Katana Consulting | 1 Measuring Airport Noise March 2014 Kevin Terrell Katana Consulting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McClellan-Palomar Airport Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update Public Meeting - Kickoff March 27, 2003.
Advertisements

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Sensitive Facilities Committee AIRPORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Louisville and Jefferson County MITIGATION ISSUES.
Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Prescreening Training Module 3 Noise Review.
East Hampton Airport Phase I Noise Analysis Interim Report October 30, 2014 Prepared by Young Environmental Sciences and Noise Pollution Clearinghouse.
Trends & Indicators of Encroachment Association of California Airports 2007 Annual Fall Conference September 20, 2007 Lake Tahoe, CA.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Airport Noise Basics Noise Analysis Overview 2010 Hershey Conference Chris Osburn, Env. Protection.
Juneau Flightseeing Noise Informational Work Session November 6, 2000.
1 Comprehensive Management Plan for East Hampton Airport  Safety, Noise and Operations Peter J. Kirsch December 1, 2011.
Reid-Hillview Airport FAR Part 150 Noise and Land Use Compatibility Study Third Public Meeting 25 September 2001.
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base/Tucson Joint Land Use Study WELCOME! Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) Meeting July 23, 2003.
Fifth Public Meeting Review of the Draft Noise Compatibility Program September 18, 2002 Reid-Hillview Airport FAR Part 150 Noise and Land Use Compatibility.
Airport Planning. errata Traditional forecasting techniques are still in play, but are considered archaic. US airlines are focused on international travel.
Noise Problems and the Balanced Program Erik Nielsen Director, Head of Environmental Affairs Copenhagen Airports.
Introduction to Noise Control
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Data Analysis and Reporting MICS Survey Design Workshop.
Quiet Please: The Future of EU Noise Policies Brussels, 25 May 2011 Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise Dr Rokho Kim WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal Briefing to FACC 7 th March 2013.
1 Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Powered Aircraft: EPA Activities & Next Steps For National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Meredith Pedde May 21, 2015.
Other Environmental Issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Noise Endangered and Threatened Species Explosive/Flammable Hazards and Underground.
New Engine Thrust Calculation For Arrivals ICRAT 2004 Ivan de Lépinay, ENVISA, Paris (France) based on a dynamic equilibrium equation Welcome!
Strengthening General Aviation Security November 2011.
“LEGAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH AN RSA PROJECT” Mark Bautista Deputy General Manager Monterey Peninsula Airport David Prentice Scott Huber Stephanie Alford.
OSU Airport – Overview of Master Plan and Draft Environmental Assessment Purpose of an Airport Environmental Assessment (EA) Identify environmental impacts.
San Francisco International Airport Community Managed Noise Mitigation.
Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group NOISE ABATEMENT STRATEGIES Alternatives and Results New Zion Baptist Church Neighborhood Orientation and Discussion.
How does aircraft noise Affect the expansion of Airports.
Canada Health Canada Santé Canada Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau National Guidelines for Environmental Assessment: Health Impacts of.
Presentation to: 2006 Transportation Research Board Noise & Vibration Conference Williamsburg, VA Supplemental Tools for Environmental Noise Analysis Roger.
Wyle Aviation Services, Arlington, VA www.wylelabs.com Sustaining Your Airport - FAA Can’t Do It For You Wyle Aviation Services Joe Czech October.
Overview What we’ll cover: Key questions Next steps
NEW FLIGHT PATHS AND STANSTED SECOND RUNWAY PRESENTATION TO STANSTEAD ABBOTTS PARISH COUNCIL 17 JULY 2008.
INTRODUCTION  Industry-Wide Participation  Room to Improve Nighttime Flight Tracks  Comprehensive Approach  GOALS –Improve Efficiency –Enhance Safety.
