Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
RtI Response to Intervention
Data Collection Benchmark (CBM Family) Progress Monitoring Interventions Tiers Training/Materials Problem Solving Model Allocation of Resources.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
What is RTI? RTI is a general education initiative aimed at improving student performance through the use of effective scientific research-based instructional.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention This ppt is an adaptation of a specific PISD Training on RTI, The Educational Testing and.
Help for Struggling Students. “RTI” stands for “Responsiveness to Instruction” Tier 1: Core instruction, sufficient for 80-90% of students.
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Ventura County SELPA Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses (PSW) Model: An Overview This PowerPoint is provided as an overview to the Ventura County SELPA.
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
The Evaluation Report A Guide Summer First Page Date of Report: – The Date of Report is the date all of the information is compiled and the report.
Considerations in Determining Primary Disability Speech Language Impairment or Specific Learning Disability.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
 Kingsport City Schools.  The RTI² framework allows for an integrated, seamless problem-solving model that addresses individual student need.  This.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Orientation to Special Education From Referral to Eligibility.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
EC CHAIRPERSON/PSYCHOLOGIST MEETING Helpful Tips re: Interventions.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
New Eligibility Requirements for Special Education Karen Johnson Leigh Ann Roderick August 1, 2012.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Progress Monitoring for All Student Adapted from the Kentucky Systems of Interventions Guidance Document.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The RTI² framework is aligned with the special population department’s beliefs and allows for an integrated, seamless problem-solving.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.
Evaluation and Eligibility Using RTI Crook County School District February 26, 2010.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Under 34 CFR , the public agency must conduct a full and individual evaluation Under 34 CFR , the public agency must ensure: The child is.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
Referral Made Like any other disability determination under IDEA, can’t be based on any single criterion – meaning a single test, assessment, observation,
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Information taken from the Kansas Special Education Process handbook. See
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Pre-Referral to Special Education: Considerations
Understanding the IEP Process
Response to Intervention
Specific Learning Disability: Guidelines
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Special Education Process
Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility

What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive research- based instructional interventions

What is Tiered Intervention? Tier 1 – Core Curriculum Tier 2 – Supplementary Interventions Tier 3 – Intensive Interventions (Tier 4 – Special Education)

What if a student does not respond to intervention? A special Education Referral may be made Areas of concern may include:  Basic reading skills  Reading comprehension  Reading fluency  Math calculation  Math problem solving  Written expression  Oral expression  Listening comprehension

What information is needed to make a special education referral?

Parent Notification  Must document that parents were notified of the following: –The amount and nature of data to be collected and general education services (intervention) provided. –Strategies to be used to increase the students learning. –Their right to request an evaluation –Parents were provided data-based documentation of repeated assessments at reasonable intervals during the intervention period

Information regarding TIER 1 Interventions  Documentation of core instruction provided for each area of concern –Evidence based curriculum –Effective for most students –Taught by qualified personnel Documentation of differentiation of the core curriculum instruction and it’s effectiveness

Information regarding TIER 1 Interventions  Documentation of core instruction provided – for each area of concern How do I document Evidence based curriculum?  Name of curriculum used  Provided in the general education classroom  Duration, Frequency and Intensity (minutes per session)

Information regarding TIER 1 Interventions  Documentation of core instruction provided for each area of concern How do I document the curriculum is Effective for most students? Data documenting approximately 80% of students meet grade level benchmarks  ISAT  IRI  Grade level CBM  Other (Name of assessment, Area Assessed, Date, Benchmark, Percentage of grade level peers meeting benchmark, Target student performance level.)

Information regarding TIER 1 Interventions  Documentation of core instruction provided for each area of concern How do I document differentiation of the core curriculum instruction and it’s effectiveness?  Narrative - Describe what was tried - How was effectiveness determined?

Information regarding TIER 2 Interventions  Documentation of Tier 2 interventions for each area of concern  Baseline data in each area of concern.  Description of intervention provided  Duration, intensity, frequency of intervention (Approximately 6-8 weeks)  Data is collected every two weeks during intervention period and compared to growth of other students.  Dates and Changes made to intervention  Description of effectiveness of the intervention

Information regarding TIER 2 Interventions Graphing the Data Progress monitoring graph for each academic area of concern Aimline Trendline Decision Points Student’s rate of Improvement Grade level/Class peers

Information regarding TIER 3 Interventions  Description of intensive intervention provided for each area of concern  Duration, intensity, frequency of intervention (Approximately 6-8 weeks)  Data collected every week during intensive intervention period and compared to growth of other students.  Dates and Changes made to intervention  Description of effectiveness of the intervention

Information regarding TIER 3 Interventions Graphing the Data Progress monitoring graph for each academic area of concern Aimline Trendline Decision Points Student’s rate of Improvement Grade level/Class peers

Weeks Words Correct Per Minute Continue Intervention and Monitor Progress Class=24 Egbert=11 Class Growth Egbert goal line Change Intervention Change Goal

Weeks Words Correct Per Minute Implement Second Intervention Revision and Monitor Results Class Growth Change Intervention

Culturally Diverse and English Language Learners Progress documenting the students growth and compared against their subgroup progress. Percentage of Disaggregated Group Level Peers meeting performance benchmark.

Referral to Special Education If adequate progress is not made in general education interventions: –A special education referral may be made. –Consent for Assessment – Procedural Safeguards –60 Day timeline begins RTI cannot delay a parents’ request for an evaluation.

Therefore, If a parent or outside agency is requesting an evaluation you still have to collect the required referral elements –In rare instances, this may happen after consent is signed or during the 60 day assessment period –Best practice is to provide appropriate interventions and progress monitoring with fidelity prior to referral to MDT

Exclusionary Factors Exclusionary factors should be considered throughout the evaluation process. If any exclusionary factor is found to be a primary factor in the student’s learning difficulty, the student may not be found eligible under the category of Specific Learning Disability –cultural or linguistic differences –insufficient instruction –attendance problems (for initial evaluation only) –lack of motivation –fatigue –emotional disturbance –cognitive impairments –performance anxiety –psychiatric disorders –sensory impairments –medical conditions, etc…

Special Education Evaluation Resource teacher assesses the student in the specific area(s) of concern. (Standardized testing/academic achievement) The school psychologist assesses related processing skills. (Demonstrate the impact of the psychological process on the academic achievement deficit area.)

Evaluation Process  The MDT also considers the preponderance of evidence (standardized testing, RTI data, statewide assessments, grades, CBM’s, observations, ESL data, etc.) to support the student’s pattern of strengths and weaknesses.

Adverse Effect  The team then determines the adverse effect that the student’s Specific Learning Disability has on his or her:  Educational performance in the general education curriculum  Ability to meet grade level achievement standards  Gen.Ed. Teacher provides input regarding how the child is impacted in classroom activities.

Specially Designed Instruction  The team then describes the Specially Designed Instruction necessary for the student to be able to access and progress in the general education curriculum and grade level achievement standards.

Eligibility is Determined Using State SLD Eligibility Criteria, the team will determine whether or not the student meets criteria for the SLD eligibility category. If determined eligible an IEP will be created and parents can choose to place their child in special education or choose to deny services.

Tier 4 The IEP is tailored to match the identified processing deficits and academic deficits (PLOP and goals are written for each specific area).