Architectural Model to Enable Power System Tradeoff Studies Chrys Chryssostomidis Julie Chalfant David Hanthorn.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gas Turbine Applications
Advertisements

PowerPoint ® Presentation Chapter 4 System Components and Configurations Components Electricity Sources System Configurations.
Lesson 38 Shipboard Power
University of Iowa Indoor Practice Facility Outside-the-box HVAC Lincoln Pearce, PE – KJWW Engineering David Hahn – University of Iowa Chilled Water Plant.
Reliability Software1 Reliability Software Minimum requirements & Best practices Frank Macedo - FERC Technical Conference July 14, 2004.
Thermal System Modeling and Co-Simulation with All-Electric Ship Hybrid Power System with All-Electric Ship Hybrid Power System Ruixian Fang 1, Wei Jiang.
1. 11/26/2012: NERC Board of Trustees adopted CIP v5 CIP thru CIP CIP and CIP Version 5 Filing FERC requested filing by 3/31/2013.
Professor Sung-Yeul Park
1 Sensor Relocation in Mobile Sensor Networks Guiling Wang, Guohong Cao, Tom La Porta, and Wensheng Zhang Department of Computer Science & Engineering.
1 Stochastic Event Capture Using Mobile Sensors Subject to a Quality Metric Nabhendra Bisnik, Alhussein A. Abouzeid, and Volkan Isler Rensselaer Polytechnic.
ERIC VANDENBURG, SPENCER HOMAN, TREVOR LARSON and NIK URLAUB Team website: / 1.
IFPAC-NeSSI Report.ppt; 29 January 2008; Slide 1Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc. Criteria for Design and Specification NeSSI Issues Presentation to IFPAC.
Extended Gantt-chart in real-time scheduling for single processor
1 Scheduling Mapping of tasks to time slots  Computation  Communication Mapping of power usage to time slots  Mechanical devices  Thermal subsystems.
Shipboard Electrical Distribution …“Shifting the Electric Plant to a Normal Full Power Lineup.”
POWER SUPPILES LECTURE 20.
There are four symbols that every competent EE must be able to manipulate with Consummate Skill: e j  $ Energy = $ Power = “Cash Flow” =
13-15 March 2002 Power Systems Conference 2002 Impact of Distributed Generation 1 Harmonic and Distributed Generation Interaction Issues in the U.S. Navy.
ROUTING ON THE INTERNET COSC Aug-15. Routing Protocols  routers receive and forward packets  make decisions based on knowledge of topology.
Approved for Public Release
Voice of the Engineer (VOE)
Review of progress and future work SQSS Sub Group 2 August 2006 DTI / OFGEM OFFSHORE TRANSMISSION EXPERTS GROUP.
Shipboard Electrical Distribution References Required Introduction to Naval Engineering – Ch 17.
ENERGY CONSERVATION BUILDING CODE – 2006 PRESENTATION BY VP GUPTA PRINCIPAL CHIEF ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL), BSNL CHENNAI.
1 EVALUATING INTELLIGENT FLUID AUTOMATION SYSTEMS USING A FLUID NETWORK SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT Ron Esmao - Sr. Applications Engineer, Flowmaster USA.
Applying the Distribution System in Grid Restoration/NERC CIP-014 Risk Assessment Srijib Mukherjee, Ph.D., P.E. UC Synergetic.
Manned Ground Vehicles 2004 Combat Vehicles Conference
Air conditioning – Refreshes your life EWTP MBY Applied Systems Sales1 EWTP-MBYNN Air-cooled Heat Recovery.
STEP 3 EVALUATE THE ADVERSARY. Sequence of Presentation Disposition of Adversary Doctrinal Templates Enemy Tactics HVTs COG Analysis.
Onboard DC Grid The step forward in Power Generation and Propulsion © ABB Group October 7, 2015 | Slide 1 Ismir Fazlagic, Global Products and Solution.
1 Critical Mission Support Through Energy Security Susan Van Scoyoc Concurrent Technologies Corporation 16 August 2012 Energy Huntsville Meeting Huntsville,
Introduction A GENERAL MODEL OF SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION.
1 Distributed Energy-Efficient Scheduling for Data-Intensive Applications with Deadline Constraints on Data Grids Cong Liu and Xiao Qin Auburn University.
