CONECT Northeast Trade & Transportation Conference AES & CBP Enforcement March 18, 2009 Roland Shrull, Esq. Middleton & Shrull (781) 272-7966 www. middleton-shrull.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
10+2 Importer Security Filing Brought To the Importer By
Advertisements

Importer Security Filing We’ll Make It Work For You.
On January 26, 2009, a new rule titled Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier requirements went into effect. This rule is known as because.
© 2009 Transmodal Corporation 1 Overview of ISF Presented By Chris Peterson, Vice President Customs & Compliance.
1 The Software Solution for the Future of Freight The Software Solution for the Future of Freight.
Dale C. Kelly Assistant Division Chief Data Collection
NEW U.S. SECURITY PROGRAMS AFTER SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 FREEHILL HOGAN & MAHAR, LLP 80 PINE STREET NEW YORK, NY TEL: FAX:
A-TCET Outbound Enforcement February 12, Outbound Mission Preventing terrorists, terrorist groups, rogue nations and other criminal organizations.
In-Bonds (CBP 7512) Mercancia bajo finanza Aduanero
January 16, 2008 Moderated by Mary Jo Muoio, NCBFAA President Peter H. Powell, Sr., NCBFAA Senior Counselor Alan R. Klestadt, NCBFAA Customs Counsel Importer.
10+2 Importer Security Filing Brought To the Importer By.
1 CHAPTER XXXI INT'L FREIGHT FORWARDER & ELECTRONIC EXPORT INFORMATION  International Freight Forwarder  Electronic Export Information.
1 Routed Export Transactions June 2013 Name Place, date United States of America Routed Export Transactions June 2013 Freight Forwarders – Routed Export.
Reduce Exporting Stress withAES. l Electronic Filing of Shipper’s Export Declarations (SEDs) l Electronic Filing of Carrier Outbound Manifests What Is.
2000 U.S. Census Bureau Reduce Exporting Stress with AES.
Bill Delansky, Product Owner, Manifest and Exports ACE Business Office
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Outbound Issues Webinar
Required Advance Electronic Presentation of Cargo Information - Air; Final Rule US Customs and Border Protection JANUARY 2004.
U.S. Census Bureau Reduce Exporting Stress with AES Automated Export System Branch Foreign Trade Division U.S. Census Bureau.
Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements Notice of Proposed Rulemaking What NCBFAA and NEI Members Need to Know January 31, 2008.
April CBP Initiative: Advance Trade Data Elements Advance Trade Data Elements “Security Filing”
Foreign Trade Division AES Compliance Seminar
Compliance April 29, What is Customs Compliance? A program of ‘shared’ responsibility in which Customs requires all importers to demonstrate reasonable.
1 Foreign Trade Statistics Regulations U.S. Census Bureau Foreign Trade Division Regulations, Outreach and Education Branch.
Integrated Shipping Services EU 24 Hour Transmission.
1 RBNA/ITR3 | 11/17/2009 | © 2009 Robert Bosch LLC and affiliates. All rights reserved. Update on the Importer Security Filing ITA/GC Arthur O’Meara Robert.
NCBFAA WEBINAR ADVANCE TRADE DATA ELEMENTS March 1, 2007 Moderated by Mary Jo Muoio and Alan R. Klestadt.
Foreign Trade Division Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee 1 September 2012.
1 Omari Wooden Trade Ombudsman U.S. Census Bureau Foreign Trade Division Foreign Trade Regulations & Automated Export System.
® Mailer’s Technical Advisory Committee Meeting USPS Headquarters Washington, DC August 12, 2009.
Trade Act of 2002 Office of Field Operations Kimberly Nott, Chief Manifest and Conveyance Branch September 2004.
1 Omari Wooden Trade Ombudsman U.S. Census Bureau Foreign Trade Division Automated Export System Overview.
MASS EXPORT CENTER Export Control Reform - ECR Automated Export System - AES December 10, 2013 Moe Mitchell.
Importer Security Filing “10 + 2”. What is it? Required electronic filing of certain data elements 24 hours prior to the vessel loading in the foreign.
The Role of the Freight Forwarder
1 Foreign Trade Regulations Mandatory Automated Export System Christina Farr September 15, 2008 Foreign Trade Division Regulations, Outreach and Education.
