Themes in 12 Angry Men Groupthink Obedience to Authority Conformity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 12 Group Dynamics Groups and Social Groups and Social Exchanges Exchanges The Group Development The Group Development Process Process Roles and.
Advertisements

Chapter 9 Group Dynamics and Teams. Self Managed Teams Benefits company performance organizational learning and adaptability employee commitment.
Crisis And Conflict Management
Psychology in Action (9e)
Social Scientists define a social group as a group of two or more people who have four characteristics: * They interact regularly and influence each other.
Sociology 545 Social Psychology Fall Topics Social Groups Social Groups Social Institutions Social Institutions Collective Behavior / Social Movements.
GROUPS IN SOCIETY. In-group/Out-group Group’s boundaries are made clear People define themselves as in-group or out-group In-group: the group that a person.
Module 56. Conformity Studies Adjusting one’s behavior or thinking to coincide with a group standard.
Organizational Behaviour Individual and Social Behaviour
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Learning Outcomes.
Organizational Behavior: An Experiential Approach 7/E Joyce S. Osland, David A. Kolb, and Irwin M. Rubin 1 ©2001 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 15.
Chapter 8 – Groups Part 2: Oct. 22, Group Performance Process loss can reduce group perf. –How? –Brainstorming example –
Group and Social Influence on Behavior and Decision Making.
Chuck Millstead – Master Student University of Michigan, Flint
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved Chapter Fourteen Groups and Teams.
Chapter 15 Decision Making and Organizational Learning
Bipartisan Reports Cite Groupthink
Chapter 8 – Groups Part 1: Oct. 21, Groups and Social Processes Groups are 2 or more people who interact and perceive themselves as a unit/”us”
Re-designing Decision-Making Processes (Kennedy Cases) Prof. Morten Hansen MIIC, April
Prepared by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama © 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning All rights reserved. Group and Interpersonal Behavior.
Chapter 8 – Groups Part 2: March 28, Group Polarization Group discussion strengthens members’ initial attitudes  polarization Typical Group Study:
Social Psychology Alive, Breckler/Olson/Wiggins Chapter 10 Chapter Ten Group Dynamics and Intergroup Conflict.
“Patrice Zagame’s Team Leadership of Novartis Brazil” Case Study for Chapter 11 “Developing and Leading Teams” by Mohammad Khadim.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior 2e Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
Chapter 5: Groups and Organizations. Objectives (slide 1 of 2) 5.1 Types of Social Groups Define what a social group is and describe types of groups.
Foundations of Group Behavior
Groups and Teams. What are Groups and Teams Group: Two or more people working together Team: “... intact social system complete with boundaries and differentiated.
Prejudice, Discrimination & Racism. Discussion As our society becomes more diverse, does stereotyping, prejudice, discrimination and racism increase or.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE LORD OF THE FLIES. Ralph, Piggy, and Jack can be seen as incomplete characters. Ralph, Piggy, and Jack can be seen as incomplete.
How Teams Work. Task and Maintenance Needs  Task Activities – Any activity a team member does that contributes to the group’s performance purpose. 
TEAM PRESSURES AND CHALLENGES MEETING THE CHALLENGES.
Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 1.
Chapter 8 In and out groups and intercultural differences.
GroupThink Embracing the Power of the Group Elaine Seat, PhD, PE.
Groupthink What is it? Why should we care about it? What can we do about it?
Abilene Paradox Group members adopt a position because they feel that other group members desire it Team members do not challenge suggestion because they.
Decision Making in Groups. Outline I. Problems in Decision Making Failure to share information Risky shift/polarization II. Video: GroupThink.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. © 1999 Slide 13-1 Chapter 13 Groups, Teams, and Their Leadership.
Defective Decision Making & Problem Solving Small Group Communication.
Lesson 3: Individuals in Groups. When in groups we act differently than we would on our own ◦ The decisions we make & the actions we take in groups may.
Interpersonal & Group Perspectives Your Milgram Q’s are due today!!
Conformity and Groupthink MAR 3503 February 14, 2012.
Chapter 8 Group Processes. Why Join a Group? The complexities and ambitions of human life require that we work in groups Humans have an innate need to.
Groupthink Clip art.
Chapter Thirteen Groups & Teams: Increasing Cooperating, Reducing Conflict McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
©2002 Prentice Hall Behavior in Social and Cultural Context.
Abilene Paradox Group members adopt a position because they feel that other group members desire it Team members do not challenge suggestion because they.
Foundations of International Foreign Policy.  Definition  Issues – Group versus individual genius  Issues – individual versus group acceptance  Issues.
Listening in Groups. Listening - HURIER Hearing Understanding Remembering Interpreting Evaluating Responding.
Decision-Making © 2010 Randall B. Dunham. Decision-Making Define decision-making Assess individual versus group decision- making Consider the group phenomenon,
Social Thinking: Attitudes & Prejudice. What is an attitude? Predisposition to evaluate some people, groups, or issues in a particular way Can be negative.
Overview Roles and rules Social influences on beliefs Individuals in groups Us vs. Them: Group identity Group conflict and prejudice.
Groupthink When group members striving for agreement (norm for unanimity), fail to realistically appraise alternative courses of action A means for a group.
Eight Main Symptoms of Group Think.
Chapter 15: Decision Making and Organizational Learning
Chapter 6: Social Influence and Group Behavior
Foundations of Interpersonal and Group Behavior
Processes that Occur in Group Decision Making
Team Dynamics Eric M. Robinson.
Groupthink: The Desperate Drive for Consensus at Any Cost Irving L
Chapter 8 – Group Influence
Why should we care about it?
Formation of Prejudices
Group Behavior and Influence
Understanding Work Teams
Re-designing Decision-Making Processes (Kennedy Cases)
Groupthink.
Group think A Potential Steel Barrier to Becoming Your Future You
Chapter 8 – Groups Part 2: Oct. 22, 2010.
Group Behavior and Influence
Presentation transcript:

