Names in the New Standards for the Evaluation of Names and Armory (formerly the Rules for Submission) A Brief Summary Produced by the Laurel Office Permission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report Writing for Business Students. Business School Report Writing Topics 1.Planning 2.Structure & Content 3.Style.
Advertisements

The International Register of Certificated Auditors Putting Annex SL into context An awareness and orientation session about the new common text framework.
What is a Database By: Cristian Dubon.
Armory in the New Standards for Evaluation of Names and Armory (formerly the Rules for Submissions) A Brief Summary Produced by the Laurel Office Permission.
Concurrency II. Shared/Exclusive Locks Problem: while simple locks + 2PL guarantee conflict­serializability, they do not allow two readers of DB element.
CSCI 6962: Server-side Design and Programming Input Validation and Error Handling.
Member FINRA/SIPCThursday, November 12, 2009 Resource Menu Changes - Report User Experience Study | Kevin Cornwall.
Exam Writing and Grading Nan D. Hunter Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Graduate Programs November 2013.
Grant Proposal Writing© Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid, CS5014, Fall CS5014 Research Methods in CS Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid Computer Science Department Virginia.
Tuesday, January 21, 2014 Review Copyright Basics and Fair Use (for test) Share “Case Research”
Chapter 12 – Strategies for Effective Written Reports
1 Use and content of the RFP  Request for Proposals (RFP) is similar to bidding documents and include all information of the assignment, selection of.
Names 101 – Intro to name rules Presented by Yehuda ben Moshe Elmet Herald 1.
© 2006 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Longman Publishers Chapter 7: Organizing Ideas Reading Across the Disciplines: College Reading and Beyond,
Chapter Concepts Discuss Fonts Understand Fonts
1 Module 5 How to identify essay Matakuliah: G1222, Writing IV Tahun: 2006 Versi: v 1.0 rev 1.
XHTML1 Tables and Lists. XHTML2 Objectives In this chapter, you will: Create basic tables Structure tables Format tables Create lists.
Introduction to Structured Query Language (SQL)
COMM : Applied Organizational Communication Instructor: Dan Lair Day Twenty Three: Reports and Presentations November 15, 2005.
Document Type Definitions. XML and DTDs A DTD (Document Type Definition) describes the structure of one or more XML documents. Specifically, a DTD describes:
Lecture 3: Writing the Project Documentation Part I
Changes in the New Standards for Evaluation of Names and Armory (previously the Rules for Submissions) A Brief Summary Produced by the Laurel Office Permission.
Book Heraldry 100 Introduction Presented by Yehuda ben Moshe Elmet Herald 1.
CANKAYA UNIVERSITY FOREIGN LANGUAGES UNIT
XP New Perspectives on XML Tutorial 3 1 DTD Tutorial – Carey ISBN
Proofreading & Revising
Helpdesk video  bhtRU bhtRU.
University of Sunderland Professionalism and Personal Skills Unit 6 Professionalism and Personal Skills Lecture 6: Report Writing.
1/19 Component Design On-demand Learning Series Software Engineering of Web Application - Principles of Good Component Design Hunan University, Software.
Title Page (Act and Scene) Your name Your partner’s name.
Supplementing Your Reports: by Jennifer L. Bowie Information from Lannon 16 & Kolin 16 At Look at Front and End Matter.
Scientific writing style Exact  Word choice: make certain that every word means exactly what you want to express. Choose synonyms with care. Be not.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Selection and Definition of a Problem. First Step Identify a general area that is related to your area of expertise and is of particular interest to you.
PRESENTATIONS: WHAT MAKES FOR A SUCCESSFUL PRESENTATION? PRESENTATIONS: WHAT MAKES FOR A SUCCESSFUL PRESENTATION? PRESENTED BY: ILDIKO HORVATH For reference.
Adding the Executive Summary and …. Executive Summary (1-2 pages) briefly presents these items: 1.sustainability problem 2.rationale for your project.
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 16 Experimental Research Proposals.
Interactive Probabilistic Search for GikiCLEF Ray R Larson School of Information University of California, Berkeley Ray R Larson School of Information.
Assignee Name Harmonization Efforts at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office US Patent and Trademark Office Office of Electronic Information Products Patent.
Concepts of Database Management Seventh Edition
RDA in NACO Module 4.a Module 4.b Module 4.c RDA Chapter 9: Identifying Persons— Overview Recording the Attributes.
Chapter 6 Repetition…. Objectives (1 of 2) Reinforce the importance of the principle of repetition. Understand the effect of repetition in a design. Appreciate.
4 1 SEARCHING THE WEB Using Search Engines and Directories Effectively New Perspectives on THE INTERNET.
MODES OF DEVELOPMENT: CLASSIFICATION ESSAY Lit and Comp 2.
Welcome Back! 1.Walk quietly to your seat 2.Place your backpack under your seat 3.Turn on your computer and log in 4.Log into (remember,
Concepts of Database Management Eighth Edition Chapter 3 The Relational Model 2: SQL.
Community Resources Assessment Training 4-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 4-2.
Writing a Critical Review
INT222 - Internet Fundamentals Shi, Yue (Sunny) Office: T2095 SENECA COLLEGE.
XML CSC1310 Fall HTML (TIM BERNERS-LEE) HyperText Markup Language  HTML (HyperText Markup Language): December  Markup  Markup is a symbol.
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2014 BasmahAlQadheeb. What is a report? A report is a clearly structured document that presents information as clearly as possible.
Microsoft Expression Web 3 – Illustrated Unit D: Structuring and Styling Text.
Photo Editing Custom Colors Advanced Layout Hodge Podge.
So you want to be a (book) herald? Part I - Introduction Presented by Yehuda ben Moshe, Elmet Herald.
Chapter 2 Scanning. Dr.Manal AbdulazizCS463 Ch22 The Scanning Process Lexical analysis or scanning has the task of reading the source program as a file.
Chapter 7: Basic Information for All Types of Interviews An interview is all types of planned, face-to-face encounters in which at least one of the participants.
Sample paper in APA style Sample paper in APA style.
INTRODUCTION TO COLLEGE WRITING Writing Workshop September 24 & 25, 2015.
Survey Training Pack Session 20 – Presentation of Findings.
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
1 Lecture 2 - Introduction to C Programming Outline 2.1Introduction 2.2A Simple C Program: Printing a Line of Text 2.3Another Simple C Program: Adding.
APA Format What you need to know
Statutory Interpretation 1
HOW TO WRITE A SYSTEMATIC/NARRATIVE REVIEW
New Perspectives on XML
TECHNICAL REPORT.
PLAGIARISM! What is it? How do I avoid it?.
Multiple Choice with footnotes-HINT VERSION
English Concepts & Vocabulary # 2.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: sec
Presentation transcript:

