“We give the US Air Force its Wings” Air Force Research Laboratory Air Vehicles Directorate: Cooperative Airspace Operations 3 March 05 Air Force Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mafijul Islam, PhD Software Systems, Electrical and Embedded Systems Advanced Technology & Research Research Issues in Computing Systems: An Automotive.
Advertisements

Airpower: the Industry Vision
Navy’s Operational Authority for Naval Networks, Information Operations, and FORCEnet 2004 Strike, Land Attack & Air Defense Annual Symposium Vice Admiral.
NASA Aeronautics Airspace Systems Program Air Traffic Management Research for the National Airspace System Briefing to the IT Summit John A. Cavolowsky.
ASTM UMV Autonomy and Control Sub-Committee F41.01
AT 209 Introduction to Civil Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
Laboratory Overview MIT Humans and Automation Lab February 2006.
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
Certification Challenges for Autonomous Flight Control System Mr. David B. Homan AFRL Air Vehicles Directorate (937)
1 Integrity  Service  Excellence Autonomy Challenges From an AFRL Perspective 7 August 2014 Kris Kearns AFRL Portfolio Lead for Autonomy Research
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
Better Robots 1 The Goal: More Robots Enabling Fewer Soldiers Military “robots” today lack autonomy –Currently, many soldiers control one robot –Want few.
Aurora Flight Sciences proprietary Aurora Overview James D. Paduano Presented to the ACGSC October Aurora Flight Sciences Corporation 9950 Wakeman.
SpeedNews Aerospace & Defense Suppliers Conference Rich Baldwin Vice President, Military Sales 5/11/05.
Reducing the cost of sustained operations through technology infusion April 2004 Darin Skelly NASA Kennedy Space Center Transformational Spaceport & Range.
Industry Session – Mixed Criticality and Multi-Core David Corman Program Director, Cyber Physical Systems National Science Foundation 1.
Unmanned aerial systems, what they are and what is available? Professor Sandor M Veres University of Sheffield.
John Gruetzmacher, Lockheed Martin
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
Project Partners AUVSI North America 10 th - 14 th August 2009 Mr Reece Clothier Prof. Rodney Walker The Smart Skies Project.
Flight Critical Systems Software Certification Initiative A Presentation to SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee, Meeting 95 2 March 05.
Technology Maturation for the Automated Aerial Refueling (AAR) Project Carol Ventresca SynGenics Corporation Case Number: 88ABW , Distribution:
SENSE AND RESPOND LOGISTICS R&D Activities at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill S&RL Workshop Fort Belvoir, Virginia September 21, 2006 Dr. Noel.
Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE)
Agent Technology Center, Czech Technical University 25+ researchers performing : »basic research in multi-agent systems, agent based computing and agent.
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
FAA NAS Enterprise Architecture – Informing Future Challenges in V&V for NextGen 2009 V&V Summit November, 2009.
Space-Based Network Centric Operations Research. Secure Autonomous Integrated Controller for Distributed Sensor Webs Objective Develop architectures and.
Collision Avoidance for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
2/27/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 2/27/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance Gaps.
Sustainability/Logistics – Transportation and Distribution Management (4b) Technology Enabled Capability Demonstration Alan Santucci
Symbiotic Simulation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
1 Towards an Integrated Global Observation System NASA/NOAA/DOE Collaboration for Utilization of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Climate Change and Global.