Neighbor’s Committee Meeting Paul L. Shank P.E., C.M Chief Engineer July 14, 2015.
East Hampton Airport Safety, Noise and Operational Management Plan Peter J. Kirsch December 1, 2011.
Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program Update Shreveport Regional Airport.
European Commission 1 EU EU activities in the field of Aviation Noise ^ Ronny Rohart.
NEPA, Noise and the F/A-18 E/F Dan Cecchini Head, COMLANTFLT NEPA Support Atlantic Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command 7 April 2004.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
Cognitive Impact on Children from Airplane Noise 2008.
NextGen for Noise Mitigation Paul Dunholter, P.E. BridgeNet International October 10, 2007.
Review of the Noise Compatibility Program Presentation to the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors October 29, 2002 Reid-Hillview Airport FAR Part 150.
Fourth Public Meeting June 20, 2002 Reid-Hillview Airport FAR Part 150 Noise and Land Use Compatibility Study.
NATS TCN AIRSPACE PROPOSALS + SECOND RUNWAY PRESENTATION TO STAPLEFORD ABBOTTS PARISH COUNCIL 7 JULY 2008.
Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal Briefing to FACC 26 th November 2014 TAG Farnborough Airport.
FUKISHIMA Nuclear Reactors Radiological Assessment Air Measurement Surveillance AMS March 22,
Radiological Assessment March 22, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 40 hours of flying Plot interpretation.
Buffalo Niagara International Airport Noise Mitigation Program Political Contours versus Reality Presented by : Mark Clark Sr. Aviation Planner of BNIA.
Why is the Navy doing this EIS? They want to bring in new types of aircraft o F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, F-22 Raptor, etc. They want the flexibility to.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Project and Implementation Update Presentation to: Congressional Staffers By: Steve Kelley, Airspace Redesign.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Record of Decision (ROD) Announcement Congressional Briefing Name: Steve Kelley Date: September 5, 2007 Federal.
NEPA, Noise and the Super Hornet Fred Pierson Navy East Coast AICUZ/RAICUZ Center of Excellence Center of Excellence NAVFAC Atlantic Division 7 April 2004.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration CHANGING NOISE CONTOURS AN FAA PERSPECTIVE NOISE MITIGATION SYMPOSIUM JOHN SILVA OCTOBER 2, 2006.
Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal Briefing to FACC 6 th March 2014 TAG Farnborough Airport.
AIRPORT NOISE SYMPOSIUM MODIFICATIONS TO AIRPORT NOISE CONTOURS AND ITS IMPACT ON LOCAL COMMUNITIES PRESENTED TO: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES.
Update dose-effect relations for annoyance for aircraft noise Martin van den Berg Steering group noise Tampere.
15 January 2015 Add Presentation Title in Footer via ”Insert”; ”Header & Footer” Latest research on Wind Turbine Noise Take away from EWEA works shop on.
1 EMERGENCE OF REGIONAL JETS AND THE IMPLICATIONS ON AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT MIT International Center for Air Transportation Aleksandra Mozdzanowska, R.
Port of Bellingham Briefing BELLINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN BRIEFING April 2014.
Town of Morrisville, NC November 2012 AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES.
Sustainable Aviation: Cleaner, Quieter, Smarter
Mary Ellen Eagan President Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc. Using ‘Supplemental Metrics’ to Address the Effects of Noise on People TRB ADC40 Committee.
Santiago Hills II East Orange General Plan Noise Assessment Matthew B. Jones, P.E. Mestre Greve Associates.
Introduction to Noise Control Environmental Science Ithan B. Zimmer, Ph.D., P.E.
Teterboro Airport Part 150 Noise/Land Use Compatibility Study
Draft ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Planning for Airport Noise The Roar of Discontent
Fifth Standard Solar Project Complex
Aircraft Noise Exposure Contour Update
9th Noise Expert Group Centre Borschette, Brussels, Belgium.
Update on forthcoming assessments by ETC/ACM
Presentation transcript:

Katana Consulting | 1 Measuring Airport Noise March 2014 Kevin Terrell Katana Consulting

Katana Consulting | 2 Agenda 1. Background and FAA outreach 2. The noise metric Day-Night-Level 3. Understanding alternative noise metrics 4. Applying alternative metrics at MSP 5. Summary and action plan

Katana Consulting | 3 1 | Under RNAV, SW Minneapolis and Edina would have had a 5x increase in noise and number of departures, with 23% of ~580 daily departures. 27 Xerxes Ave Penn Ave 2012 Departure 2012 Landing SOURCE: ightracker for Tuesday, July 10th am + 8 hourswww.macnoise.com/fl ightracker Runway 30L/R RNAV departure tracks Katana analysis Key road Proposed departure track RMT 50 th Street % % 4 1% 3 1% 70 12% 98 17% 98 17% # daily RNAV flights % of daily total % 30R 30L

Katana Consulting | 4 1 | For RNAV, FAA’s outreach will advise you that there is a Finding of No Significant Impact or “FONSI” relative to a noise limit of 65 dB DNL. SOURCE: FAA Airports Desk Reference, Chapter 17

Katana Consulting | 5 1 | The 65 dB line the FAA uses for a FONSI extends at most about 1.5 miles from the end of runways 30L and 30R. Xerxes Ave Penn Ave 50 th Street France Ave 30R 30L

Katana Consulting | 6 1 | Locally we use the 60 dB line to decide if the MAC must provide noise mitigation. The FAA does not heed that community guideline for a FONSI. Xerxes Ave Penn Ave 50 th Street France Ave 30R 30L

Katana Consulting | 7 Agenda 1. Background and FAA outreach 2. The noise metric Day-Night-Level 3. Understanding alternative noise metrics 4. Applying alternative metrics at MSP 5. Summary and action plan

Katana Consulting | 8 2 | DNL is the modeled logarithmic average of noise exposure over the course of a year, adjusted for our extra sensitivity to nighttime noise. SOURCE: Overview of Noise Metrics at DaytimeNighttime + 10 dB

Katana Consulting | 9 2 | However, noise experts recognize that DNL as a measurement is flawed. SOURCE: What’s In Your DNL?, Wyle Laboratories, 2006 Limited explanation “Reducing noise exposure to a single value of DNL does not convey to the public the extent of the impact upon them” Missing factorsNot representative “A DNL contour map does not tell residents how many times airplanes fly over them, at what time of day, what type of airplanes, or how those flights may interfere with activities, such as sleep and watching television” “If the number of aircraft noise events above the minimum threshold that an individual finds annoying increases, then the noise environment for that person has increased”

Katana Consulting | 10 2 | DNL does not account for real world perceptions of noise. SOURCE: Harris Miller Miller & Hanson “Basic Aircraft Terminology”

Katana Consulting | 11 2 | The application of DNL is based on 40 year old research showing 13% of the population is highly annoyed by 65 decibels of average noise. SOURCE: EC Position Paper on Dose Response 2002, Katana analysis 1972 Highly Annoyed % of People Annoyed by Aircraft Noise % Average Noise Exposure (dB)

Katana Consulting | 12 2 | Current research on plane noise indicates that a 55 dB contour line is a more appropriate place to draw that “FONSI” line. SOURCE: EC Position Paper on Dose Response 2002, Katana analysis 2002 Highly Annoyed % of People Annoyed by Aircraft Noise % Average Noise Exposure (dB) 1972 Highly Annoyed

Katana Consulting | 13 2 | Additional research indicates that average noise levels over 55 dB can have a noticeable impact on the reading skills of schoolchildren. SOURCE: European Environment Agency report No 11/2010

Katana Consulting | 14 Agenda 1. Background and FAA outreach 2. The noise metric Day-Night-Level 3. Understanding alternative noise metrics 4. Applying alternative metrics at MSP 5. Summary and action plan

Katana Consulting | 15 3 | California uses a more nuanced logarithmic measurement called CNEL that accounts for evening noise. L den is similar and is used in Europe. DaytimeEvening + 5 dB Nighttime + 10 dB MSP = ~ DNL decibels

Katana Consulting | 16 3 | Many countries use the 55 dB CNEL contour to restrict uses due to health concerns, and all of Europe is required to show the 55 dB contour. SOURCE: Methods of Assessment of Airport Noise, NJS Burton, London South Bank University 55 dB contour lines required55 dB limit on noise

