Conflict of Interest for Institutional Review Boards

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

EDUCATION SERVICE UPDATE
GSA Expo 2009 Ethics: Know the Rules of the Road Nicole Stein Desk Officer/Office of Government Ethics.
Ethics – Dos and Don’ts Mary Garcia Melissa Miller Dennis McGuire Office of Regional Counsel.
Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Afzal Bari House Committee Maps Updated: March 19, 2015.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
State and Local Health Department Governance Classification System
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, FY.
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
Electronic Death Registration Systems, by Jurisdiction
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 240 sessions with 8,187 participants
Existing laws requiring abortion clinics to meet surgical center standards and require abortion providers to have hospital privileges WY WIǂ WV WA VA VT.
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
House price index for AK
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Other Adults, January 2017
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
States with Section 1115 ACA Expansion Waivers, December 2015
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
PRACTICA & ONLINE ED AUTHORIZATION STATUS
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 250 sessions with 8,352 participants
Uninsured Rate Among Adults Ages 19–64, 2008–09 and 2019
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Post-Reform: Projected Percent of Adults Ages 19–64 Uninsured by State
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Presentation transcript:

Conflict of Interest for Institutional Review Boards Jane Gutcher Office of General Counsel Ethics Specialty Team August 14, 2012

Department of Veterans Affairs Training Topics Introductory slides Applying rules to IRB members as Federal employees Conflict of Interest Statutes Gifts from Outside Sources Outside Activities Applying rules to VA researchers AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Why Follow the Rules? Public service is a public trust Employees must place loyalty to the Constitution, the laws and ethical principles above private gain Maintain public’s confidence in the Federal Government, VA and VHA’s research program AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Why Get Ethics Advice Take advantage of Safe Harbor - cannot be disciplined if disclose fully and rely on advice in good faith Criminal prosecution almost certainly will be declined - if you disclose fully and rely on our advice Ethics advice should always be in writing - to ensure above protections AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs The Rules Conflict of Interest Laws 18 U.S.C. §§ 201-209 Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch 5 C.F.R. Part 2635 14 General Principles AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Conflict of Interest Laws CRIMINAL STATUTES – 18 U.S. Code Federal Government employees are prohibited from participating personally and substantially as part of official duties in a particular matter that will have a direct and predictable effect on their financial interest or the financial interest of their spouse, minor child, outside employer, or certain others 18 U. S.C. § 208 AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Conflict of Interest Laws CRIMINAL STATUTES No bribery No representing non-Government parties back to the Federal Government after leaving Government service in certain situations – don’t switch sides AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Conflict of Interest Laws CRIMINAL STATUTES No supplementation of Government salary by non-Government entity No representing non-Government parties, with or without compensation, in matters in which Government is a party or has a substantial interest AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Standards of Ethical Conduct Promulgated by the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) pursuant to two Executive Orders Create Government-wide, mandatory standards for all employees of the Executive Branch. AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