Polymorphous Computing Architectures Run-time Environment And Design Application for Polymorphous Technology Verification & Validation (READAPT V&V) Lockheed.
Integrated System Health Management Design Study Integrated System Health Management (ISHM) Design Study Jim MacConnell Consensus Technology, LLC 2200.
Presented to: NASA Applied Sciences Weather Program Review By: Warren Fellner, Aviation Weather Office Date: November 18, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration.
10/19/2005 ACGSC Fall Meeting, Hilton Head SC Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © 2005 James D. Paduano 1 NTC ACTIVITIES 2005 Outline 1)Activities.
Key Technologies for UAV Interoperability 41 st Annual NDIA Symposium Presented by: Dave Buis The Boeing Company 19 November 2003.
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
A Vision Based on Achievable Expectations Jack Howell Director / Air Navigation Bureau Agenda Item 1.
Network UAV C3 Stage 1 Final Briefing Timothy X Brown University of Colorado at Boulder Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program Electrical and Computer.
UAV See & Avoid Employing Vision Sensors
Issues and Challenges for Co-operative UAV Missions Chris Halliday and Tony Dodd.
Intelligent Distributed Spacecraft Infrastructure Earth Science Vision Session IGARSS 2002 Toronto, CA June 25, Needs for an Intelligent Distributed.
Aviation System Capacity Frank J. Aguilera National Aeronautics & Space Administration.
Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) For Environmental Applications Robbie Hood, NOAA UAS Program Director NOAA Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research.
Mine Warfare - A Total Force Approach for the Future
Boeing-MIT Collaborative Time- Sensitive Targeting Project July 28, 2006 Stacey Scott, M. L. Cummings (PI) Humans and Automation Laboratory
Meeting #96 Brian Van Vliet Chief, Control Sciences Division AFRL/VAC; Air Force Research Laboratory AEROSPACE.
1 Power to the Edge Agility Focus and Convergence Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century presented to the Focus, Agility and Convergence Team Inaugural Meeting.
Lt Col Tim Brown HQ AFSPC/DA5F Launch and Test Range Activities Update May 2006.
ASTWG Vision Team Group Exercise: Initial Summary of Results.
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 10/7/09 Autonomous Systems Sensors – The Front End of ISR Mr. Patrick M. Sullivan SPAWAR ISR/IO.
Protecting Against Cyber Challenges Pacific Operational Science & Technology Conference 15 March 2011 Rob Wolborsky Chief Technology Officer Space and.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
Introduction to Avionics Mac Mollison. What I Want to Talk About l What do we mean by “avionics”? l What is the focus of this course?
High Fidelity Simulation as a Route to Certification Autonomous Systems: Legal / Regulatory Aspects and V&V Workshop 22 nd February 2016 Dr. M. Jump.
Machine Reasoning and Learning Workshops III and IV Kickoff Wen Masters Office of Naval Research Code 311 (703)
Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather
2003 National Fire Control Symposium NIST/Raytheon Joint Paper
Blocks 2 & 3 Overview Samuli Vuokila Air Navigation Commissioner
Agenda Item 1 A Vision Based on Achievable Expectations Jack Howell Director / Air Navigation Bureau.
Intelligent Automation, Inc.
FAA Building Blocks Leading to UAS Integration Emerging Trends
Autonomy and Flight Ken Dunlap, Managing Partner Catalyst-Go
Engineering Autonomy Mr. Robert Gold Director, Engineering Enterprise
Joint Planning and Development Office “Where new ideas are welcome”
DDR&E AC: Aligned to the National Defense Strategy
Spatial Integrated Systems, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

