CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is Screening?
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Response to Intervention
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
May Dr. Schultz, Dr. Owen, Dr. Ryan, Dr. Stephens.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is a Multi-level Prevention System?
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
ICSD District RtI Committee Agenda 3/13/12 3:45- Review of Our Norms and today’s agenda 4:00- Defining RtI and screening tool criteria 4:30- Begin review.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
An Introduction to - PBIS in Roseburg Public Schools: RTI, Professional Learning Communities and How to Respond When Kids Don’t Learn.
Response to Intervention
PBIS Data Review: Presented by Susan Mack & Steven Vitto.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-based Reading Instruction Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
D62 Response to Intervention
Harry Wong Says Procedures are the Way to Go… Response to Intervention is a procedure-based system. It is also a problem solving system. Something isn’t.
High Plains Education Cooperative.  A Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS) is a term used in Kansas to describe how schools go about providing supports.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
Importance of Building Family and Community Engagement for Implementing a Multi-Tiered System of Support There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Opener Write an “elevator speech” –the amount of time spent on an elevator between floors—describing Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) to: Family.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
“Kids are here to maintain our humility.” Dr. Rob Horner
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Training Modules  Participants will understand… Progress Monitoring Graphing Data Data-Based Decisions Linking Cases to PS/RtI.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Progress Monitoring National Center on Response to Intervention.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
MTSS implementation: Perspectives from the National Center on Intensive Intervention Allison Gandhi, Ed.D. American Institutes for Research.
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Data-Based Decision Making
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Presentation transcript:

CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports Facilitative Leadership * * Continuous Improvement * Aligned Systems * Capacity Building curriculum instruction Few Some All assessment

Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series Unit 1: What is a Multi-Tiered System of Supports? d Unit 2: Data-based Decision Making Unit 3: Instructional Planning and Supports Unit 4: Leadership for Implementation of MTSS

Learning Objectives By the end of this unit, you will be able to: State the rationale for data-based decision making in MTSS Define and describe the importance of universal screening and progress monitoring Identify resources for screening and progress monitoring Describe strategies for analyzing data to guide intervention

Unit 1 Take Away Activity Multi-Tier System of Support (MTSS) By: Orla Higgins Averill, Claudia Rinaldi, Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative Using the graphic organizer in your Unit 2 Participant Packet, note: Features of RtI Features of PBIS Features of MTSS Steps necessary to bring MTSS to scale Talking Points: In order to more clearly understand the components of MTSS and the implementation process that will be highlighted in Unit 2, this Take Away Activity, will provide you with greater insight into the larger structural framework of supports that MTSS provides as well as a clearer understanding of the steps necessary to bring MTSS to scale at your school site. As you read the article, using the graphic organizer in your training packet, note the features of RtI, PBIS and MTSS. What steps are necessary for bringing MTSS to scale? Facilitator’s Notes Direct participant to handout #____, and instruct them to take notes and respond to the questions in the graphic organizer following the text of the article.

Review of Unit 1 Take Away Activity RtI Universal screening of all students Multiple tiers of intervention service delivery Problem-solving method Data-based decision making PBIS Multi-tiered, data-based approach to behavioral supports Utilizes integrated data collection and an assessment system to make informed decisions at each tier of service delivery MTSS Leverages the principles of RtI and PBIS Further integrates a continuum of system-wide resources, strategies, structures, and practices to offer a comprehensive and responsive framework for systemically addressing barriers to student learning Bringing MTSS to Scale Requires all district staff to change the way they have traditionally worked. Script: Features of RTI - practice of providing high-quality, multi-tier instruction and interventions matched to students’ needs, monitoring student progress frequently to make decisions about instructional methods, and evaluating routinely collected data on student progress to determine the need to refer for special education support • universal screening of all students, • multiple tiers of intervention service delivery, • a problem-solving method, and • an integrated data collection and assessment system to inform decisions at each tier of service delivery. Features of PBIS - preventative behavioral instruction is delivered to the whole school population in an effort to foster a positive school climate. • multi-tier, data-based approach to service delivery utilizing integrated data collection and assessment system to inform decisions at each tier of service delivery. • first tier includes teaching and reinforcing a set of appropriate behaviors within the whole school; • second tier efficiently activates behavioral interventions for students who do not respond to core instruction; and • third tier involves intensive, individualized behavior support plans for students who do not respond to primary or secondary prevention support

Time to Reflect Reflecting on your district or school What data for academics and behavior is being consistently collected? How is that data currently being used to guide services and supports? What additional data would be helpful to you as you plan to deliver instruction?

