Giving Shape to the Vision: Putting together the puzzle of planning and integration in the Central East LHIN Planning Partners Symposium, June 5-7, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Advertisements

What does it mean to partner?. Outcomes for today A wider understanding of the concept of partnership and what makes them valuable to your organisation.
Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.
1 Service Providers Capacity Assessment Framework Presentation to the Service Delivery Advisory Group August 28, 2008.
Labour Market Planning LMDA Service Delivery Advisory Group September 28, 2006 CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION.
Objectives Improve programs and services Explore the processes involved in identifying and creating successful partnerships Identify the steps to follow.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
PUT TITLE HERE Collaborating for Better IEPs Slide Deck No.4 Ministry of Education, 2009.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Health and wellbeing boards and Police and Crime Commissioners.
Institutionalizing HIA in Québec: Section 54 of the Public Health Act Dr. Alain Poirier, National Public Health Director and Assistant Deputy Minister.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Ontario’s Special Needs Strategy Spring The Vision “An Ontario where children and youth with special needs get the timely and effective services.
CTCN ORIGINS 2 COP 15 (Copenhagen): agreement to establish a “Technology Mechanism” COP 16 (Cancun): Technology Mechanism further elaborated (TEC and.
SEN 0 – 25 Years Pat Foster.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
Partnerships for the Future Implementing a sustainable framework of partnership working with service users and other partners Thursday 2 May 2013 Giving.
AugusBoth checks were cut the was cut on1/16 and the other one for was cut yesterday, both went out yesterday Marybeth Tahar Interaction.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Outcomes of the 16 th Regional Disaster Managers Meeting held from 9 th – 11 th August 2010 Presentation to the Pacific Humanitarian Team Monday 6 th December.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
1 Customized Employment Strategic Service Delivery Component Disability Employment Initiative.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Human Services Integration Building More Effective Responses to Peoples’ Needs.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Programme for Health Service Improvement in Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan CARDIFF AND VALE NHS TRUST YMDDIRIEDOLAETH GIG CAERDYDD A’R FRO.
Family Service System Reform Grant Application Training Video FY Donna Bostick-Knox, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children.
Partnership Analysis & Enhancement Tool Kit Cindy S. Soloe Research Triangle Institute (RTI) April Y. Vance Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
BACKGROUND TO THE HEALTH AND WELLBEING STRATEGY Neil Revely.
New Expectations, New Possibilities: Creating an Integrated Health System June 5 th, 2007.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
1 Perspectives on Collaboration Presentation to Travel Demand Modelling in the GTHA Organizational Structure and Regional Collaboration Systems Analysis.
1 An Overview of Process and Procedures for Health IT Collaboration GSA Office of Citizen Services and Communications Intergovernmental Solutions Division.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
Future Council Programme Update to the Birmingham Smart City Commission 17 June 2015 Page 1.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Guide to the Advanced Health Links Model. Advanced Health Links Model To continue the momentum of Health Links it is important for the program to evolve.
Framework for Enhancing Student Learning School District 63 (Saanich)
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) & Lead Professional (LP)
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Putting people first, with the goal of helping all Michiganders lead healthier and more productive lives, no matter their stage in life. 1.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Working with your AoA Project Officer
Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport Strategy
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport Strategy
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
Okanogan County Coalition for Health Improvement
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Strategy
LHIN Service Change Planning
Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities
Presentation transcript:

Giving Shape to the Vision: Putting together the puzzle of planning and integration in the Central East LHIN Planning Partners Symposium, June 5-7, 2007 James Meloche Sr. Director, Planning, Integration and Community Engagement

Pause and reflect… Framework for Engagement and Planning Extensive community engagement across the region Detailed feedback and data collection to validate directions Establishment of 9 collaboratives, 3 networks, 5 task groups Integrated Health Service Plan and community consultations IHSP work plan and feedback New investments and projects launched LHIN Board and organizational developmental start-up

A year ago we told you…. …that the path of change would be challenging and that there would be bumps along the way

Today… The Path travelled is clear. The Path ahead remains unknown. The journey of change continues….

Objectives of this Presentation For Planning Partners –Need: Planning partners (Networks, Collaboratives, Task Groups) are maturing as planned. As the LHIN develops, these teams are in need of a overview of how “the pieces fit together.” –Objective: Give an overview of the planning flow that will ultimately lead to the provision of advice to the CE LHIN Board For Health Service Providers (HSPs) & Other Stakeholders –Need: Enhanced capacity to work across organizational boundaries to identify and implement health system improvements and integration. –Objective: Outline CE LHIN planning & engagement framework and expectations regarding integration decisions; and provide HSPs an opportunity to leverage LHIN planning structures.

Objectives of this Presentation (2) For the CE LHIN Board –Establish clear expectations on the processes used to gather local advice such that there is increased confidence that the community has been involved in creating solutions for Board decisions.