is intended to improve the ability of Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”)to identify high-risk shipments to the United States will require.
2000 U.S. Census Bureau Regulations Update Foreign Trade Division September 2000.
Trade Security Importer Security Filing We’ll Make It Work For You Mary Jo Muoio Senior Vice President Barthco Trade Services, division OHL President.
E-NOA/D June 2005 Peter Pallas Tel: Cell: Fax: shipping.com.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection JFK International Airport
AES NOW and 2014 Presented for Export Expo 2013 December 10, 2013 by Harvey Waite, OCEANAIR Inc.
1 Foreign Trade Regulations Highlights Texas Brokers Association, Inc. Jerry Greenwell September 24-27, 2008.
Implementation of Prior Notice. Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (Bioterrorism Act-BTA) Public Law
March 7, Trade Software Developer Technical Seminar March 7, 2012 Cargo Release Scope and Functionality  Steven Lubel, CBP, ACE Program, Technical.
What Testing Is Required As a Basis for Certification?  Certification must be based on “a test of each product or upon a reasonable testing program” 
PROPOSED NEW DATA ELEMENTS 24 Hours Prior to Lading.
The U.S. Department of Transportation and the International Trade Data System Steven Beningo Transportation Border Working Group Border Data Workshop June.
Foreign Trade Division Jerry Greenwell, Chief Regulations, Outreach and Education Branch.
Required Advance Electronic Presentation of Cargo Information Summary of Inbound Vessel Cargo Provisions March 18, 2004.
Rules for Improving Cargo Security The Maritime 24 Hour Rule The Trade Act of 2002 The Automated Manifest System (AMS)
AUTOMATED EXPORT SYSTEM PRESENTATION PRESENTED BY: HARVEY R. WAITE, II Partner, Director of Regulatory Compliance and Security OCEANAIR, Inc. December.
CROSS BORDER TRADE October, 2004 M O V I N G F O R W A R D 2004.
Routed Export Transactions
Automated Manifest System (“AMS”) C. Jonathan Benner Troutman Sanders LLP Washington, D.C. 22 March 2004 Stamford, Connecticut.
Prepared and presented by Ricky Pillay EXPORT CYCLE (Roles and Responsibilities) AGENT OF.
2003 U.S. Census Bureau AES Filer Licensing Program C. Harvey Monk, Jr. Chief, Foreign Trade Division.
Transitioning to the ACE Platform Omari Wooden Assistant Division Chief, Trade Outreach and Regulations December 11, 2015.
Reduce Exporting Stress withAES. l Electronic Filing of Shipper’s Export Declarations (SEDs) l Electronic Filing of Carrier Outbound Manifests What Is.
Office of Export Enforcement Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) U.S. Department of Commerce Anthony Levey Special Agent in Charge Los Angeles Field.
Tradewatch 2011 February 17, Tradewatch 2011 Feb. 17, 2011 Paulette Kolba, Panalpina, Inc. Partners in Compliance Exporter and Forwarder Challenges.
Supply Chain Security Programs: Challenges and Effects - An Ocean Carrier Export View Tradewatch 2011 Andy Lumley OOCL (USA) Inc. February 17, 2011.
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION LOS ANGELES / LONG BEACH SEAPORT.
FTR & ACE Transition Update Theresa Gordon International Trade Management Division U.S. Census Bureau.
Brady Act Requirements In November 1993, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 (Brady Act), Public Law , was signed into law requiring.
Tablet Press & Capsule Filling Machine Transaction Regulations
AUTOMATED EXPORT SYSTEM PRESENTATION
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Outbound Issues Webinar
Exporting and Logistics
TRADE ACT OF 2002 (TRUCK): Impact on Border Crossings
Presentation transcript:

CONECT Northeast Trade & Transportation Conference AES & CBP Enforcement March 18, 2009 Roland Shrull, Esq. Middleton & Shrull (781) www. middleton-shrull.com

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved2 New AES Penalty Guidelines On September 30, 2008 filing AES became mandatory Effective Date: February 1, 2009 for violations which occur after February 1, Violations Covered: mandatory filing of export information through Automated Export System (AES) issued Foreign Trade Regulations (FTR) issued by Census Bureau (DOC). Penalties: to be issued and collected by CBP. Penalty Amount: Up to $10,000 per violations.

