Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Spatial Distributions Simulated in Magnetosphere Michio Fuki Faculty of Education, Kochi University 2-5-1, Akebono-cho, Kochi 780-8520,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
X-ray spectra from magnetar candidates – Monte Carlo simulations Nicola Parkins, Silvia Zane, Roberto Turolla and Daniele Viganò University of Liverpool,
Advertisements

ELENA VANNUCCINI ON BEHALF OF PAMELA COLLABORATION Measurement of the Hydrogen and Helium absolute fluxes with the PAMELA experiment.
S. Della Torre 1,2, P. Bobik 5, G. Boella 1,3, M.J. Boschini 1,4, C. Consolandi 1, M. Gervasi 1,3, D. Grandi 1, K. Kudela 5, F. Noventa 1,3, S. Pensotti.
The Results of Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS01) Experiment in Space Behcet Alpat I.N.F.N. Perugia TAUP 2001 Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
21 ECRS, Kosice, 12/09/2008 Trapped charge particles measurements in the radiation belt by PAMELA instrument Vladimir V. Mikhailov (MEPHI) for PAMELA collaboration.
The second exam is this Thursday. It will cover everything we have covered from since the first exam (until the end of class today). There will be a review.
Space Weather. Coronal loops Intense magnetic field lines trap plasma main_TRACE_loop_arcade_lg.jpg.
Paul Evenson, Waraporn Nuntiyakul,
Space Weather Causes and Consequences An introduction to Space Weather What is it? Where does it come from? Who is impacted? Rodney Viereck NOAA Space.
Cosmic rays in solar system By: Tiva Sharifi. Cosmic ray The earth atmosphere is bombarded with the energetic particles originating from the outer space.
March 13thXXXXth RENCONTRES DE MORIOND 1 The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station Carmen Palomares CIEMAT (Madrid) On behalf.
Presented by Steve Kliewer Muon Lifetime Experiment: A Model.
Gravitational waves LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory ) in Louisiana. A laser beam is.
From Geo- to Heliophysical Year: Results of CORONAS-F Space Mission International Conference «50 Years of International Geophysical Year and Electronic.
Solar Energetic Particles -acceleration and observations- (Two approaches at the highest energy) Takashi SAKO Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory,
PLANETOCOSMICS L. Desorgher, M. Gurtner, E.O. Flückiger, and P. Nieminen Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern ESA/ESTEC.
THE SUN AND STARS And anything I want to put in here.
Sponge: List the six layers of the Earth.. Atmosphere A mixture of gases: N 2 78% O 2 21% Ar0.9% CO %
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
Section 1: Structure of the Sun
Antiprotons of interstellar origin at balloon altitudes: Flux simulations U. B. Jayanthi, K. C. Talavera Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE),
Cosmic Rays in the Heliosphere J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona I acknowledge helpful discussions with J. Kόta and J. GIacalone. Presented at the TeV.
Our second exam is next Tuesday – Nov 1. It will cover everything I have covered in class including material covered today. You will be allowed one 8 ½.
The Sun Section 1 Section 1: Structure of the Sun Preview Objectives The Sun’s Energy Nuclear Fusion Mass Changing into Energy The Sun’s Interior The Sun’s.
Chapter 29 The Sun 29.1 Structure of the Sun
 Ch 29: The Sun by: Emily Hartley. Nuclear fusion  The process by which nuclei of small atoms combine to form a new, more massive nucleus; the process.
March 13thXXXXth RENCONTRES DE MORIOND 1 The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station Carmen Palomares CIEMAT (Madrid) On behalf.
Forces between electric charges in motion.
Evaluation of the flux of CR nuclei inside the magnetosphere P. Bobik, G. Boella, M.J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita.
Charged Particle Trajectories in Earth’s Magnetic Field Sarah Arveson.
The PLANETOCOSMICS Geant4 application L. Desorgher Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern.
Section 1: Structure of the Sun
Solar Wind and Coronal Mass Ejections
THE EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD Note; The geographical north pole acts like the south pole of a magnet.
Space Environment SSE-120 Please type in your questions and raise your hand so we can answer it during class.
P. Bobik, G. Boella, M. J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita 2D Stochastic Monte Carlo to evaluate the modulation.
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russia
The PAMELA Experiment: Preliminary Results after Two Years of Data Taking Emiliano Mocchiutti - INFN Trieste on behalf of the PAMELA Collaboration.
Application of neutrino spectrometry
Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)
Trapped positrons and electrons observed by PAMELA Vladimir Mikhailov NRNU MEPHI, Moscow, Russia For PAMELA collaboration ICPPA 2015, PAMELA workshop,
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) on the International Space Station (ISS) Maria Ionica I.N.F.N. Perugia International School.
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
RCCN International Workshop sub-dominant oscillation effects in atmospheric neutrino experiments 9-11 December 2004, Kashiwa Japan Input data to the neutrino.
Trapped radiation models
David Argento (some aspects of) cosmogenic nuclide production.
Radiation Storms in the Near Space Environment Mikhail Panasyuk, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics of Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Primary Cosmic Ray Spectra in the Planet Atmospheres Marusja Buchvarova 1, Peter Velinov 2 (1) Space Research Institute – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,
Theoretical Modeling of the Inner Zone Using GEANT4 Simulations as Inputs R. S. Selesnick and M. D. Looper The Aerospace Corp., Los Angeles, CA USA R.
In high energy astrophysics observations, it is crucial to reduce the background effectively to achieve a high sensitivity, for the source intensity is.
Magnetic Forces. The Force on a Moving Charge in a Magnetic Field Just as current-carrying wires (a stream of moving charges) experience a force in a.
Workshop on AstroParticle Physics, WAPP 2009 Bose Institute, Darjeeling, December 2009 Extensive Air Showers and Astroparticle Physics Observations and.
A complete simulation of cosmic rays access to a Space Station Davide Grandi INFN Milano, ITALY.
Ching-Yuan Huang (黄庆元) 20 October 2010
Layers of the Atmosphere Check your JIGSAW! Do you have all of these facts?
COSMIC RAYS. At the Earth’ Surface We see cascades from CR primaries interacting with the atmosphere. Need to correct for that to understand their astronomical.
High Energy Observational Astrophysics. 1 Processes that emit X-rays and Gamma rays.
Chapter 29. Sec 1 Structure of the sun People believed the sun’s energy came from fire They believed the sun burned some type of fuel to produce energy.
Sponge: List the six layers of the Earth.
Layers of the Atmosphere
Search for Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station G. LA VACCA University of Milano-Bicocca.
Solar Modulation Davide Grandi AMS Group-INFN Milano-Bicocca.
Secondary positrons and electrons measured by PAMELA experiment
Vladimir Mikhailov (MEPhI) on behalf PAMELA collaboration
Section 1: Structure of the Sun
ICRC2003 OG Calculation of Cosmic-Ray Proton and Anti-proton Spatial Distribution in Magnetosphere Michio Fuki, Ayako Kuwahara, Nozomi, Sawada Faculty.
Presentation transcript:

Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Spatial Distributions Simulated in Magnetosphere Michio Fuki Faculty of Education, Kochi University 2-5-1, Akebono-cho, Kochi , JAPAN ECRS2004 Aug.31-Sep.3 Abstract : The recent balloon experiments as well as satellites and space-station experiments have been demonstrated the flux and the energy spectrum of antiprotons which naturally exist around the earth. Specially they are observed on the top of atmosphere in the polar region and believed to be secondarily produced from the high energy cosmic-ray interactions with interstellar matter. They have the characteristic energy around 2 GeV and are influenced with the Earth's magnetic fields. I computed the motion of antiprotons in the Magnetosphere region with some initial conditions and plotted the spatial distributions of them. The antiprotons in the polar region are looked like coming from the outer region. Meanwhile, the antiprotons in the space-station region are trapped in the radiation belts. The source of the former may be the produced particles from the collisions of Cosmic-rays on the Sun surface or in the extra-solar region. The latter is explained by the model that antiprotons are originated in decay particles from the antineutrons produced with the cosmic ray interactions in atmosphere. They gather in the radiation belts as well as protons and electrons. The plots show that in the space-station altitudes they are rich in the SAA region. In order to distinguish between antiprotons and protons effectively, the differences of arrival directions of them are important.

1. Motivation 1-1 Experiments of anti-proton observation  Balloon experiments ⇒ antiprotons & protons  Satellites/Space-station ⇒ protons, nuclei , electrons) BESS BESS, CAPRICE, etc. AMS, HEAT, PAMERA… Where and How much natural anti-protons exist around the Earth ? Where and How much natural anti-protons exist around the Earth ?  Computer simulation estimates the spatial and energy distributions, to make clear the antiproton origin.

