Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June 20081 DAPHNE Programme II 2004 - 2008 An investigation into forms of peer- peer bullying at school in pre- adolescent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stop - Cyberbullying What is cyber bullying? By Tom (Year 5)
Advertisements

When you or someone else uses a computer or cell phone to cause harm or distress to other kids, this is called.
Συνάντηση στη Θεσσαλονίκη Meeting Thessaloniki June 2011 Spanish Team R. Ortega, R. Del Rey, J. A. Casas & J. Calmaestra.
Teen Health Perspective Results “Honestly, most issues are mental like anxiety, stress, worry, and over thinking. They do all not need to be treated with.
Anna Ševčíková David Šmahel The presented research was supported by the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MSM and 1P05ME751). MASARYK.
What is Cyber bullying? Cyber bullying is when a person, or a group of people, uses the internet, mobile phones or other digital technologies to threaten,
Bullying & Cyber Bullying Presented by… Teresa Errickson, SMS Counselor A-L Stephanie Davis, SMS Counselor M-Z.
Data Analysis Statistics. Levels of Measurement Nominal – Categorical; no implied rankings among the categories. Also includes written observations and.
By Hathiya Chea, Ashley Dorsey, & Timothy Maggio Shepherd University.
ICT Unit 1Selby High School Unscramble the word to find out what we are learning today.
What is Anti-Bullying week?
Effects of Bullying. The 4 categories of bullying Physical victimization Verbal victimization Social exclusion (exclusion from peer group) Attacks on.
Bullying Fact or Myth.
THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF BULLYING ON THE QUALITY OF FUTURE INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS By: Jamie Kalff.

