Presentation by: Andrew Clark Director of the Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice and the Institute for Municipal and Regional Policy at CCSU Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2007 General Assembly.
Advertisements

Oklahoma Department of Corrections DUI Offender Profile
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Slide 1 Recent Developments in Sentencing and Corrections Reform Presentation to the Nevada Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice January.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
Sponsored by: CCSU’s Women’s Center; Center for Public Policy & Social Research and the Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice.
IN NUMBERS: INCARCERATION-RECIDIVISM-EDUCATION THE NEED FOR BETTER COMMUNICATION BEHIND BAR COMMUNICATION BEHIND BARS TDCJ REHABILITATION PROGRAMS DIVISION.
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
Re-Entry and Recidivism
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Community Corrections.  Community Corrections are the subfield of corrections in which offenders are supervised and provided services outside jail or.
Community Supervision and Alternative Sanctions Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
Virginia’s Geriatric Release Provision. 2 Geriatric Release Provision & Truth-in-Sentencing  The Geriatric Release Provision was adopted as part of the.
Community Corrections
Sentencing and Punishment
Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
1 THE MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL Office of the Correctional Investigator Royal Canadian Mounted Police Solicitor General Department National Parole.
Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2009 General Assembly.
Probation and Parole in the United States Your presenter:
Housing: A Significant Reentry Barrier Nicole E. Sullivan NC Department of Correction Office of Research and Planning.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
Michigan Department of Corrections Institutional and Community Corrections.
NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission RECIDIVISM OF 16 AND 17 YEAR OLD AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS: FINDINGS FROM TWO STUDIES Presented to Youth Accountability.
Housing Ex-Offenders: Identifying Barriers and Proposing Solutions Angela Lee ODRC Reentry and Family Program Administrator.
MICHIGAN PRISONERS, VIOLENT CRIME and PUBLIC SAFETY: A PROSECUTOR’S REPORT.
Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress October, 2011 COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES A PARTNERSHIP APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY David Pisapio, Correctional.
Maine Board of Corrections March 25, 2009 Maine’s Unified Correctional System Design Development Process Discussion Presents: ONE MAINE ONE MAINE ONE SYSTEM.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
1 A Presentation to Senate Judiciary B And Judiciary C Committees February 15, 2000 Kari Belvin, Senate Fiscal Services Chris Keaton, Legislative Fiscal.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
Ursula Hill February 2012 Notre Dame-AmeriCorps Mid-Year Conference.
SENTENCING REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA Thomas W. Ross.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
Michigan Department of Corrections Updated Prison Bed Space Projections Impact from Probation, Community Corrections, Parole and the MPRI Presentation.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
1 Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2005 Virginia General Assembly.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Early Release Schemes in Hong Kong Mr. Kenneth LEUNG Principal Officer Hong Kong Correctional Services Department.
Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2008 General Assembly.
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
HB 3194 CRAIG PRINS3/5/14 OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION NEVADA ADVISORY COMMISSION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
Realignment: A One-year Examination of Offenders Released from State Prison in the First Six Months of Public Safety Realignment Association for Criminal.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
11/18/20151Sex Offenders Notes - Kuzyk Notes on recidivism among Connecticut sex offenders: Male offenders released in 2005 CT OPM – Criminal Justice Policy.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.
Risk Assessment and Community Notification Mark Bliven, Minnesota Dept. of Corrections Wednesday, Dec 9, 2015 Special Committee on Sex Offenders Connecticut.
Task Force on Public Safety OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION OCTOBER 30, 2013.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Criminal Justice Policy & Planning Division STATE OF CONNECTICUT OFFICE OF POLICY & MANAGEMENT (OPM) 1 ANNUAL REPORTS.
