1 Response to Intervention (RTI) in the Area of Early Mathematics Gerbie Rodriguez Math Coordinator Region One ESC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructional Decision Making
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville Project.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Introduction to Response to Intervention: A comprehensive School Support Perspective Gary L. Cates Illinois State University.
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development October 9, 2009.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Getting Started with RTI School-wide Assessment Tool for an RTI Model.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
Curriculum Based Evaluations Informed Decision Making Leads to Greater Student Achievement Margy Bailey 2006.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Administrators’ Back to School INSTITUTE August 2013 RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI ) Brownsville Independent School District Curriculum & Instruction Department.
RTI & THE CONNECTION TO PLC’S Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
CENTENNIAL PUBLIC SCHOOL RtI 101 Slides adapted from the NE RtI Consortium.
An Introduction to - PBIS in Roseburg Public Schools: RTI, Professional Learning Communities and How to Respond When Kids Don’t Learn.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Response to Intervention
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Response to Instruction & Intervention (RtI 2 ) Using Differentiation to Provide Equity and Access for All Students.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Professional Development Training September 27, 2013 Jubilee Academic Center “A Premier Choice in Education” Angie T. Morales, Special Programs Director.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
High Plains Education Cooperative.  A Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS) is a term used in Kansas to describe how schools go about providing supports.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
Cindy Edwards, Administrative Supervisor Response to Intervention, Dyslexia/504 August 2, 2011 A Multi-Tiered Prevention System.
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
RTI & THE CONNECTION TO PLC’S Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Response to Intervention: Many Parts, One Purpose Problem Solving Universal Screening Progress Monitoring Written Plan Data.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
1 Response to Intervention Background and Laws Gaynard Brown Paul Bunyan Special Education Co-op Director.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
Using Data to Implement RtI Colleen Anderson & Michelle Hosp Iowa Department of Education.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
RTI Response to Intervention Connecting the Pieces.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Data Review Team Time Spring Purpose 0 This day is meant to provide school leadership teams with time to review the current status of their.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED
What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a benchmark and progress monitoring system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.
Mathematics Interventions
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Presentation transcript:

1 Response to Intervention (RTI) in the Area of Early Mathematics Gerbie Rodriguez Math Coordinator Region One ESC

2 Response to Intervention (RtI) is A method of improving instruction by:  identifying students who need early intervention for academics or behavior  matching interventions to the specific needs of struggling students  documenting student response to interventions and making changes in content and methodology based on response data

3 Components of RTI  Universal Screening  Interdisciplinary Problem-Solving Teams  WRITTEN intervention plans  Multi-tiered Research-based Instruction/Interventions  Progress Monitoring  Fidelity/Integrity of Implementation  Family Involvement in the process © 2008 J. Reyes, Region One ESC

4 Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems 1-5% 5-10% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Of longer duration Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response 80-90% Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Enter a School-Wide Systems for Student Success

5 Reading First RTI  Tiered model  Research-based Interventions  Small Group Instruction  Student Progress Monitoring  Reading Focus  Elementary Focus  Federally funded  Only certain campuses are Reading First campuses  Tiered Model  Research-based Interventions  Small Group Instruction  Student Progress Monitoring  Any content area including behavior issues  All grade Levels, ALL students  Use funds already available in the district  Involves all campuses  Relies on a STRONG Intervention Team  A WRITTEN intervention plan  Fidelity of Implementation  Fidelity Monitoring  Strong family involvement

6 Universal Screening

7  Purpose:  Is used as a benchmark to measure the performance of ALL students in both academics and behavior.  This data is used to determine which students need closer monitoring or an intervention.

8 Universal Screening  Purpose:  Can give you a bird’s eye view of how your campus compares to another in your district.  Helps you to assess the efficacy of your instruction and curriculum.

9 Universal Screening  Who is screened?  Everyone is screened.  How often do screenings occur?  Screenings occur 3 times a year.  Who is responsible for the screening?  The general ed teacher is responsible.

10 Universal Screening  What screening tools are available?  CBM (Curriculum Based Measurement)  STEEP (System To Enhance Educational Performance)  AIMSWeb  DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills)  Others  What do we do with the data?  Compare our district performance to state/national standards  Compare our schools to each other  Compare classrooms at each campus to each other SBS Group, 2007

11

12

13

14

15

16

17 The “Others”  What are some readily available MATH universal screeners and progress monitoring tools available?  Discuss this with your neighbor and make a list.  Be prepared to share your results

18 Progress Monitoring

19 Progress Monitoring “A scientifically based practice that is used to assess students’ academic performance and evaluate the effectiveness of instruction.” National Center on Student Progress Monitoring, 2004© 2006, J. Reyes, Region One ESC

20 Why monitor progress?  To make instructional changes as needed to ensure that there is a positive response to intervention  Decide whether to keep, modify, or drop a certain intervention  Allow students being served in Tier II and Tier III the opportunity to move to another tier as sufficient progress is made.

