‘Dark Side’ The ‘Dark Side’ of Gamma-Ray Bursts and Implications for Nucleosynthesis neutron capture elements (‘n-process’) light elements (spallation?)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GRB PRODUCTION & SN SIGNATURES IN SLOWLY ROTATING COLLAPSARS. Diego Lopez-Camara Instituto de Astronomía (UNAM), Mexico City. In collaboration with William.
Advertisements

The Science of Gamma-Ray Bursts: caution, extreme physics at play Bruce Gendre ARTEMIS.
Who are the usual suspects? Type I Supernovae No fusion in white dwarf, star is supported only by electron degeneracy pressure. This sets max mass for.
Ryo Yamazaki (Osaka University, Japan) With K. Ioka, F. Takahara, and N. Shibazaki.
Accretion Processes in GRBs Andrew King Theoretical Astrophysics Group, University of Leicester, UK Venice 2006.
Gamma-Ray bursts from binary neutron star mergers Roland Oechslin MPA Garching, SFB/TR 7 SFB/TR7 Albert Einstein‘s Century, Paris,
Supernovae Supernova Remnants Gamma-Ray Bursts. Summary of Post-Main-Sequence Evolution of Stars M > 8 M sun M < 4 M sun Subsequent ignition of nuclear.
The evolution and collapse of BH forming stars Chris Fryer (LANL/UA)  Formation scenarios – If we form them, they will form BHs.  Stellar evolution:
From Progenitor to Afterlife Roger Chevalier SN 1987AHST/SINS.
Raffaella Margutti Harvard – Institute for Theory and Computation On behalf of the Harvard SN forensic team Kyoto2013 What happens when jets barely break.
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Tsvi Piran Re’em Sari 2nd EUL Workshop on Gamma-Ray Bursts.
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Re’em Sari Tsvi Piran GRBs in the Era of Rapid Follow-up.
Off axis counterparts of SGRBs tagged by gravitational waves Kazumi Kashiyama (Penn State) with K.Ioka, T.Nakamura and P. Meszaros.
New Frontiers in Nuclear and Particle Astrophysics: Time varying quarks MHD Jets Neutrino Mass Hierarchy G. J. Mathews – UND OMEG5-I Nov. 18, 2011 NAOJ,
Gamma-Ray Burst Jets: dynamics and interaction with the progenitor star Davide Lazzati, Brian Morsony, and Mitch Begelman JILA - University of Colorado.
Neutron Star Formation and the Supernova Engine Bounce Masses Mass at Explosion Fallback.
Reverse Shocks and Prompt Emission Mark Bandstra Astro
Spectral Energy Correlations in BATSE long GRB Guido Barbiellini and Francesco Longo University and INFN, Trieste In collaboration with A.Celotti and Z.Bosnjak.
GLAST Science LunchDec 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/21 Can emission at higher energies provide insight into the physics of shocks and how the GRB inner.
The s-process Fe Co Ni Rb Ga Ge Zn Cu Se Br As Zr Y Sr Kr (n,  ) ()() ()() r-process p-process 63 Ni, t 1/2 =100 a 64 Cu, t 1/2 =12 h, 40 % (
X-ray/Optical flares in Gamma-Ray Bursts Daming Wei ( Purple Mountain Observatory, China)
A Radio Perspective on the GRB-SN Connection Alicia Soderberg May 25, 2005 – Zwicky Conference.
G.E. Romero Instituto Aregntino de Radioastronomía (IAR), Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas, University of La Plata, Argentina.
Ehud Nakar California Institute of Technology Gamma-Ray Bursts and GLAST GLAST at UCLA May 22.
Phy Spring20051 Rp-process Nuclosynthesis in Type I X-ray Bursts A.M. Amthor Church of Christ, Kingdom of Heaven National Superconducting Cyclotron.
 The GRB literature has been convolved with my brain 
Gamma Ray Bursts and LIGO Emelie Harstad University of Oregon HEP Group Meeting Aug 6, 2007.
Collapse of Massive Stars A.MacFadyen Caltech. Muller (1999) “Delayed” SN Explosion acac Accretion vs. Neutrino heating Burrows (2001)
Modeling GRB B Xuefeng Wu (X. F. Wu, 吴雪峰 ) Penn State University Purple Mountain Observatory 2008 Nanjing GRB Workshop, Nanjing, China, June
Cosmic Rays Discovery of cosmic rays Local measurements Gamma-ray sky (and radio sky) Origin of cosmic rays.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: The Biggest Explosions Since the Big Bang Edo Berger.
The Propagation and Eruption of Relativistic Jets from the Stellar Progenitors of Gamma-Ray Bursts W. Zhang, S. E. Woosley, & A. Heger 2004, ApJ, 608,