Themes in 12 Angry Men Groupthink Obedience to Authority Conformity In-group/Out-group Persuasion Prejudice/Stereotyping Self-Justification

Stereotype v. Prejudice A widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing. Example: African Americans have exaggerated features. Prejudice- Unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, especially of a hostile nature regarding a racial, religious, or national group. Example: African Americans are criminals.

In-group/Out-group Group’s boundaries are made clear People define themselves as in-group or out-group In-group: the group that a person belongs to and identifies with Tend to separate themselves from other groups through the use of symbols. Groups will often use badges, clothing, names, or slogans as forms of identification. Members view themselves positively and they often view out-groups in negative terms. Compete with out-groups, even to the point of engaging in conflict. Out-group: Any group that a person does not belong to or identify with

Groupthink Groupthink occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of “mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment” Groups affected by groupthink ignore alternatives and tend to take irrational actions that dehumanize other groups.  A group is especially vulnerable to groupthink when its members are similar in background, when the group is isolated from outside opinions, and when there are no clear rules for decision making.

Symptoms of Groupthink Illusion of invulnerability –Creates excessive optimism that encourages taking extreme risks. Collective rationalization – Members discount warnings and do not reconsider their assumptions. Belief in inherent morality – Members believe in the rightness of their cause and therefore ignore the ethical or moral consequences of their decisions. Stereotyped views of out-groups – Negative views of “enemy” make effective responses to conflict seem unnecessary. Direct pressure on dissenters – Members are under pressure not to express arguments against any of the group’s views. Self-censorship – Doubts and deviations from the perceived group consensus are not expressed. Illusion of unanimity – The majority view and judgments are assumed to be unanimous. Self-appointed ‘mindguards’ – Members protect the group and the leader from information that is problematic or contradictory to the group’s cohesiveness, view, and/or decisions. When the above symptoms exist in a group that is trying to make a decision, there is a reasonable chance that groupthink will happen, although it is not necessarily so.  These group pressures lead to carelessness and irrational thinking since groups experiencing groupthink fail to consider all alternatives and seek to maintain unanimity.  Decisions shaped by groupthink have low probability of achieving successful outcomes.

HITLER AND THE HOLOCAUST Brainwashing or proper persuasion? Using stereotypes as justification  Promoting unity, purifying the Aryan race, national pride and purpose, self-worth, etc. Self-justification: describes how, when a person encounters a situation in which a person's behavior is inconsistent with their beliefs, that person tends to justify the behavior and deny any negative feedback associated with the behavior. Aryan vs. Jew: Sub-human (In-group, Out-group)

Self-Justification A person encounters a situation in which their behavior is inconsistent with their actual beliefs. People then tend to justify the behavior with rationale and deny any negative feedback associated with the behavior.