“We give the US Air Force its Wings” Air Force Research Laboratory Air Vehicles Directorate: Cooperative Airspace Operations 3 March 05 Air Force Research Laboratory Air Vehicles Directorate: Cooperative Airspace Operations 3 March 05 Daniel Thompson Future Capability Lead, Cooperative Airspace Op’s Air Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory Daniel Thompson Future Capability Lead, Cooperative Airspace Op’s Air Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory

Capability Focused Tech Investment War Winning Upgrades for Today’s Platforms Superior Technologies for Future Aerospace Dominance

Cooperative Airspace Operations Vision: Same Base, Same Time, Same Tempo Based on JUCAS ICD, SAB Summer Study, Global Hawk ORD, OSD UAV Roadmap, Predator CDD Partners in CAO: AFRL: VA, SN, HE, MN, IF DoD: DARPA, Navy, Army Other: NASA, Industry Reliable, Certifiable Systems & Software Safe Interoperability & Coordination Sense, Avoid, File & Fly Transparent Ground & Air Op’s Collaboration & Teaming Critical System Attributes: Reliable & Safe – Op’s in proximity to man Responsive/adaptive to dynamic missions As autonomous as needed, as interactive as desired Operations transparency Affordable & Certifiable System of Systems Decision Making

Cooperative Airspace Operations CFTI Taxonomy Cooperative Airspace Ops Operations in manned/unmanned teams CapabilityAttributesProduct Safe operations from airbases and in airspace J-UCAS 4-ship flight management Multi-UAV distributed control V&V of flt critical intelligent software Terminal area & ground ops Health mgmt integ w/adaptive control Open architecture, highly reliable VMS HALE UAV detect and avoid Non-GPS nav, landing, and ground ops Multi-vehicle see and avoid Status As Of Aug 04 Product Area Multi- vehicle Teaming Airspace Operations Reliable Control SW V&V

Cooperative Airspace Operations Attribute Availability Forecast Far Term (15) Near Term (07) Mid Term (10) BASELINE X-45, Predator Manned/Unmanned Teaming Safe Airbase/Airspace Op’s Single coordinated UCAV package Adaptive to continue the mission V&V’able today Min ATC Op’s – “See & Avoid” (1 v 1) Flexible ATC & Ground Op’s – “File & Fly” n v m GATM compliance Equivalent ATC & Ground Op’s – “Same Time, Same Base, Same Tempo” Safety/Reliability – Equivalent to manned systems Distributed/Cooperative Control of multiple packages and ISR assets Adaptive for max effectiveness in dynamic environment Manned/Unmanned Teaming V&V of intelligent and adaptive systems Safe Airbase/Airspace Op’s Ability to operate w/o GPS Manned/Unmanned Teaming Human as Operator Human as Supervisor Human as Teammate

Cooperative Airspace Operations CFTI Taxonomy Cooperative Airspace Ops Operations in manned/unmanned teams CapabilityAttributesProduct Safe operations from airbases and in airspace J-UCAS 4-ship flight management Multi-UAV distributed control V&V of flt critical intelligent software Terminal area & ground ops Health mgmt integ w/adaptive control Open architecture, highly reliable VMS HALE UAV detect and avoid Non-GPS nav, landing, and ground ops Multi-vehicle see and avoid Status As Of Aug 04 Product Area Multi- vehicle Teaming Airspace Operations Reliable Control SW V&V

Reliable Affordable Affordable Adaptive Adaptive Autonomous AutonomousReliable Affordable Affordable Adaptive Adaptive Autonomous Autonomous Control of Multi-Mission UAV Systems Demonstrate TRL 6 maturity of critical integrated technologies to achieve reliable, affordable, adaptive, autonomous control for effective multi-ship combat UAV operations Objective Compact, light weight, low cost VMS On-board, real-time, diagnostics Adaptive flight control Autonomous, cooperative flight mgmt Reconfigurable, adaptive flight control Reactive, autonomous, cooperative flight mgmt

Cooperative Airspace Operations CFTI Taxonomy Cooperative Airspace Ops Operations in manned/unmanned teams CapabilityAttributesProduct Safe operations from airbases and in airspace J-UCAS 4-ship flight management Multi-UAV distributed control V&V of flt critical intelligent software Terminal area & ground ops Health mgmt integ w/adaptive control Open architecture, highly reliable VMS HALE UAV detect and avoid Non-GPS nav, landing, and ground ops Multi-vehicle see and avoid Status As Of Aug 04 Product Area Multi- vehicle Teaming Airspace Operations Reliable Control SW V&V

Air Force Research Laboratory – Unleashing the Power of Innovative Aerospace Technology Collision Avoidance with cooperative & non-cooperative aircraft Interoperability with manned / unmanned aircraft ATC Communications Compliance with 14 CFR Take-off & Landing FAA Airspace Classifications Weather Avoidance? Safety & Reliability Issues Navigation Command & Control Link Operator Qualifications Aircraft Airworthiness Airspace Access