Katana Consulting | 17 3 | N70 is an easy to understand measurement developed in Australia. It is calculated using the same noise model that the FAA uses for DNL. SOURCE: Expanding Ways to Describe and Assess Aircraft Noise, Department of Transport and Regional Services, Australia

Katana Consulting | 18 3 | These additional noise measures are already approved by FAA. SOURCE: FAA Airports Desk Reference, Chapter 17

Katana Consulting | 19 3 | Summary of noise measures DNL Flawed, logarithmic measurement + 65 dB DNL line for noise studies is based on 40 year old research CNEL, etcN70 Updated & slightly better logarithmic measurement + 55 dB contour line is required in EU and used by some to limit impact A simple, linear measurement = How many times a day can I not hear you because of a plane?

Katana Consulting | 20 Agenda 1. Background and FAA outreach 2. The noise metric Day-Night-Level 3. Understanding alternative noise metrics 4. Applying alternative metrics at MSP 5. Summary and action plan

Katana Consulting | 21 4 | Recall that the FAA uses the 65 dB contour as the area to analyze for a FONSI. Xerxes Ave Penn Ave 50 th Street France Ave SOURCE:

Katana Consulting | 22 4 | Other countries use the 55 dB contour. Here, that extends to Penn Ave, beyond Lake Harriet and encompasses thousands of additional people. Xerxes Ave Penn Ave 50 th Street France Ave SOURCE: MAC PBN Overview map, Katana analysis

Katana Consulting | 23 4 | Beyond Lake Harriet, departing flights from medium aircraft typically exceed 70 decibels, and would be counted as part of the N70 metric. SOURCE: Altitude

Katana Consulting | 24 4 | With RNAV the N70 map to the northwest of MSP would likely blanket Minneapolis, Richfield & Edina with 100+ count tracks & the contour extends. Xerxes Ave Penn Ave France Ave th Street 2 1 N N Key road Number of daily flights greater than 70 dB (N70) SOURCE: Katana analysis; 55 dB line is estimated based on current RMT data 55 dB DNL

Katana Consulting | 25 4 | Arrivals would continue over the lakes, as is the case today. Xerxes Ave Penn Ave France Ave th Street 2 1 Number of daily flights greater than 70 dB (N70) SOURCE: Katana analysis, 55 dB line is estimated based on current RMT data N N Key road 55 dB DNL Arrival path

Katana Consulting | 26 E G I J K L N P Q V 4 | The 55 dB CNEL contour and N70 would affect 19 more schools than the FAA addresses today, including 1/3 of Minneapolis’ total public enrollment U F M B C H D S T O R 2 Local schools A.Lake Nokomis B.Our Lady of Peace C.Hale Community D.Roosevelt High E.Windom F.Annunciation G.Ramsey H.Field Community I.Washburn High J.Kenny K.Anthony L.Armatage M.Carondelet N.Lake Harriet Upper O.Southwest High P.Carondelet Q.Lake Harriet Lower R.Barton Open S.Pilgrim Lutheran T.Lake Country U.Burroughs V.Academy of Holy Angels 55 dB CNEL, est. 65 dB DNL 29 RMT N70, 100+ SOURCE: MAC PBN Overview, Katana + community analysis; 55 dB CNEL based on 2011 RMT data 8 A

Katana Consulting | 27 Agenda 1. Background and FAA outreach 2. The noise metric Day-Night-Level 3. Understanding alternative noise metrics 4. Applying alternative metrics at MSP 5. Summary and action plan

Katana Consulting | 28 5 | Summary Outdated metrics The FAA’s FONSI is based on an outdated metric and a 40 year old understanding of the impact of noise New metrics availableWe just need to ask There are more current, more accurate and easier to understand ways to express the impact of noise on our community This is OUR community – not the FAA’s Those new metrics are available to us – we just need to demand action from our representatives

Katana Consulting | 29 Contact: Kevin Terrell Board Member, Lynnhurst Neighborhood Association (Minneapolis) Co-Founder, MSP FairSkies For further information Visit for a more complete and narrated version of this and other presentations