Essential RtI Components (NCRTI)

Essential Concepts CA MTSS RtI2 Addresses the needs of ALL Students Universal screening Multiple tiers of intervention Data-driven decision making Problem solving teams Focus on CCSS Aligns the entire system of initiatives, supports, and resources Implements continuous improvement processes at all levels of the system

Data-Based Decision Making: It’s Not Just For Individual Students District Level Objective data on student progress is used to Guide curriculum improvement Help educators recommend innovations and make decisions on how to sustain practices Support targeting services and supports across schools Guide the allocation of resources for professional development

District Level Box and Whisker Graph 90th %ile 200 75th %ile 50th %ile 175 25th %ile 150 10th %ile 100 Target 75 School A School B 50 School C 25 School D School E Composite Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3

Data-Based Decision Making: It’s Not Just For Individual Students School Site Level Objective data on student progress is used to Examine school and grade level trends Help determine the effectiveness of the curriculum and the fidelity of the instructional delivery

School Level Analyzing Growth by Ethnic Groups 140 Caucasian 120 Unidentified 100 Target Scores Words Read Correctly 80 Hispanic/Latino 60 African American 40 Asian 20 Fall Winter Spring

Data-Based Decision Making: It’s Not Just For Individual Students Grade/Course Level Identify trends in academic and social/behavioral areas in order to: Adjust instruction Evaluate the effectiveness of the curriculum at that grade level Set grade level goals Identify students who need additional assessment or instruction

Grade Level Analyzing Effects of Changes to Instruction Did Not Meet Criteria (Need More Intense Intervention) 100 90 80 15 70 32 Percent 60 47 Did Not Meet Criteria (Need Some Intervention) 50 40 30 53 53 53 80 20 Met Criteria for Established Benchmark 10 Fall Winter Spring

Universal Screening Evaluates whether students are on an appropriate learning trajectory Conducted with all students Answers the questions Is the core curriculum and instruction effective for all students? What additional assessments and/or instructional supports might be needed? Addresses both academic and behavioral performance

Academic Achievement Screening Purpose Identify which students might need additional supports Focus All students Tools Brief, valid, reliable, and evidence-based Timeframe Multiple times a year Typically fall, winter, and spring

Behavior Screening Attendance Grades Discipline referrals Teacher checklists Teacher referrals

Cut Score A score on a screening test that divides students who are considered potentially “at risk” from those who are considered not “at risk” Cut scores used to identify students as “at risk” may not be the same Method used to identify students who need supplemental support (National Center on Response to Intervention)

Establishing Cut Scores http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0lLkDicXZA (National Center on Response to Intervention)

Establishing Cut Scores Educationally relevant Based on logical practices Based on the likelihood of demonstrated mastery of core testing Benchmark testing Teams should ask: Do the screening tools we are using include national norms to establish cut scores? Do we have local norms from our own assessments that could be used as cut scores?