Sense-and-Avoid Goal: Develop and Demonstrate Safe Multi-Vehicle Air Operations Phases/Tech Availability: Phase 1 (Manual): FY06 Phase 2 (Auto): FY07 Phase 3 (Multi-Veh): FY10 Technology Challenges: Cost Effective Sensing Sensor/Datalink/Avionics Fusion Equivalent Level of Safety Operations with close separation Enable UAVs to perform a wider range of Air Force missions

Non-GPS Landing & Ground-Ops Goal: Develop and demonstrate sensor architectures and algorithms for UAV airbase operations without reliance on GPS availability Tech Availability: FY09 Technology Challenges: Multi-purpose Sensor Integration Cost Effective Sensing Sensor/Datalink/Avionics Fusion Real-time Data Interpretation Manned System Equivalence GPS Kalman Filter Autonomous Landing Pos Vel INS Imaging Sensors DTED & Maps Radar Alt Geo Fix

Autonomous Terminal Area and Ground Operations Goal: Develop and demonstrate equivalent airbase operations as manned operations: “Same base, same time, same tempo” Tech Availability: FY12 Technology Challenges: Manned System Equivalence Mixed Operations Robust Safety Sensed Situational Awareness Operator-Vehicle Ratio V&V of On-Board Algorithms

Cooperative Airspace Operations Product Area: Limited FOR DAA Program Other Funding Leveraged Program 6.2 Program Transition Point (TAD) 5 Technology Readiness Level Products S1 Spiral Funded Transition Unfunded Transition 6.1/SBIR Effort HALE UAV DAA ACAS AFCST AFRL/SN DAA AFRL/SN 6 Limited FOR DAA Global Hawk

Cooperative Airspace Operations Product Area: Non-GPS Ground Operations Program Other Funding Leveraged Program 6.2 Program Transition Point (TAD) 5 Technology Readiness Level Products S1 Spiral Funded Transition Unfunded Transition 6.1/SBIR Effort Devel sensing arch for UAV airspace op’s -- SEFAR AFCST Non-GPS Gnd Op’s Non-GPS Gnd Ops 6 5 TBD

Cooperative Airspace Operations Product Area: See and Avoid Program Other Funding Leveraged Program 6.2 Program Transition Point (TAD) 5 Technology Readiness Level Products S1 Spiral Funded Transition Unfunded Transition 6.1/SBIR Effort Devel sensing arch for UAV airspace op’s -- SEFAR HALE UAV DAA ACAS AFCST 6 TBD 5 Multi-vehicle SAA 6 See & Avoid

Cooperative Airspace Operations Product Area: Terminal Area and Ground Operations Program Other Funding Leveraged Program 6.2 Program Transition Point (TAD) 5 Technology Readiness Level Products S1 Spiral Funded Transition Unfunded Transition 6.1/SBIR Effort Devel sensing arch for UAV airspace op’s -- SEFAR HALE UAV DAA ACAS AFCST Non-GPS Gnd Op’s ATAO Reqmts 6 6 Refine/demo alg’s - - ATAO Sim NASA Access 5 MISCU Auton Term Area & Gnd Ops Term Area & Gnd Op’s TBD 6 3 Multi-vehicle SAA 6

Cooperative Airspace Operations CFTI Taxonomy Cooperative Airspace Ops Operations in manned/unmanned teams CapabilityAttributesProduct Safe operations from airbases and in airspace J-UCAS 4-ship flight management Multi-UAV distributed control V&V of flt critical intelligent software Terminal area & ground ops Health mgmt integ w/adaptive control Open architecture, highly reliable VMS HALE UAV detect and avoid Non-GPS nav, landing, and ground ops Multi-vehicle see and avoid Status As Of Aug 04 Product Area Multi- vehicle Teaming Airspace Operations Reliable Control SW V&V

Goal: Affordable Validation, Verification, & Certification of Flight Critical, Intelligent Software Problem: Software is already a schedule & cost critical issue. Emerging UAV adaptive & autonomous functions will significantly expand this problem Technology Challenges: Man & Machine Interoperability Learning/Adaptive Functionality Multi-vehicle System of Systems Mixed Criticality – Flight & Mission Sensor Fusion/Integration Validation and Verification of Flight Critical Intelligent Software