21 Introducing…  Texas Early Mathematics Inventory (TEMI)  Progress Monitoring  Outcome

22 General Information: Purpose of the Measures  TEMI-PM  TEMI-O  Kindergarten, first grade, and second grade  Cost: FREE July 2008 Workshop © 2008 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency

23 General Information: Assessment Periods Assessment periods:  Fall screening/identification: September/October* Form A  Winter progress monitoring: January/February Form B  Spring progress monitoring: April/May Form C * Some districts may choose to administer the TEMI to kindergarten students later in the fall or after winter break. July 2008 Workshop © 2008 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency

24 Description Norming process:  Tests were normed in all the regions of Texas and have been rated very high on the validity and reliability factors Assesses:  Fundamental number, operations, and quantitative reasoning skills (kindergarten, first grade, and second grade)  Skills that are fundamental to broad-based mathematics proficiency July 2008 Workshop © 2008 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency

25 Description (cont.)  Format: Four subtests: 30–45 minutes total test time to be divided into 2-3 days Each subtest is 2 minutes, plus time for demonstrations, practice, and transition Students attempt as many problems as they can in 2 minutes  Three forms: A (fall), B (winter), and C (spring) July 2008 Workshop © 2008 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency

26 Texas Early Mathematics Inventory- Progress Monitoring TEMI-PM

27 TEMI-PM: Number Identification and Quantity Recognition: Kindergarten only  Number Identification (0–20): Shapes appear in a box Four answer choices Response format: Circle the number that shows how many there are in all TEMI-PM Kindergarten Sample

28 TEMI-PM: Number Identification and Quantity Recognition: Kindergarten only  Quantity Recognition: One to six dots in a cluster Six answer choices Response format: Circle the number that shows how many there are in all July 2008 Workshop © 2008 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency

29 TEMI-PM: Magnitude Comparisons Two numbers appear next to each other:  Kindergarten: Circle the bigger number or both numbers if they are the same, or equal.  First and second grade: Circle the smaller number or both numbers if they are the same, or equal. TEMI-PM Kindergarten Sample

30 TEMI-PM: Number Sequences Three numbers appear in a sequence, but one number is represented by a blank (beginning, middle, and end): Kindergarten: Circle the missing number (0–20). First grade: Circle the missing number (0–99). Second grade: Write the missing number (0–999). TEMI-PM First Grade Sample

31 TEMI-PM: Place Value  First grade: Models of tens and ones Four response choices Response format: Circle the number that shows how many there are in all  Second grade: Models of hundreds, tens, and ones Response format: Write the number that shows how many there are in all TEMI-PM First Grade Sample

32 TEMI-PM: Addition/Subtraction Combinations  First and second grade only  Addition and subtraction facts  Students write the answers July 2008 Workshop © 2008 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency TEMI-PM Second Grade Sample

33 Texas Early Mathematics Inventory- Outcome TEMI-O

34 Rationale for TEMI-O  To identify struggling students, determine math strengths and struggles, and inform instruction  To focus on content standards identified by NCTM as being fundamental to student success.  Number, Operations and Quantitative Reasoning; Algebraic Thinking, Geometry and Spatial Reasoning: Measurement; Probability and Statistics; and Underlying Processes and Mathematical tools

35 TEMI-O: Mathematics Problem Solving Format:  Not timed, 30–45 minutes  Each item read aloud; boldface words repeated  About 10 seconds allocated per question  Questions with an asterisk are given 25– 30 seconds  Answers are marked by connecting two dots Kindergarten:  Three response choices First and second grade:  Four response choices  One choice is not shown (NS) TEMI-O Second Grade Sample

36 Preparation  Students will need: Pencils: Erasers are not needed, as the students will be taught during the demonstration how to correct an answer Dividers (optional) Test  Teachers will need: Overhead, overhead marker Transparency of demonstration pages Two timers Testing manual/directions July 2008 Workshop © 2008 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency

37 Professional Development in these areas FIRST Math

38 RtI is about change, how you look at things. Change cannot be mandated.

 user name: austin\assessment password: s3rp!2008! 39