Realism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2501 THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Advertisements

Understanding IR Theories I: Liberalism and Realism
POSC 2200 – Theoretical Approaches
RealPolitik or Power Politics
Neo-Realism: a structural theory of IR
Fundamental Question What is the fundamental difference between international politics and those that occur within states? It is the lack of institutions.
Realist and Neorealist Theories of War
The Realist Paradigm- Hans Morgenthau
Plan for Today: Understanding Classical Realism and Neorealism
Realism States main actors States are unitary States are rational States’ primary interest is national security.
Realism Kenneth Waltz Kaisa Ellandi Lecture 2.
What are the properties of a billiard (or pool or snooker) ball? How do they behave?
International Relations Grand Debates
 Realists see the world as it is  Basic assumptions of realism  Groupism; group cohesion to survive, nation state and nationalism, anarchic social.
REALISM. Origins of Realism  The realist theory of international relations came into being during the time of the Great Depression of 1929 when the economies.
Chapter 2: Theories of World Politics
IR 501 Lecture Notes (2) Realism
ESSENTIALS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Finishing classical realism. Neorealism. Other contemporary realism.
Topics Today: Neorealism and Other Contemporary Realism 1.Completing introduction to neorealist principles. 2.Introduction to another version of contemporary.
Realism and the Study of Global Politics Learning Objectives: Understand how Realists describe global politics Identify the Realist view of power Explain.
2.0. Theoretical Perspectives and the Study of Global Politics Learning Objectives: Understand how Realists describe global politics Identify the Realist.
Realism. Assumptions  States: unitary, rational actors -Treaty of Westphalia (1648)  Anarchy: no central government  Survival: primary objective 
Political Science BALLB Ist sem UNIT - 1
International Relations
Foreign Policy and National Security
International anarchy could be best defined as: Chaos Multilateralism No world government Government by the United Nations No world government.
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 3: Classical Realism.
International Politics on the World Stage WORLD POLITICS INTERNATIONAL POLITICS ON THE WORLD STAGE ******** International Politics.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY INTRODUCTION HC 35.
Chapter 1 Notes. Citizen : a person’s membership into a political community Government : an institution through which leader’s exercise power to make.
Chapter 3 Contending Perspectives: How to Think about International Relations Theoretically.
Operační program Vzdělávání pro konkurenceschopnost Název projektu: Inovace magisterského studijního programu Fakulty ekonomiky a managementu Registrační.
POSC 1000(056) Introduction to Politics Politics and Governance the Global Level/Conclusions and Exam Advice Russell Alan Williams.
International Security and Peace
SeungJu Kim I Realism  State is the pre-eminent actor in the international system.  Self-help: state must build up its military power to ensure.
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
Outline of Course: Security and International Relations Theory and Practice The course is divided into three parts –1) Part one explains why the nation-state.
Lenses – The Great Debate Unit 1 – Theories of World Politics.
Political Concepts An Introduction To Political Theory and Statehood.
©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. ©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Thinking Theoretically: Putting.
Introducing the IR Paradigms
Lecture 1 The Origins of the International State System.
Introducing the IR Paradigms 1: Liberalism(s) in IR Prepared for Junior International Politics Class at NENU, Fall 2015.
Realism Statism…survival…self-help. Why theory “A theory must be more than a hypothesis; it can’t be obvious; it involves complex relations of a systematic.
Security in International Relations Prepared for Junior Int'l Politics class at NENU, Fall 2015.
Review of Previous Lecture- Disarmament Disarmament: systematic plan for reduction or abolition of armed forces, number of weapons, military bases and.
Political Philosophy: Hobbes and Locke
‘Anarchy is What States Make of It’
Realism vs. Liberalism: Which theory best explains the current world affairs? Aikerim Daurenbayeva.
International Politics- meaning, nature and scope According to Hans Morgenthau International Politics is the struggle for power between states in the international.
WEEK 3 THE THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. Vocabulary Focus Positivism is a philosophic system which considers that truth can be verified only by facts.
IR 306 Foreign Policy Analysis
James Fitzgerald School of Law and Government Dublin City University
Intensive Readings in International Relations Fall 2006 Peking University Instructor: Ji Mi ( 吉宓)
Introduction to Political Science (IRE 101) Week 3 Political Theories
Introduction to International Relations Week 2 Lecturer: Andris Banka
Power & IR theorıes.
** Emergence of Realism
Unit Two: Realist Theory and IPE
Ch. 12 International security
World Politics Under a system of Anarchy
THE ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF THE STATE and THEORIES OF RULE!
REALISM PAMELA RIZIKI I43022.
Theories of International Relations
THE ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF THE STATE and THEORIES OF RULE!
IR Theory No Limits Debate.
International Security and Peace
Theories of International Relations
THE ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF THE STATE and THEORIES OF RULE!
Presentation transcript:

Realism

Introduction Realism: Leading Theory of International Relations Power of states is the major element/factor of international relations States are competitive Peace through strength Born out of WWII Replaced the Idealist or Utopian ideals of the Inter-War Period Reinforced State-Centric Assumption of Realism established by Peace of Westphalia (1648) Historical tradition of realism Thucydides (460-406BC) Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778)

Reason of State Raison d’etat or Reason of State Born out of the historical writers Maxims on how leaders conduct foreign affairs to ensure security of the state States must pursue power Leaders must make most rational decision to promote life of state Must not sacrifice self-interest of the state because of universal moral principles Leaders must distance themselves from rational morality because of the ideals of caution, piety, and the greater good Follow political necessity not traditional Christian Virtues

Dual Moral Standard Duel Moral Standard One moral standard for individual citizens living in a civil state One moral standard for the state existing in a world full of international anarchy International Anarchy = no central authority or government to promote peace and human rights = promotes winner take all The double standard principle The state represents a moral force, and individual does not, DMS is needed to promote moral and ethical political community within the state. Calls for two structures to take place Domestic = promotes morality and civility International = promotes survival and power

Core Elements of Realism All realist follow the three “S” Statism State = Main actor in IR Max Weber said state is “the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory” Sovereignty = Distinguishing = trait of state State has supreme authority to make and enforce laws Power = ability to control over the minds and actions of others Down plays the power of Corporations, NGO’s, Terrorist, etc… State as the legitimate representative of the collective will of the people Has legitimacy to exercise authority within its domestic borders Out side borders anarchy exist = no central authority Order and Security Missing for IS States Compete with other states for resources Zero-Sum Equation

Continue Survival First priority of a state Survival = Security = Power More power = better chance of survival Promotion of National Interest = best conditions for survival All leaders must promote national interest regardless of domestic ideology Political Economic Cultural Ideological Ethic of Responsibility Realization that individual acts of an immoral kind might have to be taken for the greater good Used to justify aggressive acts

Continue Self-Help That action taken in an anarchical system with no global government by promoting national interest No other state or institution can be relied upon to guarantee your survival The Principle of Action Providing your own security Self Reliance of security Security dilemma The military preparations of one state create an uncertainty in the mid of another as to whether those preparations are for offensive or defensive purposes One states security is an others insecurity Increase it Capabilities and Resources Promotes the short term needs of the state, and not the long term stability of the international community Encourages a Balance of Power Threat by a hegemonic state or coalition of states, they should form alliances to persevere their own independence by checking the power of opposing sides

One Realism, or many? Three views of Realism: Classical Realism Thucydides – realism a condition of human nature People self-seeking egoist Drive for power and will to dominate human nature Power politics prevails in International Relations Peloponnesian War The growth of Athenian power and the fear which this caused in Sparta caused the war The Melian Dialogue Machiavelli The Prince The fall of Florence “The ends justify the means” in promoting the state War is a part of Human Nature

Continue Structural Realism International Politics is a struggle for power between states, but not as a result of human nature Concerned with ranking order of states Three Structure elements of the International System that determine ranking, according to Kenneth Waltz’s “Theory of International Politics” Organizing Principles Anarchy – International Politics Hierarchy – Domestic Politics Differentiation of Units Sovereign States Distribution of Capabilities Resources available to the to the states

Continue States need to be concerned with Survival, not power? Offensive Realism (power) v. Defensive Realism (Survival) Power maximizers v security maximizers Power Maximizers (Offensive) Ultimate goal of all stats is to achieve a hegemonic position Hegemony – political, economic, ideological, or cultural power exerted by a dominate group over other groups Crush all other powers is the ultimate survival Security Maximizers (Defensive) Only seek the required amount of power to generate survival To much power can cause a backlash Is The US Experiencing a Hegemonic Decline?

Continue Contemporary Realism Skeptical of ranking order of states determines behavior (Structural Realism) = not all states can be defined as like units Places emphasis on Perception of state leaders Not all state leaders have common goals or are rational actors Leaders have different views of power State-Society relationships Are the people loyal to the state Can the state motivate its people and resources Motivation of states Directing resources in pursuit of a particular goal Different from state to state