1) Energy Spectrum Mode energy ~ 0.3 – 0.7 GeV Mode energy ~ 2.0 GeV Fisk BESS ●Protons ●Anti-protons ( < 1/10000 )

2 )Radiation spatial distribution (Alt.400km) ●Proton & electron ( by Mir ) ●Neutron ( RRMD @ STS ) Where anti-protons ? Abundant in SAA and both magnetic poles Solar- min Solar- max

2. Computation model 2-1 Equation of Motion Lorentz force F ; m: mass , c : light velocity ,q: charge , V : velocity , B : magnetic field (static) , ⇒ Magnetosphere ( IGRF) E = 0 ;⇒ no electric field

2-2 Injection models (Initial conditions) Protons I ) protons (free injection out of magnetosphere) galactic (or solar) cosmic ray primary protons : GCR II ) p + A → p + X (nuclear collision with atmosphere) creation @ 20 km, Albedo protons : CRAP III )p + A → n + X (nuclear collision with atmosphere ) n → p + e - + ν (decay from albedo neutron) τ = 900sec, creation <10・ R E , decayed protons : CRAND Antiprotons, ( collision origin ; pair creation ) I) galactic cosmic ray antiprotons (similar to protons) II) p + A → p + p + p - + X (pair-creation) III )p + A → p + n + n - + X (pair-creation) n - → p - + e + + ν (decay from anti-neutrons)

Three injection models for protons GCR CRAP CRAND

Anti-proton Energy Spectra from Monte Carlo Simulation Multi-Chain-model for p-A collision, each 100,000 events ・ Accelerator data and simulation ・ Simulation in lab. system GeV Eo= GeV

2.3 Energy spectrum form Analytical form Monte Carlo form

Kinetic energy spectral function ( Model- Ⅰ&Ⅱ )  E m : mode energy, a, b: spectral power index set a = -1, b = 2.0. E m = 0.3 GeV for protons (solar minimum era), E m = 2.0 GeV for antiprotons. Decayed proton/antiproton spectra (Model- Ⅲ ) (anti)neutron decay-time:τ= 900sec, yield time t = 0.2sec.

3. Computing method and parameters Solve 3D equation of motion ( 1 ) numerically by time Adamus-Bashforth-Moulton 6 th method used  (better than Runge-Kutta-Gill 4 th method) Range : RE(=6,350km)+20km ~ 10 ・ RE ( in magnetosphere ) Time step : variable , 10 μsec ( <1000km ) ~ 10 msec ( outer ) Time limit : trace up to max.600sec(10 min.) Magnetosphre fields: static, IGRF (inner region) + Mead (outer region) Use Monte Carlo simulation for initial conditions Energy range : 10 MeV ~ 10 GeV random  Sample from Energy spectrum Starting position and direction : random ( uniform, isotropic ) ( Anti ) neutron decay : random ( τ = 900 sec ),< 10 ・ RE

Model Ⅰ GCR モデル -II モデル -III Input 100,000 protons Model Ⅱ CRAP Model Ⅲ CRAND 4. Results: Spatial distribution(1)

Spatial distribution (2) ・) Surface distribution in Polar Protons/Model-I input 100,000 particles Aurora zone Antiprotons/Model-I input 100,000 particles Wide spread

Spatial distribution (3) ・ ) World surface distribution on Protons/Model-III Input 100,000 particles  East tail Antiprotons/Model-III Input 100,000 particles  West tail Looks gathering in SAA Same color means same particle (orbits)

Spatial distribution(4) Proton rich around 4000 km and antiprotons rich in 2000 km Low altitude components → SAA Altitude distribution  cross section ( Φ=-50deg(SAA) and 130deg(opposite side) ) ●Protons●Antiprotons

Differences of arrival directions between protons and anti-protons ● Protons Input 100,000 particles from above: north east from below: south east ● Antiprotons Input 100,000 particles from above: south west from below: north west

4. Conclusions Polar region (High latitude)  Cosmic-ray (anti)protons arrive to both polar regions ( by model Ⅰ)・・・・ due to Rigidity Cut-off  Antiprotons is more spread than protons in polar regions Radiation belts  Decayed (anti)protons make Van-Allen radiation belts (CRAND; Cosmic ray Albedo neutron decay : model Ⅲ )  Low energy ( <0.1GeV ) decayed protons are trapped widely  High energy (~ 1GeV ) antiprotons are trapped in inner zone  Antiprotons are gathered in low altitudes ( ~ 2000km) at ISS altitudes  Protons and antiprotons are same gathered in SAA region  Arrival directions are opposite for protons (north east) and antiprotons (south west)  Tails of protons are east, tails of antiprotons are west ( These are qualitative )

5. Discussions and future subjects Spatial distribution of protons and antiprotons are simulated qualitatively  More statistics !  100K partilcles→1M….. now,10K/1day(Pentium4,2.4GHz) Needs quantitative discussion by unified model :  Flux, p - /p-ratio, ( nuclei, isotope, anti-helium? )  Energy spectrum, Direction distribution.  Production rate , Trapping time , Leakage rate .  Time fluctuation ( short,long ).  Solar activity, Modulations etc. Needs comparison with other results  Theory ・ Simulation  ( coming ) Experimental data Other solar effects  magnetic fields, of Sun, Planets