1 Preparing for Uniform Grant Guidance Including Cost Allocation Plans for CILs September 16, 2014 Presenters: John Heveron, Jr. CPA Paula L. McElwee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Financial Monitoring Techniques
Advertisements

Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews May 15, 2008 Bruce Robinson FTA Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation.
Allowable Costs Division of Financial Services – Sponsored Programs November 2013.
California Department of Food and Agriculture
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Regulation Grant Brown Bag Session February 12, 2013.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Two: Indirect Costs.
SILC-NET, a project of ILRU – Independent Living Research Utilization 0 0 SILC-NET at ILRU Presents… Playing by the Rules: A SILC Fiscal Guide to Spending.
4/28/2015 Presented by David McQuay, Jr., CPA 1 Non-Profit Financial Management Florida Non-profit Housing, Inc. Self-help Housing Conference.
INDIRECT COST BASICS Presented by Gene Fornecker, CPA DPI School Finance Auditor.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF COST ALLOCATION Presenters: Steven J. Zuraf, Branch Chief for Colleges/Universities, Non-Profits & Hospitals.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
1 CIL-NET Presents… EDGAR and More A Two-Part National Teleconference & Webcast Tuesday, October 27 and Thursday, October 29, :00 PM – 4:30 PM EDT.
1 CYS COST ALLOCATION WORKSHOP March , 2007 Chicago, Illinois Presented by R. Armstrong.
Presented by Ginger Baker Eileen Campbell. Cost Principles for Educational Institutions found in 2 CFR Part 220  The Federal Government guidelines for.
Grant Management Webinar Presenters – Karla Freeman – Beth Romero – Chris Epoca.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
GPD Indirect Cost Rate Training OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215) 2 CFR Part 230 Appendix A – General Principles GPD Indirect Cost Rate Agreement Chief,
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES. Presenters: Tanielle Chandler, Financial Management Specialist, U.S. Department of Education, Rehabilitation.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
05/31/2012 Page 1 Financial Management: Timekeeping.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
Proper Management of Federal Grants – Support for Salaries and Wages or Time & Effort Reporting 1.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE National Institute of Food and Agriculture Nonprofit Indirect Cost Training – One Rate Method.
Programmatic and Fiscal Compliance as a Team Effort 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Cost Principles: It Depends!
The Management of Service centers NCURA REGIONS VI and VII CONFERENCE April 7, 2009.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
Cost Principles provide guidance for determining eligible costs and whether those costs are direct or indirect. Outlined in detail in OMB Circular A-21.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
University of Minnesota Internal/External Sales Internal Sales Rate Development Level I.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
Indirect Cost Rates Department of Health & Human Services National Institutes of Health Division of Financial Advisory Services, OALM, OD Ray Woodruff,
1 Expenditure Documentation Review. 2 The Purpose of the Expenditure Documentation Review Beginning with Fiscal Year , the Office of Family Planning.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
COMMUNITY FOOD COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM Award Information Webinar Thursday, October 22, 2015 Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial.
Cost Allocation Prepared by: Colleen B. Mendel, Executive Director & Chris Watkins, Management Specialist WKU 2009 FSS Fiscal Conference.
1 SPS Primer SPS Primer Workshop Cost Accounting Considerations When Preparing Budgets for Sponsored Proposals Division of Financial Affairs.
Kuali Financial Systems – Financial Administrator Development Series - October, 2006 Indirect Cost Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs.
Eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Fiscal Components of Monitoring Stephanie English, Chief Monitoring.
TIME AND EFFORT NEW FLEXIBILITY GUIDELINES. ALLOCATING PAYROLL COSTS: TIME DISTRIBUTION Rules set out in OMB Circular A-87  Must demonstrate that employees.
Cost Allocation/Indirect Costs Cost Allocation/Indirect Costs November 2 nd 2009.
Cost Allocation & Indirect Costs Requirements, Steps & Administrative Costs.
Department of Community and Senior Services Jason Stempinski, CIA Compliance Manager COST ALLOCATION PLAN Presented by:
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
12/11/20071 Indirect Cost Study Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs Indiana University Sally Link Cost Accounting Manager Financial Management Services.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
United States Department of Labor Employment & Training Administration TAA-CCCT Round 4 New Grantee Fiscal and Administrative Q&A TAA-CCCT Round 4 New.
1 1 Financial Management: Workshop for CILs…Regulations and Beyond Baltimore, Maryland May 25-27, 2016 Presenters: John Heveron, Jr. CPA Heveron & Company,
THE BIGGEST WINNER Uniform Guidance. Test Your Knowledge UG Basics Equipment & Facilities Shared Costs Items of Cost Bits & Pieces
1 1 Financial Management: Workshop for CILs…Regulations and Beyond Baltimore, Maryland May 25-27, 2016 Presenters: John Heveron, Jr. CPA Heveron & Company,
1 1 Financial Management: Workshop for CILs…Regulations and Beyond Baltimore, Maryland May 25-27, 2016 Presenters: John Heveron, Jr. CPA Heveron & Company,
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Independent Living Research Utilization
The Council Budget Understanding the Budget Process
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews
Cost Allocation Plans for CILs
F&A Rate Practices, Concepts and Calculations
Federal Cost Principles & Compliance
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Fiscal Compliance for Title III
Indirect Costs Mark W. Stout, MBA Branch Chief Indirect Cost Services Division (ICSD) Interior Business Center (IBC) U.S. Department of Interior (DOI)
Presentation transcript:

1 Preparing for Uniform Grant Guidance Including Cost Allocation Plans for CILs September 16, 2014 Presenters: John Heveron, Jr. CPA Paula L. McElwee

2 Upon completion of this webinar, participants will be able to: Define the purpose, objectives, and contents of a CIL Cost Allocation Plan. Understand how soon-to-be-implemented Uniform Grant Guidance will affect cost allocation plans, indirect cost rates, and other requirements. Identify the areas that are changing and the items that will require development and implementation of clear policies, procedures, and monitoring controls. Identify the role of senior management in successful implementation of the guidelines, which become effective for non-profits on December 26, 2014.

3 Uniform Grant Guidance: What You Need to Know Now Uniform Grant Guidance is effective December 26, 2014 and will apply to any new federal grants and new federal awards starting after that time. Every federal agency is rewriting their regulations. (Department of Education rewriting EDGAR, HHS rewriting HHS Regulations) They will be very focused on these new rules. We will be updating our sample policies and procedures and providing additional training as these changes become clear.

4 Uniform Grant Guidance: What You Need to Do Before Year-End Get a more thorough understanding about uniform grant guidance, and how it applies to you based on your funding and your operations. The US chief Financial Officers’ Council provides links and training Develop and adopt policies and procedures to comply with the new rules (Internal Controls, Procurement, Cost Allocation) Identify who will be responsible for compliance with these rules. Obtain training about the new rules for responsible individuals. Stay tuned — we will be providing assistance in these areas.

5 How does this affect cost allocation? Remember that every non-profit that receives federal funds must have a written, approved method for spreading indirect or shared costs across its projects. Centers have most often used a cost allocation plan, although an approved Indirect Cost Rate is an option. Cost Allocation Plans are approved by Department of Education’s Indirect Cost group. We will let you know when HHS assumes this for centers. When HHS regulations are released we will have the detail needed to assist you in applying changes.

6 Uniform Grant Guidance: Direct and Indirect Costs Appendix IV of Uniform Grant Guidance has information about indirect cost rates for nonprofits including the process for obtaining indirect cost rates. Section groups indirect cost rates with Cost Allocation Plans, so we believe the same rules will apply.

7 Questions and Answers

8 What is a Cost Allocation Plan? A cost allocation plan is a written procedure charging direct and indirect costs to programs and other functions. Direct costs are those that can be identified specifically with a particular cost objective (one of your programs or other activities such as fundraising). Indirect costs benefit all programs and must be shared or split fairly between those programs. A simplified allocation method is available to many small organizations including most CILs. It allows these organizations to treat everything as direct except “general administrative and general expenses” (in other words, general administrative and general is the same as indirect).

9 What is a Cost Allocation Plan? cont’d. General administrative and general expenses include costs such as receptionist, accounting, rent and utilities for your business office and similar items that benefit all programs. Agencies that don’t have current approved indirect cost or cost allocation plans, and don’t elect the 10% reimbursement may be denied any indirect cost reimbursement. While this is NOT a revenue allocation plan, most States and RSA are requiring that you separate out your costs by funding source or grant rather than the more general “cost objective.”

10 Cost Allocation Plan Example We are going to work through a sample cost allocation plan based on the typical programs you may have.