Context Local Health Integration Act Central East LHIN Framework for Community Engagement and Local Health Planning Central East Integrated Health Service Plan & Work Plan Presupposes future additional context of: LHIN Decision Making Framework Supporting tools and documentation that will provide direction/assistance in planning and proposal development.

Commitment to Change and Engagement The Central East LHIN is committed to on-going engagement. Engagement provides an opportunity to unlock and leverage system planning expertise from within the CE LHIN and overcome artificial barriers between providers On-going engagement allows for emerging trends to be identified in support of existing or future LHIN priorities and/or integration decisions. The focus on engagement is on improved access and performance through integration/realignment/establishment of health services. –It is not focussed on internal health service provider matters (i.e., operations) that are the prime responsibility of a health service provider and its board. Accountability for system performance lies ultimately with the CE LHIN board and the local health provider boards. Engagement of planning partnerships does not displace this accountability – only strengthens it.

Other LHIN Interests Create Opportunities by through capacity building and/or removing traditional barriers Eliminate gaps in awareness and knowledge (i.e., surprises) and the friction that it creates. Redesign local health system based on cooperation and mutual interests (negotiation) rather than the failed approaches of command and control (provocation).

Caveats In addition to CE LHIN priorities, the Minister/Ministry of Health and Long Term Care set provincial priorities through its strategic plan and/or Ministry-LHIN accountability agreements (MLAA). Ministry direction may require the LHIN to implement without a fulsome engagement of local planning partnerships The CE LHIN may be required to exercise its authority at anytime and without consultation in the name of public interest. The CE LHIN Board and health service provider boards will work collaboratively in identifying and negotiating integration opportunities. This is learning process. Adaptations may be necessary.

Planning Partnerships 9 Collaboratives 3 Priority Networks Task Groups (5 current) Health Professionals Advisory Committee (TBD) All are guided by a terms of reference outlining purpose and function. All the scenarios presented here are consistent with existing policy, terms of reference, and the requirements of LHIN legislation

Planning Partnerships: Functions Example: Collaborative as defined by the Terms of Reference Provide advice on the needs of the population of the Planning and Engagement Zone; Considering the Central East LHIN strategic priorities and objectives, work with healthcare providers, local and regional networks and consumers to identify local service gaps and opportunities for improved coordination and integration of health care services; Review LHIN-wide priorities and objectives against local strengths and gaps in capacity; Identify emerging local health needs and future health care priorities; Advise on opportunities for improved health care efficiencies and cost effectiveness; If requested, assist Central East LHIN staff and local providers in the implementation and monitoring of the Integrated Health Service Plan including assessing progress against action plans, identifying barriers to progress and advising on strategies to overcome barriers; When requested by the Central East LHIN and agreed to by the Collaborative as a whole, serve as a resource to local service providers/agencies in their planning and engagement needs.

Health System Planning & Integration The Integrated Health Service Plan (IHSP) sets the priorities and context for the local health system. Development and implementation of the IHSP, as well as addressing emerging system challenges and opportunities will require coordinated efforts of the LHIN, planning partners, and health service providers. –Scenario 1: Development of IHSP and strategic plans –Scenario 2: Identifying emerging local needs and opportunities –Scenario 3: Supporting health service providers and new planning expectations The IHSP and other local priorities will also generate opportunities for integration –Scenario 4: Facilitated or Negotiated Integration Decisions –Scenario 5: Required Integration Decisions –Scenario 6: Stopping Voluntary Integration

Supporting Planning

Scenario 1: IHSP Action for LHIN-wide implementation LHIN LHIN Priority Network Or Task Group LHIN Collaborative LHIN Health Service Provider LHIN Board Approves IHSP and Work Plan Network/Task Group creates and/or advises on strategy that supports IHSP implementation Collaboratives and/or agencies provide local direction to strategy and advice on implementation back to Network. CE LHIN considers strategy and negotiates implementation through Service Accountability Agreements (SAA) or facilitated integration decision with health service providers (Scenario 4) Health Service Providers implement strategy Denotes potential referral back to LHIN Health Service Provider

Scenario 2: Identifying Emerging Local Needs/Opportunities Task Group/Networks Networks / Task Groups LHIN Health Service Provider Collaborative, Network or Task Group identifies system need, service realignment and/or integration opportunity. Notifies and seeks direction from LHIN staff. Reciprocal engagement of relevant CE LHIN planning partners Appropriate engagement of relevant providers Networks/Task Groups/Collaboratives provide advice and findings to the CE LHIN CE LHIN considers advice. May decide to Approve, and negotiate with health service providers through the SAA or negotiated integrated decision (Scenario 4) Consider further engagement and planning or issue a required integration order (Scenarios 1 and 5, respectively) Defer decision Health service providers implement local strategy as outlined in SAA or integration decision. LHIN Collaborative Health Service Provider Denotes potential referral back to LHIN