At Lewis Field Glenn Research Center Controls and Dynamics Branch Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report Dr. Sanjay Garg.
Bachelor Degree in Maritime Operations (BMO) Diesel Technology and Emissions Waste Heat Recovery Lecturer: Mr. Kalyan Chatterjea Presented By: Tam Kong.
1 Optical Packet Switching Techniques Walter Picco MS Thesis Defense December 2001 Fabio Neri, Marco Ajmone Marsan Telecommunication Networks Group
IntroductionResources Requirements Approach and Considerations Summary Abstract E agle Bluff is an environmental learning center, which has the goal to.
1 Iterative Integer Programming Formulation for Robust Resource Allocation in Dynamic Real-Time Systems Sethavidh Gertphol and Viktor K. Prasanna University.
M.E.F. Mechanical Energy Factory Mechanical Power Converter & Re-Generator System.
CHP & DG METERING & MONITORING IN NEW YORK STATE CASE STUDIES AND IMPLEMENTATIONS Presented By: STEPHEN STONE, PE DSM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PC
We can…. 2 GLOBAL REFERENCES Rev: 00 References :
Rapid Strategic Lift Ship (RSLS) FY 04 Feasibility Studies February 2005 SEABASE CONUS Steven Wynn NAVSEA 05D1
Localized Low-Power Topology Control Algorithms in IEEE based Sensor Networks Jian Ma *, Min Gao *, Qian Zhang +, L. M. Ni *, and Wenwu Zhu +
Teknologi Pusat Data 12 Data Center Site Infrastructure Tier Standard: Topology Ida Nurhaida, ST., MT. FASILKOM Teknik Informatika.
Bringing together leading research institutions to advance electric ship concepts. Power Interconnect Tool Angela Card Mississippi State.
Bringing together leading research institutions to advance electric ship concepts. Bringing together leading research institutions to advance.
MH...CH LECT-021 SYSTEMS CONCEPT Adopting a materials handling systems from overall optimization point of view. Adopting a materials handling systems.
2.8.1 Power Cabling C. Chryssostomidis, C. Cooke, H. Babaee, J. Chalfant, M. Ferrante Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
LINKS ACHIEVEMENT SELF STARTING STATIONS SYNCHRONISING SUB-STATIONS SYNCHRONISING SUB-STATIONS.
1 HybridationPAC CVS ArchitecturesOptimisation SC Conclusion Markos García Arregui Theoretical study of a power generation unit based on the hybridization.
Ship Design Exercise: 10,000 ton, 100 MW, 20kVDC Surface Combatant ESRDC.
MIT Contribution to ESRDC Effort Chryssostomidis Hover Karniadakis Kirtley Leeb Triantafyllou Chalfant Marden Prempraneerach
Contract: EIE/07/069/SI Duration: October 2007 – March 2010 Calculation of the integrated energy performance of buildings EN 15316: Heating systems.
COOLING & VENTILATION PLANTS M. Nonis – CERN EN Department / CV Group Annual Meeting of the FCC study – Rome 14 th April 2016.
MVDC Collaboration MVDC Issues and Viability of Red Demo in Philadelphia.
1 40 MW 20 MW 15 MW 11 MW5 MW HFAC Baseline Architecture: modeling status R. Hebner A. Ouroua Center for Electromechanics The University of Texas at Austin.
Boiler Safety Valve Regulations
1 Meeting of Red Team – Purple Team Ship Design Process and Model Development Arlington VA August 20, 2010.
MVDC & MVAC Baseline Architecture Models in RTDS and ESRDC’s VV&A Process Michael “Mischa” Steurer Grant No. N Discussion at RedTeam Meeting.
SMPS.
Electrification of the Future US Navy Warships
Modular Power Conversion Cabinet for Future Warships
ESRDC Overview for Load Management
Market Architectures Integrating Ancillary Services from Distributed Energy Resources Olivier Devolder Head of Energy Group N-SIDE.
D. Menniti, N. Sorrentino, A. Pinnarelli, M. Motta, A. Burgio and P
M.KARTHIK (10F41D4307) Under the esteemed guidance of
Shipboard Electrical Distribution
PROGRAM SCOPE Design, Build and Test 2 Vehicles with alternative forms of energy MULE Purpose: Evaluate energy demands and packaging restraints to traverse.
Anna Brinck, M.S. Student Robert Cuzner, Assistant Professor
Generators.
Presentation transcript:

Architectural Model to Enable Power System Tradeoff Studies Chrys Chryssostomidis Julie Chalfant David Hanthorn

Goal Overall architectural model for an all-electric ship Overall architectural model for an all-electric ship Fully-integrated physics-based simulation of electrical, hydrodynamic, thermal, and structural components of ship operating in seaway. Fully-integrated physics-based simulation of electrical, hydrodynamic, thermal, and structural components of ship operating in seaway. An early-stage design tool capable of performing tradeoff studies on concepts such as An early-stage design tool capable of performing tradeoff studies on concepts such as AC vs. DC distribution AC vs. DC distribution frequency and voltage level frequency and voltage level energy and power management options energy and power management options effect of arrangements and topology effect of arrangements and topology

Metrics Weight Weight Volume Volume Efficiency/Fuel Consumption Efficiency/Fuel Consumption Cost Cost Reliability (Quality of Service) Reliability (Quality of Service) Survivability Survivability hull, mechanical and electrical (HM&E) systems

Naval Architecture Model Begin with balanced design of ship envelope, bulkheads, decks Begin with balanced design of ship envelope, bulkheads, decks Zonal arrangement of major equipment Zonal arrangement of major equipment Zonal distribution of systems Zonal distribution of systems Tool used: Paramarine Tool used: Paramarine Very high level model but can monitor usual naval architecture criteria (LCG, VCG, GM, Floodable Length) Very high level model but can monitor usual naval architecture criteria (LCG, VCG, GM, Floodable Length)

Distributed System Model Paramarine

Distributed System Model Simulink

Electrical Loads Propulsion Propulsion Radar Radar Pulsed Weapon Pulsed Weapon Load Centers in each zone Load Centers in each zone Energy Storage Energy Storage Distribution System Zonal Distribution Ring Bus (initially) Load Centers modeled as lump parameters Switches included for isolation Distributed System Model

Damage Model Center and radius Center and radius Anything within radius is destroyed Anything within radius is destroyed Trace systems back to first undamaged isolation point Trace systems back to first undamaged isolation point

Overall Architectural Model Notional Ship Notional Ship Survivability Metric Survivability Metric

Paramarine Design Began with a balanced low-level Frigate design Began with a balanced low-level Frigate design Initial power requirements Initial power requirements 80MW Propulsion 80MW Propulsion 37MW Estimated future electric loading 37MW Estimated future electric loading 6 vertical zones 6 vertical zones At least 1 PGM per zone (except 1 – ESM?) At least 1 PGM per zone (except 1 – ESM?)

Zonal and Machinery Layout

Design Challenges/Possible Solutions Gas turbine exhaust, fore and aft Gas turbine exhaust, fore and aft Diesels would give more flexibility Diesels would give more flexibility Moving the bridge location Moving the bridge location Restricting Helo operations Restricting Helo operations PMM placement PMM placement Podded propulsion Podded propulsion

Survivability Metric Manageable scope - useful in early stage design Manageable scope - useful in early stage design Prioritizing loads: Prioritizing loads: Survive the damage Survive the damage Continue to operate Continue to operate Perform its mission Perform its mission Can be applied to: Can be applied to: Electrical Power Electrical Power Chill water Chill water Seawater Seawater Ventilation Ventilation Changes in fidelity of analysis by altering level of system detail Changes in fidelity of analysis by altering level of system detail