11 This is a sample plan and sample language You can use some of the following language to develop your cost allocation plan but you will need to change the titles and content to very specifically describe your CIL and your allocation procedures. Key staff need to understand this plan and continue to apply it correctly over time, not just once. If something in your formula changes, you need to adjust accordingly. One center that used square footage as part of the formula, moved to another building but forgot to adjust their allocation. As a result they had a payback to RSA.

12 Contents: Cost Allocation Plan Application for our hypothetical CIL—PENN CIL Cost Allocation Procedures—Attachment A Organization Chart—Attachment B Schedule of Federal Awards—Attachment C Schedule of Direct and Indirect Costs—Attachment D Schedule of Payroll and Related Costs—Attachment E Certification of Cost Allocation Plan—Attachment F Reconciliation to form 990, Financial Statements, or approved budget—Attachment G Timesheet Example—Attachment H Contact information—name, address, phone,

13 Attachment A—Cost Allocation Policy/ Procedures (example) Open with a Purpose/General Statement: The purpose of this cost allocation Policy is to summarize the methods and procedures that this organization uses to charge direct costs and to allocate indirect costs to various programs, activities, grants, contracts and agreements.

14 P l urpose/General Statements, cont’d. 2 Only costs that are allowable, in accordance with the Uniform Grant Guidance, are to be charged to programs by PENN CIL, Inc. We have eliminated items that would cause distortion such as certain contracts that pass along benefits directly to consumers but do not impact indirect costs.

15 Questions and Answers

16 General Approach (example) PENN CIL follows US generally accepted accounting principles and uses the accrual basis of accounting. The general approach of PENN CIL in allocating costs to particular grants and contracts is as follows: A.All allowable direct costs are charged directly to programs, grants, activities, etc. B.If an allowable direct cost can be identified to more than one program (such as the time for a specific staff person) it is pro-rated as direct cost using a base most appropriate to the particular cost being prorated (in the case of staff time, the time and effort reporting).

17 General Approach, cont’d. C. All other allowable general and administrative costs (costs that benefit all programs and cannot be identified to a specific program) are pooled and allocated to programs, grants, etc. based on the ratio of direct costs for each program or activity to total direct costs (or based on the ratio of direct salaries for each program or activity to total direct salaries.)

18 Allocation of Costs (example) The following information summarizes the procedures used by PENN CIL, Inc. beginning October 1, A. Payroll and Related Costs—Documented with timesheets and personnel activity reports (PARs) showing time distribution for all employees and assigned to programs and activities based on time spent on each program, activity or grant. Salaries and wages are charged directly to the program for which services have been performed. Costs that benefit all programs are allocated based on the ratio of direct costs for each program or activity to direct costs.

19 Allocation of Costs, cont’d. A.Payroll and Related costs cont’d. 1.Fringe benefits (FICA, Unemployment Compensation, and Worker’s Compensation) are assigned in the same manner as salaries and wages. Health insurance, dental insurance, life and disability, and other fringe benefits are also allocated in the same manner as salaries and wages. 2.Vacation, holiday, and sick pay are assigned in the same manner as salaries and wages.

20 Examples of Salary Costs Included as Indirect Costs and Supported by Detailed Records Executive Director’s time/salary and fringe costs may be both direct and indirect. Direct costs are shared between all the grants/programs based on actual time records. A Program Manager’s time/salary and fringe costs are shared between all the grants/programs based on actual time records. General and indirect salaries such as the receptionist, the accounting staff, some Executive Director salary and fund developer may be generally indirect and included in the overall indirect costs.

21 Allocation of Costs, cont’d. 2 B. Travel Costs—assigned based on purpose of travel. All travel costs (local and out-of-town) are charged directly to the program for which travel was incurred. Costs that benefit all programs are included with general and administrative, and allocated based on the ratio of direct costs for each program or activity to total direct costs.

22 Allocation of Costs, cont’d. 3 C. Equipment—assigned based upon use. Equipment is capitalized and depreciated when the initial acquisition costs exceed $1,000 [or whatever capitalization amount you use], and the useful life of the equipment exceeds one year. Items below those limits are expensed in the current year. Equipment used solely by one program is charged directly to the program using the equipment. Costs that benefit all programs are included with general and administrative, and allocated based on the ratio of direct costs for each program or activity to total direct costs.

23 Allocation of Costs, cont’d. 4 D. Contracted Services Costs (such as consulting and interpreter services)—assigned to the program benefiting from the service. All professional service costs are charged directly to the program(s) for which the service was incurred. Costs that benefit all programs are included with general and administrative, and allocated based on the ratio of direct costs for each program or activity to total direct costs.

24 Examples of Contracted Service Costs Janitorial services/building maintenance Alarm services Accountant Interpreter services Audit Payroll services

25 Allocation of Costs, cont’d. 5 E.Rent and Utilities—assigned based on usable square footage. Facilities costs that benefit all programs are included with general and administrative, and allocated based on the ratio of direct costs for each program or activity to total direct costs. F.Office supplies and expenses—Expenses used for a specific program are charged directly to that program. Costs that benefit all programs are included with general and administrative, and allocated based on the ratio of direct costs for each program or activity to total direct costs.

26 Allocation of Costs, cont’d. 6 G. Supplies and Materials—Expenses used for a specific program are charged directly to that program. Costs that benefit all programs are included with general and administrative, and allocated based on the ratio of direct costs for each program or activity to total direct costs. H. Dues, Subscriptions, Postage and Printing—Expenses are charged directly to the program benefiting from them. Costs that benefit all programs are included with general and administrative, and allocated based on the ratio of direct costs for each program or activity to total direct costs.

27 Allocation of Costs, cont’d. 7 I. Training, Conferences, Seminars—Allocated to the program benefiting from these activities. Costs that benefit all programs are allocated as indirect. J.Administrative/Board Costs are allocated as indirect. K.Insurance—Expenses used for a specific program are charged directly to that program. Costs that benefit all programs are included with general and administrative, and allocated based on the ratio of direct costs for each program or activity to total direct costs.

28 Allocation of Costs, cont’d. 8 L.Other—Allowable costs that benefit a single or multiple programs are assigned directly to those programs. Costs that benefit all programs are included with general and administrative, and allocated based on the ratio of direct costs for each program or activity to total direct costs.

29 Examples of Costs that Typically Cannot Identify to a Particular Program General bookkeeping and accounting General liability insurance Independent audit costs and costs of preparing annual filings

30 Allocation of Costs, cont’d. 9 M.Unallowable Costs—Costs that are unallowable with federal funds in accordance with the Uniform Grants Guidance, include alcoholic beverages, bad debts, certain advertising, contributions, certain entertainment, fines and penalties, and certain lobbying.

31 A little more about allowable and unallowable costs… Unallowable costs, including related indirect costs, cannot be paid with federal funds. You may be able to raise other funds to pay for these costs. In the case of Title VII funded CILs, Resource Development (fundraising) costs ARE allowable. (These are allowable under Title VII for Part B and Part C CILs as a requirement, even though they are not typically allowable for federal funds.)

32 Expense Categories Should Match Your Financial Report The level of detail in your cost allocation plan should be based on and be similar to the level of detail in your statement of functional expenses if you issue formal financial statements, or to your Form 990 if you issue a full form 990 rather than a Form 990 EZ.

33 How Do We Make a Cost Allocation Plan Simpler? Stick with your methodology; review it carefully before you submit it. Simplify your accounting and your vouchering by putting more categories into indirect. Track your expenses by service area. If you have multiple funders for the same program you may also need to break it down by funding source. Be mindful of other funding requirements such as those your State imposes.

34 Questions and Answers

35 Attachment C—Schedule of Federal Awards (example) PENN CIL Schedule of federal awards: GrantorPassthruCFDA#2014 Total $ExpendituresPeriod of Perf. Department of Education A$400,000 10/1/13 – 9/30/14 Social Security $90,000$390,0007/1/13 – 6/30/14 Department of Labor NY State96.630$150,000 7/1/13 – 6/30/14

36 Attachment D—Schedule of Direct & Indirect Costs (example) Indirect Costs Payroll122,750 Payroll OH 19,183 Outside Services 5,900 Rent 5,100 Utilities 1,270 Maintenance 2,600 Travel and Training 800 Depreciation 4,648 Telephone 7,572 Insurance 6,586 Dues and Subscriptions 3,500 Advertising 3,660 Office Supplies & Exp. 1,974 Other Exp. 3,057 TOTAL $188,600 Direct Costs Payroll510,750 Payroll OH 79,820 Outside Services 42,587 Rent102,757 Utilities 11,597 Maintenance 37,580 Travel and Training 46,892 Program Supplies 27,652 TOTAL $859,635

37 PENN CIL Attachment E ─ Schedule of Payroll & Related Costs (example) Projected Payroll, Payroll Overhead and Indirect Allocation NamePositionTotalVIIBVIICLocal ProgFundraisingG&A RichardProgram Director71,00017,75039,05010,6503,550 JaneExecutive Director74,0007,40022,2007,40011,10025,900 SallyDevelopment Director32,00027,2004,800 BrendaSystems Manager15,500 StephanieDeaf Services Coordinator48,000 MultipleCounselor/Advocate (4)185,000 MultipleCase Manager (3)135,000 DanielAccountant42,000 PattiReceptionist31,000 Totals633,50025,150429,25018,05038,300122,750 Payroll Overhead FICA48,463 SUTA9,503 Disability/compensation15,838 Health/life25,200 Totals99,003 Payroll OH%15.63%3,93067,0832,8215,98519,183 Other direct costs269,0659,840227,8509,77521,600 Total direct costs38,920724,18330,64665,885 Allocation of indirect8,539158,8836,72414,455-

38 Attachment -- Certification of Cost Allocation see uniform grant guidance appendix IV sec. D for language after December 26, 2014 PENN CIL I have reviewed the indirect cost proposal dated ______________________ This is to certify that: 1.All costs to be allocated on this cost allocation plan, effective on January 1, 2014, are allowable in accordance with the requirements of grants/contracts to which they apply and with OMB Circular A- 122 Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations. 2.The costs described in this plan are not unallowable under the applicable federal cost principles. 3.Fundraising costs are unallowable under General Grants Guidance; however the center is required under Title VII to conduct resource development activities to obtain funding from other sources. 4.The requirements and standards on lobbying costs for nonprofit organizations, found in the General Grants Guidance, have been complied with for the periods covered by the plan. 5.All costs described in this plan are properly allocable to the Department of Education and other federal agency grants/contracts on the basis of a beneficial or causal relationship between the expenses incurred and the agreements to which they are allocated in accordance with applicable federal cost principles. I declare to the best of my knowledge that the foregoing is true and correct. Organization: PENN CIL Signature _____________________________ Name ________________________________ Title _________________________________ Date _________________________________

39 Attachment G—Reconciliation to Financial Statements (example) Total Direct Costs859,635 Total Indirect Costs188,600 ________________________ Total Costs 1,048,235 Total expenses on the audited financial Statements: 1,087,235 Explanation: Depreciation relating to the equipment purchased with federal monies is excluded from the cost allocation plan (-$2,000) The organization is adding an assistant Executive Director for the current year (+$41,000)

40 Attachment H—Sample Timesheet and Policy Attach a sample timesheet for review. If you use a timesheet as a personnel activity report only one document would be in this section. If you use a separate PAR, both a sample time sheet and a sample PAR should be included here. If you use another method to document payroll and time worked, be sure your policy properly describes it We will review sample PARs in tomorrow’s webinar. RSA’s example is included at

41 Annual Review Must Be Submitted (Name & Address of Grantee) This is to certify that no changes have been made to the Cost Allocation Plan dated________________ The costs described in the plan referenced above are allocated using the same methodology approved by the letter from the Indirect Cost Group dated_____________ I declare to the best of my knowledge the foregoing is true and correct. Organization: ______________________________________ Signature: ________________________________________ Name: ___________________________________________ Title: ____________________________________________ Date: ____________________________________________

42 Questions and Answers

43 CIL Financial Management Resources IL-NET Financial Management for CILs If you do not find the material at this link, you can locate documents on ILRU.org by either using the link “CIL Financial Management” on the Browse by Topic navigation bar or by searching for “financial management.”

44 For More Information John Heveron - Paula L. McElwee –

45 Wrap Up and Evaluation Please click the link below to complete your evaluation of this program:

46 CIL-NET Attribution Support for development of this training was provided by the U.S. Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration under grant number H132B No official endorsement of the Department of Education should be inferred. Permission is granted for duplication of any portion of this PowerPoint presentation, providing that the following credit is given to the project: Developed as part of the CIL-NET, a project of the IL-NET, an ILRU/NCIL/APRIL National Training and Technical Assistance Program.