Cyberbullying: An Old Problem with New Technology Tara Morse.
Factors influencing bully-victim behaviour with special focus on self-esteem and depression Dóra Várnai M.A., Ágnes Németh PhD., Ágnes Balogh, M.A., Gyöngyi.
DAPHNE PROGRAME II “ A n investigation into forms of peer-peer bullying at school in pre-adolescent and adolescent groups: new instruments and.
Anja Schultze-Krumbholz, Anne Siebenbrock & Herbert Scheithauer Unit of Developmental Science and Applied Developmental Psychology Department of Educational.
The My World Survey (MWS): The Twin Track- Alcohol and mental health in young people today Amanda Fitzgerald 1 & Barbara Dooley 1,2 UCD School of Psychology.
Bullying and Harassment Sian Jackson Semester 2, 2010.
On the planet In the world In the United States In California In Irvine At Plaza Vista In your family With yourself.
Cyber-bullying is … being cruel to others by sending or posting harmful material using technological means; an individual or group that uses ICT to facilitate.
Internet...? Definition: The Internet is millions of computers around the world connected to each other. Explanation: When you're on the Internet, your.
Module 1: Bullying Awareness Training. Learning outcomes of Module 1  Learning about workplace bullying  Learning about cyber-bullying  Get to know.
Rosario Ortega Juan Calmaestra Joaquin Mora-Merchán With the col. of Paz Elipe Rosario Del Rey Cyberbullying in Spain Findings of the DAPHNE II Programme.
The Nonverbal Murder of Technology: Cyber Bullying.
As of 8/31/15 Cyberbullying. Learning Target: I can learn how to protect myself from cyberbullies. Success Criterion: I can identify 3 types of cyberbullying.
Anja Schultze-Krumbholz, Anne Siebenbrock & Herbert Scheithauer Unit of Developmental Science and Applied Developmental Psychology Department of Educational.
By: Anthony Miele, Matt McCune Shamar Potter  Cyber bullying statistics refers to Internet bullying. Cyber bullying is a form of teen violence that.
Συνάντηση στη Θεσσαλονίκη Meeting Thessaloniki June 2011 Spanish Team R. Ortega, R. Del Rey, J. A. Casas & J. Calmaestra.
What’s the Big Deal About Bullying?
International Conference “National Strategies on Violence against Children” Vienna, May 2010 School Bullying & Cyber-bullying By Ms Dominique Versini.
Do pictures always give truthful information? Can publishing it be hurtful??
LOGO Cyberaggression among primary school pupils in England and Spain Claire P. Monks, Rosario Ortega, Susanne Robinson, Mónica Alfaro, Penny Worlidge.
Bullying in the Classroom and School What it looks like and what to do about it.
Background I.C.T. (Information Communication Technology) is increasingly being used by younger children. With the increased affordability and accessibility.
Pham Bich Diep Addiction Therapy 2015 Florida, USA August 03-08, 2015.
10/29/2015 Exploring the Persuasiveness of “Just-in-time” Motivational Messages for Obesity Management Persuasive 2008, Oulu, Finland. Megha Maheshwari.
DAPHNE II Questionnaire Bologna Team Thessaloniki, June 2011.
By: Jithin and Rey.  Cyber bullying is a form of bullying, which is carried out through an internet service such as , chat room, discussion group,
Cyberbullying 8/14/2013. Learning Target I can learn how to protect myself from cyberbullies. Success Criterion: – I can identify 3 types of cyberbullying.
Good afternoon fellow classmates and Mrs.Morgado. The topic we were focusing on is Modes of Communication. We surveyed three classes: gr.1, gr.4, and.
EDTECH Module 7 Technology Survey by J.D. Winterhalter.
1 DAPHNE PROGRAMME Italy team Maria Luisa Genta, Antonella Brighi, Annalisa Guarini.
Lauren Sayah, Abby Wills, Sara Stahl. What is Cyber Bullying?  Is the use of electronic means by a minor to torment, threaten, harass, humiliate, embarrass.
BULLYING AND VICTIMIZATION IN OVERSEAS MIDDLE SCHOOLS Kent M. Blakeney, PhD International School of Dakar.
INTERVENTIONS IN THE LESOTHO APPAREL INDUSTRY ALAFA KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE & PRACTICES PROGRESS & OUTCOMES REPORT IN 2012.
 According to the CDC bullying is an aggressive behavior that is repeated over time and involves a real or perceived imbalance of power or strength 
 The use of new media to harass, threaten, humiliate, embarrass, or target another person.  It only occurs among young people (adults involved: cyber-harassment.
Judit Kormos and Kata Csizér
What is Cyber bullying? Cyber bullying is when a person, or a group of people, uses the internet, mobile phones or other digital technologies to threaten,
Bullying Mr. Dillon. Types of Bullying. What are four kinds? Physical: hitting, pushing. Verbal: saying mean/untrue things. Social Isolation: keeping.
Anti-Bullying Week 2014 “Let’s stop bullying for all”
Screen Out the Mean!! What can you do when someone is mean to you online?
Internet Safety. Online Concerns: Contact Content Conduct.
Adolescent Vaccination: Taking It to the Schools Immunization Site Preferences Among Primarily Hispanic Middle School Parents Amy B. Middleman, MD, MSEd,
International Perceptions of Cyberbullying Within Higher Education
CYBERBULLYING A Melbourne Athenaeum Library
KiVa: An evidence–based programme
Cyberbullying BY LORD MUSHANGO.
Bullying and Cyberbullying: italian preventing strategies
HIB Lesson Bullying Prevention 7th Grade
Electronic Aggression
Virtual Battles: Cyberbullies
Aim The aims of today's session is to think about what bullying is and how to help yourself or others who are being bullied. To understand what Anti-Bullying.
Teen Health Perspective Results
Teen Health Perspective Results
Cyber Bullying.
Personal Safety Online
Presentation transcript:

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June DAPHNE Programme II An investigation into forms of peer- peer bullying at school in pre- adolescent and adolescent groups: new instrument and preventing strategies Bologna Unit Maria Luisa Genta, Antonella Brighi, Annalisa Guarini, Andrea Canevaro, Elena Malaguti, Elena Buccoliero, Lucia Berdondini, Davide Barbieri, Sandra Nicoletti, Francesca Gallingani, Stefano Passini, Davide Morselli, Ognjen Tomic

