Theories of International Relations Realism Realism Idealism Idealism Constructivism Constructivism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NATIONAL DEFENSE ACT INCREASED THE NUMBER OF ARMY AND NATIONAL GUARDSMEN AUGUST $313 MILLION CHANNELED INTO BUILDING UP THE NAVY COUNCIL OF NATIONAL DEFENSE.
Advertisements

Liberalism Central Assumptions and Propositions View of history: progressive change possible – Material: prosperity through technological progress, economic.
Rethinking U.S. Foreign Policy: Bush vs. Obama “Cowboy Diplomacy”or the only alternative in a dangerous world?
The Cold War US vs. USSR Never any “hot” military combat between countries, more of a political (cold) stand-off.
US Response to and Entry into WWI. Initial Response Tradition of isolation Tradition of isolation Protect Trade Protect Trade European Roots European.
US Declares War. Zimmerman Note decoded by the British and presented to the US.
Neo-realists – neo-liberals The debate to date. Neo-realism Neo-Liberalist.
Chapter 5 Power, Conflict, and Policy
International Relations
HONORS WORLD HISTORY: VOCABULARY REVIEW The New Imperialism
US National Interests 1. 1.What are the threats to the US? 2. 2.What role should the US have in the world? Who decides the answer?
Liberalism: Conclusion Lecture 14. The Question of the Month How Can Countries Move from Anarchy, War of All Against All, to Cooperation? Security Dilemma.
Social Constructivism
World Organizations. GLOBALIZATION Advancements in transportation and Technology (communication) Exchanges of culture and resources Economic interdependence.
Κονστρουκτιβισμός
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORIES: PLURALISM OR LIBERALISM
ENDURING UNDERSTANDING: European competition and rivalry led to World War I. The U.S. attempted to remain neutral but was eventually drawn into the war.
Homework 1. What is this study based on? How did the group determine levels of corruption? 2. How have the countries at the top of the list (least corrupt.
Edward Luck: How not to Reform the United Nations UN Reform.
“ “War is politics…” Carl von Clausewitz ( ) War in HistoryWar in HistoryWar in HistoryWar in History.
The Rise of China and the Policy Responses of the US Jaechun Kim.
Political Concepts An Introduction To Political Theory and Statehood.
Ending the War  Germany and Berlin divided into 4 zones  Nuremberg Trials  United Nations – international peace organization  Security Council – U.S.,
Lecture 4: “The War to End all Wars” January 12, 2009.
Causes of World War I and U.S. Involvement in the Great War
Jeopardy Cold War Terms WW II People & Places Cold War United Nations Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.
Lecture 5: The Long Crisis Begins April 7, Wilson’s idealism “We created this Nation, not to serve ourselves, but to serve mankind.” “We created.
WILL GLOBALIZATION CHANGE EVERYTHING? Four big questions for social scientists: Will global politics in the 20 th c. follow the rules of a new system?
World War II: Continuation of the Trend toward Total or Pure War Background: –US enters the war to end all wars and to make the world safe for democracies:
Lecture 21: Democratization May 14, Democracies Today
What is foreign policy? Foreign Policy: everything a nation's government says and does in world affairs Location, desire for certain natural resources,
International System International Relations. Basic concepts What is IR? Who are the actors/players in IR? Why they behave in a certain way? What quality.
THE US-KOR ALLIANCE Hoon Lee Prof. Jaechun Kim International Security and Peace.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Liberalisms and Idealisms.
Prof. Murat Arik School of Legal Studies Kaplan University PO420 Global Politics Unit 2 Approaches to World Politics and Analyzing World Politics.
IR 306 Foreign Policy Analysis
Post-WW II-Regional Power vs. Global Power: Choose Global Power ( )
Presentation by Dr. Kevin Lasher. TrumanKennan.
1 Sino - US Relations in the Asia-Pacific: New Dynamics 苏浩 教授/博士 外交学与外事管理系 外交学院.
19-4: Wilson Fights for Peace "The world must be made safe for democracy. Its peace must be planted upon the tested foundations of political liberty. We.
Prof. Murat Arik School of Legal Studies Kaplan University PO420 Global Politics Unit 2 Approaches to World Politics and Analyzing World Politics.
North Korean Perception of International Relations
HISTORY 103 The Global Cold War.
Week14: The U.s. and East asia.
Guiding or Essential Questions
System, State and Individual
DO THE OLD THEORIES APPLY ANY MORE?
“War is politics…” Carl von Clausewitz ( )
April 25, 2017 U.S. History Agenda: DO NOW: Term Matching
World Politics Under a system of Anarchy
April 18, 2018 U.S. History Agenda: DO NOW: Term Matching
American Isolationism
Theories of International Relations
America Takes Sides.
The History of Humanity
“War is politics…” Carl von Clausewitz ( )
Concert of Europe Balance of Power
World War I War to End All Wars
History and Government of East Asia
Foreign Policy Eisenhower Years.
How did WWII change the world? (politically and economically)
Third Geneva Convention (1949)
IR Theory No Limits Debate.
The Cold War Begins.
America Takes Sides.
Rethinking U.S. Foreign Policy: Bush vs. Obama
U.S. Enters the War 1917.
World War I FOCUS QUESTION: What caused World War I, and why did the United States enter the war?
Chapter 11 Section 1 World War 1.
Good morning! First Four – In your spiral notebook
Presentation transcript:

Theories of International Relations Realism Realism Idealism Idealism Constructivism Constructivism

Realism I Power: the ability to influence others Power: the ability to influence others Irrelevance of morality and ethics and law Irrelevance of morality and ethics and law Kellogg-Briand Pact (1928) Kellogg-Briand Pact (1928) Kellogg-Briand Pact (1928) Kellogg-Briand Pact (1928) Irrelevance of domestic political systems Irrelevance of domestic political systems Why is power the only thing that matters? Why is power the only thing that matters? Human nature Human nature Anarchic world: no rules Anarchic world: no rules

Realism II All nations are self-reliant All nations are self-reliant To preserve peace use Balance of Power To preserve peace use Balance of Power US vs. USSR in Cold War US vs. USSR in Cold War US—China—Japan in East Asia US—China—Japan in East Asia Unipolarity cannot last Unipolarity cannot last Nations will balance against US power Nations will balance against US power

England’s Balancing Act England RussiaPrussia/Germany FranceAustria-Hungary

The Cold War Balance of Power IsraelSyria/Egypt EthiopiaSomalia TaiwanChina S. KoreaN. Korea S. Viet NamN. Viet Nam W. BerlinE. Berlin W. GermanyE. Germany Britain/France/JapanPoland/Czech USUSSR

Unipolar World EUJapanRussiaChinaIndiaUS

Power?

US: Weak Neighbors, Big Oceans

Germany Strong Neighbors, Easy Access

Power?

Power? Shanghai, China

Power? Jaipur, India

Power? Thailand Algeria South Korea Thailand Algeria South Korea

Power?

Idealism I Power is not the only thing that matters Power is not the only thing that matters States have common interests and common values States have common interests and common values Trade is the key common interest Trade is the key common interest

Idealism II Global Marketplace Global Marketplace Interdependence Interdependence Desire for rules Desire for rules Desire for predictability and stability Desire for predictability and stability International system is based laws (Treaties) and institutions (UN, WTO) International system is based laws (Treaties) and institutions (UN, WTO) International law International law

UN General Assembly, New York

International Court of Justice, The Hague, Netherlands

WTO, Geneva

Constructivism I Nation-states are not all alike Nation-states are not all alike Political culture shapes foreign policy Political culture shapes foreign policy Form of government shapes foreign policy Form of government shapes foreign policy History shapes foreign policy History shapes foreign policy Domestic political trends and debates shape foreign policy Domestic political trends and debates shape foreign policy

Constructivism II States have identity States have identity State identity influences the way states interact with each other State identity influences the way states interact with each other Examples: Examples: China sensitivity to any policies of other states that threaten its unity and sovereignty China sensitivity to any policies of other states that threaten its unity and sovereignty US desire to transform the world US desire to transform the world

Russian fear of invasion

China 21 st Century

Qin Dynasty BC

China: Tang Dynasty

China: Qing Dynasty

China: Colonized

US: Woodrow Wilson, 1917 “The world must be made safe for democracy. Its peace must be planted upon the tested foundations of political liberty. We have no selfish ends to serve. We desire no conquest, no dominion. We seek no indemnities for ourselves, no material compensation for the sacrifices we shall freely make. We are but one of the champions of the rights of mankind. We shall be satisfied when those rights have been made as secure as the faith and the freedom of nations can make them. “ “The world must be made safe for democracy. Its peace must be planted upon the tested foundations of political liberty. We have no selfish ends to serve. We desire no conquest, no dominion. We seek no indemnities for ourselves, no material compensation for the sacrifices we shall freely make. We are but one of the champions of the rights of mankind. We shall be satisfied when those rights have been made as secure as the faith and the freedom of nations can make them. “

US: GW Bush, 2005 “And we have declared our own intention: America will stand with the allies of freedom to support democratic movements in the Middle East and beyond, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world. “ “And we have declared our own intention: America will stand with the allies of freedom to support democratic movements in the Middle East and beyond, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world. “