Reaching the Public: Taking Science Directly to the Public through Books, Op-eds, and Public Appearances Leah Ceccarelli nSCI Conference, Journals and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit IV: Lesson 1 Slow Way Home Persuasive Writing Assessment
Advertisements

Nonfiction. What is Nonfiction? Written works intended to give facts, or true accounts of real things and events. Written works intended to give facts,
The Three Argument Appeals, Aristotle’s Methods of Convincing
Mrs. Day - 9th Lit/Comp. Nonfiction Essential Questions Why should you believe me? What makes a credible source? What makes a good leader? How can I persuade.
Rhetorical Strategies for Writing An Introduction.
What is a Professional Literature Review? Not to be confused with a book review, a literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources.
©2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Thinking and Speaking Critically.
Building our Own definitions. You need to convince one of your parents to allow you to do something they normally would NEVER let you do. Take a few minutes.
Going public: My experience in communicating climate change science Richard C. J. Somerville Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California,
Research methods and Critical thinking
War on Science By Adam Hatefi. The Question We Are Trying to Answer What factors could effect an individual’s denial of natural sciences and thus affecting.
Chapter 5E Correlation and Causality Bethany Higley Math 1030 Final Project.
Not In My Back Yard FAIR HOUSING FOR ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS.
Chapter 4 Designing Significant Learning Experiences II: Shaping the Experience.
“The Most Dangerous Game” Literary Terms
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Day 2. Standards Reading: 1.0 Word Analysis, Fluency, and Systematic Vocabulary Development- Students apply their knowledge of word origins to determine.
Chapter 1: The Evolution of Psychology. From Speculation to Science: How Psychology Developed  Prior to 1879  Physiology and philosophy scholars study.
Chapter 1: The Evolution of Psychology. Why Study Psychology? Psychology is ____________ Psychology is a powerful way of thinking Psychology teaches a.
© Crown copyright Met Office Discussing climate science via social media Richard Betts.
Short Story Elements.
“Countering the antivaccination movement and vaccination scares - Working with the Media” VHPB – Geneva Robert Aston, UK 14 March 2003.
Chapter 21 Supporting Your Views
It’s Fun Persuasive Writing. Aristotle: 3 Methods of Convincing.
Reviewing how to analyze rhetorically for all genres.
Usual Advice # 1  Avoid certain kinds of “argument”  Arksey & Harris ( 2007) ch. 5: avoid personal rant,
The U.S. Media and Climate Confusion Erik M. Conway Historian 16 October 2010.
English 11 Writing an Argument. One of the Greatest Arguments Ever Made? St. Crispins’ Day Speech St. Crispins’ Day Speech Prince Harry in Henry V Prince.
Giving human characteristics to non-human things…human characteristics.
From the lab to the public-the making of science news Thomas Abraham.
Building Opposition Cases In Parliamentary Debate
Persuasive Appeals ENGLISH 11. Persuasion Persuasion is presenting an argument The goal of argument is to win acceptance of one's ideas. Modern argumentation.
Debate Project Integrated Skills III – 2011/02. Here are some links that may be of help: DEBATE CENTRAL 
J. Bardzell, School of Informatics1 New Media Theory: How To.
Do Now: Pick your best inference from your homework Write the inference ( and the line numbers you based your inference on) on a Post-It Note. Write your.
Opinion-Editorial  Definition:  An editorial is written in response to a major issue. This may be social, political, economical, etc.  Focuses on a.
Exploration of Poetry AP Poetry Unit. Aspects of Poetry Voice Voice Tone Tone Diction Diction Syntax Syntax Imagery Imagery Figures of Speech Figures.
Chapter Study Guide GROUP COMMUNICATION. Chapter What are the 4 steps in the problem solving process? Describe and understand the problem.
Developing a Philosophy for Science Teaching and Learning How do our personal beliefs compare to standards-based teaching and learning?
Introducing Communication Research 2e © 2014 SAGE Publications Chapter One Getting Started: Possibilities and Decisions.
Persuasion Terms. Logos- The process of reasoning that uses logic, numbers facts and data. Pathos- When the writer appeals to the reader’s emotions Ethos-
What are Rhetorical Strategies?. What is “rhetoric”?  Rhetoric is the “art or study of effective language.”  Effective language is language used to.
Objects of Study Constructing a text for criticism.
Critical Analysis Analyzing a Text.
Understanding Science 9. Science and Scientists © Colin Frayn,
Review Writing Opinión Writing.
The analysis question An analytical paper breaks down an issue or an idea into its component parts, evaluates the issue or idea, and presents this breakdown.
GOOD AFTERNOON!  An empty bus pulls up to a stop and 10 people get on. At the next stop 5 people get off and twice as many people get on as at the first.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
SOAPSTONE & STRATEGIES Annotation Notes. SOAPS Speaker Occasion Audience Purpose Subject.
Developing a Philosophy for Science Teaching and Learning How do our personal beliefs compare to standards-based teaching and learning?
Writing to Argue L:O – To develop skills required when writing to argue.
CRITICAL READING Becoming an aware and smart READER.
THE ART OF EFFECTIVE SPEAKING Rhetoric. the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, especially the use of figures of speech and other compositional.
Developing a Philosophy for Science Teaching and Learning How do our personal beliefs compare to standards-based teaching and learning?
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 3rd Edition Section(s)
Lesson 1: The Meaning of Educational Technology
7th Grade Short Story Elements
CRITICAL ANALYSIS Purpose of a critical review The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review.
Debate Terminology.
“Don’t raise your voice, improve your argument.”
Argumentative Writing
Harvard's Implicit Bias test for race and one for gender
How To Critique Art.
Gareth Millward – – Centre for History in Public Health Go through:
Academic Vocabulary Unit 1.
The Art of Persuasive Writing
Rhetoric Ethos Logos Pathos.
Philosophy and Logic Section 4.3
Presentation transcript:

Reaching the Public: Taking Science Directly to the Public through Books, Op-eds, and Public Appearances Leah Ceccarelli nSCI Conference, Journals and Science November 14, 2013

Rhetoric of Science The application of concepts developed in the humanities to analyze and evaluate the persuasive communication of scientists

Preview Terms of art to be introduced: hedges, hyperbole, metaphor, litotes, metastasis Cautionary Tales Exemplary Cases

hedge: a word or arrangement of words that limits or qualifies a statement E.g., “may” “possible” “some” (Wakefield et al., The Lancet, 1992) Lauren Archer, “Harms of Hedging in Scientific Discourse: Andrew Wakefield and the Origins of the Autism Vaccine Controversy,” Technical Communication Quarterly, in press.

Wakefield Press Conference “It is our suspicion that there may well be [a genuine causal association between MMR and this syndrome] but that is far from being a causal association that is proven beyond doubt” “as yet we don’t know but there is no doubt that if you give three viruses together, three live viruses, then you potentially increase the risk of an adverse event occurring”

hyperbole: intentional exaggeration for emphasis or effect Franzen et al, “Complete Primate Skeleton from the Middle Eocene of Messel in Germany: Morphology and Paleobiology,” PLoS ONE, May 19, Miles Coleman, “Darwinius Hyperbolicus: The Unconscious ‘Disconnects’ between Scientific Consensus and Exaggerations of Scientific Significance (and Validity) Amidst the Ida Controversy,” National Communication Association, Washington DC, Nov

Chapter 3: The Dangers of Bioprospecting on the Frontier: The Rhetoric of Edward O. Wilson’s Biodiversity Appeals

Chapter 4: Biocolonialism and Human Genomics Research: The Frontier Mapping Expedition of Francis Collins

litotes: a figure of speech that works as an understatement, usually by affirming the negation of its opposite E.g., “not bad,” “not unwelcome,” “not untrue,” or “not scientifically invalid” Ron Von Burg, “Decades Away or The Day After Tomorrow?: Rhetoric, Film, and the Global Warming Debate, Critical Studies in Media Communication 29.1 (2012), 7-26.

metastasis: denying and turning back on your opponents the charges that have been directed against you E.g., countering manufactroversy with fairness claims Leah Ceccarelli, “Manufactured Scientific Controversy: Science, Rhetoric, and Public Debate,” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 14.2 (2011),

Summary Be careful about the use of hedges in public discourse. Resist the urge to offer hyperbolic significance claims in public reports. Think carefully about the metaphors you use in public communication. When responding to critics, use rhetorical strategies like litotes and metastasis.