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Outline  Data collection  Results a)School climate b)Comparisons among direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying c)Victim’s feelings d)Bystanders e)Relation between bullying and self-esteem f)Relation between bullying and loneliness  Conclusions  Work in progress

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Data collection

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Data collection Total number of collected questionnaires: 1964 Total of males: 1024 (52.1%) Total of females: 921 (46.9%)

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Data collection Parents’ levels of education are representative of the Italian population

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Data collection The number of participants is well distributed into the different types of schools

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June School climate

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - school climate -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Comparisons among direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying questionnaire - High percentage of bystanders Indirect bullying is more frequent than direct bullying and cyberbullying

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June More males than females state to be victims of direct bullying χ 2 (1, N= 1942) = 11.19, p=.001 More females than males state to be victims of: - indirect bullying χ 2 (1, N= 1942) = 6.48, p= cyberbullying (mobile) χ 2 (1, N= 1901) = 5.13, p= cyberbullying (Internet) χ 2 (1, N= 1918) = 4.30, p=.038 WHILE Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June More males than females state to be bullies in: - direct bullying χ 2 (1, N= 1936) = 40.25, p < indirect bullying χ 2 (1, N= 1939) = 7.51, p= cyberbullying (mobile) χ 2 (1, N= 1938) = 10.06, p= cyberbullying (Internet) χ 2 (1, N= 1928) = 7.94, p=.005 Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June More younger than older adolescents state to be victims of: - direct bullying χ 2 (2, N= 1961) = 20.20, p < indirect bullying χ 2 (2, N= 1961) = 7.51, p=.048 No significant difference on cyberbullying (mobile or Internet) Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June More older than younger adolescents state to be bullies: - indirect bullying χ 2 (2, N= 1957) = 10.87, p= cyberbullying (mobile) χ 2 (2, N= 1957) = 11.34, p = cyberbullying (Internet) χ 2 (2, N= 1946) = 14.03, p=.001 Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying questionnaire - More older than younger students state to be victims of direct bullying (several times a week or more in the last two months)

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying questionnaire - More older than younger students state to be bullies (several times a week or more in the last two months)

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying questionnaire - Within the Internet cyberbullying modalities the more frequent are s, istant messaging and chat rooms Within the mobile cyberbullying modalities the more frequent are SMS and telephone calls

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying questionnaire - In the Internet cyberbullying a large group of bullies is anonymous In the mobile cyberbullying the bullies are mainly class mates or students of the same school

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Victims’ feelings

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June More frequent categories are: angry, upset, worried, embarrassed No. of victims: 290. No. of responses: 511 Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June More frequent categories are: angry, it doesn’t bother me No. of victims: 446. No. of responses: 716 Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June More frequent categories are: angry, it doesn’t bother me No. of victims: 179. No. of responses: 265 Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June More frequent categories are: angry, it doesn’t bother me No. of victims: 139. No. of responses: 196. Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Bystanders

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Some qualitative differences between males and females strategies Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Some qualitative differences between males and females strategies Results - cyberbullying questionnaire -

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying questionnaire - Some qualitative differences between males and females strategies

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying questionnaire - Some qualitative differences between males and females strategies

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Relation between bullying and self-esteem

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and SEQ - Lower self-esteem (school, peer, family and global) in victims of direct bullying      p <.05 Independent Sample t-test

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and SEQ - Lower self-esteem (school, family) in bullies of direct bullying. However, higher self-esteem in bullies concerning sport activities and making friends.     p <.05 Independent Sample t-test

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and SEQ -     p <.05 Independent Sample t-test   Lower self-esteem (sport, body, school, peer, family and global) in victims of indirect bullying

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and SEQ -    p <.05 Independent Sample t-test Lower self-esteem (school and family) in bullies of indirect bullying

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and SEQ -    p <.05 Independent Sample t-test Lower self-esteem (school and family) in victims of cyberbullying with mobile

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and SEQ -    p <.05 Independent Sample t-test  Lower self-esteem (school and family) in bullies of cyberbullying (mobile). However, higher self-esteem in bullies concerning sport activities.