BJS ReEntry Highlights (note: yearend 2002). BJS ReEntry At least 95% of all State prisoners will be released from prison at some point; nearly 80%
The Impact of Mandatory Supervised Release (MSR) Violators & Time Served on IDOC’s Population David E. Olson, Ph.D. & Donald Stemen, Ph.D. Department of.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
Corrections May 5, United States World Leader The United States has the largest prison system in the world with 2.2 million prisoners behind bars.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Criminal Justice Policy Development and Resource Reinvestment Len Engel, Esq. December 10, 2010 What Works Conference Portland, OR Crime and Justice Institute.
Mass Incarceration: Prospects for Reform American Friends Service Committee, Arizona.
When Discrimination is Legal: The Social Costs of Felony Convictions
Corrections GOVT 2306, Module 10.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
North Dakota Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Corrections May 4, 2017.
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Prisoners: Characteristics of U.S. Inmate Populations
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

Presentation by: Andrew Clark Director of the Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice and the Institute for Municipal and Regional Policy at CCSU Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University Overview of Connecticut Correctional Re-entry and Recidivism Statistics

Prison Population Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Prison Population CT’s prison population increased 242% from 1986 to This led the state to undertake a series of initiatives to stem the steady growth in the number of people incarcerated. Some of these initiatives involved increased funding for DOC and CSSD. This increased funding enhanced programs and services that allowed more inmates to be released to community supervision or helped them to successfully remain in the community. Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Common Misconceptions More people live in Connecticutonly 11% Increase More CT residents are of prime crime committing12% Decrease age (18-24 yrs old) More people are being arrested10% Decrease More people are being arrested only 10% Increase for drug offenses More violent crimes are being30% Decrease committed Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Common Misconceptions Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Accused vs. Sentenced Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Accused vs. Sentenced DOC houses both accused offenders who are awaiting trial and sentenced offenders. While the accused prison population has more immediate effects on the overall prison population, the significant increase in the prison population is primarily due to increases in the sentenced population. Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Recidivism in Connecticut 2001 Prepared by: Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Recidivism 2001 Conducted by: the Program Review Committee Definition: New criminal activity by a person after a criminal conviction that resulted in either imprisonment or another sanction (i.e., probation, diversionary sentence, or fine). Methodology: Three measures were used: re-arrest for a new misdemeanor or felony offense; reconviction on those new charges; and re-imprisonment or sentence to another court-imposed sanction such as probation, a diversionary program, or a fine. They examined re-arrest, reconviction, and sentencing data for all convicted felons discharged from prison or sentenced to probation from Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Recidivism 2001 Findings: Within 3 yrs of discharge, 70% were rearrested at least once for a new crime. Almost half of the discharged inmates were reconvicted of a new crime. Felony inmates had significantly higher rates of re-arrest, reconviction, and re-incarceration than felony probationers. Males had significantly higher recidivism rates than females. Young offenders were more likely to reoffend than older inmates. Age, race, and gender were significant predictors of repeat criminal activity. Purpose and Recommendation Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Annual Report 2007 & 2008 Connecticut Recidivism Studies Prepared By: Office of Policy & Management Criminal Justice Policy and Planning Division & Central Connecticut State University Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Recidivism 2007 & 2008 Conducted by: the ISCJ under OPM Findings: offenders released to post-release supervision were less likely to return to prison. Offenders released with no community supervision were more likely to be arrested, convicted, and incarcerated for a new offense. Offenders released end of sentence with no post-release supervision had the highest recidivism rate: 56% were rearrested, 39% were convicted, and 21% received a new prison sentence. Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Annual Report 2009 Connecticut Recidivism Study Prepared By: Office of Policy & Management Criminal Justice Policy and Planning Division Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Recidivism 2009 Conducted by: OPM Methodology: the study tracked 16,486 sentenced inmates for 3- yrs following their discharge from prison or release to a community program in Using data provided by the DOC, CSSD and the DPS, the study captured any subsequent arrests, readmissions to prison, convictions and re-incarcerations for new offenses for each offender in the cohort. Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Recidivism 2009 Findings: 67% of offenders were arrested for new offense (new arrest) 56% of offenders were incarcerated (any re-incarceration) 55.6% were convicted of a new offense (new conviction) 36.7% of offenders received a new prison sentence for a new offense. Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Timeline of Significant CJ Initiatives 1981 Supervised Home Release (SHR) was created which produced Indeterminate Sentencing. Parole was abolished for those currently serving a determinate sentence. “Good time” was reduced from 15 to 12 days a month. 1983Sentence length increased by 25% 1986To accommodate the state’s growing prison population the DOC began its expansion project, creating new facilities as well as expanding existing ones. Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Timeline 1987 The General Assembly enacted mandatory minimum sentencing laws for drug sale offenses DOC facilities experienced a serious overcrowding issue. At that time, SHR program phase-out begins; parole was reinstated for all inmates serving a sentence of more than 2 years “Time served” increased by 25% for court imposed sentences 1992“Time served” increased by 40% for court imposed sentences Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Timeline 1993P.A established the Board of Parole which now had discretionary release and supervision authority over inmates who received a sentence of more than 2 years “Truth in Sentencing”- time served was increased to 85% for serious violent offenders. 1996Prison expansion project was completed. DOC added 12 new prisons and renovated 13 existing facilities to increase capacity Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Timeline 1999 DOC contracted with the VA DOC to transfer 484 inmates from CT to a maximum security prison 2001 P.A authorized judges to depart “for good cause” from mandatory minimum sentences for certain drug offenses 2003Building Bridges: From Conviction to Employment CT’s Justice Reinvestment Initiative was presented and issues relating to reentry were discussed. The creation of additional community correction programs became the primary focus of these discussions. Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Timeline 2003The Board of Parole and the Board of Pardons were merged into DOC. This increased DOC authorization to transfer an additional 2,000 inmates for a total out-of-state contract of 2,500 beds for fiscal years 2004 and 2005 (PA 03-6). 2004P.A An Act Concerning Prison Overcrowding enacted a new offender reentry strategy based on the justice reinvestment model. This contained many initiatives to help control the state’s prison overcrowding issue. One of its major goals was to decrease the prison population by 20%. Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Timeline 2004In July, Governor Rell ordered the DOC to: Return all inmates transferred out-of-state back to CT. Develop a comprehensive offender re-entry strategy intended to control prison overcrowding and assist offenders as they transition from prison to the community while maintaining public safety and supporting victims’ rights (PA ). 2005By November, all 500 out-of-state inmates were returned to CT. $13 million was invested into DOC and CSSD for initiatives outlined in the comprehensive offender re-entry strategy (PA ). Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Timeline 2006July 1 st, the Criminal Justice Policy & Planning Division was created within OPM and tasked with developing a plan to promote a more effective and cohesive state criminal justice system (PA ) The Connecticut Sentencing Task Force was created (PA ) effective to review CT’s criminal justice and sentencing policies and laws; and make recommendations to create a more just, effective and efficient system of criminal sentencing. Sources: P.A Compliance Project: Program Review and Investigations Staff, 01/12/06. Connecticut Correctional Population Projections Study. The Office of Policy and Management, Criminal Justice Policy and Planning Division. Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Justice Reinvestment In 2003, Rep. Dyson, Chair of the Appropriations Committee, gathered policy makers and CJ agency representatives to discuss re-entry at “Building Bridges: From Conviction to Employment” held at CCSU. The justice reinvestment initiative was presented, and policy makers were proposing ways to balance the state’s budget without having to lay-off any state employees. Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Justice Reinvestment The funding DOC received annually far surpassed the budget of any other state agency, so efforts to balance the state’s budget were directed toward DOC expenditures. This created additional community correction, and re-entry programs became a primary focus of these discussions. Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Contact Information Community Based New Haven Re-entry Roundtable Contact: Deborah Marcuse Bridgeport Re-Entry Roundtable: Contact: Dan Braccio, Program Director CO-OP Center/ The Council of Churches of Greater Bridgeport Juvenile: The Connecticut Juvenile Justice Alliance website: Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice Central Connecticut State University

Contact Information Statewide Office of Policy and Management (OPM)CriminalJustice Policy & Planning Division website: