Academic Senate Student Learning Outcomes Why The Controversy? Presentation to the MPC Board of Trustees November 25, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Advertisements

I Love Outcomes (or at least not dread them so much) Reedley College Institutional Learning Outcomes Workshop January 8, 2009.
Student Learning Outcomes Curriculum Change Request Academic Council Presentation Gary Howard Rosemary Hays-Thomas October 22, 2004.
School Culture The Main Condition for Student Success.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009 Veronica Jaramillo, Ph.D. Mona Panchal Anthony Cadavid ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009.
The Academic Assessment Process
Understanding Teaching Effectiveness and Assessment Projects.
Assessing and Evaluating Learning
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Student Learning Outcomes: Tools for Intentionality.
Jeanne M. Clerc, Ed.D. Western Illinois University (WIU) October 14, 2011.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
Writing Student Learning Outcomes Consider the course you teach.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Accreditation, SLOs and You – What are the patient outcomes? or Will the patient survive? Facilitators: Janet Fulks and Phillip Maynard.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD REPORT, DECEMBER 7, 2010 SLO Coordinators: Maggie Taylor (FCC) and Eileen Apperson(RC)
CSE ACCREDITATION REVIEW BY CAC & EAC UC Irvine October 2, 2013.
Outcome-based Education – From Curriculum to Classroom practices
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
Updating Curriculum to Support Learning Davidson County Community College May
Equivalence at MPC Goals: 1.Articulate to the MPC community the expectations for granting equivalency to faculty applicants 2.Clearly define roles and.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Co-Curricular Learning Assessment Academy for Student Centered Learning Fall 2013.
REVISIONS TO GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Auburn University Senate Information Item, August 2014.
Technische Universität Berlin 1 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jörg Steinbach Vice-president of the Technische Universität Berlin Past-President of SEFI Accreditation.
Academic Senate GEOs General Education Outcomes Fred Hochstaedter Academic Senate President SLO Coordinator Monterey Peninsula College Website for more.
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
Standards-Based Curricula Dr. Dennis S. Kubasko, Jr. NC Teach Summer 2009.
Write On! Your Course Outline. Pedagogy Unbound Series Facilitated by: Deborah Richards Florence Daddey.
What the*!?# is an SLO? Train the Trainers Workshop Marcy Alancraig Cabrillo College
Considerations for Curricular Development & Change Donna Mannello, DC Logan University.
What the*!?# is an SLO? Workshop on Student Learning Outcomes For De Anza College Faculty.
16 OCTOBER 2015 JOACHIN ARIAS, SLO COORDINATOR EDWARD PAI, DEAN OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation.
Programme design and student assessment David Baume 1.
MVC – Outcomes Assessment FLEX –Day February 8, 2013.
Academic Senate Student Learning Outcomes Why The Controversy? Presentation to the MPC Board of Trustees November 25, 2008.
Introduction to Keypads Agenda 2010 Determining Priorities for State-District Leadership and Action.
2 Digital Citizenship
The School Effectiveness Framework
SLOAC The Skyline Way1 Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here
Curriculum and Accreditation
SLOs and SAOs: What Are They?
NJCU College of Education
SLOs and Course Objectives
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Assessment and Accreditation
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
February 21-22, 2018.
Curriculum Committee Report
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Presentation transcript:

Academic Senate Student Learning Outcomes Why The Controversy? Presentation to the MPC Board of Trustees November 25, 2008

Academic Senate First Things First What are SLOs? ACCJC: Knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes that a student has attained at the end (or as a result) of his or her engagement in a particular set of collegiate experiences. MPC: An SLO is a measurable or evaluable description of what students are expected to be able to “do” as they successfully complete a course. The word “do,” in this context, could mean “perform,” “paint,” “analyze,” “demonstrate,” “synthesize,” “use the scientific method,” or any number of verbs appropriate for a particular course. But there’s more…..

Academic Senate First Things First What is the SLO-Assessment Model?  Shifts the focus to student learning  Integrates the assessment results into all aspects of institutional planning and resource allocation Expectations of student learning….. Assessment….. Analysis….. Dialog….. Planning

Academic Senate Hoped-for Outcomes of this Presentation Board members being able to…  Read and endorse the self-study with more historical insight Knowledge of SLO controversy will lead to….  Act with a deeper insight into the pulse of the faculty

Academic Senate SLOs: So Why the Controversy?  Evaluation  Workload  Standardization/Academic Freedom  Bureaucratic waste of time because  We already do it  Doesn’t value the individuality of students  Doesn’t value the complexity of teaching and learning  Can’t possibly be of any value  It’s a fad…Nobody cares  We should spend our time teaching Not suggesting these objections are…  prioritized  valid  Or that we agree.  Only that they exist. It is my job to present the pulse of the faculty

Academic Senate Evaluation  From the ACCJC Standards, in the HR section: “Faculty and others directly responsible for student progress toward achieving stated student learning outcomes have, as a component of their evaluation, effectiveness in producing those learning outcomes.”  Faculty evaluation is negotiable issue, not a directive of an accrediting agency.  Could lead to low-level learning….Can you spell E-a-r-t-h? SLO Controversy  CTA parent investigating legal action.

Academic Senate Faculty Evaluation Criteria SLO Controversy Who should establish faculty evaluation criteria? Is a negotiable issue, not a directive of an accrediting agency. Accrediting agencies should help define evaluation criteria Diversity of faculty opinion

Academic Senate Who should establish faculty evaluation criteria? Is a negotiable issue, not a directive of an accrediting agency. Accrediting agencies should help define evaluation criteria Faculty Evaluation Criteria Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Neutral Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree

Academic Senate Workload Developing SLOs…..evaluating them…..analyzing the results.. …talking about them……planning what to do next…. How much time will this take? SLO Controversy A lot, to do it well. All take time. It’s why we’re all so busy.

Academic Senate Work Load SLO Controversy Developing SLOs…..evaluating them…..analyzing the results.. …talking about them……planning what to do next…. An un-negotiated addition to our workload. An over-riding framework for what we already do as faculty. Diversity of faculty opinion SLOs are…

Academic Senate Work Load An un-negotiated addition to our workload. An over-riding framework for what we already do as faculty. SLOs are…

Academic Senate Standardization/Academic Freedom  Tension between Academic Freedom and Standardization  Students’ access to a diversity of views and opinions.  This diversity is intellectual pluralism, the marketplace of ideas, the foundation of our Academic Freedom policy. SLO Controversy  Or are SLOs a framework for ensuring consistency between courses?

Diversity of faculty opinion Academic Senate Standardization/Academic Freedom Yes. Intellectual Pluralism compromised, and standardized curriculum coming soon SLO Controversy No. Just another framework for course consistency and curriculum alignment. Do SLOs compromise Academic Freedom?

Academic Senate Standardization/Academic Freedom Yes. Intellectual Pluralism compromised, and standardized curriculum coming soon No. Just another framework for course consistency and curriculum alignment. Do SLOs compromise Academic Freedom?

Diversity of faculty opinion Academic Senate Standardization/Academic Freedom SLO Controversy What are SLOs again? This is No Child Left Behind Means to defend against No Child Left Behind

This is No Child Left Behind Means to defend against No Child Left Behind Diversity of faculty opinion Academic Senate Standardization/Academic Freedom SLO Controversy What are SLOs again? CTA State Leadership State Academic Senate

This is No Child Left Behind Means to defend against No Child Left Behind Academic Senate Standardization/Academic Freedom SLO Controversy What are SLOs again? CTA State Leadership State Academic Senate Lower academic standards Can you spell E-A-R-T-H? Faculty’s opportunity to set academic standards/expectations

Academic Senate Standardization/Academic Freedom What are SLOs again? This is No Child Left Behind Means to defend against No Child Left Behind

Academic Senate Bureaucratic Waste of Time Doesn’t value the individuality of students.  Students learn differently  Have chaotic lives  Respond/learn in many different ways to our courses  Not always captured in pithy statements SLO Controversy Doesn’t value the complexity of topics and teaching.  SLOs become overly vague generalizations of what we expect  “Use the Scientific Method to investigate the natural world.”  In what context?  At what complexity?

Academic Senate Bureaucratic Waste of Time Can’t possibly be of any value It’s a fad…..Nobody cares about them We should spend our time teaching  What should we eliminate, to complete these SLO tasks? SLO Controversy We already do this.  Course Outline of Record  State Mandated through Title 5  Objectives (=ACCJC SLOs)  Assessment Methods  Informally with Colleagues

Academic Senate SLO Controversy Why don’t we want this again? Bureaucratic Waste of Time Diversity of faculty opinion We already do this Extra work better directed elsewhere

Academic Senate Why don’t we want this again? Bureaucratic Waste of Time We already do this Extra work better directed elsewhere

Academic Senate Yes  Standardization/ Academic Freedom Problems  No Child Left Behind  Un-negotiated Higher Work Load  Bureaucratic waste of time No

Academic Senate SLOs Controversy  Standardization/Academic Freedom  Evaluation  Work Load  Bureaucratic waste of time Do ALL faculty worry about these things? But to varying degrees – --from hardly at all……. to a whole lot. YES! And we all believe in accreditation.

Academic Senate SLO Controversy No clarity from ACCJC Why has there been such controversy? Lack of experienced leadership at MPC No agreement on what SLOs represent or should be used for.

Academic Senate SLO Controversy No clarity from ACCJC  A recognition of what it means to be an ethical human being and effective citizen….” “General education has comprehensive learning outcomes ……including the following:

Academic Senate SLO Controversy No clarity from ACCJC  A recognition of what it means to be an ethical human being and effective citizen….” “General education has comprehensive learning outcomes ……including the following:  “The willingness to assume civic, political, and social responsibilities locally, nationally, and globally.”

Academic Senate SLO Controversy Lack of experienced leadership at MPC SLOs are new; no agreement on how they should be used SLOs are a multi-faceted and complicated Lack of common definitions leads to incompatible visions and confusion

Academic Senate So what has the Senate accomplished?  “Articulating SLOs for MPC”, Nov 2007  Faculty primacy in setting standards and assessing student learning  Student learning assessed by classroom instructors, not a committee.  Starting on General Education program SLOs (GEOs)  The Form to record course-level assessement.

Academic Senate What does my cloudy crystal ball say? Our day-to-day activities: How the quality of our institution is evaluated: Has changed, a lot. SLOs become a framework for ensuring and demonstrating quality. Not much change.

Academic Senate On behalf of the Academic Senate… Thank You