Response to Intervention in New York State NYSCEA Meeting May 15, 2009 Noel Granger 518 473-2878 Office of Vocational and Educational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

Response to Intervention in Illinois November 22, 2008 Presented by: Beth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
RtI Response to Intervention
Response to Instruction ________________________________ Response To Intervention New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
A Problem-Solving Approach to Student Success.  Review of RTI  Definitions  The Problem-Solving Approach  Role of the Three Tiered Intervention System.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention This ppt is an adaptation of a specific PISD Training on RTI, The Educational Testing and.
1 Third Annual Massachusetts Summit on Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment December 7 th and 8 th, 2010 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support –
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services Louis Danielson Research to Practice.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
Response to Intervention Big Ideas: Since its inception as a category, SLD has been characterized by severe discrepancy between ability/achievement. In.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Current Status – RtI in NYS Matthew Giugno Program Manager for RtI VESID (518)
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
May Dr. Schultz, Dr. Owen, Dr. Ryan, Dr. Stephens.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
“Sorting Out Response to Intervention” Nassau Association of District Curriculum Officials February 26, 2009 Presented by Arlene B. Crandall ABCD Consulting,
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February.
Response to Intervention: New York State Regulations and Policy Framework Barbara Miller Response to Intervention and.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
A Three-Tiered Model: early intervention for students “at- risk” for learning difficulties CASP Convention 2004 Allan Lloyd-Jones Special Education Consultant.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The RTI² framework allows for an integrated, seamless problem-solving model that addresses individual student need.  This.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services.
RTI² Overview Response to Intervention? RTI² is NOT......Just a special education initiative...Only for students with disabilities...Only for beginning.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
Matthew Giugno Barbara Miller New York State Education Dept. VESID (518) Implications of RtI Implementation.
Overview, Considerations, and Implementation Sharon Hance Erie 1 BOCES SETRC Information for this presentation.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
Referral Made Like any other disability determination under IDEA, can’t be based on any single criterion – meaning a single test, assessment, observation,
 RtII is a comprehensive multi-tiered prevention model that provides services and interventions as early as possible to meet the instructional needs.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Presentation transcript:

Response to Intervention in New York State NYSCEA Meeting May 15, 2009 Noel Granger Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities (VESID)

What’s All the Buzz About? Response to Intervention (RtI) Provides high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and uses frequent and ongoing monitoring of student progress to make important instructional decisions about an individual student.

5/18/20153 Why RtI Provides appropriate learning for all studentsProvides appropriate learning for all students Uses school-wide progress monitoringUses school-wide progress monitoring Promotes early identification of potential problemsPromotes early identification of potential problems Uses multiple measures of performance, not measurement at a single point in timeUses multiple measures of performance, not measurement at a single point in time Can be used as a component of LD determinationCan be used as a component of LD determination

What curriculum areas are the focus of RtI?  Most research available in area of reading, especially in the early grades.  Most students with learning difficulties have problems in the area of reading.  RtI can be used in other content areas and for behavior.

5/18/20155 Principles of RtI System wide school approachSystem wide school approach Prevention and Early identificationPrevention and Early identification Universal ScreeningUniversal Screening

Multiple tiers of interventionMultiple tiers of intervention Progress monitoringProgress monitoring Decision making processDecision making process Design of service delivery modelDesign of service delivery model Principles of RtI, cont.

Parent involvementParent involvement Fidelity of implementationFidelity of implementation Professional DevelopmentProfessional Development Principles of RtI, cont.

5/18/20158 Schoolwide Systems Schoolwide Systems AcademicBehavioral Intensive InterventionsIntensive Individual Interventions Small Group InterventionsTargeted Group Interventions Scientific, Research Based Core Instruction Universal Interventions 1-5% 5-10% 80-90%

5/18/20159 Systemwide School Approach Systemic service delivery system whose goal is achievement of all studentsSystemic service delivery system whose goal is achievement of all students LeadershipLeadership CollaborationCollaboration Identification of current support systems to support RtI (e.g., PBIS)Identification of current support systems to support RtI (e.g., PBIS)

5/18/ Special Considerations Culturally and linguistically responsive instructionCulturally and linguistically responsive instruction Upper elementary, intermediate and secondary studentsUpper elementary, intermediate and secondary students Limited English Proficient/English Language LearnersLimited English Proficient/English Language Learners

5/18/ Tools to Guide Implementation School readiness surveySchool readiness survey Identification of screening toolsIdentification of screening tools Identification of research based reading instructionIdentification of research based reading instruction Decision-making process – problem solving or standard protocolDecision-making process – problem solving or standard protocol Implementation of a multi-tiered processImplementation of a multi-tiered process –Determination of cut-off points –Progress monitoring and analysis of data –Determination of appropriate interventions