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and SEQ -    p <.05 Independent Sample t-test  Lower self-esteem (body, school and family) in victims of cyberbullying (Internet).

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and SEQ -   p <.05 Independent Sample t-test  Lower self-esteem (school and family) in bullies of cyberbullying (Internet).

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Relation between bullying and loneliness

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and LCA -   p <.05 Independent Sample t-test  Higher level of loneliness in victims of direct bullying.  

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and LCA -  p <.05 Independent Sample t-test  Higher level of loneliness (parents) in bullies of direct bullying.

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and LCA -  p <.05 Independent Sample t-test Higher level of loneliness in victims of indirect bullying.    

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and LCA -  p <.05 Independent Sample t-test High level of loniliness (parents) in bullies of indirect bullying. 

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and LCA -  p <.05 Independent Sample t-test Higher level of loneliness in victims of cyberbullying (mobile).    

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and LCA -  p <.05 Independent Sample t-test Higher level of loneliness (parents) in bullies of cyberbullying (mobile). 

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and LCA -  p <.05 Independent Sample t-test Higher level of loneliness in victims of cyberbullying (Internet).   

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Results - cyberbullying and LCA -  p <.05 Independent Sample t-test Higher level of loneliness (parents) in bullies of cyberbullying (Internet). 

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Conclusions

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Conclusions a)School climate: Although the results are generally positive, the data concerning the support of adults in school (18.9%) and students’ trust in adults inside the school (20.8%) are negative and alarming. b)Comparisons among direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying: 1.Indirect bullying is more frequent than direct and cyber; 2.A very high percentage of bystanders admit to have seen/known episodes of direct/indirect/cyber bullying; 3.More males than females state to be victims of direct bullying; 4.More females than males state to be victims of indirect, cyberbullying (both mobile and Internet); 5.More males than females state to be bullies in all the types of bullying 6.More younger than older students state to be victims of direct and indirect traditional bullying; 7.More older than younger students state to be bullies in indirect and cyberbullying (both through mobile and Internet); 8.Considering the intensive frequency of the phenomenon (several times a week or more in the last two months) we can notice an increasing trend with age, both in direct and indirect bullying. In fact the older students, mostly males, declare with a high percantage (24.7%) to have bullied someone both directly and indirectly.

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Conclusions 9.Considering the overlapping between different roles (no role, bully, victim and bully/victim) we can stress the result concerning indirect bullying: 10.5% of participants state to be bully/victims. 10.Within the mobile cyberbullying modalities the more frequent are sms and telephone calls; 11.Within the Internet cyberbullying modalities the more frequent are s, instant messaging and chat rooms; 12.In the mobile cyberbullying the bullies are mainly class mates or students of the same school, while in the Internet cyberbullying a large group of bullies is anonymous. c)Victims’ feelings and responses: while in the direct bullying victims state to feel angry, upset, worried and embarrassed, in all the other types of bullying the more frequent answers are ‘it doesn’t bother me’ and angry. d)Bystanders: we can notice different behavioural responses between males and females in all the types of bullying.

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Conclusions e)Relation between bullying and self-esteem: 1.Bullies show a lower self-esteem than peers concerning the areas of school and family; sometimes they show a higher self-esteem in sport activites and in making friends; 2.Victims show a lower self-esteem in the areas of school and family; moreover victims of direct and indirect bullying show a lower self-esteem regarding all the areas investigated. f)Relation between bullying and loneliness: 1.Bullies (in all the types of bullying) show a higher degree of loneliness than peers in the items regarding their parents; 2.Victims (in all the types of bullying) show a higher degree of loneliness than peers in all the investigated areas.

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Work in progress

Bologna Unit Lisbon, 26th-27th June Work in progress....  Collection of qualitative data (focus groups)  Enhancing of Italian sample (about 400 new questionnaires)  Analysis of Bosnia questionnaires  Comparisons of results among different countries involved in DAPHNE Programme  Validation of cyberbullying questionnaire in different languages (book or paper?)  Disseminations of the results (how and when)  Editing of video and website