Electric Load Priority 1. Power Generation PGMs and required auxiliaries PGMs and required auxiliaries 2. Damage Control Fire fighting, dewatering, IC Fire fighting, dewatering, IC 3. Basic Mobility 4kt propulsion and steering system 4kt propulsion and steering system 4. Self Defense Sufficient sensors and weapons Sufficient sensors and weapons 5. Exterior Communications All excomms All excomms 6. Helo and Boat Recovery Lights, RAST, boat davits Lights, RAST, boat davits 7. Increase Speed to 10 knots 8. Basic Offense Min Radar, weapon, ship control sys Min Radar, weapon, ship control sys 9. Full Flight Operations All flight equipment incl. refueling 10. Increased Offense Medium Radar, addl weapons 11. Increase Speed to 20 knots 12. Miscellaneous Mechanical systems Compressors, RO units, etc. 13. Full Offense Full Radar, hi-energy weapon 14. Increase Speed to 25 knots 15. All non-vital loads Laundry, Galley, heat, etc. 16. Increase to Maximum Speed

Proposed Survivability Tiers A Ship likely to be lost with the loss of over 25% embarked personnel B Ship likely to be lost with the loss 25% or under embarked personnel C Does not meet Power Generation and Damage Control - Ship's status is likely to continue to degrade D Meets Power Generation and Damage Control- Ship is able to combat existing damage but is vulnerable to further threats. E Meets Basic Mobility and Self Defense - Is able to sustain itself against the enemy. F Meets Exterior Communications and Helicopter and Boat Recovery - Basic functionality without offense. G Meets Increased Speed, Basic Offense - Can perform at least one primary mission H Meets Full Flight Operations and Increased Offense - Can perform most or all primary missions I Meets Increased Speed, Mechanical Services and Full Offense - As far as a military asset, unaffected J Complete functionality - all loads are filled

Survivability Calculation – First Metric Highest tier achieved while also meeting lower tier requirements Highest tier achieved while also meeting lower tier requirements To meet the tier requirements the Boolean statement must be satisfied To meet the tier requirements the Boolean statement must be satisfied Example to meet Self Defense: Example to meet Self Defense: SeaRAM OR sensor AND decoy system SeaRAM OR sensor AND decoy system Example to meet Tier E: Example to meet Tier E: Self Defense AND Basic Mobility AND Tier D - implies previous Tiers Self Defense AND Basic Mobility AND Tier D - implies previous Tiers

Survivability Calculation – Second Metric Total load value of all system loads that can be serviced Total load value of all system loads that can be serviced Uses surviving Generators and loads along with surviving connectivity to return a weighted score Uses surviving Generators and loads along with surviving connectivity to return a weighted score

Survivability Metric Calculation Calculation process Calculation process Dijkstra’s algorithm Dijkstra’s algorithm linear programming linear programming Four examples Four examples full operation full operation large PGMs isolated large PGMs isolated zones isolated zones isolated zone 4 damaged zone 4 damaged

Dijkstra’s Algorithm calculates the lowest weight path calculates the lowest weight path from a single node to each other node from a single node to each other node in a directed, weighted graph in a directed, weighted graph

Linear Programming find the maximum of f * x find the maximum of f * x where f i is the weight/priority of filling load x i where f i is the weight/priority of filling load x i subject to linear constraints such that subject to linear constraints such that total power supplied by a generator ≤ the capacity of the generator, total power supplied by a generator ≤ the capacity of the generator, the total power supplied to a load ≤ the size of the load, the total power supplied to a load ≤ the size of the load, a generator only supplies power to a load for which connectivity exists between the generator and the load. a generator only supplies power to a load for which connectivity exists between the generator and the load.