5/18/ Professional Development Collaboration between general and special educatorsCollaboration between general and special educators Changing rolesChanging roles School leadershipSchool leadership Data gathering and data analysisData gathering and data analysis Identifying appropriate research-based instruction/interventionsIdentifying appropriate research-based instruction/interventions

IDEA Requirements Procedures to determine LD through RtI (or similar approach): Evaluation Data-based progress Student observation Written Report Group determination of disability

Regulatory Amendments (See final slides for specific regulatory language) Part 117 Part 100 Part 200 Effective on July 1, 2012 a school district must have an RtI process in place, as it may no longer use the severe discrepancy between achievement and intellectual ability to determine that a student in grades K-4 has a learning disability in the area of reading.

5/18/ Collaborative Effort Internal SED WorkgroupInternal SED Workgroup –VESID and P-16: Reading FirstReading First Regional School ImprovementRegional School Improvement Bilingual EducationBilingual Education Curriculum and Instruction and Instructional TechnologyCurriculum and Instruction and Instructional Technology –External Stakeholders

5/18/ Next Steps New York State RtI Technical Assistance CenterNew York State RtI Technical Assistance Center RtI Guidance DocumentsRtI Guidance Documents Grants to schools as pilot sitesGrants to schools as pilot sites

5/18/ NYS RtI Technical Assistance Center Contract: Awarded to Buffalo State College 5 year period: January 2009-December 2014 Mission: Support capacity-building efforts of NYS schools to implement proven and promising practices within a Response to Intervention model

5/18/ RtI Technical Assistance Center Goals Indirect Services: Compile/disseminate relevant & useful information, resources, and tools relative to RtI Provide indirect technical assistance (TA) & professional development (PD) to NYS schools on RtI-related topics

5/18/ RtI Technical Assistance Center Goals Direct Services: Technical Assistance & Professional Development to 14 VESID-identified schools NYS schools over 5 years –On-site TA by consortium member RtI Readiness Survey RtI Implementation Plan Periodic site-visits by consortium member –School-embedded professional development opportunities –Evaluation of RtI programs

5/18/ CONSORTIUM MEMBERS Dr. L. Strong College of St. Rose East Joan Miller MSMC Hudson Dr. K. Stahl NYU Dr. R. Vuhovic NYU Tanya Eckert Syracuse University Dr. S. Graney RIT Dr. A. Piper Fredonia CSD Dr. T. Janczak BSC

5/18/ Guidance Documents Guidance directed to professionalsGuidance directed to professionals Guidance written for parentsGuidance written for parents

Guidance Document Minimum Requirements of a Response to Intervention Program (RTI) –Appropriate Instruction –Screenings Applied to all Students in the Class –Instruction Matched to Student Need –Repeated Assessments of Student Achievement (Progress Monitoring) –Application of Student Information to Make Educational Decisions –Notification to Parents

Guidance Document School District Selection of Specific Structure and Components of an RtI Program Ensuring Staff Knowledge and Skills Necessary to Implement RtI Programs Use of Response to Intervention in Determination of Learning Disability Readings and References

Parent’s Guide to RtI What is Response to Intervention? What are the Steps in RtI? –Screening –Levels of support (tiers) –Progress monitoring –Information provided to parents Glossary References

5/18/ LEA Grants Request for applications (RFA)Request for applications (RFA) 2 Schools per region2 Schools per region Certain parameters for selectionCertain parameters for selection Priority areasPriority areas

5/18/ Resources/Links iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/resources.htmliris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/resources.html

Information Sources Federal Statute (PL ) Federal Regulations (300 CFR) State Laws and Regulations Materials from “National Research Center on Learning Disabilities” (NRCLD) National Center on Response to Intervention NASDSE publication on LD/RtI (revised 2007)

Part Diagnostic Screening Diagnostic Screening Screening in literacy, math, motor and cognitive developmentScreening in literacy, math, motor and cognitive development Students with low test scoresStudents with low test scores Review of instructional programs Review of instructional programs Periodic monitoring through screenings and on-going assessments Periodic monitoring through screenings and on-going assessments Instruction tailored to meet needs “with increasing intensive levels of targeted intervention and instruction” Instruction tailored to meet needs “with increasing intensive levels of targeted intervention and instruction” Written notification to parents Written notification to parents