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved3 New AES Penalty Guidelines Reasons for Assessing a Penalty: 1) Failure to file export information in AES, 2) Delay in filing export information in AES, 3) Other violations, including filing false or ‘misleading’ information in AES, and 4) Failure of the export carrier to provide certain documents or information to CBP. Each of these categories has its own penalty and mitigating guidelines.

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved4 New AES Penalty Guidelines Penalty my be assessed against any ‘culpable’ party which includes: 1)USPPI 2)FPPI (routed export transaction) 3)Freight forwarder 4)Authorized agents (incl. brokers and other parties to the export transaction) 5)Carrier Penalties may be assessed against multiple parties in a single transaction, e.g. USPPI fails to provide carrier with AES proof of filing citation (ITN) and carrier fails to include filing citation legend on the manifest. Penalties will be assessed against each culpable party to a transaction rather than to each violation of that transaction, e.g. USPPI provided incorrect information concerning the identity of the foreign consignee and value of the goods, in this instance only one penalty will be assessed.

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved5 New AES Penalty Guidelines For first time violations, CBP may use alternative action rather than assessing a penalty, e.g. education, informing violators of U.S. law, issuing ‘warning’ letters, etc. Issuance of a penalty for violating the FTR does not preclude the assessment of additional penalties for other violations, e.g. trademark laws. Mitigating guidelines based on party’s history of prior violations. Period reviewed in determining mitigation is the 3 years prior to the violation under review.

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved6 New AES Mitigation Guidelines Violations : Failing to File Occurs when government discovers that there is no record of AES filing by date record is required and such discovery is communicated to USPPI, agent, carrier, etc. Any AES record filed after 10 days when it was required is considered a failure to file even if not discovered by the government. 1st recorded offense: $750 - $2,500 2nd recorded offense: $1,000 - $3,500 3rd recorded offense: $1,500 - $5,000 4th recorded offense: $2,000 - $10,000

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved7 New AES Mitigation Guidelines Violations : Late Filing of Electronic Export Information (EEI) Filed beyond due date but before the 10 days when it is considered a non-filing or before it is discovered by the government. 1st recorded offense: $250 - $1,500 (per day) 2nd recorded offense: $500 - $2,500 (per day) 3rd recorded offense: $750 - $3,500 (per day) 4th recorded offense: $1,100 - $10,000 (per day up to $10,000) Penalty Notice will be issued at $1,100 per day ($10,000 max). The maximum mitigated penalty is $250.

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved8 New AES Mitigation Guidelines Violations: False or Misleading Information Includes following actions, e.g. : 1)Providing incorrect value, 2)Provide incorrect party identity, 3)Failure to cite license code and number, 4)Failure to obtain power of attorney to submit AES submission, 5)Failure to correct information in AES as the changes become known to the filer, 6)Failure to provide carrier with proof of filing citation or exemption 7)Failure to retain all records relating to exports made during the prior 5-year period

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved9 New AES Mitigation Guidelines Violations: False or Misleading Information 1st recorded offense: $500 - $2,500 2nd recorded offense: $750 - $3,500 3rd recorded offense: $1,000 - $5,000 4th recorded offense: $2,000 - $10,000 Maximum mitigation permitted in these circumstances is $500.

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved10 New AES Mitigation Guidelines Violations: Carrier Penalties Penalties may be assessed for the following violations: 1)Failure of carrier to adhere to export carrier requirements ( Sec ) 2)Failure to provide USPPI or authorized agent with changes to date and port of export 3)Failure to report proof of filing citation or exemption legend on manifest 4)When filing incomplete manifest under bond, the failure to file the manifest information within proscribed time period after export (late filing) 5)When filing incomplete manifest under bond, the failure to provide the list of proof of filing citations or exemption legends prior to departure from the port of exit. 6)For carriers exempted from filing a manifest, the failure to file, upon request the proof of filing citations or exemption legends.

