Department of Special Education August 3, 2010 iSTEEP Follow-up & Training Presented by: Raecheal Vizier, M.Ed. Special Education Program Effectiveness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Monitoring And RtI System
Advertisements

RTI Response to Intervention. Tier I Contents Review Review Paper work information Paper work information Procedures Procedures.
Tier III Meeting Outline. Roles of Team Members Coordinator –Set up meetings, contact parents, inform members of team about agenda, inform teachers about.
Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer Aimsweb support
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Jhanyce A. Acosta. What? * Fluency Assessment -a method of listening to students read aloud in order to gathering their data,
MEASURABLE ANNUAL GOAL Include: Condition, Name, Behavior, and Criteria (Refer to annotated IEP for description of these components.) Describe HOW the.
November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.
Building Level Benchmark Data This represents the percent of students who demonstrated the following proficiency levels on benchmark assessments. AP-Advanced.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
Progress Monitoring of Special Education Students Dr. Deirdre J. Osypuk Director SSS Bloomfield Public Schools.
Oregon Reading First IBR V - Cohort B Introduction to Lesson Progress Reports (LPRs)
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
 “Fluency assessment consists of listening to students read aloud and collecting information about their oral reading accuracy, rate, and prosody.” (Page.
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
Reading Maze General Outcome Measurement TES Data Meeting April, rd and 4 th Grades Cynthia Martin, ARI Reading Coach.
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Minnesota Center for Reading Research 175 Peik Hall 159 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN Contacts: Kathrin Maki:
Literacy Achievement Plans Adams 12 Five Star Schools A Guide to Initiating, Implementing, and Managing LAPS Revised October 2010.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
Progress Monitoring Cadre 8 Training February 6 th, 2012.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Middle Schools Winter, 2009.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Developing the Plan. Tier III Developing the Intervention Plan Developing the Intervention Plan.
Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
RTI Response to Intervention A View of the Ascension Experience.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Student Progress Monitoring and How Will it Help Me? Laura Florkey.
Training for Problem Solving Teams Susan Clay Jefferson County Board of Education Fall 2014.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
June 5, 2014 Michelle Burks - Elementary ELA Coordinator.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Elementary Middle School Expectation and Goal Setting Meeting June 26, 2009.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
RTI 2 Please write down three things you want to know before this session is done today.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support 21.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Overview of DRA2 (Developmental Reading Assessment) Middle School Presentation Cathy Rosso Stephanie Williams May 2012.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Progress Monitoring IEPs: Combining Well-Written Goals, Curriculum-Based Measurement and Technology Tools for Success Facilitated by Jennifer Gondek Instructional.
RTI Trends & Issues Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School District Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School.
Responsive Instruction at Algonkian Elementary October 1, 2013.
SSMT Progress Monitoring
What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a benchmark and progress monitoring system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Data Collection Challenge:
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
Improved Outcomes For All Children Progress Universal Monitoring
Response to Intervention = RTI
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
Ensuring Success for Every Reader
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

Department of Special Education August 3, 2010 iSTEEP Follow-up & Training Presented by: Raecheal Vizier, M.Ed. Special Education Program Effectiveness Liaison

Introduction “If You’re Riding A Horse and It Dies, Get OFF”

Why iSTEEP? “System to Enhance Educational Performance” 1. Identify or develop practices that have scientific merit. 2. Develop materials that make the practices "doable" and within reach of all types of schools. 3. Provide implementation services to help schools to use the practices with fidelity.

Benchmarking is the Universal Screening aspect of RTI. It allows teachers to see where their special education students performed in comparison to the whole school. Teachers can assess benchmarking data three times per year. Progress monitoring allows teachers to specifically monitor students on their targeted area of need (fluency, comprehension, etc.). This will allow teachers to determine if intervention is working and make adjustments as needed.

Identifying Needs Universal screening will be done by the RTI team using iSTEEP benchmarking materials for all middle school students and all 9 th grade high school students. The benchmarking maze is a 3 minute timed assessment which evaluates students reading comprehension skills.

Identifying “At Risk” Students After grading the benchmarking, data will be entered in the iSTEEP computer system. This will be done three times per year. (fall, winter, spring) The iSTEEP system will determine the placement of students in levels/zones: – Red (frustration)- lowest performers – Yellow (instructional)- performing at instructional level – Green (Mastery) performing above level

Special Education Component Get the school wide report identifying zones (red, yellow, green). Identify where your special education students are. Those who placed in the green and yellow zone will be monitored using the iSTEEP comprehension maze twice a month.

Progress Monitoring: Maze Teachers & trained paras will give the comprehension maze to students twice a month. Follow the instructions for Maze Assessment. It is a 3 minute timed maze (students do not receive modifications/accommodations on probes). The hard copies of all probes will be kept on file for each student, not in the IEP folder.

Maze Continued: All progress monitoring data will be placed into the iSTEEP computer system in a timely fashion each month. If you determine that the student didn’t do there best, repeat the maze (can’t do/won’t do). Follow instructions for that process. Once you are finished with benchmarking and you have determined the intervention program, teacher, how often, and time, you must complete the iSTEEP instructional planning worksheet. This must be done on all students.

Progress Monitoring: Fluency All red zone students will have to complete the middle school fluency probe. Teachers and trained paras will have to complete the “Finding the Reading Level” on all students who placed in the red (frustration) level. This is done one-on-one with each student. Start at Passage 5a and go down. Remember you must take the medium of three probes and following the guidelines on the form.

Fluency Continued: Once you have completed the “Score Entry Form Finding the Reading Level”, you have determine the oral reading fluency level to which probes will be done. You will need to complete the iSTEEP instructional planning worksheet outlining data, intervention program, teacher and time. Fluency probes will be done at least twice per month. Each students will complete three ORF probes and you will take the medium of the three scores.

Fluency Continued: The special education mandate is to progress monitor fluency twice a month. However, if any student is reading at or below a 3 rd grade level, you are encouraged to progress monitor those students weekly. You will need to carefully monitor these students progress. Data will be enter into the iSTEEP computer system in a timely fashion. Hard copies of progress monitoring probes will be kept on file not in IEP folders.

Data Driven Decisions The iSTEEP system allows you to collect, analyze, and print data in a timely fashion. Teachers should carefully monitor and assess students’ progress monitoring data points. Using the data, teachers determine whether program/strategy is working or if it needs to be changed. Once a student has three data points under the aim line, an adjustment must be made.

What do I do with data? Teachers are encouraged to review graphs with students in an effort encourage them to monitor their own progress (watch the points go up or down). Teachers are encouraged to send graphs home each nine weeks in report cards. Parents are more likely to understand a graph then written paperwork. Teachers should use graphs during IEP meetings, re-evals, RTI meetings etc. All graphs and reports should be printed and placed in the IEP folder at the end of each school year.

For Math… Follow the same procedures: – Benchmarking three times per year – Progress monitoring twice per month Basic facts or mixed probes – Input data in to iSTEEP computer system – Print graphs as noted before

Specific to High Schools Benchmark 9 th grade for reading and math Follow the same procedures as noted before. If students test out based on the benchmarking, then progress monitoring should occur through their intervention programs.

“You Know You’re a Teacher If…”

Closure iSTEEP Contact Person: Specific to each school (Literacy Coach/Interventionist) Questions Comments “You can teach a student a lesson for a day; but if you can teach him to learn by creating curiosity, he will continue the learning process as long as he lives.” ~Clay P. Bedford