Ring Bus with ZEDS Zonal Load Centers Zonal Load Centers Propulsion Propulsion Radar Radar Pulsed Weapon Pulsed Weapon

Loads

Full Operation Survivability Tier J: Complete functionality - all loads are filled Survivability Tier J: Complete functionality - all loads are filled Survivability Score = 100% Survivability Score = 100%

Full Operation STBD PORT STBD PORT PULSE RADAR PMM PMM PULSE RADAR PMM PMM POWER GENE DC BASIC MOBILITY SELF DEFENSE EXCOMM HELO/BOAT KTS BASIC OFFENSE FULL FLIGHT OPS INCR OFFENCE KTS MISC MECH FULL OFFENSE KTS NON-VITAL MAX SPEED

Large PGMs Isolated Survivability Tier I: Meets Increased Speed, Mechanical Services and Full Offense - As far as a military asset, unaffected Survivability Tier I: Meets Increased Speed, Mechanical Services and Full Offense - As far as a military asset, unaffected Survivability Score = 92% Survivability Score = 92%

Large PGMs Isolated STBD PORT STBD PORT PULSE RADAR PMM PMM PULSE RADAR PMM PMM POWER GENE DC BASIC MOBILITY SELF DEFENSE EXCOMM HELO/BOAT KTS BASIC OFFENSE FULL FLIGHT OPS INCR OFFENCE KTS MISC MECH FULL OFFENSE KTS NON-VITAL MAX SPEED

Zones Isolated Survivability Tier H: Meets Full Flight Operations and Increased Offense - Can perform most or all primary missions Survivability Tier H: Meets Full Flight Operations and Increased Offense - Can perform most or all primary missions Survivability Score = 73% Survivability Score = 73%

Zones Isolated STBD PORT STBD PORT PULSE RADAR PMM PMM PULSE RADAR PMM PMM POWER GENE DC BASIC MOBILITY SELF DEFENSE EXCOMM HELO/BOAT KTS BASIC OFFENSE FULL FLIGHT OPS INCR OFFENCE KTS MISC MECH FULL OFFENSE KTS NON-VITAL MAX SPEED

Zone 4 Damaged Survivability Tier I: Meets Increased Speed, Mechanical Services and Full Offense - As far as a military asset, unaffected Survivability Tier I: Meets Increased Speed, Mechanical Services and Full Offense - As far as a military asset, unaffected Survivability Score = 94% Survivability Score = 94%

Zone 4 Damaged STBD PORT STBD PORT PULSE RADAR PMM PMM PULSE RADAR PMM PMM POWER GENE DC BASIC MOBILITY SELF DEFENSE EXCOMM HELO/BOAT KTS BASIC OFFENSE FULL FLIGHT OPS INCR OFFENCE KTS MISC MECH FULL OFFENSE KTS NON-VITAL MAX SPEED

Summary Overall Architectural Model Overall Architectural Model Notional Ship Notional Ship Distribution System Distribution System Damage Model Damage Model Metrics Metrics Two-fold Survivability Metric Two-fold Survivability Metric Survivability Tiers Survivability Tiers Survivability Score Survivability Score

Backup Slide

Proposed Survivability Tiers AShip likely to be lost with the loss of over 25% embarked personnel BShip likely to be lost with the loss 25% or under embarked personnel CDoes not meet Power Generation and Damage Control - Ship's status is likely to continue to degrade D Meets Power Generation and Damage Control- Ship is able to combat existing damage but is vulnerable to further threats. Minimum requirements: one operational generator with associated auxiliaries, two firepumps. E Meets Basic Mobility and Self Defense - Is able to sustain itself against the enemy. Minimum requirements: achieve 4 knots with steering, one self-defense system (either a CIWS/SeaRAM or a sensor and associated missile decoy system). F Meets Exterior Communications and Helicopter and Boat Recovery - Basic functionality without offense. Minimum requirements: one operational mode of exterior communications, close-in radar, able to recover helicopter and boat. G Meets Increased Speed and Basic Offense - Can perform at least one primary mission Minimum requirements: operate at 10 knots, perform one primary mission. H Meets Full Flight Operations and Increased Offense - Can perform most or all primary missions Minimum requirements: flight operations, two primary missions I Meets Increased Speed, Mechanical Services and Full Offense - As far as a military asset, unaffected Minimum requirements: power to all loads at this level and below J Complete functionality - all loads are fulfilled Minimum requirements: fulfill all loads, including non-vital loads