Sentencing Ken Lay & Jeffrey Skilling © Frank Bowman University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Internet Fraud & Access Device Fraud
Advertisements

RETROACTIVITY OF THE FSA CRACK GUIDELINE AMENDMENT Laura S. Wasco Research & Writing Attorney.
Sandra Abbott th ST. Suite D Charlottesville, VA Phone: Fax: 434—
924(c) Convictions and Career Offender Sentencing Keith A. Williams.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 1 Virginia Child Protection Accountability System §
Federal Sentencing Federal Public Defender’s Office June 23, 2014.
Faking It: Calculating Loss in Computer Crime Sentencing Jennifer S. Granick, Esq. Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society
Sexual Assault CRIMINAL LAW –UNIT #3. Sexual Assault A sexual assault is:  An assault that is sexual in nature There are three levels of sexual assault:
Section 2.6 Question 1. Section 2.6 Answer 1 Section 2.6 Question 2.
Sentencing in Canada Imposing a Sentence.
+ The Nature of Crime. + Goals By the end of this chapter you will be able to: Describe the elements that must exist for a person to be charged with and.
YCJA THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. JOHN HOWARD SOCIETY ROLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Provides public education about the law, especially the.
Employee Responsibility Chapter Seven Jerry Estenson.
Name Municipal Court (Judge/Administrator/Clerk) City of Blank.
Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited CANADIAN BUSINESS AND THE LAW Second Edition by Dorothy Duplessis Steven Enman Shannon.
1 Sentencing Decisions Chapter Sixteen. 2 Lady Justice Right hand: scales of justice symbolizing fairness in the administration of justice. Eyes: blindfold,
PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING. Goals of Sentencing  In Section 718 of the Criminal Code a statement is found that gives judges some direction.
The Judgement and Civil Remedies. After the trial the Judge delivers a judgement. After the trial the Judge delivers a judgement. In Small Claims Court,
Rights, Duties, and Responsibilities
Lesson 2. What are we looking for in this section?  The roles and responsibilities of citizen’s in the justice system including jurors, advocates and.
Why We Have Laws Chapter 19.
Criminal Justice Today Twelfth Edition CHAPTER Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21 st Century, 12e Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2014.
Risk/Needs Assessment Within the Criminal Justice System.
Sentencing and the Presentence Investigation Report
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
Andrew Fastow G.W. Amos Lauren Wright. Background Born December 22, 1961 in Washington DC Born December 22, 1961 in Washington DC B.A. in Chinese and.
Domestic Violence and Stalking Behaviour: The need for criminalizing emotional and psychological woman abuse Dr. Julian Hermida.
Deciding on a Punishment. Sentencing is a difficult job for a Judge. There is much at stake. Safety of society Safety of society Freedom of the offender.
Sentencing for Manslaughter in Cases Involving Intimate Relationships R v Lavallee.
1. Explain retribution to deter crime At one time the primary reason for punishing a criminal was RETRIBUTION. This is the idea behind the saying “an.
SENTENCE:  punishment imposed on a person convicted of committing a crime.
Victim Remedy in Malaysia Andrew Khoo Co-Chair, Human Rights Committee Bar Council Malaysia.
Fraud Offence s In NSW. What is fraud????????????? Deceitful or dishonest conduct carried out for personal gain A type of economic offence.
Judicial Concurrence with Sentencing Guidelines Preliminary FY2009.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Identify the sentencing principles that guide the judiciary in Canada  LO2 Describe the adult.
Law 12 MUNDY, 2008 CIVIL LAW JUDGEMENTS. Delivery of Judgement In small claims court, judgement is typically delivered orally by the judge while all parties.
“Show me the Money!!” The Judgment: Damages & Other Compensations.
Chapter Nine Criminal Practice: Criminal Law and Juvenile Law.
Discretion in the Criminal Justice System Meaning of Discretion The power to determine guilt or innocence The power to determine guilt or innocence The.
IOSH Midlands South Branch Legal Update 30 September 2015 Andrew Litchfield – Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co LLP.
SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS CHAPTER 15 PAGES
Grade 11 Canadian Law Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Enron –Individual Costs Employees loss of jobs, pension, savings Stockholders monetary loss, 60 billion Barlow-suicide Fastow Prison term reduced to 4.
Chapter 2 Section 1 Federal & State Court System.
Intro To Criminal Law.
THE AIMS OF PUNISHMENT AND PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING 1 Lady Justice Hallett DBE and Dame Linda Dobbs DBE.
Section 2.1 Crimes and Criminal Justice Section 2.1 Crimes and Criminal Justice A _____ is an act that _______ the ______ of _______, or the _______.
Enron: 21,000 Arthur Anderson: 29,000 Retirement: $1.2 Billion Pensions: $2 Billion
What are the Goals of Sentencing?? Protection of the Public Main goal is to protect the public. When an offence is committed the individual harms the victim.
Chapter 15 Section 3 Criminal Law. Types of Crimes Criminal law State criminal case v. federal criminal case Criminal justice system.
Drug/Heroin Prosecution & Sentencing
VIII. DEATH PENALTY CONSIDERATIONS
American History Chapter 7 Sections 1,2 and 3.
Section 4 Crime and Punishment
Crime Victim Reparation Commission
I am so happy to have you all in class today 
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS?
Domestic Violence and Stalking Behaviour: The need for criminalizing emotional and psychological woman abuse Dr. Julian Hermida.
11.1 – SENTENCING LAW 12.
Oceanport School District EVVRS Statistics for the School Year Presented by Matthew Howell, Principal October 22, 2014 Electronic Violence.
Canadian Criminal Code Part 2 Violent Crimes
CIVIL LAW JUDGEMENTS.
The indictment Kenneth Lay, Jeffrey K. Skilling, ad Richard A. Causey, and their conspirators, were indicted to have engaged in a wide-ranging.
Crime in the United States
Sentencing Guidelines/Mandatory Minimums and Charging
Bullying in the classroom
Criminal Law 2.1 Intro To Criminal Law
SENTENCING Goals of Sentencing Procedures of Sentencing
The indictment Kenneth Lay, Jeffrey K. Skilling, ad Richard A. Causey, and their conspirators, were indicted to have engaged in a wide-ranging.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS?
Presentation transcript:

Sentencing Ken Lay & Jeffrey Skilling © Frank Bowman University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law

Jeffrey Skilling U.S.S.G. Section 2B1.1 2B1.1(a): Base Offense Level B1.1(a): Base Offense Level B1.1(b)(1)(N): Loss 2B1.1(b)(1)(N): Loss What IS the “loss” here? What IS the “loss” here? “Loss” is “the reasonably foreseeable pecuniary harm that resulted from the offense” “Loss” is “the reasonably foreseeable pecuniary harm that resulted from the offense” How do we quantify that in Skilling’s case? How do we quantify that in Skilling’s case? A question to be determined by Judge Lake A question to be determined by Judge Lake

Jeffrey Skilling U.S.S.G. Section 2B1.1 2B1.1(a): Base Offense Level B1.1(a): Base Offense Level B1.1(b)(1)(N): Loss 2B1.1(b)(1)(N): Loss May be more than $100 million+ 26 May be more than $100 million+ 26 2B1.1(b)(2)(B): >50 victims B1.1(b)(2)(B): >50 victims B1.1(b)(8): Sophisticated means B1.1(b)(8): Sophisticated means B1.1(b)(12)(A): > $1 million receipts+2 2B1.1(b)(12)(A): > $1 million receipts+2 TOTAL from 2B1.1:38

Jeffrey Skilling, cont. TOTAL from 2B1.1:38 U.S.S.G. Chapter 3 3B1.1(a) Aggravating role+4 3B1.1(a) Aggravating role+4 3B1.3 Abuse of trust+2 3B1.3 Abuse of trust+2 TOTAL OFFENSE LEVEL44 CRIMINAL HISTORY CATEGORY = I

Jeffrey Skilling LIFE

Kenneth Lay U.S.S.G. Section 2B1.1 2B1.1(a): Base Offense Level B1.1(a): Base Offense Level B1.1(b)(1)(N): Loss 2B1.1(b)(1)(N): Loss May be more than $100 million+ 26 May be more than $100 million+ 26 2B1.1(b)(2)(B): >50 victims B1.1(b)(2)(B): >50 victims B1.1(b)(8): Sophisticated means B1.1(b)(8): Sophisticated means B1.1(b)(12)(A): > $1 million receipts+2 2B1.1(b)(12)(A): > $1 million receipts+2 TOTAL from 2B1.1:38

Kenneth Lay, cont. TOTAL from 2B1.1:38 U.S.S.G. Chapter 3 3B1.1(a) Aggravating role+4 3B1.1(a) Aggravating role+4 3B1.3 Abuse of trust+2 3B1.3 Abuse of trust+2 TOTAL OFFENSE LEVEL44 CRIMINAL HISTORY CATEGORY = I

Kenneth Lay LIFE

Andrew Fastow (if he’d gone to trial) U.S.S.G. Section 2B1.1 2B1.1(a): Base Offense Level B1.1(a): Base Offense Level B1.1(b)(1)(N): Loss 2B1.1(b)(1)(N): Loss More than $100 million+ 26 More than $100 million+ 26 2B1.1(b)(2)(B): >50 victims B1.1(b)(2)(B): >50 victims B1.1(b)(8): Sophisticated means B1.1(b)(8): Sophisticated means B1.1(b)(12)(A): > $1 million receipts+2 2B1.1(b)(12)(A): > $1 million receipts+2 What about 2B1.1(b)(12)(B)? [+4?] What about 2B1.1(b)(12)(B)? [+4?] TOTAL from 2B1.1:38

Andrew Fastow, cont. TOTAL from 2B1.1:38 U.S.S.G. Chapter 3 3B1.1(a) Aggravating role+4 3B1.1(a) Aggravating role+4 3B1.3 Abuse of trust+2 3B1.3 Abuse of trust+2 TOTAL OFFENSE LEVEL44 CRIMINAL HISTORY CATEGORY = I

Andrew Fastow LIFE (but …)

Only suckers pay the sticker price 10 years, less possible substantial assistance departure, less 15% Out in, say, 2010