Names in the New Standards for the Evaluation of Names and Armory (formerly the Rules for Submission) A Brief Summary Produced by the Laurel Office Permission granted for anyone in the SCA to use for educational purposes.

Overall Organization Letters indicate the sections:  GP — General Principles  PN — Personal Names  NPN — Non-Personal Names  A — Armory GP talks about underlying principles and defines several key terms, like ‘period’, ‘substantial’, and so on. PN, NPN, and A have several parts – Content, Style, Conflict, Presumption, and Offence Appendices all use “Appendix” (they’re awesome!)

SCA items: Conflict Non-SCA items: Presumption Relationships: Conflict Powers, Rank, Position: Presumption Offensive things: Offense Some Broad Categorizations

Why are SCA items counted differently from Non-SCA items? SCA ItemsNon-SCA Items Definition from Corpora: “To avoid undue confusion” Definition from Corpora: “To prevent offense due to obvious usurpation of identity or armory" All listed in the O&AMost armory listed in the O&A, but few names listed Can get permission to conflict Cannot get permission to conflict Only protect the exact item Protect names and some armory in multiple forms

Why are relationship claims under conflict? In the previous rules, armory already considered relationship claims to be “conflict”. (A “distinct change” in armory is the kind of change people used in period to show close relationships) Relationship claims are allowed with permission, unlike other kinds of presumption. So, in these standards, names and armory match – an unmistakable relationship claim is considered a conflict with an SCA item.

