Licences for Europe Workgroup 3 Presentation on Collective Management Organisations (CMOs) 18 April 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Orphan works and the cultural sector. A governmental organisation perspective Rossella Caffo Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali – Italy Coordinator.
Advertisements

Oxford Media Convention 2006 Rights and revenue models: what IP model for public service communications?
1 Licences for Europe Working Group 3 Sub-group: Scope of potential for the WG to promote solutions with regard to television archives Helen Keefe, April.
Member States' Expert Group on Digitisation and Digital Preservation – 13. December 2007 Jakob H. Petersen Head of Division Danish Library Agency
Role of PLS in Text and Data Mining Licences for Europe WG4 Friday 8 th March 2013 Sarah Faulder Chief Executive Publishers Licensing Society
Relevance of Copyright & Related Rights for SMEs Copyright industries SMEs as user and/or owner/creator Basics and role of copyright Digital age.
Levies on Reprographic devices to compensate authors and publishers Olav Stokkmo, Chief Executive, IFRRO 6 April 2011Polska Kziaska conference, Krakow.
Copyright licensing: a virtuous circle Peter Shepherd
Accessing Cultural Heritage Out-of-Commerce Works MoU Olav Stokkmo, CEO of IFRRO Licence for Europe WG 3 4 March 2013,Brussels.
Accessing Cultural Heritage The Role of Collective Management Olav Stokkmo, CEO of IFRRO ARIPO-IFRRO-NCC-Repronig-WIPO conference, 17 September 2013,Lagos.
Permissions Clearance and Costs: Fair Use and Fair Dealing Lynette Owen, Copyright Director, Pearson Education Ltd, United Kingdom.
Vivien Irish, Patent Attorney, WIPO and TPI, January 2005 Copyright and related issues for SMEs Vivien Irish Consultant Patent Attorney.
Polish Copyright Forum and orphan works Katarzyna Ślaska National Library of Poland.
Piero Attanasio Associazione Italiana Editori Access to books – European publishers’ view Krakow, 5 April 2011 Conference: Use of Books and.
1 Information Online 2009 Rights management – does copyright still matter in the 21st century? 20 January, 2009 Caroline Morgan General Manager, Corporate.
Obtaining Permission to use Copyrighted Materials Insert Date Insert Instructors’ Names / Titles The following slides are based on the work of the UCLA.
Licences for Europe WG 3: Audiovisual Presentation of a licensing structure: Copydan AV, Denmark Peter Schønning 18 April 2013.
"Open Europe: Open Data for Open Society" Selected legal barriers for Open data results from Lapsi 2.0 best practices in IP.
Key Functions and Operation of RROs Lagos, 17 September 2013 Madeleine Pow International Rights Manager UK Copyright Licensing Agency.
Copyright for Songwriters and Composers. Protects the form of expression of ideas but not the ideas themselves. It builds a system where authors are rewarded.
Accessing Cultural Heritage The Role of Collective Management Rainer Just, President of IFRRO August 2013Bangkok, Thailand.
The FastTrack network: Overview and Aims Antonio Brunetti Fabrizio Zavagli AXMEDIS –Conference Florence 1 December 2005.
The ERA Licensing Scheme from April 2014 Broadcast & Copyright in Education BUFVC AGM Helen Nicholson 29 November 2013.
DIRECTIVE 2003/98/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information (PSI directive) Theory.
IFRRO and the Work of the Reproduction Rights Organisation - RRO Olav Stokkmo, IFRRO Chief Executive 6 April 2011Polska Kziaksa, Krakow.
P2P file-sharing and collective management Séverine Dusollier University of Namur CRID.
MoU On Out of Commerce Books and Learned Journals Jerker Rydén Senior Legal Adviser National Library of Sweden.
Preserving our audiovisual heritage Plan for a national television and radio archive.
Making cultural heritage available to the public Managing Orphan and Out-of-Print Works Olav Stokkmo, Chief Executive, IFRRO 5 April 2011Polska Kziaska.
IFRRO Legal Issues Forum Brussels – 9 June 2011 Martin Delaney Legal Director.
1 Copyright Issues Considerations for Educational Designers: The Big Picture Created by DETA and adapted by SBIT Library 2009.
1 Wizards of OS 3 The Future of the Digital Commons Berlin - June 10 to 12, 2004 International Copyright in the Digital Era Geidy Lung WIPO Copyright Law.
Global Meeting on Emerging Copyright Licensing Modalities - Facilitating Access to Culture in the Digital Age Making Orphan Works Available: a Licensing.
Copyright and EMu: Some thoughts on using the rights module Emily Hudson 5 th Australasian EMu User Group Meeting National Museum.
Licences for Europe WG 3: Public Broadcaster Perspective 4 March 2013, Helen Keefe Audiovisual and film heritage institutions.
Controlling and monetising press cuttings Ljubljana, 2011.
Local content in a Europeana cloud Kate Fernie, 2Culture Associates, Project Manager LoCloud is funded by the European Commission's ICT Policy Support.
 Copyright Collective - Not for profit company  Established 1988 by PANZ in response to copyright abuse  Jointly owned PANZ/NZSA  Member of IFRRO.
Library Privileges and Educational Freedoms: Limits, Limitations and Licenses Prof. P. Bernt Hugenholtz Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam.
Directive on the Authorisation of electronic communications networks & Services Directive (2002/20/EC) Authorisation Directive Presented by: Nelisa Gwele.
October 2010 Music Publishing Overview. 2 Overview of Music Publishing Music Publishing is the business of acquiring, administering and exploiting rights.
Copyright Law for Archivists Georgia Harper University of Texas System.
Facilitate Authors’ Rights Access for Audiovisual Media in Europe.
China July 2004 The European Union Programmes for EU-China Cooperation in ICT.
Ecommerce Applications 2007/8 E-Commerce Applications UK e-Commerce Regulations.
Licensing of Orphan Works Olav Stokkmo, Chief Executive, IFRRO 26 October 2009European Commission, Orphan Works hearing.
COPYRIGHT CLEARANCE PROCEDURE. LEGAL SERVICES COPYRIGHT ACT The Copyright Act no. 98 of 1978 governs the use of copyright protected works – those works.
Introduction to Copyright & Related Rights Lucinda Jones WIPO-INSME International Training Program on Intellectual Property and Management of Innovation.
RROs and Access to Content by Persons with Print Disability Olav Stokkmo, Chief Executive, IFRRO 22 October 2009IFRRO AGM 2009, Oslo.
Copyright for teaching. 2 katelyncollins/category/week-5 CC BY.
Extended Collective Licensing WIPO Cooperation with the Polish Ministry of Culture, Warsaw 16 and 17 March 2016 TOPIC 5.v. Cultural institutions, incl.
ECL – FOR ONLINE ACCESS TO BROADCASTERS’ ARCHIVES IN SWEDEN Extended Collective Licensing Conference in Warsaw Birgitta Adamson Legal Counsel,
E XTENDED C OLLECTIVE L ICENSING : DIFFERENT MODELS AMONG S CANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES AND LONG TERM PRACTICES OF STATES Warsaw, March 16, 2016 Johan Axhamn,
Extended Collective Licensing Models and Practices World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Ministry of Culture and National Heritage Warsaw, March.
Copyright and the public domain: contradictory or complementary notions? Irini Stamatoudi, LL.M., Ph.D., General Director, Hellenic Copyright Organisation.
Jakub Slovák Permanent Mission of the Slovak Republic in Geneva/ Copyright Unit Media, Audiovisual and Copyright Department Ministry of Culture of the.
Benefitting from your COPYRIGHT and Using Copyright Works of Others in Your Business Carol Simpson Head, Caribbean Section, Regional Bureau for Latin America.
Distribution of revenues and technical standards
Music Publishing Overview
« Out of commerce works » The French system
Professor Niklas Bruun
IFRRO AGM 2009 OSLO Speaker: Dr. Anke Schierholz
CLA and the Legal Sector
HOW TO DEFINE ARCHIVES? We recommend avoiding academic arguments: This is all about library productions that can only be made available by means of replacing.
COPYRIGHT A Melbourne Athenaeum Library Cybersafety Information Guide
IPR in FP7 Bart Janse DG Research A.2.
Extended Collective Licensing: a solution or an additional problem?
Caroline Morgan, CEO of IFRRO Malaysian National Seminar
Documentaries, UPF, 19 April 2018
“Integrity means that you do the right thing, even when no one is watching.” --Anonymous.
Presentation transcript:

Licences for Europe Workgroup 3 Presentation on Collective Management Organisations (CMOs) 18 April 2013

Audio-visual authors’ CMOs in Europe ALCS Directors UK SDCSI SACD SCAM SPA SGAE DAMA SIAE SSA Suissimage VDFS Lit-Mec DACIN-SARA Filmjus LITA DILIA ZAPA EAAL Kopiosto Copyswede VG Bildkunst VG Wort LIRA VEVAM SACD/SCAM SABAM Albautor Filmautor Copydan AKKA-LAA LATGA-A AsDAC Norwaco SAZAS SAA member

Rights administered by SAA members

The challenge Cultural institutions (film archives, libraries, broadcasters, etc.) want to be able to digitise their collections of large numbers of AV works, many of them dating back many years, and make them available to citizens. Currently they face two major problems: – The high cost of digitising these works, compared with the low value and volume of uses – Inability to identify the rightsowners of the works

Role for CMOs? CMOs are being asked to set out how they could facilitate problem two. One method could be the operation – via a Memo of Understanding similar to that covering out-of-commerce print publications – of a blanket licensing scheme that would permit digitisation and making available. Other uses may be required –more information needed about what these might be. Other CMOs would also need to offer a similar facility e.g. music CMOs, AGICOA

Role for CMOs? For this presentation, audio-visual CMOs who are members of SAA (Society of Audio-Visual Authors) were asked to respond to 5 questions – SAA members are CMOs representing writers and directors of films and television programmes

Could your database of audiovisual works and authors (or IDA) be used or useful to assist cultural institutions in identifying works and rightowners? Databases may not be publicly available Charge may be levied Use of IDA database/identifiers would assist this Databases may not be publicly available Charge may be levied Use of IDA database/identifiers would assist this

Could your society grant such a blanket licence now to a) broadcasters, b) libraries, c) film archives d) other?

Could your society grant permission for works on behalf of authors/estates of deceased authors who are not members? If not, what would be required in order to permit this?

Could your society facilitate or carry out a diligent search for authors/estates of deceased authors who are not members? If not, what would be required in order to provide this?

What broad terms might apply to the granting of such licences? A grant of permission of use – Subject to clear conditions e.g. For cultural or public service use Fair licence fee/remuneration based on a % of the revenue of exploitation – with a fixed minimum for “free” or low revenue use Special care needed to ensure no interference with commercial licensing of the works

What broad terms might apply to the granting of such licences? Extended collective management solution like in the Nordic countries (or compulsory collective management) to permit uses of orphan works and those of non-members – Or a workable alternative that permits exclusion of the works of non- members Annual licence fees Adequate reporting of usage to enable accurate distributions Protection of moral rights

Summary and conclusions Existing and extensive network of audio-visual CMOs throughout Europe – Linked through CISAC and SAA – EC Directive on collective rights management to come CMOs administer varied groups of rights on behalf of original AV authors (writers and directors) Databases likely to be a valuable resource for search and identification of original authors – What about producers/existing owners?

Summary and conclusions Change in law needed to empower CMOs to grant licences to cultural bodies Work needed to empower CMOs to licence works of non-members – But some CMOs already doing this via ECL or orphan works regimes Diligent searches for non-members widely possible Licence terms require further discussion with users

Thank you!