Benefits of District-Established Cut Scores May lead to more effective and efficient allocation of resources Allows district education teams to: Target schools with the greatest need Identify effective approaches for scaling up in other sites Make decisions about resources that are based on data Make decisions about resource allocation that are relevant and timely

Benefits of District-Established Cut Scores Increased use of data by schools and teachers Common message and focused activities Expectations across sites are clear and consistent Focus is on progress Increased access to supplemental supports

Universal Screening Resources Screening Tools Chart: http://www.rti4success.org/screeningTools/ (National Center of Response to Intervention)

Progress Monitoring Systematic method for tracking and comparing learning progression through data collection Involves a set of assessment procedures that determine the extent to which students are benefitting from instruction Evaluates the effectiveness of instruction Can be implemented with individual students or an entire class

Progress Monitoring Purpose Focus Tools Timeframe Monitor students’ response to interventions in order to Estimate rates of improvement Identify students who are not making progress Compare the success of different forms of instruction Focus Students who have been identified as “at risk” through the screening process Tools Brief, valid, reliable, and evidence-based Timeframe Monthly, weekly, or biweekly

Student Progress Data Should answer the following questions: Are students making progress at an acceptable rate that will allow them to meet the content standards? Are students meeting both short-term and long-term performance goals? Can the effectiveness of the intervention be supported by data and graphed? Does the instruction or intervention need to be adapted or changed?

Types of Progress Monitoring Diagnostic Conducted before instruction Measure current knowledge and skills for the purpose of planning instruction Formative Conducted during instruction Tell how well students are responding to instruction Summative Conducted after instruction Tell what a student has learned

Identify Students Not Making Adequate Progress Increasing Scores: Flat Scores: X Goal line Trend line X Goal line Trend line X X X X (NCRTI “What Is Progress Monitoring?” module 2012)

Progress Monitoring Resources Progress Monitoring Tools: http://www.rti4success.org/progressMonitoringTools/ (National Center of Response to Intervention)

Types of Decisions The Site Implementation Leadership Team asks: How effective is the instruction? What instructional changes need to be made? Are the supports provided in Tiers 2 and 3 successful for individual students? When should the team recommend additional assessments for possible identification of a disability? How does the team know the overall effectiveness of the core curriculum, instruction for all students, interventions, and the MTSS framework?

Decision Making Routines & Procedures The District Implementation Leadership Team should establish “Non-negotiable” areas in order to establish equity and consistency across the district Site level procedures and routines for the grade/course level teams to use when conducting data reviews Decision making processes Explicit decision rules for assessing student progress

Explicit Decision Rules Define what will guide the team when Less than 80% have reached the cut score Lack of progress is evident Student progress varies by target group Decision rules should be established at all levels

Data Reviews Conduct data reviews at logical, predetermined intervals Schedule data reviews prior to the beginning of instruction Use established meeting structures Involve relevant team members

Problem-Solving Process “…Problem-solving is a self-correcting, decision-making model focused on academic and/or behavioral intervention development and monitoring using frequently collected, measurable data on student performance. The problem-solving process should be rich in data collected, and can be repeated as necessary.” (The New Hampshire Response to Instruction Framework, 2012)

Continuous Improvement Problem-Solving Process 1. Plan 2. Do 3. Study 4. Act 5. Communicate

1. Plan Collect and analyze data Define the problem Develop a plan of action Define the evidence-based interventions that will be used Assign responsibilities to individual team members Identify the necessary materials and resources Create an implementation timeline

2. Do Implement the plan with fidelity Collect progress monitoring data to determine academic and behavioral success Examine the fidelity of the implementation

3. Study Analyze the progress monitoring data collected to determine the fidelity of implementation Determine if The student is making sufficient progress The instruction or intervention is effective

4. Act Make any necessary refinements to the plan to improve the chance of success Might involve Increasing the intensity of intervention Adjusting resources Increasing expectations Deciding that the student will benefit from less intensive intervention

5. Communicate Routine and frequent information sharing Communicate successes, challenges and lessons learned All teams have information that is useful in ensuring that MTSS is effective and sustainable

Take Away Activity Reflect on the data-driven instructional planning elements in your setting: How do universal screening and progress monitoring occur? Are teams established to examine student data in academics and behavior? Are team members trained in problem-solving processes to guide decisions?

Time to Reflect What did you learn in Unit 2? What questions do you have?

Unit 3 Preview Instructional practice Universal design for learning Differentiated instruction Accommodations Modifications