Cooperative Airspace Operations Product Area: V&V of Flight Critical Intelligent Software Program Other Funding Leveraged Program 6.2 Program Transition Point (TAD) 5 Technology Readiness Level Products S1 Spiral Funded Transition Unfunded Transition 6.1/SBIR Effort VVIACS CERTA-FCS FWV Initiative, & Other Gov’t Integrated SW Envir Phase I – Definition & Metrics Phase II – Development of processes Phase III – Demo against relevant application TASS SBIRs DARPA MoBIES, PCES Other VA Affordable processes for flight critical intelligent software devel and V&V TBD

Cooperative Airspace Operations CFTI Taxonomy Cooperative Airspace Ops Operations in manned/unmanned teams CapabilityAttributesProduct Safe operations from airbases and in airspace J-UCAS 4-ship flight management Multi-UAV distributed control V&V of flt critical intelligent software Terminal area & ground ops Health mgmt integ w/adaptive control Open architecture, highly reliable VMS HALE UAV detect and avoid Non-GPS nav, landing, and ground ops Multi-vehicle see and avoid Status As Of Aug 04 Product Area Multi- vehicle Teaming Airspace Operations Reliable Control SW V&V

UAV Flight Management Goal: Develop and Demonstrate Single & Multi- ship Flight Management – “As Autonomous As Needed, As Interactive As Desired” Initial User/TAD: UCAV/TBD Technology Challenges: Single & Multi-vehicle Control & Coordination Optimal Use of Resources Real Time Response On-board Situational Awareness & In- Situ Decision Making Limited Datalink Bandwidth V&V of Adaptive & Intelligent Software

Autonomy Continuum Autonomous Control Level (ACL) Fully Autonomous Remotely Piloted Preplanned Mission Changeable Mission Limited Response Fault/Event Adaptive Multi-Vehicle Coordination Multi-Vehicle Cooperation Battlespace Knowledge Battlespace Cognizance Battlespace Swarm Cognizance Off-Board Data + Sensed Data+ Inference Individual UAV Multi-vehicle Adaptive Health Prognostic Assessment Wide Separation Close SeparationCollision Avoidance Tactical Plan Group Tactical Plan Group Tactical Goal Group Strategic Goal Large Numbers, Complex Environment Off-Board Assess & Replan On-Board Trajectory Replan On-Board Group Replan Group Assessment Implicit/Predictive Replan Diagnostic Coordination Adaptability Intelligence Airspace Op’s

Multi-vehicle Teaming Hierarchical Control Group planning and resource assignment done by leader Plan communicated and executed by team members 6.3 ACL5 Implicit Coordination Each vehicle plans for all vehicles Distributes the data and computing Requires synchronized information Facilitates transition to distributed 6.2 ACL6 More flexible and efficient use of available resources Distributed Control Individual planning and replanning Group coordination 6.1 ACL7-8

Cooperative Airspace Operations Product Area: Multi-vehicle Teaming Program Other Funding Leveraged Program 6.2 Program Transition Point (TAD) 5 Technology Readiness Level Products S1 Spiral Funded Transition Unfunded Transition 6.1/SBIR Effort CMUS (Baseline, Tech Val) DIReCT DCAT Selection/refinement towards end-application needs -- DICCAT 4-ship JUCAS Flt Mgmt COE Cooperative Control & Control Collaborative Center DARPA SEC & MICA Flight test of multi-UAV control -- DCACD Multi-UAV Distrib Control TBD Multi-UAV SBIRs 6 UAVOM JUCAS AFOSR, AFRL/MN, Navy (Future Naval Capabilities), & Army (Autonomous Cooperative Operations) Programs ExACT

Cooperative Airspace Operations Cooperative Airspace Op’s – Developing and demonstrating the key technology products to enable UAV’s (and manned systems) to be more effective and reliable in performance of operator missions