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts. Summary of Post-Main-Sequence Evolution of Stars M > 8 M sun M < 4 M sun Subsequent ignition of nuclear reactions involving.
Gamma-Ray Bursts from Radiation-Dominated Jet? Kunihito Ioka (KEK) T. Inoue, Asano & KI, arXiv: KI, arXiv: Suwa & KI, arXiv:
The Collapsar Model for Gamma-Ray Bursts * S. E. Woosley (UCSC) Weiqun Zhang (UCSC) Alex Heger (Univ. Chicago)
Gamma Ray Bursts Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.
Collapsar Accretion and the Gamma-Ray Burst X-Ray Light Curve Chris Lindner Milos Milosavljevic, Sean M. Couch, Pawan Kumar.
The Early Time Properties of GRBs : Canonical Afterglow and the Importance of Prolonged Central Engine Activity Andrea Melandri Collaborators : C.G.Mundell,
A numerical study of the afterglow emission from GRB double-sided jets Collaborators Y. F. Huang, S. W. Kong Xin Wang Department of Astronomy, Nanjing.
1 Physics of GRB Prompt emission Asaf Pe’er University of Amsterdam September 2005.
Neutrino Cooled Accretion Disk as the Central Engine of Gamma Ray Bursts N. Kawanaka, S. Mineshige & S. Nagataki (Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics)
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) Eildert Slim. Timeline of the Universe 0 sec Big Bang: Start of the expansion secPlanck-time: Gravity splits off.
1/15 The r-Process in the High- Entropy-Wind of Type II SNe K. Farouqi Inst. für Kernchemie Univ. Mainz, Germany Frontiers Workshop August
New Nuclear and Weak Physics in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Christel Smith Arizona State University Arizona State University Erice, Italy September 17, 2010.
BH Astrophys. Ch3.6. Outline 1. Some basic knowledge about GRBs 2. Long Gamma Ray Bursts (LGRBs) - Why so luminous? - What’s the geometry? - The life.
Gamma-Ray Bursts Energy problem and beaming * Mergers versus collapsars GRB host galaxies and locations within galaxy Supernova connection Fireball model.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
Gamma-ray Bursts and Particle Acceleration Katsuaki Asano (Tokyo Institute of Technology) S.Inoue ( NAOJ ), P.Meszaros ( PSU )
Hyperaccreting Disks around Neutrons Stars and Magnetars for GRBs: Neutrino Annihilation and Strong Magnetic Fields Dong Zhang (Ohio State) Zi-Gao Dai.
Selected Topics in Astrophysics
Magneto-hydrodynamic Simulations of Collapsars Shin-ichiro Fujimoto (Kumamoto National College of Technology), Collaborators: Kei Kotake(NAOJ), Sho-ichi.
The Vigorous Afterlife of Massive Stars Kristen Menou Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP)
Stellar Spectroscopy and Elemental Abundances Definitions Solar Abundances Relative Abundances Origin of Elements 1.
Gamma-Ray Bursts. Short (sub-second to minutes) flashes of gamma- rays, for ~ 30 years not associated with any counterparts in other wavelength bands.
(Review) K. Ioka (Osaka U.) 1.Short review of GRBs 2.HE  from GRB 3.HE  from Afterglow 4.Summary.
Gamma-ray Bursts from Synchrotron Self-Compton Emission Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland Boris Stern AstroSpace Center, Lebedev Phys. Inst., Moscow,
Formation of BH-Disk system via PopIII core collapse in full GR National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Yuichiro Sekiguchi.
Radio afterglows of Gamma Ray Bursts Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics - Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Collaborator: Dale.
Waseda univ. Yamada lab. D1 Chinami Kato
the s process: messages from stellar He burning
Star Formation Nucleosynthesis in Stars
Rebecca Surman Union College
Mysterious Abundances in Metal-poor Stars & The ν-p process
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
N. Tominaga, H. Umeda, K. Maeda, K. Nomoto (Univ. of Tokyo),
Observations: Cosmic rays
Prompt Emission of Gamma-ray Bursts
Supernova Nucleosynthesis and Extremely Metal-Poor Stars
Nucleosynthesis in Early Massive Stars: Origin of Heavy Elements
Nucleosynthesis in jets from Collapsars
Presentation transcript:

‘Dark Side’ The ‘Dark Side’ of Gamma-Ray Bursts and Implications for Nucleosynthesis neutron capture elements (‘n-process’) light elements (spallation?) ApJ (2003) 595, 294 Susumu Inoue Nucleosynthesis in Baryon-Rich Outflows Associated with GRBs in collaboration with Nobuyuki Iwamoto (U. Tokyo) Manabu Orito (Tokyo Inst. Tech.) Mariko Terasawa (CNS) ‘Dark Side’

outflows in GRBs ultrarelativistic (  >100), baryon-poor (M<10 -4 M ◎ ) outflow E=  c 2 Meszaros ‘01 massive star core collapse, compact binary, etc… → hot T 0 >~MeV, thick   ~  e ≫ 1, n-rich initial conditions → expansion → nucleosynthesis?  GRB jet → limited nucleosynthesis (small amounts of D, 4 He) Lemoine 02, Pruet, et al 02, Beloborodov 03 entropy/baryon s/k b =4  m p c 2 /3T 0 ~1250  T 0 /1MeV   dimensionless entropy 〜 final Lorentz factor  =L/Mc 2. baryon-rich outflow (BRO)    → much more interesting! (n-capture elements, up to Pt, Au, U?)

dark side evidence for the dark side of GRBs (baryon-rich outflows) generic initial conditions for central engine → nucleosynthesis likely! optically thick   ~  e ≫ 1 high temperature T>~MeV → expansion high neutron fraction in most models Pruet, Woosley, Hoffman ‘02 L=  c 2. numerical simulations of jet propagation in collapsars Zhang, Woosley & Heger ‘03 significant energy in peripheral, low  outflow → X-ray flashes, statistics of afterglow light curve breaks

dark side evidence for the dark side of GRBs (baryon-rich outflows) generic initial conditions for central engine → nucleosynthesis likely! optically thick   ~  e ≫ 1 high temperature T>~MeV → expansion high neutron fraction in most models Pruet, Woosley, Hoffman ‘02 L=  c 2. observations! of low  outflow in GRB030329/SN2003dh Berger et al. ‘03, Nature, 426, 154 dominant energy in peripheral, low  (~a few) outflow → dark energy rules (at least in some GRBs) !

dark side evidence for the dark side of GRBs (baryon-rich outflows) generic initial conditions for central engine → nucleosynthesis likely! optically thick   ~  e ≫ 1 high temperature T>~MeV → expansion high neutron fraction in most models Pruet, Woosley, Hoffman ‘02 L=  c 2. numerical simulations of jet propagation in collapsars Zhang, Woosley & Heger ‘03 example of failed GRB → GRB-less hypernovae?

parameters L =10 52 erg/s luminosity r 0 =10 7 cm central engine radius  =L/Mc 2 dimensionless entropy Y e =(n n /n p +1) -1 initial electron fraction. log t’ [s] (comoving time) log T [MeV]  =2  =10 2  =10  =10 3  T log  [g cm -3 ] fireball  &T profile (comoving frame trajectory) exponential power-law start from the simplest dynamical model: spherical, adiabatic, freely expanding thermally-driven steady flow choose  2 (M~10 -2 M ◎ ) relativistic limit, validity of fireball model

parameters L =10 52 erg/s luminosity r 0 =10 7 cm central engine radius  =L/Mc 2 dimensionless entropy Y e =(n n /n p +1) -1 initial electron fraction. log t’ [s] (comoving time) log T [MeV]  =2  =10 2  =10  =10 3  T log  [g cm -3 ] fireball  &T profile (comoving frame trajectory) exponential power-law start from the simplest dynamical model: spherical, adiabatic, freely expanding thermally-driven steady flow choose  2 (M~10 -2 M ◎ ) relativistic limit, validity of fireball model nuclear reaction network >3000 n-rich species inclusion of light n-rich nuclei (Terasawa et al. ‘01) crucial for n-rich, rapid expansion

 =100, Y e =0.4  T9 D2 He4 n p B11 Be9 T3 He3 Li7 s/k b ~10 5,  0 ~ g/cm 3 some D, 4 He production freezeout t’>~1ms not very exciting…  T9 D2 He4 n p B11 Be9 T3 He3 Li7 reactions continue, t’>~100s, A>16 and beyond late D production by n decay → p(n,  )d a lot more interesting!  =2, Y e =0.4 s/k b ~2500,  0 ~ g/cm 3

Y e =0.1,  =2 near r-process (n-dripline) path flow > 3rd peak → fission cycling? abundance at peaks Y 1 <<Y 2 ~Y 3 ~10 -6, neutrons remaining s/k b ~2000  0 ~ g/cm 3 NS mergers? high M, low  disks?.