Amendments to Parts 100 and 200 Section (ii) Section (ii) Response to Intervention Programs (RtI)Response to Intervention Programs (RtI) Section (b) Section (b) Board of Education RequirementsBoard of Education Requirements Section (j) - LD Procedures Section (j) - LD Procedures Individual EvaluationIndividual Evaluation Process for determining eligibilityProcess for determining eligibility Criteria for LD determinationsCriteria for LD determinations Documentation for eligibility determinationDocumentation for eligibility determination

Response to Intervention Section (ii) Minimum requirements of an RtI program: Minimum requirements of an RtI program: Appropriate instruction for all studentsAppropriate instruction for all students Scientific research-based reading programs Scientific research-based reading programs ScreeningsScreenings Instruction matched to student needInstruction matched to student need Increasing levels of intervention Increasing levels of intervention Repeated assessmentsRepeated assessments Application of information to make decisionsApplication of information to make decisions

Section (ii) Written notification to parentsWritten notification to parents Student performance data & gen. ed. services Student performance data & gen. ed. services Strategies to increase learning Strategies to increase learning Parents right to request evaluation Parents right to request evaluation

Section (ii) District selects RtI structure District selects RtI structure Criteria to determine levelsCriteria to determine levels Types of interventionsTypes of interventions Data to be collectedData to be collected Progress monitoringProgress monitoring Staff Development to implement RtI Staff Development to implement RtI

Contract for Excellence Allowable Program: Dedicated Instructional Time ( CR) 1. dedicated block(s) of time created for instruction; 2. research-based core instructional program; 3. a response-to-intervention program; and/or 4. individualized intensive intervention shall be provided.

Board of Education Policies and Practices Section 200.2(b) adopt written policy that establishes administrative practices and procedures for implementing school- wide approaches adopt written policy that establishes administrative practices and procedures for implementing school- wide approaches which may include a RtI process pursuant to 100.2(ii)which may include a RtI process pursuant to 100.2(ii)

Additional Procedures for Identifying Students with Learning Disabilities Section 200.4(j)

Evaluation (j) (1) Variety of assessment tools and strategies Variety of assessment tools and strategies No single procedure No single procedure Observation Observation From routine classroom instruction; orFrom routine classroom instruction; or Arrange to have observation conductedArrange to have observation conducted

Evaluation (j) (1) Underachievement is not due to lack of appropriate instruction, CSE must consider: Underachievement is not due to lack of appropriate instruction, CSE must consider: Data that demonstrates appropriate instruction in regular education settings delivered by qualified personnelData that demonstrates appropriate instruction in regular education settings delivered by qualified personnel Data-based documentation of repeated assessments reflecting student progress provided to parentsData-based documentation of repeated assessments reflecting student progress provided to parents

200.4 (j) (2) CSE makes determination of eligibility for special education for student suspected of having a learning disability. CSE must include: CSE makes determination of eligibility for special education for student suspected of having a learning disability. CSE must include: General Education TeacherGeneral Education Teacher Person qualified to conduct diagnostic examsPerson qualified to conduct diagnostic exams

Criteria – (j) (3) When provided with appropriate instruction, student does not achieve adequately for age, or grade level standards in one or more of the following: When provided with appropriate instruction, student does not achieve adequately for age, or grade level standards in one or more of the following: Oral expressionOral expression Listening comprehensionListening comprehension Written expressionWritten expression Basic reading skillsBasic reading skills Reading fluency skillsReading fluency skills Reading comprehensionReading comprehension Math calculationMath calculation Math problem solvingMath problem solving

Criteria – (j) (3) Student does not make sufficient progress when using RtI; orStudent does not make sufficient progress when using RtI; or Exhibits patterns of strengths and weaknesses:Exhibits patterns of strengths and weaknesses: Performance, achievement or both Performance, achievement or both Relative to age, grade-level standards, or intellectual development Relative to age, grade-level standards, or intellectual development

Documentation – (j) (5) Written report includes: Written report includes: Whether student has LDWhether student has LD Basis for determinationBasis for determination Relevant behaviorRelevant behavior Educationally relevant medical findingsEducationally relevant medical findings Student does not achieve adequately, andStudent does not achieve adequately, and Does not make sufficient progress, or Does not make sufficient progress, or Exhibits pattern of strengths and weaknesses Exhibits pattern of strengths and weaknesses Exclusion factorsExclusion factors

5/18/ (j) (4) Districts not prohibited from considering severe discrepancy model, except: Districts not prohibited from considering severe discrepancy model, except: Discrepancy model not allowed after 7/1/2012 forDiscrepancy model not allowed after 7/1/2012 for K-4 K-4 To determine LD in Reading To determine LD in Reading

Documentation – (j) (5) If RtI process is used: If RtI process is used: Instructional strategies used and data collected; andInstructional strategies used and data collected; and Parents notifiedParents notified