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved11 New AES Mitigation Guidelines Violations: Carrier Penalties 1st recorded offense: $500 - $2,500 2nd recorded offense: $750 - $3,500 3rd recorded offense: $1,000 - $5,000 4th recorded offense: $2,000 - $10,000 Maximum mitigated penalty is $500.

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reseved12 New AES Mitigation Guidelines Mitigating Factors 1)First time violation 2)Voluntary Self-Disclosure 3)Documentation to show remedial action to prevent future violations 4)Exceptional cooperation with government 5)Violation was an isolated occurrence 6)Party has provided substantial assistance in the investigation of another person 7)Party has a systematic export compliance effort.

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved13 New AES Mitigation Guidelines Aggravating Factors 1)Several violations in the same export transaction, e.g. wrong port code, value, violation of other agency regulations 2)Suggestions that violation was intentional 3)High number of prior violations during past 3 years 4)Prior criminal conviction for related violation, e.g. BIS violation 5)Party exhibits a pattern of disregard for its responsibilities under U.S. export law 6)Party exports as a regular part of its business but lacks systematic export compliance effort.

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved14 China’s ’24 Hour Rule’ 1) China to implement ’24 Hour Advance Manifest Regulations’ in early ) Risk management involves cross referencing large amount of data, including from 3 rd parties, with that provided as part of the Customs declaration data. 3) Applies to imports, exports and transshipments [except Hong Kong & Macau] 4) Applies to various modes of transportation, e.g. vessel, train, air, truck. 5) Primary responsibility rests with vessel operators which must provide PRC Customs with manifest data electronically 6) Other parties, e.g. NVOCC, freight forwarder, etc. may also submit data 7) Prior to submitting data party must register with Customs

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved15 China’s ’24 Hour Rule’ Importing into China 1) Vessel operator must advise Customs of ETA and port of entry prior to submitting manifest 2) Later must provide arrival notice with exact ETA and port 3) Manifest data must provided electronically 4) Data is identified as ‘main data’ and ’other data’. Within both categories data is further identified as ‘compulsory’ or ‘optional’ 5) ‘Main data’ must be provided 24 hours before loading for container ships but only 24 hours before arrival for non-container ships 6) ‘Other data’ must be provided prior to arrival

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved16 China’s ’24 Hour Rule’ Exporting from China 1) Export pre-manifest: submitted for exporter’s Customs cargo declaration and clearance formalities, includes both ‘main’ & ‘other’ data elements and must be submitted at least 24 hours prior to cargo loading at China port. 3) Export loading manifest based on Customs released data must be provided 30 minutes before loading at the port 4) Data divided into several categories: - Standard Information: e.g. carrier name - Basic Shipment Information: e.g. mode of transportation - Port & Route Information: e.g., port of loading - B/L Party & Information: e.g. payment terms, quantity, weight - Container & Cargo Related: e.g. container no., seal no. - Amendment 5) Data elements for import and export transactions are not identical.

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved17 China’s ’24 Hour Rule’ Mandatory Data Conditional Data Carrier Name Carrier Agent Code Port Loading HBL Carrier Registration Next Calling Port Mode of Transport Notify Party Vessel name & Voyage Container No., Size & Type Port of Loading & Date MBL Payment Terms Quantity Weight (per commodity) Shipper & Address Consignee & Address Description Up to 45 data elements might have to be provided (if all ‘conditional’ elements are included) Above is partial list of data elements

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved18 China’s ’24 Hour Rule’ Penalties 1)Refusal of a vessel to enter or depart Chinese port 2)Certain violations may be considered in accordance with smuggling or other Customs laws which constitutes a crime 3) Informal indication that enforcement will be delayed 3-6 mos.

Copyright (c) 2009 Middleton & Shrull All Rights Reserved19 Other ’24’ Hour Rule Countries 1- US (Automated Manifest System) 2- Canada (Advanced Commercial Information) 3- EU is discussing a similar program 4- WTO approved Global Trade Security and Facilitation Standards