Y e =0.4,  =2 intermediate path > 2nd peak small flow > 3rd peak abundance at peaks Y 1 ~10 -7,Y 2 ~10 -6,Y 3 ~10 -8, neutrons remaining low M, high  disks?.

final heavy element abundances  =2, Y e = Ye= Ye= Ye= Ye= Ye= solar total arbitrary norm. production up to actinides for Y e <~0.4 → fission cycling? peaks intermediate between r & s (n-process) abundances at peaks Y p ~10 -6 for Y e <~0.4; small flow to high A for Y e ~0.5 neutrons always remaining → external n-capture process?

heavy element abundances vs. observations GRB-BRO (  =2) peak abundance Y F ~10 -6 ejected mass M F ~10 -2 M ◎ SN -driven wind peak abundance Y SN ~10 -4 ejected mass M SN ~10 -4 M ◎ Galactic abundances? assume: event rate R F ~ /yr/gal ~1-10 R GRB (f  =10 -3 ) ~ R SN M Gal =10 11 M ◎, t Gal =10 10 yr Y Gal =Y F M F R F t Gal /M Gal ~ ~ × solar pattern different from SN → contribution to some Galactic elements? comparable per event! kinetic energy E F = erg

heavy element abundances vs. observations GRB-BRO (  =2) peak abundance Y F ~10 -6 ejected mass M F ~10 -2 M ◎ SN -driven wind peak abundance Y SN ~10 -4 ejected mass M SN ~10 -4 M ◎ metal poor stars? assume: f MPS =M F /M sh ~ event dilution factor (M sh = M ◎ mass of mixing shell) Y MPS =f MPS Y F ~ ~ × solar association with most massive stars → prominent contribution at low Fe/H? comparable per event! kinetic energy E F = erg

assume: f bin =f cap M F /M mix ~ binary dilution factor (M mix = M ◎ mass of mixing zone) BH binary companion surface Y bin =f bin Y F ~ ≫ solar! (Y ◎ ~ ) sensitivity to Y e → probe of GRB central engine conditions? c.f. GRO J Israelian et al. (1999) BH companion heavy element abundances vs. observations GRB-BRO (  =2) peak abundance Y F ~10 -6 ejected mass M F ~10 -2 M ◎ SN -driven wind peak abundance Y SN ~10 -4 ejected mass M SN ~10 -4 M ◎ comparable per event! kinetic energy E F = erg

next directions need good understanding of central engine… but we don’t more realistic dynamical conditions, microphysics ( → more nucleosynthesis? r-process pattern?) non-relativistic, collimation, … -interactions, fission, p-rich heavy nuclei,, … Pruet, Woosley & Hoffman 03, Pruet, Surman & McLaughlin 03… BH accretion disk models? modeling of ‘wind’ difficult… interaction with external matter (spallation, external n-capture, etc)… crude estimate M CO ~10M ◎ r~10 10 cm X L ~n BRO  (p+CO->L) r p (GeV) f   ~ CO e.g. p+CO->Li, Be, B contact discont. forward shock p CO C+O->L? Si, Fe layers? streaming neutrons? after shock established:

Summary low  baryon-rich outflows (the dark side) of GRBs synthesize heavy n-capture elements up to the actinides induce ‘n-process’ (intermediate between r & s) synthesize some light elements D, Li, Be, B much more by spallation? baryon-poor, ultrarelativistic outflows (successful GRBs): not much happens… heavy n-capture elements possibly observable in: Galactic abundances, metal poor stars BH binary companions → probe of GRB central engine conditions? baryon-rich, mildly relativistic outflows (circum-jet winds or failed GRBs) can: observational implications Something interesting may be going on in places not readily seen! energetically important (often dominant) interesting for nucleosynthesis