natura 2000 Unit, DG Environment European Commission International.

The White Paper from 2001 to 2010 Vision White Paper  Issued by the EC  Consultation from stakeholders, Parliament and Council  Will set out.

MARKET ECONOMY. FEATURES OF THE FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM: Owning private property is a basic freedom in the free enterprise system.

Planning Scotland’s Seas consultation Seas Consultation 2013.

How to Debate Disadvantages. DA Uniqueness: Status of a key issue in the SQ – Example: The economy is improving Link: how the plan disrupts the SQ – Example:

Constructing a Case for the Opposition International Debate Education Association.

GDI 2015 THE NEGATIVE.  The counter to the Affirmative  Negates the course of action proposed  So much variety! Many ways to negate  What makes someone.

AQA E CON 1: M ARKETS AND MARKET FAILURE The impact of government intervention on market outcomes You have now covered all the theoretical content.

POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.

 Philosophical or performative advocacy  Rejects Traditional policy focus  Micro vs Macro resistance to oppression.

Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards & Russell Kirkscey June 2015.

Beginning Policy Debate: I ain’t scared ! NSDA Nationals 2014 Jane Boyd Grapevine HS, TEXAS.

Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),

The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.

Debate System. Parts of the debate: Pro Side 1.Lead Debater- opens the debate 2.Pro Cross-examiner- responds to what was presented by both the con cross-

 The Affirmative team states its position agreeing with the resolution. The United States should continue space exploration as it...

An Inland Port in Salt Lake County

Basics of Debate Damien Debate.

TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY Ground transportation by road is one of the most important today as well as for freight and people, due to the great development of.

How to be negative Gabi Yamout.

Analyze a problem Conduct research Utilize principles of argumentation

Green Bonds for Latin America and the Caribbean

Unit 8 The tertiary sector.

Introduction to Policy Debate

© All Rights Reserved.

Introduction to the Neg

Thinking like a Policy Debater

National Interest & Foreign Policy

Presentation transcript:

Policy Debate Topic Discussion Transportation Infrastructure

National Case Distribution

What is being debated? National Argument list currently features close to 300 teams Most popular cases are: --National Infrastructure Bank --Port deepening projects --High Speed Rail development

What is being debated? --NexGen transportation system --Inland Waterways --Port security --Bering Strait tunnel --Carbon capture & Storage --Short Sea Transportation

What about kritiks? Focus is on disadvantaged groups --Race/poverty based --Persons with disabilities --Transportation as a means of control --Persons seen as nomads

What about advantage areas? Hegemony National security Foreign relations Climate change Economic impacts

Negative Arguments State counterplans Privatization counterplans Spending Disadvantages Trade-off Disadvantages Can you use your affirmative as a negative argument?