Why is it organized this way? Why is it so long? These Standards are 70 pages long; the Appendices are 30 pages. The old Rules were only 25 pages, but need 1000s of rulings to understand. These standards are designed around the most common use: working on a single submission  For example, Personal Names and Non-Personal Names have superficial similarities but also large differences – so they are separate. Approximately ¼ of the main body of these Rules is examples to help understanding.

Personal Names Content Names are built out of name phrases which are built out of name elements and can come from:  Attested name phrases  Constructed name phrases  Lingua Anglica allowance  Borrowed names  Legal name allowance  Branch name allowance  Grandfather clause Each name phrase must be internally consistent with a single time and place

Personal Names Style Names must be constructed like period names:  Appendix A lists name construction patterns for many languages Names must:  contain name phrases from a single time and place OR  combine name phrases from a single Regional Naming Group and have all parts within 500 years OR  combine name phrases from two Regional Naming Groups that are compatible and have all parts within 300 years OR  attest the combination of name phrases OR  combine name phrases from the legal name allowance, grandfather clause, or branch name allowance with name phrases from a single Regional Naming Group which are within 500 years Appendix C lists the Regional Naming Groups

Personal Names Conflict Identity Conflict:  Based on sound and appearance only  Based on accumulated changes to entire name  Addition or removal of any element can contribute  Standards: changes to any two syllables, substantial change to one syllable, smaller changes for short, simple names Relationship Conflict: Making an unmistakable claim to be a close relative of an SCA person.  Usually must be their entire name

Personal Names Presumption and Offense Personal names may not:  Claim a protected rank which the person doesn’t have permanently  Make an unmistakable claim to be from an important family  Create a claim to rank by using honorific titles that were granted by a ruler, or combinations of an occupation and locative that suggest an official position  Make a claim to have superhuman or magical powers or imply divine origin  Claim identity or relationship with non-SCA individuals who we consider important enough to protect (same standards as conflict) Names must not be offensive to a modern audience; the standards are quite high

Non-Personal Names Content and Style A non-personal name must have two parts:  Designator: what kind of name it is  Substantive element: which one it is Designator must match submission’s type Substantive element must match a single time and place - all in one language context Substantive elements come from the same types of places as personal name elements: attested elements, constructed elements, Lingua Anglica, branch name allowance, grandfather clause, etc.

Non-Personal Names Conflict Identity Conflict:  Based on sound and appearance only of the substantive element (designator doesn’t count!)  Based on accumulated changes to entire name  Addition or removal of any element can contribute  Standards: changes to any two syllables, substantial change to one syllable, smaller changes for short, simple names Affiliation Conflict: Making an unmistakable claim to be owned by or affiliated with an SCA person.  Usually must be their entire name

Non-Personal Names Presumption and Offense Non-personal names may not:  Claim a protected rank which they don’t possess permanently  Use the names of peerage order or important real world knightly orders in certain ways  Use elements that would be presumptuous for individuals  Make a claim to have superhuman or magical powers or imply divine origin (but ones named for saints or deities do not necessarily make such claims)  Claim identity or affiliation with non-SCA individuals, places, entities, orders, etc. which we consider important enough to protect (same standards as conflict) Names must not be offensive to a modern audience; the standards are quite high

Why Use Appendices? Faster updates because new precedents are easier to absorb  Changes to the Standards require Board approval in advance  Appendices only require notification to the Board after the fact Information that we’ve relied on senior commenters to provide late in the process has been collected  Name construction patterns  Permissible language mixes  Acceptable transliterations of foreign characters

Appendices are Awesome! Appendix A: How to build names Appendix B: Types of bynames Appendix C: Regional Naming Groups Appendix D: Transliteration schemes Appendix E: Non-personal designators