The 14 General Principles Apply to every employee of the Executive Branch Foundation principles Two predominant concepts: Do not use your public office for private gain Do not give unauthorized preferential treatment to any private organization or individual AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Applying Rules to IRB Members as Federal Employees ___________________________________________ AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Hypothetical #1 A member of an IRB is approached by someone who offers to pay the member $10,000 if he ensures that a particular research study is approved by the IRB. Should he take the money? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Not unless he wants to go to jail for bribery. The person paying the bribe is also subject to the law. Hypothetical #2 What if a member of an IRB is offered a $10,000 speaking engagement with Company XYZ, with the unstated understanding, wink, wink, that he will ensure that a particular study is approved by the IRB? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Not as straight forward – looks as if member is entering a legitimate outside employment arrangement except … for the unstated requirement that the payment is not really for the speaking engagement, but is in fact a payment to get the member to act in a certain way as part of his official duties. DO NOT DO IT. Also a 208 criminal violation AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Hypothetical #3 An executive of Company XYZ offers to give the son of a member of the Central IRB a $10,000 scholarship to attend any college of the son’s choosing. May the son accept the gift of the scholarship? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Gifts What is a Gift? “Gift” is any item of monetary value, including any gratuity, favor, service, discount, entertainment, or hospitality 5 C.F.R. § 2635.203 AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Gifts What is not a Gift? Loans or discounts available to the general public Presentation item of little intrinsic value Modest food or refreshments Coffee and donuts – not a meal AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Gifts From Outside Sources RULE: You may not directly or indirectly solicit or accept a gift given: By a prohibited source Because of your official position Examples of “prohibited source” – VA contractor Veteran Veteran Service Org. Patient Drug Co. Vendor AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Gifts From Outside Sources EXCEPTIONS to gift prohibition $20/$50 rule Unsolicited gift from prohibited source with value $20 per less per occasion (no cash) No more than $50 per year from one source Gifts based on personal relationship Gifts based on spouse’s employment AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Gifts From Outside Sources EXCEPTIONS to gift prohibition Discounts Offered to all Government employees Offered to a group unrelated to Government Mileage points on official travel Widely Attended Gathering AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Gifts From Outside Sources Unsolicited offer of free attendance at conference Attend in official VA capacity; and Assigned to speak, present information, or participate in panel; and Offer made by sponsor of event Then acceptance of free attendance on day of presentation allowed- not a gift – 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(1) AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Gifts From Outside Sources Unsolicited offer of travel support from non-Federal source for meeting Away from duty station in official capacity Approval in advance using VA Form 0893 Supervisor agrees meeting is in VA’s interest and related to employee’s official duties Review by Government Ethics official AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Gifts From Outside Sources Non-Federal travel support cont. Travel support includes travel, lodging, meals, and attendance fees “Meeting” or similar function does NOT include a meeting required to carry out an agency’s statutory function such as investigations, inspections, audits, site visits, negotiations or litigation Not appropriate to accept gift from non-Federal source to attend IRB meetings (e.g. Central IRB) AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Gifts From Outside Sources Offer of scholarship to son of IRB member could be an “indirect” gift to the member If given by a prohibited source or given to the son because of the member’s official position, it would be a prohibited gift Seek ethics advice – ethics official will: Look at facts of particular gift See if any exceptions apply AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Hypothetical #4 IRB member has outside job as a consultant to small biotech company. A second IRB member has a salaried appointment at the University-affiliate. A VA PI, who is also employed at the University-affiliate, is PI for a VA CRADA with that same biotech company. The study comes to the IRB. Can either of the members participate in the review of the study? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Outside Activities RULE: An employee shall not engage in outside employment or any other outside activity that conflicts with official duties AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Outside Activities An activity conflicts with an employee’s official duties when: It is prohibited by statute It would require the employee’s disqualification from matters so central to the performance of his official duties that the employee’s ability to perform the duties of his position would be materially impaired AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Conflict of Interest Laws CRIMINAL STATUTES – 18 U.S. Code Federal employees are prohibited from participating personally and substantially in a particular matter as part of official duties that will have a direct and predictable effect on their financial interest or the financial interest of their spouse, minor child, outside employer, or certain others 18 U.S.C. § 208 AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Impartiality RULE: Federal employee may not participate in particular matter in which any “person” with whom he has a “covered relationship” is a party, or represents a party, where a reasonable person with knowledge of all the relevant facts would question the employee’s impartiality Violates the ethics rules which prohibit favoritism in performance of official duties AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Impartiality Which “persons” are in covered relationship with employee? Personal (members of household, spouse, relatives, friends) Business (anyone with whom employee has or seeks a business, contractual, or other financial relationship) AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Impartiality Covered relationship, cont. Organizations in which employee is an active participant Employers, including: spouse’s former any non-Federal prospective AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Hypo # 4 - Solution So, IRB member who is a consultant at the biotech company is prohibited from participating in the review of the study funded by the biotech company. Why? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Possible violation of 18 U.S.C. § 208 Central IRB member has personal financial interest in study if his participation in study review is determined to affect the ability or willingness of the biotech company to pay his consulting fees Fact-driven determination AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Violation of impartiality regulation The biotech consultant/IRB member has a covered relationship with the biotech company Prohibited from participating in review of the study if a person with whom the member has a covered relationship is a party to the matter AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Hypo #4 Solution – cont’d IRB member who is an employee at the University may participate in the review provided: He has no personal financial interest in the study University has no financial interest in the study that would be imputed to him Potential for university to have ownership of any IP resulting from the study because PI is DAP is too attenuated No covered relationship exists just because IRB member works at same university as PI AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Say another IRB member’s spouse works for a large medical device company that is funding a different study at VA, which comes before the IRB. May this IRB member participate in the study review? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest No. IRB member may not participate. Possible violation of 18 U.S.C. § 208 Spouse’s relevant financial interests in company imputed to member Stock ownership Bonus dependent on company performance Other relevant financial interests Salary is not relevant to participation in study review unless the study affects the ability or willingness of company to pay spouse’s salary AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Possible violation of 208 cont. Financial interest of spouse’s employer is not imputed to the member (unless spouse has “ownership” interest in company) Determination of financial interest fact-driven If spouse has relevant financial interest in study, then member prohibited from participating in study review due to imputed financial interest AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Violation of impartiality regulation IRB member has covered relationship with spouse’s employer Even if no imputed financial interest in the company through his wife Prohibited from participating in the study review where wife’s employer is a party to the CRADA AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Applying Rules to VA Researchers ___________________________________________ AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Hypothetical #5 Dr. Rich Stocker, VA researcher and clinician, has an idea for a new use of a drug manufactured by BigDrugCo. He wants BigDrugCo to fund a VA study under a Clinical Trial CRADA. Dr. Stocker holds $14,000 worth of BigDrugCo shares and his 12-year-old daughter holds $10,000 – any problems? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Researcher is prohibited from participating in a matter that affects his own financial interest unless there is a regulatory exemption. $15,000 de minimis exemption for publicly-traded stock Must aggregate all affected stock held by employee, spouse, minor children $14,000 and $10,000 takes him over allowed amount AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Dr. Stocker may – recuse himself, sell the stock or seek a waiver of the criminal conflict If stock not publicly-traded no de minimis exemption ownership of any amount would cause a financial conflict AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Do the laws and rules of conflict of interest apply to researchers (and IRB members!) at VA under a Without Compensation (WOC) appointment? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Yes. A researcher/IRB member under a WOC (or IPA) appointment is considered a VA employee subject to all of the laws and rules of Government Ethics. May a VA researcher conduct VA research on a licensed invention owned and patented by the VA researcher? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Maybe – prior to royalty flow unclear if financial interest – attenuated, but prudence dictates - time to get a waiver of the criminal conflict of interest law Once royalty flowing – employee researcher may not participate (conduct research) in a particular matter (licensed invention) that will have a direct and predictable effect on his own financial interest Must get a 208 waiver AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest What if a VA researcher starts his own company to license an invention owned by VA? Can he continue to research the invention at VA? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest No. The VA researcher may not continue to research the invention at VA without a waiver of the criminal conflict (“208 waiver”) Likelihood of one in this circumstance is very small AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Can VA researcher consult for a company that is licensing his invention (under a license with the university affiliate) if he holds no ownership interest in the company and is NOT researching the invention at VA? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Yes. The VA researcher may consult for the licensee under these facts – may not use government time, facilities or equipment However, he may NOT conduct additional research on his invention at VA if he is a consultant for the outside company AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Must maintain a clear delineation between VA job and consulting job – cannot be paid by another to do his Government job (209 violation) Researcher should legal seek advice – each factual situation is different AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest May a VA employee who is a consultant for, or in a speaker’s bureau for, a company conduct VA research that benefits that company? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest No. VA researcher is prohibited from participating in matter that could affect his financial interest. Here, financial interest is the ability or willingness of the company to continue to hire him as a consultant or speaker by conducting the research. AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Even without a criminal prohibition, the researcher has a covered relationship with the company Absent an authorization, he would be prohibited from participating in research study where the company is a party if a reasonable person with knowledge of the facts would question his impartiality AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest May the VA researcher who is also a university-affiliate employee request that part of his VA research be contracted to: himself at the university? his spouse at the university? another university employee? AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Absent a 208 waiver, the researcher is prohibited by the conflict of interest law from participating in a matter that affects his own financial interest or the financial interest of certain others such as his outside employer, the university VA researcher may request contracting officer procure certain service not available within VA Request must not be for a specific entity or researcher Needs a 208 waiver to put specifics into grant proposals AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest Federal employees are prohibited from receiving any salary or contribution to or supplementation of salary from any source other than the United States as compensation for services as a Government employee 18 U.S.C. § 209 AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Conflict of Interest VA researchers may work for both the university and VA, but NOT at the same moment in time Need strict accounting of time Need to use VA computer systems and email when on VA time Need to segregate VA research from non-VA research Data issues – authority to give VA data to others AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Advice and Guidance When in doubt, seek advice before taking any action! Contact the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO), Alternate DAEO, or Deputy Ethics Officials in the Office of General Counsel or Regional Counsel and their Staff ethics officials AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Contact Information VA Ethics Officials Walter A Hall, Assistant General Counsel and Designated Agency Ethics Official Renée L. Szybala, Associate General Counsel and Alternate DAEO VACO Deputy Ethics Officials: Jane Gutcher, Jonathan Gurland, Chris Britt Office of General Counsel (023) 810 Vermont Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20420 (202) 461-7694 or (202) 461-1600 or at GovernmentEthics@va.gov AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Contact Information Other VA Ethics Officials: OGCNorthEastEthics@va.gov for ME, NH, VT, MA, RI, CT, NY, NJ, DE, PA, OH, WV, MI, WI OGCSouthEastEthics@va.gov for VA, NC, SC, GA, FL, MS, AL, LA, southern TX, Puerto Rico   OGCMidwestEthics@va.gov for DC, MD, IN, KY, TN, AR, MO, IL, IA, MN, ND, SD, NE, KA, OGCWestEthics@va.gov for northern TX, OK, NM, AZ, CO, UT, WY, MT, ID, NV, CA, OR, WA, HI, AK, Guam, Philippines AUG12 Department of Veterans Affairs