Program Review 2014 Report to College Council, May 2, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accreditation – Progress Report Recommendations 3, 5.1, 7.1, 8.1
Advertisements

Engaging Online Faculty and Administrators in the Assessment Process at the American Public University System Assessment and Student Learning: Direct and.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
Sacramento City College Budget Committee Handbook October 28, 2002.
History, Status and Challenges as of August 2010 Outcomes, Assessment and Accreditation.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Central Virginia Community College Where your future begins.
The Program Review Process What is Instructional Program Review?
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
 Mission College Preparation of the Accreditation Self-Evaluation WVMCCD Board of Trustees November 19, 2013.
PROGRAM REVIEW ANNUAL SUMMARY 2014 Prepared by the Program Review Committee (PRC)
FLEX Day Presentation August 13, Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM)
Educational and Facilities Master Plan: In-Flight Update Flex Day January 26, 2006.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
Semester Conversion CPP Academic Senate March 12 th by F.A.Neto Semester Conversion Director 3/12/20141FAN.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM) Summit August 29, 2014.
PRESENTATION TO ASSOCIATION OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND PLANNING OFFICERS BUFFALO, NEW YORK JUNE 11, 2009 How Campuses are Closing the GE Assessment.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Moving Forward Accreditation Efforts at BC. ACCJC Annual Report Student Achievement Data Student, Program, and Institutional Learning Outcomes.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
The New Mission Frontier: The Community College Baccalaureate Degree Pilot John Stanskas, ASCCC Executive Committee Jolena Grande, Cypress College Jackie.
Staff Development Organized Four Flex Days Worked with Office of Emergency Preparedness and Workplace Safety to facilitate mandated safety training.
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Armstrong’s QEP Quality Enhancement Plan. QEP Steering Committee Nancy Remler, Chair – John Kraft, Andy Clark, Marilyn O’Mallon, Bob LeFavi, Mario Incorvaia,
IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process
1 District Office Administrative Services Unit Review (ASUR) and Annual Operational Planning November 7, 2013 Presented by Dr. George Railey Vice Chancellor.
Cañada College Professional Development Committee Determining Participants.
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING ACTIVITIES FUNDING REQUESTS PLAF – Info Session Spring 2016.
CIAS Program Level Assessment Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment September 6, 2016.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Accreditation Update August 24, 2016 Susan Mills, Accreditation Liaison Officer.
Academic Affairs Update
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
Dr. Annebelle Nery Vice President of Student Success
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
Program Review Annual Summary 2016
Bakersfield College Annual Program Review Work Session 2013
Student Learning Outcome Assessment Plan
Student Success Tell Your Story: Communication Skills for the Artist
Program Review and Accreditation
Summary Report 2017 Prepared by the Program Review Committee
Program Review Annual Summary 2014
New Certificate Program
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Program Review Feedback Process
Dr. Annebelle Nery Vice President of Student Success
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Program Review Feedback Process
Completing your Program Review
Dr. Annebelle Nery Vice President of Student Success
Program review Summary Report 2018
Accreditation follow-up report
Completing your Program Review
Bakersfield College Annual Admin Structure Review
Educational Master Plan
Presentation transcript:

Program Review 2014 Report to College Council, May 2, 2014

Pilot Comprehensive Program Review Each program completes this review every three years.

Our Fearless Pilots CTE: Vocational Nursing—Jennifer Johnson ADMIN: Technology Support Services, Info and Media Services—Kristin Rabe STUDENT SERVICES: Counseling—Sue Granger-Dickson INSTRUCTION: American Sign Language—Tom Moran

Their Timeline January 21-24, 2014 You will receive the revised forms. Friday, March 7 You will submit the completed forms to BC Program Review Tuesday, March 25 You will receive a checklist with feedback from the Program Review Committee (PRC). You will also be asked to evaluate the process. Friday, March 28 You will turn in your evaluation to BC Program Review. Friday, May 2 PRC will present a summary of the pilot project results to College Council.

Focus of Review Program Assessment Technology and Facilities Analysis Trend Data Analysis Progress on Goals Curricular Revisions Faculty and Staff Engagement Program Funding Sources

What did we learn?

So what did we do? Positives We have some remarkable programs. The process works for all types of programs. To Work On BC is not yet clear on the distinction between Outcomes and Student Achievement Data. As readers, we don’t always look for–or see— the same things.

We focused on responding to the pilots. We added specific questions to the Checklist. We held a norming session—applying the questions to two of the pilots.

Example 1.Program information A.Does the program mission describe students served and services offered? Is the language specific to that program? B.Are the program learning outcomes listed? C.Is the discussion of how their program supports the college mission clear and complete? D.For academic programs, does it list degrees and certificates offered?

What did we learn? The entire form needed revising. Some sections of the form also needed internal revision. Questions within sections did not always lead to organized responses—it was the form’s fault. Some questions were not clear—they did not lead to the responses we had anticipated.

What did we do? We knew we needed to revise the forms. We sent sections of the forms to the appropriate committees for review and recommendations. We met with CTE chairs to discuss certificates. We wound up revising both forms: The Annual Update The Comprehensive Program Review

What’s next? The Annual Update form and Checklist with questions should be ready for FCDC’s next meeting. The Comprehensive Program Review form and Checklist with questions should also be ready. The Comprehensive PR cycle (one third of programs complete this in the fall) should also be ready. The Handbooks should be ready soon.

TRAINING OCCURS FCDC in May—introduced Chair Academy in August Flex Week Sessions

Fall 2014: We revise the PRC charge to increase membership to mirror Curriculum and ISIT (one faculty representative for each department). We carry out both the Annual Update and Comprehensive Review processes. We evaluate the work. We present our results to College Council in December.

PRC Members INSTRUCTIONAL: Kate Pluta Co-Chair Greg Chamberlain Career & Technical Education (CTE) Billie Jo Rice General Education (GE) Kimberly Nickell Basic Skills Kathy Rosellini Student Services Anna Agenjo Library Jennifer Johnson Faculty Chair & Directors Council (FCDC) John Carpenter Assessment Committee Liaison Lynn Krausse At Large ADMINSTRATIVE: Manny Mourtzanos Co-Chair vacant Student Services Liz Rozell Instructional Laura Lorigo Facilities vacant Information Technology Michael Carley Director of Institutional Research (ex-officio) CLASSIFIED: Kristin Rabe Administrative Meg Stidham CSEA President or designee Bernadette Martinez Student Services vacant Instructional

Kate Pluta, PRC faculty co-chair, May 1, 2014