The Transition to LHINs: Supporting HSPs and New Planning Expectations As of April 1, 2007 Health Service Providers are now expected to Align their strategic and service planning within the overall LHIN framework, with specific reference to the priorities identified in the Integrated Health Service Plan Implement the directions for integration laid out in the accountability agreements with LHINs Demonstrate continuous improvement in service integration, coordination and quality Play a role in informing the community and general public about opportunities for participate in LHIN initiatives Provide the input and necessary information for the development of LHIN plans Participate in LHIN planning exercises (e.g., utilize LHIN community engagement/planning partnerships)

Scenario 3: Supporting HSPs and New Planning Expectations LHIN Collaborative LHIN Local health service provider (s) identify to the LHIN Integration opportunity New program / services Local barriers for improved performance Health service provider(s) engage local and LHIN planning partners for expert advice, information and/or support in the development of a business plan Health service providers may plan for voluntary integration (see Scenario 6). Health service provider submits business (with demonstrated engagement of LHIN planning partners) to the LHIN for further consideration. LHIN may implement plan through service accountability agreements (SAA) with service providers, or integration decisions (see below) Health Service Provider (s) Task Group/Networks Denotes potential referral back to LHIN

Informing Integration Decisions

Facilitated or Negotiated Integration Decisions under 25(2)(a) 25 (2) A local health integration network shall issue an integration decision when the network, (a)facilitates or negotiates the integration of persons or entities where at least one of the persons or entities is a health service provider or the integration of services between health service providers or between a health service provider and a person or entity that is not a health service provider and the parties reach an agreement with respect to that integration; 2(1) “integration” includes (a) to co-ordinate services and interactions between different persons and entities; (b) to partner with another person or entity in providing services or in operating; (c) to transfer, merge or amalgamate services, operations, persons or entities; (d) to start or cease providing services; (e) to cease to operate or to dissolve or wind up the operations of a person or entity.

Scenario 4: Facilitated or Negotiated Integration Decisions under 25(2)(a) LHIN facilitates or negotiates integration involving HSP(s) Health Service Provider(s) (or other) LHIN issues integration decision Presupposes prior negotiation with Ministry of Health and/or engagement of health service provider, other entities and LHIN planning partners. Ministry-LHIN Accountability Agreement Scenarios 1, 2, 3 and/or Board-to-Board Engagement

Required Integration Decisions under 25(2)(b) 25 (2)(b) A local health integration network shall issue an integration decision when the network requires a health service provider to proceed with an integration under s. 26; 2 (1) “integration” includes (a) to co-ordinate services and interactions between different persons and entities; (b) to partner with another person or entity in providing services or in operating; (c) to transfer, merge or amalgamate services, operations, persons or entities; (d) to start or cease providing services; (e) to cease to operate or to dissolve or wind up the operations of a person or entity. Such instances may be a result of government action or policy, or public interest requiring expedited outcomes In all other instances, use of such authority signals a shortcoming by the LHIN in meeting its standards of collaborative planning

Scenario 5: Required Integration Decisions under 25(2)(b) LHIN considers any submissions; may change or confirm original integration decision LHIN requires integration by funded HSPs Health Service Provider LHIN issues proposed integration decision LHIN issues final integration decision Within 30 Days No timeframe specified Anyone may make submissions regarding proposed decision, including Task Group/Networks LHIN Collaborative Health Service Provider

Integration Decisions that Stop Voluntary Integrations under 25(2)(c) 25 (2)(c) A local health integration network shall issue an integration decision when the network orders a health service provider not to proceed with an integration under s. 27; 2(1) “integration” includes (a) to co-ordinate services and interactions between different persons and entities; (b) to partner with another person or entity in providing services or in operating; (c) to transfer, merge or amalgamate services, operations, persons or entities; (d) to start or cease providing services; (e) to cease to operate or to dissolve or wind up the operations of a person or entity. Use of such authority by the LHIN signals a shortcoming by the health service provider(s) in providing early awareness of the issues and/or health service providers lack of participation in LHIN collaborative planning.

Scenario 6: Integration Decisions that Stop Voluntary Integrations under 25(2)(c) HSP gives notice to LHIN that it wishes to integrated funded services LHIN considers HSP notice LHIN does not issue a proposed decision stopping integration LHIN issues proposed decision stopping integration LHIN Considers any submissions; may change or confirm proposed integration decision LHIN does not issue a final decision stopping integration LHIN issues a final decision stopping integration Integration may proceed Integration may NOT proceed Within 60 Days Within 30 days, anyone may make submissions regarding proposed decision, including Task Group/Networks LHIN Collaborative Health Service Provider Within 30 Days See Scenario 3 for generation of such opportunities

Together, we will deliver change! The costs of competition are greater than…. …the costs of cooperation!

N = Network!! Identifying and implementing change is our collective responsibility Your LHIN is committed to removing the barriers that keep all of us from working and achieving together (that is, acting as a Network). To do so requires a plan and a commitment to building capacity for integration and cooperation across the system.

Look Around You – Feel Empowered! You are members of new teams with new mandates! Collectively, your talent and motivation is unparalleled! Replace self-doubt and permission-seeking with confidence and courage! Forget perfection – you are it!

Together, we are unstoppable!